Skip to main content
0-Doubt
NewsInvestorsQuestionnairesDeveloperHelp
AnonymousSign in
0-Doubt — neutral IT/Security research
BrowseResellersCertified analystsRFI/RFP questionnairesHow trust worksHelp & FAQAPI
  1. Home/
  2. Bearer

Bearer

enriched
Application Security (ASPM)

bearer.com ↗ · required email domain for this vendor's users

Do you work at Bearer?

This profile was built from public sources and hasn't been claimed yet. Claiming it lets you correct what's wrong and add details only you can confirm — and marks that information as vendor-verified for buyers.

Free, and it does not affect ranking, placement, or comparison results. The first person verified on Bearer's email domain becomes the profile admin.

Claim this profileAlready have an account?

Trust profileHow to read thisFive separate questions a buyer actually asks, each answered with its own evidence and a link to the source. There is deliberately no overall score: a single number invites comparison it cannot support, and would mostly reflect how much of Bearer we have managed to scan rather than anything about the vendor.

Not checked means we have not looked yet, and is never counted against a vendor. Limited means we did look, but found only one line of evidence — enough to report, not enough to corroborate.

checked 10 of 16 signals
  • Limited

    Independently verified

    Has anyone other than the vendor confirmed this?

    checked 3 of 4

    Nothing here has been confirmed by an independent third party yet.

    • No third-party certifications found
    • Profile not claimed by the vendor
  • Limited

    Operating durability

    Is this a real, durable business?

    checked 3 of 4

    How long this vendor has been operating, and who stands behind them.

    • Domain registered 1999 — 27 years ago
    • Headquarters location not disclosed on their site
  • Mixed

    Behaviour under stress

    What do they do when something goes wrong?

    checked 2 of 3

    What their public record shows about handling vulnerabilities and outages.

    • 19 published CVE(s) — a public disclosure record exists
    • 4 rated critical
    • No public status page found
  • Limited

    Disclosure posture

    Do they tell you the awkward things unprompted?

    checked 2 of 3

    How much this vendor volunteers before you have to ask.

    • No trust center found
    • No bug bounty or vulnerability disclosure policy found
  • Not checked

    Momentum

    Are they still shipping, or coasting?

    checked 0 of 2

    We have not tracked this vendor's release activity yet.

    Nothing checked here yet — this is not a mark against Bearer.

Data coverage: 18/100What this measures (and doesn't)

Not a quality rating or endorsement — a measure of how much verified, disclosed data we actually have about this vendor. A low score usually means "we don't have much verified information yet," not "this is a bad vendor." Never used to sort or rank vendor lists.

Verification depth0/100
Security signal0/100
Buyer feedbackno data yet (0 reviews so far)
Profile completeness38/100
claim · HQ · materials · screenshots · integrations · certifications · security check

The platform admin controls the formula's weights.

Data coverage profileHow to read thisThe same four components behind the data coverage score above, shaped instead of listed — a vendor strong on verification but thin on buyer feedback looks visibly different from one that's the other way around. Security and feedback plot at the neutral midpoint (50) when there's no data yet (no products tracked, no reviews), matching how the actual score itself treats missing data — not a guess either way.

VerificationSecurityFeedbackCompletenessThis vendor — Verification: 0This vendor — Security: 0This vendor — Feedback: no data yetThis vendor — Completeness: 38

IntegrationsUI-12 — integration graphDetected from this vendor's own published integration/partner pages by the enrichment loop — each entry links the exact page it was found on. Directional: "integrates with" is claimed by this vendor; "integrated by" is claimed by the other vendor's site. Coverage grows as the scan progresses.

8 detected

Integrates with: Checkmarx ↗, Cycode ↗, Guardrails AI ↗, Veracode ↗

Integrated by: Infisical, Oxford Computer Group, QbitShield, Teleport

Buyer reviewsUI-14 — verified-buyer reviewsWritten only by domain-verified buyers at other companies, attributed to their company domain (never their identity), and moderated. Buyer-sourced opinion, clearly separate from the neutral catalog facts above — and never an input to search or comparison ordering.

verified buyers only

No buyer reviews yet.

