Skip to main content
0-Doubt
NewsInvestorsQuestionnairesDeveloperHelp
AnonymousSign in
0-Doubt — neutral IT/Security research
BrowseResellersCertified analystsRFI/RFP questionnairesHow trust worksHelp & FAQAPI
  1. Home/
  2. Comodo

Comodo

enriched
Data Loss PreventionEmail SecurityEndpoint Detection & ResponseWAF / DDoS / App Protection

comodo.com ↗ · required email domain for this vendor's users

Do you work at Comodo?

This profile was built from public sources and hasn't been claimed yet. Claiming it lets you correct what's wrong and add details only you can confirm — and marks that information as vendor-verified for buyers.

Free, and it does not affect ranking, placement, or comparison results. The first person verified on Comodo's email domain becomes the profile admin.

Claim this profileAlready have an account?

Trust profileHow to read thisFive separate questions a buyer actually asks, each answered with its own evidence and a link to the source. There is deliberately no overall score: a single number invites comparison it cannot support, and would mostly reflect how much of Comodo we have managed to scan rather than anything about the vendor.

Not checked means we have not looked yet, and is never counted against a vendor. Limited means we did look, but found only one line of evidence — enough to report, not enough to corroborate.

checked 8 of 16 signals
  • Limited

    Independently verified

    Has anyone other than the vendor confirmed this?

    checked 3 of 4

    Nothing here has been confirmed by an independent third party yet.

    • No third-party certifications found
    • Profile not claimed by the vendor
  • Limited

    Operating durability

    Is this a real, durable business?

    checked 2 of 4

    How long this vendor has been operating, and who stands behind them.

    • Headquarters location not disclosed on their site
  • Mixed

    Behaviour under stress

    What do they do when something goes wrong?

    checked 2 of 3

    What their public record shows about handling vulnerabilities and outages.

    • 88 published CVE(s) — a public disclosure record exists
    • 1 rated critical
    • No public status page found
  • Limited

    Disclosure posture

    Do they tell you the awkward things unprompted?

    checked 1 of 3

    How much this vendor volunteers before you have to ask.

    • No bug bounty or vulnerability disclosure policy found
  • Not checked

    Momentum

    Are they still shipping, or coasting?

    checked 0 of 2

    We have not tracked this vendor's release activity yet.

    Nothing checked here yet — this is not a mark against Comodo.

Data coverage: 13/100What this measures (and doesn't)

Not a quality rating or endorsement — a measure of how much verified, disclosed data we actually have about this vendor. A low score usually means "we don't have much verified information yet," not "this is a bad vendor." Never used to sort or rank vendor lists.

Verification depth0/100
Security signal0/100
Buyer feedbackno data yet (0 reviews so far)
Profile completeness13/100
claim · HQ · materials · screenshots · integrations · certifications · security check

The platform admin controls the formula's weights.

Data coverage profileHow to read thisThe same four components behind the data coverage score above, shaped instead of listed — a vendor strong on verification but thin on buyer feedback looks visibly different from one that's the other way around. Security and feedback plot at the neutral midpoint (50) when there's no data yet (no products tracked, no reviews), matching how the actual score itself treats missing data — not a guess either way.

VerificationSecurityFeedbackCompletenessThis vendor — Verification: 0This vendor — Security: 0This vendor — Feedback: no data yetThis vendor — Completeness: 13

Buyer reviewsUI-14 — verified-buyer reviewsWritten only by domain-verified buyers at other companies, attributed to their company domain (never their identity), and moderated. Buyer-sourced opinion, clearly separate from the neutral catalog facts above — and never an input to search or comparison ordering.

verified buyers only

No buyer reviews yet.

Reputation ratingUI-20 — anonymous ratingA single anonymous 5-star signal from buyers, resellers, and analysts who've engaged with this vendor — separate from the domain-attributed reviews above. No rater identity is ever shown, not even at company level.

anonymous

No ratings in this window yet.

External ratingsUI-22 — third-party ratingsAggregate rating and review count pulled directly from the source site's own published data — never the review text itself, which belongs to that site. Links go to the real page so you can read the actual reviews there.

via third-party review sites
PeerSpot: 4.2/5 (17 reviews) ↗

Endpoint protection platform using zero trust architecture and containment AI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →

Security & trust signalsAbout these signalsCertifications are keyword-matched from the vendor's own public pages (each claim links to its source — verify directly before relying on it). Security headers are checked live against the vendor's homepage, re-checked every 90 days. Both are independent, automated signals, not a vendor-submitted or audited claim, and are not blended into a single score.

