Skip to main content
0-Doubt
NewsInvestorsQuestionnairesDeveloperHelp
AnonymousSign in
0-Doubt — neutral IT/Security research
BrowseResellersCertified analystsRFI/RFP questionnairesHow trust worksHelp & FAQAPI
  1. Home/
  2. Bitwarden

Bitwarden

enriched
Password Management

Represented by Carahsoft ↗

bitwarden.com ↗ · required email domain for this vendor's users

Do you work at Bitwarden?

This profile was built from public sources and hasn't been claimed yet. Claiming it lets you correct what's wrong and add details only you can confirm — and marks that information as vendor-verified for buyers.

Free, and it does not affect ranking, placement, or comparison results. The first person verified on Bitwarden's email domain becomes the profile admin.

Claim this profileAlready have an account?

Trust profileHow to read thisFive separate questions a buyer actually asks, each answered with its own evidence and a link to the source. There is deliberately no overall score: a single number invites comparison it cannot support, and would mostly reflect how much of Bitwarden we have managed to scan rather than anything about the vendor.

Not checked means we have not looked yet, and is never counted against a vendor. Limited means we did look, but found only one line of evidence — enough to report, not enough to corroborate.

checked 9 of 16 signals
  • Limited

    Independently verified

    Has anyone other than the vendor confirmed this?

    checked 3 of 4

    Nothing here has been confirmed by an independent third party yet.

    • No third-party certifications found
    • Profile not claimed by the vendor
  • Limited

    Operating durability

    Is this a real, durable business?

    checked 2 of 4

    How long this vendor has been operating, and who stands behind them.

    • Headquarters location not disclosed on their site
  • Mixed

    Behaviour under stress

    What do they do when something goes wrong?

    checked 2 of 3

    What their public record shows about handling vulnerabilities and outages.

    • 17 published CVE(s) — a public disclosure record exists
    • 1 rated critical
    • No public status page found
  • Limited

    Disclosure posture

    Do they tell you the awkward things unprompted?

    checked 2 of 3

    How much this vendor volunteers before you have to ask.

    • No trust center found
    • No bug bounty or vulnerability disclosure policy found
  • Not checked

    Momentum

    Are they still shipping, or coasting?

    checked 0 of 2

    We have not tracked this vendor's release activity yet.

    Nothing checked here yet — this is not a mark against Bitwarden.

Data coverage: 18/100What this measures (and doesn't)

Not a quality rating or endorsement — a measure of how much verified, disclosed data we actually have about this vendor. A low score usually means "we don't have much verified information yet," not "this is a bad vendor." Never used to sort or rank vendor lists.

Verification depth0/100
Security signal0/100
Buyer feedbackno data yet (0 reviews so far)
Profile completeness38/100
claim · HQ · materials · screenshots · integrations · certifications · security check

The platform admin controls the formula's weights.

Data coverage profileHow to read thisThe same four components behind the data coverage score above, shaped instead of listed — a vendor strong on verification but thin on buyer feedback looks visibly different from one that's the other way around. Security and feedback plot at the neutral midpoint (50) when there's no data yet (no products tracked, no reviews), matching how the actual score itself treats missing data — not a guess either way.

VerificationSecurityFeedbackCompletenessThis vendor — Verification: 0This vendor — Security: 0This vendor — Feedback: no data yetThis vendor — Completeness: 38

IntegrationsUI-12 — integration graphDetected from this vendor's own published integration/partner pages by the enrichment loop — each entry links the exact page it was found on. Directional: "integrates with" is claimed by this vendor; "integrated by" is claimed by the other vendor's site. Coverage grows as the scan progresses.

14 detected

Integrated by: Clarity Security, Devolutions, Huntress, Monad, OctoXLabs, Offroad, Oleria, Panther, RunReveal, SafeBase, Secureframe, UncommonX, Uniqkey, torii

Buyer reviewsUI-14 — verified-buyer reviewsWritten only by domain-verified buyers at other companies, attributed to their company domain (never their identity), and moderated. Buyer-sourced opinion, clearly separate from the neutral catalog facts above — and never an input to search or comparison ordering.

verified buyers only

No buyer reviews yet.