Reputation ratingUI-20 — anonymous ratingA single anonymous 5-star signal from buyers, resellers, and analysts who've engaged with this vendor — separate from the domain-attributed reviews above. No rater identity is ever shown, not even at company level.

anonymous

No ratings in this window yet.

Developer-first SAST tool for finding security & privacy vulns in code. AI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →

Product screenshots (1)

from their products
Bearerauto

Security & trust signalsAbout these signalsCertifications are keyword-matched from the vendor's own public pages (each claim links to its source — verify directly before relying on it). Security headers are checked live against the vendor's homepage, re-checked every 90 days. Both are independent, automated signals, not a vendor-submitted or audited claim, and are not blended into a single score.

8 of 9 technical checks completed — not a score, just coverage

Security headers (3/5) — checked 8/13/2026

  • ✓ Strict-Transport-Security
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy
  • ✓ X-Frame-Options
  • ✕ X-Content-Type-Options
  • ✕ Referrer-Policy
  • ✕ security.txt

Infrastructure & transparency signals

Domain since 1999

CVE severity over timeUI-24 — CVE severity timelineEvery known CVE with a disclosure date and severity, plotted by when it was published — lets you see whether disclosures are trending toward more or less severe, not just a raw count. Same NVD-sourced, name-matched data as the list below.

LOWMEDIUMHIGHCRITICAL201720182019202020212022CVE-2022-41914 · LOW 3.7 · 2022-11-17CVE-2022-3214 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2022-09-16CVE-2022-22067 · HIGH 7.5 · 2022-09-02CVE-2022-31142 · HIGH 7.5 · 2022-07-14CVE-2022-34808 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2022-06-30CVE-2022-31069 · MEDIUM 5.8 · 2022-06-15CVE-2021-1981 · HIGH 7.5 · 2021-11-12CVE-2021-37705 · CRITICAL 10.0 · 2021-08-14CVE-2020-26834 · MEDIUM 5.4 · 2020-12-09CVE-2020-8565 · MEDIUM 4.7 · 2020-12-08CVE-2020-15125 · HIGH 7.7 · 2020-07-29CVE-2020-12624 · MEDIUM 6.5 · 2020-05-03CVE-2020-5268 · MEDIUM 6.5 · 2020-04-21CVE-2019-14019 · CRITICAL 9.1 · 2020-04-16CVE-2019-14011 · CRITICAL 9.1 · 2020-04-16CVE-2019-10214 · MEDIUM 5.9 · 2019-11-25CVE-2019-11250 · MEDIUM 6.5 · 2019-08-29CVE-2017-3215 · MEDIUM 5.3 · 2017-06-20CVE-2016-3956 · HIGH 7.5 · 2016-07-02

Known CVEs (19)About this listSourced from the public NVD database, matched by vendor name. This is a name-based match, not exact version tracking — always check the linked NVD record for affected versions before drawing conclusions. “New” means published within the last 30 days. “Actively exploited” means CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog confirms real-world exploitation, not just a theoretical severity score.

RSS ⇢
  • CVE-2022-41914 ↗LOW 3.72022

    Zulip is an open-source team collaboration tool. For organizations with System for Cross-domain Identity Management(SCIM) account management enabled, Zulip Server 5.0 through 5.6 checked the SCIM bear…

  • CVE-2022-3214 ↗CRITICAL 9.82022

    Delta Industrial Automation's DIAEnergy, an industrial energy management system, is vulnerable to CWE-798, Use of Hard-coded Credentials. Versions prior to  1.9.03.009 have this vulnerability. Exec…

  • CVE-2022-22067 ↗HIGH 7.52022

    Potential memory leak in modem during the processing of NSA RRC Reconfiguration with invalid Radio Bearer Config in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Connectivity, Snapdragon Mobile

  • CVE-2022-31142 ↗HIGH 7.52022

    @fastify/bearer-auth is a Fastify plugin to require bearer Authorization headers. @fastify/bearer-auth prior to versions 7.0.2 and 8.0.1 does not securely use crypto.timingSafeEqual. A malicious attac…