6 of 9 technical checks completed — not a score, just coverage

Security headers (0/5) — checked 8/14/2026

  • ✕ Strict-Transport-Security
  • ✕ Content-Security-Policy
  • ✕ X-Frame-Options
  • ✕ X-Content-Type-Options
  • ✕ Referrer-Policy
  • ✕ security.txt

CVE severity over timeUI-24 — CVE severity timelineEvery known CVE with a disclosure date and severity, plotted by when it was published — lets you see whether disclosures are trending toward more or less severe, not just a raw count. Same NVD-sourced, name-matched data as the list below.

LOWMEDIUMHIGHCRITICAL20072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026CVE-2016-20090 · HIGH 7.8 · 2026-06-19CVE-2016-20088 · HIGH 7.8 · 2026-06-19CVE-2026-49494 · HIGH 7.5 · 2026-06-07CVE-2019-25430 · MEDIUM 6.1 · 2026-02-19CVE-2019-25429 · MEDIUM 6.1 · 2026-02-19CVE-2019-25428 · MEDIUM 6.1 · 2026-02-19CVE-2019-25427 · MEDIUM 6.1 · 2026-02-19CVE-2019-25426 · MEDIUM 6.1 · 2026-02-19CVE-2019-25425 · MEDIUM 6.1 · 2026-02-19CVE-2019-25424 · MEDIUM 6.1 · 2026-02-19CVE-2019-25423 · MEDIUM 6.1 · 2026-02-19CVE-2019-25422 · HIGH 7.2 · 2026-02-19CVE-2019-25421 · MEDIUM 6.1 · 2026-02-19CVE-2019-25420 · MEDIUM 6.1 · 2026-02-19CVE-2019-25419 · HIGH 7.2 · 2026-02-19CVE-2019-25418 · MEDIUM 6.1 · 2026-02-19CVE-2019-25417 · MEDIUM 6.1 · 2026-02-19CVE-2019-25416 · MEDIUM 6.1 · 2026-02-19CVE-2019-25415 · MEDIUM 6.1 · 2026-02-19CVE-2019-25414 · MEDIUM 6.1 · 2026-02-19CVE-2019-25413 · MEDIUM 6.1 · 2026-02-19CVE-2019-25412 · MEDIUM 6.1 · 2026-02-19CVE-2019-25411 · MEDIUM 6.1 · 2026-02-19CVE-2019-25410 · MEDIUM 6.1 · 2026-02-19CVE-2019-25409 · MEDIUM 6.1 · 2026-02-19CVE-2019-25408 · MEDIUM 6.1 · 2026-02-19CVE-2019-25407 · MEDIUM 6.1 · 2026-02-19CVE-2019-25406 · MEDIUM 6.1 · 2026-02-19CVE-2019-25405 · HIGH 7.2 · 2026-02-19CVE-2019-25404 · MEDIUM 6.4 · 2026-02-19CVE-2019-25403 · MEDIUM 6.4 · 2026-02-19CVE-2019-25402 · MEDIUM 6.1 · 2026-02-19CVE-2025-8206 · LOW 3.1 · 2025-07-26CVE-2025-8205 · LOW 3.7 · 2025-07-26CVE-2025-8204 · LOW 3.1 · 2025-07-26CVE-2025-7098 · MEDIUM 5.6 · 2025-07-07CVE-2025-7097 · HIGH 8.1 · 2025-07-07CVE-2025-7096 · HIGH 8.1 · 2025-07-07CVE-2025-7095 · LOW 3.7 · 2025-07-07CVE-2024-7252 · HIGH 7.8 · 2024-07-30CVE-2024-7251 · HIGH 7.8 · 2024-07-30CVE-2024-7250 · HIGH 7.8 · 2024-07-30CVE-2024-7249 · HIGH 7.8 · 2024-07-30CVE-2024-7248 · HIGH 7.8 · 2024-07-30CVE-2022-34008 · HIGH 7.8 · 2022-06-21CVE-2019-18215 · HIGH 7.8 · 2019-11-19CVE-2019-14694 · MEDIUM 4.7 · 2019-08-29CVE-2019-14270 · HIGH 7.1 · 2019-07-25CVE-2019-3973 · MEDIUM 5.5 · 2019-07-18CVE-2019-3972 · MEDIUM 5.5 · 2019-07-18CVE-2019-3971 · MEDIUM 5.5 · 2019-07-18CVE-2019-3970 · MEDIUM 5.5 · 2019-07-18CVE-2019-3969 · HIGH 7.8 · 2019-07-18CVE-2018-17431 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2019-01-30CVE-2014-7872 · HIGH 7.2 · 2015-06-09CVE-2014-9633 · HIGH 7.5 · 2015-02-03CVE-2011-5123 · HIGH 10.0 · 2012-08-26CVE-2011-5122 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2012-08-26CVE-2011-5121 · HIGH 10.0 · 2012-08-26CVE-2011-5120 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2012-08-26CVE-2011-5119 · LOW 1.9 · 2012-08-26CVE-2011-5118 · LOW 1.9 · 2012-08-26CVE-2010-5186 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2012-08-26CVE-2010-5185 · HIGH 10.0 · 2012-08-26CVE-2009-5127 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2012-08-26CVE-2009-5126 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2012-08-26CVE-2009-5125 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2012-08-26CVE-2009-5124 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2012-08-26CVE-2009-5123 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2012-08-26CVE-2010-5157 · MEDIUM 6.2 · 2012-08-26CVE-2012-2273 · MEDIUM 4.9 · 2012-04-20CVE-2012-1463 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2012-03-21CVE-2012-1459 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2012-03-21CVE-2012-1456 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2012-03-21CVE-2012-1443 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2012-03-21CVE-2012-1438 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2012-03-21CVE-2012-1437 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2012-03-21CVE-2012-1431 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2012-03-21CVE-2012-1430 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2012-03-21CVE-2012-1429 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2012-03-21CVE-2008-1736 · HIGH 7.2 · 2008-04-30CVE-2008-0470 · HIGH 9.3 · 2008-01-30CVE-2007-2729 · HIGH 7.2 · 2007-05-17CVE-2007-1330 · MEDIUM 4.4 · 2007-03-08CVE-2007-1051 · MEDIUM 4.6 · 2007-02-22CVE-2007-0708 · HIGH 7.2 · 2007-02-04CVE-2007-0709 · HIGH 7.2 · 2007-02-04CVE-2006-6620 · HIGH 7.2 · 2006-12-18