Reputation ratingUI-20 — anonymous ratingA single anonymous 5-star signal from buyers, resellers, and analysts who've engaged with this vendor — separate from the domain-attributed reviews above. No rater identity is ever shown, not even at company level.

anonymous

No ratings in this window yet.

External ratingsUI-22 — third-party ratingsAggregate rating and review count pulled directly from the source site's own published data — never the review text itself, which belongs to that site. Links go to the real page so you can read the actual reviews there.

via third-party review sites
PeerSpot: 4.6/5 (7 reviews) ↗

Enterprise password manager with E2E encryption, SSO, directory sync & self-host. AI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →

Security & trust signalsAbout these signalsCertifications are keyword-matched from the vendor's own public pages (each claim links to its source — verify directly before relying on it). Security headers are checked live against the vendor's homepage, re-checked every 90 days. Both are independent, automated signals, not a vendor-submitted or audited claim, and are not blended into a single score.

7 of 9 technical checks completed — not a score, just coverage

Security headers (5/5) — checked 8/13/2026

  • ✓ Strict-Transport-Security
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy
  • ✓ X-Frame-Options
  • ✓ X-Content-Type-Options
  • ✓ Referrer-Policy
  • ✕ security.txt

Infrastructure & transparency signals

DNSSEC enabledCAA enabled

CVE severity over timeUI-24 — CVE severity timelineEvery known CVE with a disclosure date and severity, plotted by when it was published — lets you see whether disclosures are trending toward more or less severe, not just a raw count. Same NVD-sourced, name-matched data as the list below.

LOWMEDIUMHIGHCRITICAL2020202120222023202420252026CVE-2026-31835 · MEDIUM 5.4 · 2026-05-05CVE-2026-42994 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2026-05-01CVE-2026-27898 · MEDIUM 5.4 · 2026-03-05CVE-2026-27803 · HIGH 8.3 · 2026-03-05CVE-2026-27802 · HIGH 8.3 · 2026-03-05CVE-2026-27801 · MEDIUM 5.9 · 2026-03-05CVE-2026-26012 · MEDIUM 6.5 · 2026-02-12CVE-2025-5138 · LOW 3.5 · 2025-05-25CVE-2025-24365 · HIGH 8.1 · 2025-01-27CVE-2025-24364 · HIGH 7.2 · 2025-01-27CVE-2024-56335 · HIGH 7.6 · 2024-12-21CVE-2023-38840 · MEDIUM 5.5 · 2023-08-15CVE-2023-27706 · HIGH 7.1 · 2023-06-09CVE-2023-27974 · HIGH 7.5 · 2023-03-09CVE-2018-25081 · HIGH 7.5 · 2023-03-09CVE-2020-15879 · HIGH 7.5 · 2020-07-21CVE-2019-19766 · HIGH 7.5 · 2019-12-13

Known CVEs (17)About this listSourced from the public NVD database, matched by vendor name. This is a name-based match, not exact version tracking — always check the linked NVD record for affected versions before drawing conclusions. “New” means published within the last 30 days. “Actively exploited” means CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog confirms real-world exploitation, not just a theoretical severity score.

RSS ⇢
  • CVE-2026-31835 ↗MEDIUM 5.42026

    Vaultwarden is a Bitwarden-compatible server written in Rust. In versions 1.35.4 and earlier, the WebAuthn authentication flow in `validate_webauthn_login()` updates persistent credential metadata (1b…

  • CVE-2026-42994 ↗CRITICAL 9.82026

    Bitwarden CLI 2026.4.0 from 2026-04-22T21:57Z to 2026-04-22T23:30Z, when obtained from npm, had embedded malicious code. This is related to a Checkmarx supply chain incident.

  • CVE-2026-27898 ↗MEDIUM 5.42026

    Vaultwarden is an unofficial Bitwarden compatible server written in Rust, formerly known as bitwarden_rs. Prior to version 1.35.4, an authenticated regular user can specify another user’s cipher_id an…

  • CVE-2026-27803 ↗HIGH 8.32026

    Vaultwarden is an unofficial Bitwarden compatible server written in Rust, formerly known as bitwarden_rs. Prior to version 1.35.4, when a Manager has manage=false for a given collection, they can stil…

  • CVE-2026-27802 ↗HIGH 8.32026

    Vaultwarden is an unofficial Bitwarden compatible server written in Rust, formerly known as bitwarden_rs. Prior to version 1.35.4, there is a privilege escalation vulnerability via bulk permission upd…

