Skip to main content
0-Doubt
NewsInvestorsQuestionnairesDeveloperHelp
AnonymousSign in
0-Doubt — neutral IT/Security research
BrowseResellersCertified analystsRFI/RFP questionnairesHow trust worksHelp & FAQAPI
  1. Home/
  2. Barracuda

Barracuda

enriched
Backup as a ServiceNetwork Firewall (NGFW)

barracuda.com ↗ · required email domain for this vendor's users

Headquartered in United StatesHeadquarters countrySourced only from this vendor's own published headquarters address (schema.org structured data on their site) — never guessed from domain TLD. Source ↗

Do you work at Barracuda?

This profile was built from public sources and hasn't been claimed yet. Claiming it lets you correct what's wrong and add details only you can confirm — and marks that information as vendor-verified for buyers.

Free, and it does not affect ranking, placement, or comparison results. The first person verified on Barracuda's email domain becomes the profile admin.

Claim this profileAlready have an account?

Trust profileHow to read thisFive separate questions a buyer actually asks, each answered with its own evidence and a link to the source. There is deliberately no overall score: a single number invites comparison it cannot support, and would mostly reflect how much of Barracuda we have managed to scan rather than anything about the vendor.

Not checked means we have not looked yet, and is never counted against a vendor. Limited means we did look, but found only one line of evidence — enough to report, not enough to corroborate.

checked 11 of 16 signals
  • Limited

    Independently verified

    Has anyone other than the vendor confirmed this?

    checked 3 of 4

    Nothing here has been confirmed by an independent third party yet.

    • No third-party certifications found
    • Profile not claimed by the vendor
  • Strong

    Operating durability

    Is this a real, durable business?

    checked 3 of 4

    How long this vendor has been operating, and who stands behind them.

    • Domain registered 1998 — 28 years ago
    • Headquarters: United States
  • Mixed

    Behaviour under stress

    What do they do when something goes wrong?

    checked 2 of 3

    What their public record shows about handling vulnerabilities and outages.

    • 40 published CVE(s) — a public disclosure record exists
    • 8 rated critical
    • Publishes a public status page
  • Limited

    Disclosure posture

    Do they tell you the awkward things unprompted?

    checked 2 of 3

    How much this vendor volunteers before you have to ask.

    • No trust center found
    • No bug bounty or vulnerability disclosure policy found
  • Limited

    Momentum

    Are they still shipping, or coasting?

    checked 1 of 2

    Whether this vendor is visibly still building.

    Nothing checked here yet — this is not a mark against Barracuda.

Data coverage: 18/100What this measures (and doesn't)

Not a quality rating or endorsement — a measure of how much verified, disclosed data we actually have about this vendor. A low score usually means "we don't have much verified information yet," not "this is a bad vendor." Never used to sort or rank vendor lists.

Verification depth0/100
Security signal0/100
Buyer feedbackno data yet (0 reviews so far)
Profile completeness38/100
claim · HQ · materials · screenshots · integrations · certifications · security check

The platform admin controls the formula's weights.

Data coverage profileHow to read thisThe same four components behind the data coverage score above, shaped instead of listed — a vendor strong on verification but thin on buyer feedback looks visibly different from one that's the other way around. Security and feedback plot at the neutral midpoint (50) when there's no data yet (no products tracked, no reviews), matching how the actual score itself treats missing data — not a guess either way.

VerificationSecurityFeedbackCompletenessThis vendor — Verification: 0This vendor — Security: 0This vendor — Feedback: no data yetThis vendor — Completeness: 38

IntegrationsUI-12 — integration graphDetected from this vendor's own published integration/partner pages by the enrichment loop — each entry links the exact page it was found on. Directional: "integrates with" is claimed by this vendor; "integrated by" is claimed by the other vendor's site. Coverage grows as the scan progresses.

13 detected

Integrated by: D3 Security, GoodAccess, Gurucul, OctoXLabs, Plixer, SafeDNS, Seceon Inc, SecurEnvoy, Tenzir, ThreatDefence, TrustLayer, UncommonX, Veza

Buyer reviewsUI-14 — verified-buyer reviewsWritten only by domain-verified buyers at other companies, attributed to their company domain (never their identity), and moderated. Buyer-sourced opinion, clearly separate from the neutral catalog facts above — and never an input to search or comparison ordering.

verified buyers only

No buyer reviews yet.

Reputation ratingUI-20 — anonymous ratingA single anonymous 5-star signal from buyers, resellers, and analysts who've engaged with this vendor — separate from the domain-attributed reviews above. No rater identity is ever shown, not even at company level.

anonymous

No ratings in this window yet.

External ratingsUI-22 — third-party ratingsAggregate rating and review count pulled directly from the source site's own published data — never the review text itself, which belongs to that site. Links go to the real page so you can read the actual reviews there.

via third-party review sites
PeerSpot: 4.4/5 (26 reviews) ↗

Security & trust signalsAbout these signalsCertifications are keyword-matched from the vendor's own public pages (each claim links to its source — verify directly before relying on it). Security headers are checked live against the vendor's homepage, re-checked every 90 days. Both are independent, automated signals, not a vendor-submitted or audited claim, and are not blended into a single score.