Known CVEs (88)About this listSourced from the public NVD database, matched by vendor name. This is a name-based match, not exact version tracking — always check the linked NVD record for affected versions before drawing conclusions. “New” means published within the last 30 days. “Actively exploited” means CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog confirms real-world exploitation, not just a theoretical severity score.

RSS ⇢
  • CVE-2016-20090 ↗HIGH 7.82026

    Comodo Dragon Browser versions up to 52.15.25.663 contain a privilege escalation vulnerability in the DragonUpdater service due to an unquoted service path running with SYSTEM privileges. A local atta…

  • CVE-2016-20088 ↗HIGH 7.82026

    Comodo Chromodo Browser 52.15.25.664 contains an unquoted service path vulnerability in the ChromodoUpdater service that runs with SYSTEM privileges. A local attacker can insert a malicious executable…

  • CVE-2026-49494 ↗HIGH 7.52026

    Xcitium Client Security (XCS) before 13.8.2.10019 and Comodo Internet Security (CIS) through 12.3.4.8162 (fix expected by 2026 Q3) contain an integer underflow vulnerability in the firewall driver Ins…

  • CVE-2019-25430 ↗MEDIUM 6.12026

    Comodo Dome Firewall 2.7.0 contains a reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to inject malicious scripts by submitting crafted input to the username paramet…

  • CVE-2019-25429 ↗MEDIUM 6.12026

    Comodo Dome Firewall 2.7.0 contains a reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability that allows attackers to inject malicious scripts by submitting crafted input to the openvpn_advanced endpoint. Attac…

  • CVE-2019-25428 ↗MEDIUM 6.12026

    Comodo Dome Firewall 2.7.0 contains multiple reflected cross-site scripting vulnerabilities in the openvpn_users endpoint that allow attackers to inject malicious scripts through POST parameters. Atta…

  • CVE-2019-25427 ↗MEDIUM 6.12026

    Comodo Dome Firewall 2.7.0 contains a reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability that allows attackers to inject malicious scripts by submitting crafted input to the antispyware endpoint. Attackers …

  • CVE-2019-25426 ↗MEDIUM 6.12026

    Comodo Dome Firewall 2.7.0 contains a reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability that allows attackers to inject malicious scripts by submitting crafted input to the dnsmasq endpoint. Attackers can …

  • CVE-2019-25425 ↗MEDIUM 6.12026

    Comodo Dome Firewall 2.7.0 contains a reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability that allows attackers to inject malicious scripts by submitting crafted input to the VIRUS_ADMIN parameter. Attackers…

  • CVE-2019-25424 ↗MEDIUM 6.12026

    Comodo Dome Firewall 2.7.0 contains a reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability that allows attackers to inject malicious scripts by submitting unsanitized input to the EXCEPTIONSITELIST parameter.…