  • CVE-2022-34808 ↗MEDIUM 4.32022

    Jenkins Cisco Spark Plugin 1.1.1 and earlier stores bearer tokens unencrypted in its global configuration file on the Jenkins controller where they can be viewed by users with access to the Jenkins co…

  • CVE-2022-31069 ↗MEDIUM 5.82022

    NestJS Proxy is a NestJS module to decorate and proxy calls. Prior to version 0.7.0, the nestjs-proxy library did not have a way to control when Authorization headers should should be forwarded for sp…

  • CVE-2021-1981 ↗HIGH 7.52021

    Possible buffer over read due to improper IE size check of Bearer capability IE in MT setup request from network in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Connectivity, Snapdragon Consumer IO…

  • CVE-2021-37705 ↗CRITICAL 10.02021

    OneFuzz is an open source self-hosted Fuzzing-As-A-Service platform. Starting with OneFuzz 2.12.0 or greater, an incomplete authorization check allows an authenticated user from any Azure Active Direc…

  • CVE-2020-26834 ↗MEDIUM 5.42020

    SAP HANA Database, version - 2.0, does not correctly validate the username when performing SAML bearer token-based user authentication. It is possible to manipulate a valid existing SAML bearer token …

  • CVE-2020-8565 ↗MEDIUM 4.72020

    In Kubernetes, if the logging level is set to at least 9, authorization and bearer tokens will be written to log files. This can occur both in API server logs and client tool output like kubectl. This…

  • CVE-2020-15125 ↗HIGH 7.72020

    In auth0 (npm package) versions before 2.27.1, a DenyList of specific keys that should be sanitized from the request object contained in the error object is used. The key for Authorization header is n…

  • CVE-2020-12624 ↗MEDIUM 6.52020

    The League application before 2020-05-02 on Android sends a bearer token in an HTTP Authorization header to an arbitrary web site that hosts an external image because an OkHttp object is reused, which…

  • CVE-2020-5268 ↗MEDIUM 6.52020

    In Saml2 Authentication Services for ASP.NET versions before 1.0.2, and between 2.0.0 and 2.6.0, there is a vulnerability in how tokens are validated in some cases. Saml2 tokens are usually used as be…

  • CVE-2019-14019 ↗CRITICAL 9.12020

    Multiple Read overflows issue due to improper length check while decoding RAU accept/PDN disconnect Rej/Modify EPS ctxt req/bearer resource alloc Rej/Deact EPs bearer REq in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdrago…

  • CVE-2019-14011 ↗CRITICAL 9.12020

    Multiple Read overflows issue due to improper length check while decoding 3G attach accept/ SMS/ pdn connection reject/ esm data transport/ bearer modify context reject in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon …

  • CVE-2019-10214 ↗MEDIUM 5.92019

    The containers/image library used by the container tools Podman, Buildah, and Skopeo in Red Hat Enterprise Linux version 8 and CRI-O in OpenShift Container Platform, does not enforce TLS connections t…

  • CVE-2019-11250 ↗MEDIUM 6.52019

    The Kubernetes client-go library logs request headers at verbosity levels of 7 or higher. This can disclose credentials to unauthorized users via logs or command output. Kubernetes components (such as…

  • CVE-2017-3215 ↗MEDIUM 5.32017

    The Milwaukee ONE-KEY Android mobile application uses bearer tokens with an expiration of one year. This bearer token, in combination with a user_id can be used to perform user actions.

  • CVE-2016-3956 ↗HIGH 7.52016

    The CLI in npm before 2.15.1 and 3.x before 3.8.3, as used in Node.js 0.10 before 0.10.44, 0.12 before 0.12.13, 4 before 4.4.2, and 5 before 5.10.0, includes bearer tokens with arbitrary requests, whi…

Competitors (12)

full alternatives comparison →
AcunetixAdaCoreaDolus TechnologyAdroniteAikido SecurityAlmanaxAmplify SecurityAnchoreApiiroAppCheckAppknoxAppSecAI

Products (1)

Application Security (ASPM)

1
  • BearerAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Developer-first SAST tool for finding security & privacy vulns in code.