9 of 9 technical checks completed — not a score, just coverage

Security headers (4/5) — checked 8/13/2026

  • ✓ Strict-Transport-Security
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy
  • ✓ X-Frame-Options
  • ✓ X-Content-Type-Options
  • ✕ Referrer-Policy
  • ✕ security.txt

Infrastructure & transparency signals

Status: operational ↗Domain since 1998CAA enabled

Status historyAbout this timelineEvery incident detected on this vendor's own public status page since we started watching it — sourced from the same structural check as the status chip above, checked roughly hourly (every 5 minutes while an incident is active), never inferred. A resolution requires a real check confirming "operational" again; an incident with no resolution yet shown is still ongoing as of the most recent check.

No outages recorded since we started watching (first checked Aug 13, 2026, 8:23 PM).

CVE severity over timeUI-24 — CVE severity timelineEvery known CVE with a disclosure date and severity, plotted by when it was published — lets you see whether disclosures are trending toward more or less severe, not just a raw count. Same NVD-sourced, name-matched data as the list below.

LOWMEDIUMHIGHCRITICAL2005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026CVE-2026-43487 · MEDIUM 5.5 · 2026-05-13CVE-2026-22676 · HIGH 7.8 · 2026-04-15CVE-2025-34395 · HIGH 7.5 · 2025-12-10CVE-2025-34394 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2025-12-10CVE-2025-34393 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2025-12-10CVE-2025-34392 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2025-12-10CVE-2023-7102 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2023-12-24CVE-2023-2868 · CRITICAL 9.4 · 2023-05-24CVE-2023-26213 · HIGH 7.2 · 2023-03-03CVE-2021-42711 · HIGH 7.8 · 2021-12-01CVE-2019-5648 · MEDIUM 6.5 · 2020-03-12CVE-2014-2595 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2020-02-12CVE-2019-6724 · HIGH 7.8 · 2019-03-21CVE-2018-20369 · MEDIUM 6.1 · 2018-12-23CVE-2014-8428 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2017-08-28CVE-2014-8426 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2017-08-28CVE-2017-6320 · HIGH 8.8 · 2017-07-18CVE-2015-0962 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2015-05-25CVE-2015-0961 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2015-05-25CVE-2012-5316 · LOW 3.5 · 2012-10-08CVE-2012-4739 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2012-08-31CVE-2011-5114 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2012-08-23CVE-2008-0971 · LOW 3.5 · 2008-12-19CVE-2008-1094 · MEDIUM 6.5 · 2008-12-19CVE-2008-2333 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2008-05-23CVE-2007-5058 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2007-09-25CVE-2007-1669 · HIGH 7.8 · 2007-05-09CVE-2006-4082 · HIGH 7.2 · 2006-08-11CVE-2006-4081 · HIGH 7.5 · 2006-08-11CVE-2006-4000 · MEDIUM 4.0 · 2006-08-05CVE-2006-4001 · HIGH 7.5 · 2006-08-05CVE-2006-2133 · HIGH 7.5 · 2006-05-02CVE-2006-0855 · MEDIUM 5.1 · 2006-02-24CVE-2006-0833 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2006-02-22CVE-2005-2848 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2005-09-08CVE-2005-2849 · MEDIUM 6.4 · 2005-09-08CVE-2005-2847 · HIGH 7.5 · 2005-09-08CVE-2005-0431 · HIGH 7.5 · 2005-05-02CVE-2004-0234 · HIGH 10.0 · 2004-08-18

Known CVEs (40)About this listSourced from the public NVD database, matched by vendor name. This is a name-based match, not exact version tracking — always check the linked NVD record for affected versions before drawing conclusions. “New” means published within the last 30 days. “Actively exploited” means CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog confirms real-world exploitation, not just a theoretical severity score.

RSS ⇢
  • CVE-2026-43487 ↗MEDIUM 5.52026

    In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ata: libata-core: Disable LPM on ST1000DM010-2EP102 According to a user report, the ST1000DM010-2EP102 has problems with LPM, caus…

  • CVE-2026-22676 ↗HIGH 7.82026

    Barracuda RMM versions prior to 2025.2.2 contain a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows local attackers to gain SYSTEM-level privileges by exploiting overly permissive filesystem ACLs on the…

  • CVE-2025-34395 ↗HIGH 7.52025

    Barracuda Service Center, as implemented in the RMM solution, in versions prior to 2025.1.1, exposes a .NET Remoting service in which an unauthenticated attacker can invoke a method vulnerable to path…

  • CVE-2025-34394 ↗CRITICAL 9.82025

    Barracuda Service Center, as implemented in the RMM solution, in versions prior to 2025.1.1, exposes a .NET Remoting service that is insufficiently protected against deserialization of arbitrary types…