  • CVE-2019-25423 ↗MEDIUM 6.12026

    Comodo Dome Firewall 2.7.0 contains multiple reflected cross-site scripting vulnerabilities in the /korugan/proxyconfig endpoint that allow attackers to inject malicious scripts through POST parameter…

  • CVE-2019-25422 ↗HIGH 7.22026

    Comodo Dome Firewall 2.7.0 contains cross-site scripting vulnerabilities that allow attackers to inject malicious scripts through the vpnfw endpoint. Attackers can submit POST requests with script pay…

  • CVE-2019-25421 ↗MEDIUM 6.12026

    Comodo Dome Firewall 2.7.0 contains multiple cross-site scripting vulnerabilities that allow attackers to inject malicious scripts through the policyfw endpoint. Attackers can submit POST requests wit…

  • CVE-2019-25420 ↗MEDIUM 6.12026

    Comodo Dome Firewall 2.7.0 contains a reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability that allows attackers to inject malicious scripts by submitting crafted input to the snat endpoint. Attackers can sen…

  • CVE-2019-25419 ↗HIGH 7.22026

    Comodo Dome Firewall 2.7.0 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability that allows attackers to inject malicious scripts by submitting crafted input to the schedule endpoint. Attackers can su…

  • CVE-2019-25418 ↗MEDIUM 6.12026

    Comodo Dome Firewall 2.7.0 contains a reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability that allows attackers to inject malicious scripts by submitting crafted input to the FWADDRESSES parameter. Attackers…

  • CVE-2019-25417 ↗MEDIUM 6.12026

    Comodo Dome Firewall 2.7.0 contains a reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability that allows attackers to inject malicious scripts by submitting crafted input to the protocol parameter. Attackers ca…

  • CVE-2019-25416 ↗MEDIUM 6.12026

    Comodo Dome Firewall 2.7.0 contains a reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability that allows attackers to inject malicious scripts by submitting crafted input through the device parameter. Attackers…

  • CVE-2019-25415 ↗MEDIUM 6.12026

    Comodo Dome Firewall 2.7.0 contains a reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability that allows attackers to inject malicious scripts by submitting unsanitized input to the hotspot_permanent_users endp…

  • CVE-2019-25414 ↗MEDIUM 6.12026

    Comodo Dome Firewall 2.7.0 contains a reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to inject malicious scripts by manipulating the ID parameter. Attackers can cra…

  • …and 68 more

Resources & materials (18)

discovered on their site

Datasheets, whitepapers, and case studies found on comodo.com by the enrichment loop. Links open the original documents on the vendor's own site.

  • pdfComodo Secure Internet Gateway Solution Brief↗
  • pdfSecure Internet Gateway Ds↗
  • pdfComodo Secure Email Gateway Solution Brief↗
  • pdfSecure Email Gateway Ds Faq↗
  • pdfComodo Presentation↗
  • pdfComodo Mobile Device Management Empower Your Business Workforce With Mobility Without Comp↗
  • pdfCrowstrikes Bsod Nightmare↗
  • pdfComodo UE Brochure Expanded↗
  • pdfComodo Partners Accelerator Program Datasheet↗
  • pdfSOC As A Platform Solution Sheet↗
  • pdfBuyers Guide To Endpoint Protection Platforms In 2020 Offered By Comodo Cybersecurity↗
  • pdfCompare Comodo To TrendMicro Feature Analysis↗
  • pdfComodo Compared To Sophos↗
  • pdfCompare Comodo To SentinelOne Features Analysis↗
  • pdfComodo Compared To Cylance↗
  • pdfComodo Compared To Crowdstrike↗
  • pdfCookie Policy 2019↗
  • pdfPrivacy↗

Competitors (12)

full alternatives comparison →
Acronis International GmbHApozyArray NetworksBitdefenderBroadcomCiscoCloudflareCrowdStrikeDarktraceESETFortinetGuardz

Products (5)

Endpoint Detection & Response

2
  • Comodo Advanced Endpoint ProtectionAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Endpoint protection platform using zero trust architecture and containment
  • Comodo EDR SecurityAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    EDR solution for endpoint threat detection and response capabilities

WAF / DDoS / App Protection

1
  • Comodo Website SecurityAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Website security platform with WAF, CDN, malware scanning, and backup

Email Security

1
  • Comodo Secure Email GatewayAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Cloud-based email gateway with spam filtering, anti-phishing, and containment

Data Loss Prevention

1
  • Comodo Data Loss PreventionAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Cloud-based DLP solution monitoring & controlling sensitive data movement