  • CVE-2026-27801 ↗MEDIUM 5.92026

    Vaultwarden is an unofficial Bitwarden compatible server written in Rust, formerly known as bitwarden_rs. Vaultwarden versions 1.34.3 and prior are susceptible to a 2FA bypass when performing protecte…

  • CVE-2026-26012 ↗MEDIUM 6.52026

    vaultwarden is an unofficial Bitwarden compatible server written in Rust, formerly known as bitwarden_rs. Prior to 1.35.3, a regular organization member can retrieve all ciphers within an organization…

  • CVE-2025-5138 ↗LOW 3.52025

    A vulnerability was found in Bitwarden up to 2.25.1. It has been declared as problematic. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component PDF File Handler. The manipulation…

  • CVE-2025-24365 ↗HIGH 8.12025

    vaultwarden is an unofficial Bitwarden compatible server written in Rust, formerly known as bitwarden_rs. Attacker can obtain owner rights of other organization. Hacker should know the ID of victim or…

  • CVE-2025-24364 ↗HIGH 7.22025

    vaultwarden is an unofficial Bitwarden compatible server written in Rust, formerly known as bitwarden_rs. Attacker with authenticated access to the vaultwarden admin panel can execute arbitrary code i…

  • CVE-2024-56335 ↗HIGH 7.62024

    vaultwarden is an unofficial Bitwarden compatible server written in Rust, formerly known as bitwarden_rs. In affected versions an attacker is capable of updating or deleting groups from an organizatio…

  • CVE-2023-38840 ↗MEDIUM 5.52023

    Bitwarden Desktop 2023.7.0 and below allows an attacker with local access to obtain sensitive information via the Bitwarden.exe process.

  • CVE-2023-27706 ↗HIGH 7.12023

    Bitwarden Windows desktop application versions prior to v2023.4.0 store biometric keys in Windows Credential Manager, accessible to other local unprivileged processes.

  • CVE-2023-27974 ↗HIGH 7.52023

    Bitwarden through 2023.2.1 offers password auto-fill when the second-level domain matches, e.g., a password stored for an example.com hosting provider when customer-website.example.com is visited. NOT…

  • CVE-2018-25081 ↗HIGH 7.52023

    Bitwarden through 2023.2.1 offers password auto-fill within a cross-domain IFRAME element. NOTE: the vendor's position is that there have been important legitimate cross-domain configurations (e.g., a…

  • CVE-2020-15879 ↗HIGH 7.52020

    Bitwarden Server 1.35.1 allows SSRF because it does not consider certain IPv6 addresses (ones beginning with fc, fd, fe, or ff, and the :: address) and certain IPv4 addresses (0.0.0.0/8, 127.0.0.0/8, …

  • CVE-2019-19766 ↗HIGH 7.52019

    The Bitwarden server through 1.32.0 has a potentially unwanted KDF.

Resources & materials (20)

discovered on their site

Datasheets, whitepapers, and case studies found on bitwarden.com by the enrichment loop. Links open the original documents on the vendor's own site.

  • pdfSecrets Manager↗
  • pdfOnelogin Scim Integration↗
  • pdfSecrets Manager↗
  • pdfSecrets Manager↗
  • pdfSecrets Manager↗
  • pdfBitwarden Across Industries↗
  • pdfSecrets Manager↗
  • pdfBusiness↗
  • pdfJumpcloud Scim Integration↗
  • pdfSecrets Manager↗
  • pdfEntra Id Guide↗
  • pdfMicrosoft Entra Id Scim Integration↗
  • pdfBusiness Support↗
  • pdfBusiness↗
  • pdfSecrets Manager↗
  • pdfBitwarden Across Industries↗
  • pdfBusiness Support↗
  • pdfSecrets Manager↗
  • pdfEnterprise↗
  • pdfBusiness↗

Competitors (12)

full alternatives comparison →
1PasswordAkeyless SecurityAvatierAviraCatchProbeDashlaneDeepnet SecurityDetack GmbHElcomSoft Co. Ltd.EvidianExpressVPNF-Secure

Products (1)

Password Management

1
  • Bitwarden EnterpriseAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Enterprise password manager with E2E encryption, SSO, directory sync & self-host.