  • CVE-2025-34393 ↗CRITICAL 9.82025

    Barracuda Service Center, as implemented in the RMM solution, in versions prior to 2025.1.1, does not correctly verify the name of an attacker-controlled WSDL service, leading to insecure reflection. …

  • CVE-2025-34392 ↗CRITICAL 9.82025

    Barracuda Service Center, as implemented in the RMM solution, in versions prior to 2025.1.1, does not verify the URL defined in an attacker-controlled WSDL that is later loaded by the application. Thi…

  • CVE-2010-20109 ↗2025

    Barracuda products, confirmed in Spam & Virus Firewall, SSL VPN, and Web Application Firewall versions prior to October 2010, contain a path traversal vulnerability in the view_help.cgi endpoint. The …

  • CVE-2023-7102 ↗CRITICAL 9.82023

    Use of a Third Party library produced a vulnerability in Barracuda Networks Inc. Barracuda ESG Appliance which allowed Parameter Injection.This issue affected Barracuda ESG Appliance, from 5.1.3.001 t…

  • CVE-2023-2868 ↗⚠ actively exploitedCRITICAL 9.42023

    A remote command injection vulnerability exists in the Barracuda Email Security Gateway (appliance form factor only) product effecting versions 5.1.3.001-9.2.0.006. The vulnerability arises out of a f…

  • CVE-2023-26213 ↗HIGH 7.22023

    On Barracuda CloudGen WAN Private Edge Gateway devices before 8 webui-sdwan-1089-8.3.1-174141891, an OS command injection vulnerability exists in /ajax/update_certificate - a crafted HTTP request allo…

  • CVE-2021-42711 ↗HIGH 7.82021

    Barracuda Network Access Client before 5.2.2 creates a Temporary File in a Directory with Insecure Permissions. This file is executed with SYSTEM privileges when an unprivileged user performs a repair…

  • CVE-2019-5648 ↗MEDIUM 6.52020

    Authenticated, administrative access to a Barracuda Load Balancer ADC running unpatched firmware <= v6.4 allows one to edit the LDAP service configuration of the balancer and change the LDAP server to…

  • CVE-2014-2595 ↗CRITICAL 9.82020

    Barracuda Web Application Firewall (WAF) 7.8.1.013 allows remote attackers to bypass authentication by leveraging a permanent authentication token obtained from a query string.

  • CVE-2019-6724 ↗HIGH 7.82019

    The barracudavpn component of the Barracuda VPN Client prior to version 5.0.2.7 for Linux, macOS, and OpenBSD runs as a privileged process and can allow an unprivileged local attacker to load a malici…

  • CVE-2018-20369 ↗MEDIUM 6.12018

    Barracuda Message Archiver 2018 has XSS in the error_msg exception-handling value for the ldap_user parameter to the cgi-mod/ldap_load_entry.cgi module. The injection point of the issue is the Add_Upd…

  • CVE-2014-8428 ↗CRITICAL 9.82017

    Privilege escalation vulnerability in Barracuda Load Balancer 5.0.0.015 via the use of an improperly protected SSH key.

  • CVE-2014-8426 ↗CRITICAL 9.82017

    Hard coded weak credentials in Barracuda Load Balancer 5.0.0.015.

  • CVE-2017-6320 ↗HIGH 8.82017

    A remote command injection vulnerability exists in the Barracuda Load Balancer product line (confirmed on v5.4.0.004 (2015-11-26) and v6.0.1.006 (2016-08-19); fixed in 6.1.0.003 (2017-01-17)) in which…

  • CVE-2015-0962 ↗MEDIUM 4.32015

    Barracuda Web Filter 7.x and 8.x before 8.1.0.005, when SSL Inspection is enabled, uses the same root Certification Authority certificate across different customers' installations, which makes it easi…

  • CVE-2015-0961 ↗MEDIUM 4.32015

    Barracuda Web Filter before 8.1.0.005, when SSL Inspection is enabled, does not verify X.509 certificates from upstream SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtai…

  • …and 20 more

Competitors (12)

full alternatives comparison →
AcsenseADVANTUS360AhnLabAhsay Systems CorporationAlbariusAlgoSecAllotArcserveArpioArray NetworksAvePointAxcient

Investors (1)

co-investment network →
Ten Eleven Ventures

Products (5)

Network Firewall (NGFW)

1
  • Barracuda Network ProtectionFirewallAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Network and firewall protection.

Managed Detection & Response (MDR)

1
  • Barracuda Managed XDRMDR/XDRAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Cybersecurity-as-a-service (managed XDR).

WAF / DDoS / App Protection

1
  • Barracuda Application ProtectionWAFAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Web application and API security (WAF).

Email Security

1
  • Barracuda Email ProtectionEmailAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    AI-powered email security.

Backup as a Service

1
  • Barracuda Entra ID Backup PremiumAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Backs up 13 critical Microsoft Entra ID components beyond user identity data.