AI / LLM SecurityBusiness Continuity PlanningGRC & Compliance AutomationRisk Assessment
archerirm.com ↗ · required email domain for this vendor's users
Trust profileHow to read thisFive separate questions a buyer actually asks, each answered with its own evidence and a link to the source. There is deliberately no overall score: a single number invites comparison it cannot support, and would mostly reflect how much of Archer we have managed to scan rather than anything about the vendor.
Not checked means we have not looked yet, and is never counted against a vendor. Limited means we did look, but found only one line of evidence — enough to report, not enough to corroborate.
checked 10 of 16 signals
Limited
Independently verified
Has anyone other than the vendor confirmed this?
checked 3 of 4
Nothing here has been confirmed by an independent third party yet.
No third-party certifications found
Profile not claimed by the vendor
Limited
Operating durability
Is this a real, durable business?
checked 3 of 4
How long this vendor has been operating, and who stands behind them.
Domain registered 2020 — 6 years ago
Headquarters location not disclosed on their site
Limited
Behaviour under stress
What do they do when something goes wrong?
checked 2 of 3
What their public record shows about handling vulnerabilities and outages.
19 published CVE(s) — a public disclosure record exists
No public status page found
Limited
Disclosure posture
Do they tell you the awkward things unprompted?
checked 2 of 3
How much this vendor volunteers before you have to ask.
No trust center found
No bug bounty or vulnerability disclosure policy found
Not checked
Momentum
Are they still shipping, or coasting?
checked 0 of 2
We have not tracked this vendor's release activity yet.
Nothing checked here yet — this is not a mark against Archer.
Data coverage: 15/100What this measures (and doesn't)
Not a quality rating or endorsement — a measure of how much verified, disclosed data we actually have about this vendor. A low score usually means "we don't have much verified information yet," not "this is a bad vendor." Never used to sort or rank vendor lists.
The platform admin controls the formula's weights.
Data coverage profileHow to read thisThe same four components behind the data coverage score above, shaped instead of listed — a vendor strong on verification but thin on buyer feedback looks visibly different from one that's the other way around. Security and feedback plot at the neutral midpoint (50) when there's no data yet (no products tracked, no reviews), matching how the actual score itself treats missing data — not a guess either way.
IntegrationsUI-12 — integration graphDetected from this vendor's own published integration/partner pages by the enrichment loop — each entry links the exact page it was found on. Directional: "integrates with" is claimed by this vendor; "integrated by" is claimed by the other vendor's site. Coverage grows as the scan progresses.
Buyer reviewsUI-14 — verified-buyer reviewsWritten only by domain-verified buyers at other companies, attributed to their company domain (never their identity), and moderated. Buyer-sourced opinion, clearly separate from the neutral catalog facts above — and never an input to search or comparison ordering.
verified buyers only
No buyer reviews yet.
Reputation ratingUI-20 — anonymous ratingA single anonymous 5-star signal from buyers, resellers, and analysts who've engaged with this vendor — separate from the domain-attributed reviews above. No rater identity is ever shown, not even at company level.
anonymous
No ratings in this window yet.
AI governance platform for managing AI risks and regulatory compliance AI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →
Security & trust signalsAbout these signalsCertifications are keyword-matched from the vendor's own public pages (each claim links to its source — verify directly before relying on it). Security headers are checked live against the vendor's homepage, re-checked every 90 days. Both are independent, automated signals, not a vendor-submitted or audited claim, and are not blended into a single score.
8 of 9 technical checks completed — not a score, just coverage
Security headers (2/5) — checked 8/13/2026
✓ Strict-Transport-Security
✕ Content-Security-Policy
✕ X-Frame-Options
✓ X-Content-Type-Options
✕ Referrer-Policy
✕ security.txt
Infrastructure & transparency signals
Domain since 2020DNSSEC enabled
CVE severity over timeUI-24 — CVE severity timelineEvery known CVE with a disclosure date and severity, plotted by when it was published — lets you see whether disclosures are trending toward more or less severe, not just a raw count. Same NVD-sourced, name-matched data as the list below.
Known CVEs (19)About this listSourced from the public NVD database, matched by vendor name. This is a name-based match, not exact version tracking — always check the linked NVD record for affected versions before drawing conclusions. “New” means published within the last 30 days. “Actively exploited” means CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog confirms real-world exploitation, not just a theoretical severity score.
Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in EMC RSA Archer GRC 5.x before 5.5.3 allow remote authenticated users to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors.
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in EMC RSA Archer GRC 5.5 SP1 before P3 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users.
Directory traversal vulnerability in TP-LINK Archer C5 (1.2) with firmware before 150317, C7 (2.0) with firmware before 150304, and C8 (1.0) with firmware before 150316, Archer C9 (1.0), TL-WDR3500 (1…
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in EMC RSA Archer GRC Platform 5.x before 5.5.1.1 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors.
EMC RSA Archer GRC Platform 5.x before 5.5 SP1 allows remote attackers to trigger the download of arbitrary code, and consequently change the product's functionality, via unspecified vectors.
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in EMC RSA Archer GRC Platform 5.x before 5.5 SP1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users.
Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in EMC RSA Archer 5.x before GRC 5.4 SP1 P3 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors.
Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in EMC RSA Archer GRC 5.x before 5.4 SP1 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors.
Open redirect vulnerability in EMC RSA Archer GRC 5.x before 5.4 allows remote attackers to redirect users to arbitrary web sites and conduct phishing attacks via unspecified vectors.
EMC RSA Archer GRC 5.x before 5.4 allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended access restrictions and complete a login by leveraging a deactivated account.
EMC RSA Archer 5.x before GRC 5.3SP1, and Archer Smart Suite Framework 4.x, allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended access restrictions and modify global reports via unspecified vectors.
Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in EMC RSA Archer 5.x before GRC 5.3SP1, and Archer Smart Suite Framework 4.x, allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via uns…
EMC RSA Archer 5.x before GRC 5.3SP1, and Archer Smart Suite Framework 4.x, allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended access restrictions and upload arbitrary files via unspecified vectors.
EMC RSA Archer SmartSuite Framework 4.x and RSA Archer GRC 5.x before 5.2SP1 allow remote attackers to conduct clickjacking attacks via a crafted web page.
The Silverlight cross-domain policy in EMC RSA Archer SmartSuite Framework 4.x and RSA Archer GRC 5.x before 5.2SP1 does not restrict access to the Archer application, which allows remote attackers to…
Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in EMC RSA Archer SmartSuite Framework 4.x and RSA Archer GRC 5.x before 5.2SP1 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via un…
Archer Evolv™AI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
AI-powered GRC platform for governance, risk, and compliance management
Archer Regulatory & Corporate Compliance ManagementAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
Regulatory & corporate compliance mgmt platform with centralized repository
Archer Third-Party Risk ManagementAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
Platform for managing vendor risk across third-party relationships
AI / LLM Security
1
Archer AI GovernanceAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
AI governance platform for managing AI risks and regulatory compliance
Risk Assessment
1
Archer Evolv™ IntelligenceAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
Scenario-based simulation tool for assessing regulatory & operational impacts
Business Continuity Planning
1
Archer Resilience ManagementAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
Business resilience platform for continuity planning and incident management
