Skip to main content
0-Doubt
NewsInvestorsQuestionnairesDeveloperHelp
AnonymousSign in
0-Doubt — neutral IT/Security research
BrowseResellersCertified analystsRFI/RFP questionnairesHow trust worksHelp & FAQAPI
  1. Home/
  2. Freeze

Freeze

enriched
Digital Risk Protection (DRP)

freeze.com ↗ · required email domain for this vendor's users

Do you work at Freeze?

This profile was built from public sources and hasn't been claimed yet. Claiming it lets you correct what's wrong and add details only you can confirm — and marks that information as vendor-verified for buyers.

Free, and it does not affect ranking, placement, or comparison results. The first person verified on Freeze's email domain becomes the profile admin.

Claim this profileAlready have an account?

Trust profileHow to read thisFive separate questions a buyer actually asks, each answered with its own evidence and a link to the source. There is deliberately no overall score: a single number invites comparison it cannot support, and would mostly reflect how much of Freeze we have managed to scan rather than anything about the vendor.

Not checked means we have not looked yet, and is never counted against a vendor. Limited means we did look, but found only one line of evidence — enough to report, not enough to corroborate.

checked 6 of 16 signals
  • Limited

    Independently verified

    Has anyone other than the vendor confirmed this?

    checked 3 of 4

    Nothing here has been confirmed by an independent third party yet.

    • No third-party certifications found
    • Profile not claimed by the vendor
  • Limited

    Operating durability

    Is this a real, durable business?

    checked 2 of 4

    How long this vendor has been operating, and who stands behind them.

    • Headquarters location not disclosed on their site
  • Limited

    Behaviour under stress

    What do they do when something goes wrong?

    checked 1 of 3

    What their public record shows about handling vulnerabilities and outages.

    • 18 published CVE(s) — a public disclosure record exists
  • Not checked

    Disclosure posture

    Do they tell you the awkward things unprompted?

    checked 0 of 3

    We have not checked what this vendor discloses publicly yet.

    Nothing checked here yet — this is not a mark against Freeze.

  • Not checked

    Momentum

    Are they still shipping, or coasting?

    checked 0 of 2

    We have not tracked this vendor's release activity yet.

    Nothing checked here yet — this is not a mark against Freeze.

Data coverage: 13/100What this measures (and doesn't)

Not a quality rating or endorsement — a measure of how much verified, disclosed data we actually have about this vendor. A low score usually means "we don't have much verified information yet," not "this is a bad vendor." Never used to sort or rank vendor lists.

Verification depth0/100
Security signal0/100
Buyer feedbackno data yet (0 reviews so far)
Profile completeness13/100
claim · HQ · materials · screenshots · integrations · certifications · security check

The platform admin controls the formula's weights.

Data coverage profileHow to read thisThe same four components behind the data coverage score above, shaped instead of listed — a vendor strong on verification but thin on buyer feedback looks visibly different from one that's the other way around. Security and feedback plot at the neutral midpoint (50) when there's no data yet (no products tracked, no reviews), matching how the actual score itself treats missing data — not a guess either way.

VerificationSecurityFeedbackCompletenessThis vendor — Verification: 0This vendor — Security: 0This vendor — Feedback: no data yetThis vendor — Completeness: 13

Buyer reviewsUI-14 — verified-buyer reviewsWritten only by domain-verified buyers at other companies, attributed to their company domain (never their identity), and moderated. Buyer-sourced opinion, clearly separate from the neutral catalog facts above — and never an input to search or comparison ordering.

verified buyers only

No buyer reviews yet.

Reputation ratingUI-20 — anonymous ratingA single anonymous 5-star signal from buyers, resellers, and analysts who've engaged with this vendor — separate from the domain-attributed reviews above. No rater identity is ever shown, not even at company level.

anonymous

No ratings in this window yet.

Proactive attack surface protection preventing info exposure about employees AI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →

CVE severity over timeUI-24 — CVE severity timelineEvery known CVE with a disclosure date and severity, plotted by when it was published — lets you see whether disclosures are trending toward more or less severe, not just a raw count. Same NVD-sourced, name-matched data as the list below.

LOWMEDIUMHIGHCRITICAL1999200020012002200320042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017CVE-2017-7730 · HIGH 7.5 · 2017-07-11CVE-2017-6017 · HIGH 7.5 · 2017-06-30CVE-2015-1379 · HIGH 7.5 · 2017-06-09CVE-2014-2382 · HIGH 7.2 · 2014-11-20CVE-2008-5218 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2008-11-25CVE-2008-1402 · HIGH 7.1 · 2008-03-20CVE-2008-0231 · HIGH 7.5 · 2008-01-11CVE-2007-3349 · HIGH 7.8 · 2007-06-22CVE-2006-5783 · HIGH 7.8 · 2006-11-08CVE-2006-4014 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2006-08-07CVE-2005-2424 · HIGH 7.5 · 2005-08-03CVE-2005-0289 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2005-05-02CVE-2004-1216 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2005-01-10CVE-2004-1109 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2005-01-10CVE-2004-1472 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2004-12-31CVE-2003-1478 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2003-12-31CVE-2003-1143 · HIGH 7.5 · 2003-10-30CVE-1999-0087 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 1998-02-01

Known CVEs (18)About this listSourced from the public NVD database, matched by vendor name. This is a name-based match, not exact version tracking — always check the linked NVD record for affected versions before drawing conclusions. “New” means published within the last 30 days. “Actively exploited” means CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog confirms real-world exploitation, not just a theoretical severity score.

RSS ⇢
  • CVE-2017-7730 ↗HIGH 7.52017

    iSmartAlarm cube devices allow Denial of Service. Sending a SYN flood on port 12345 will freeze the "cube" and it will stop responding.

  • CVE-2017-6017 ↗HIGH 7.52017

    A Resource Exhaustion issue was discovered in Schneider Electric Modicon M340 PLC BMXNOC0401, BMXNOE0100, BMXNOE0110, BMXNOE0110H, BMXNOR0200H, BMXP341000, BMXP342000, BMXP3420102, BMXP3420102CL, BMXP…

  • CVE-2015-1379 ↗HIGH 7.52017

    The signal handler implementations in socat before 1.7.3.0 and 2.0.0-b8 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (process freeze or crash).

  • CVE-2014-2382 ↗HIGH 7.22014

    The DfDiskLo.sys driver in Faronics Deep Freeze Standard and Enterprise 8.10 and earlier allows local administrators to cause a denial of service (crash) and execute arbitrary code via a crafted IOCTL…

  • CVE-2008-5218 ↗MEDIUM 5.02008

    ScriptsEz FREEze Greetings 1.0 stores pwd.txt under the web root with insufficient access control, which allows remote attackers to obtain cleartext passwords.

  • CVE-2008-1402 ↗HIGH 7.12008

    MG-SOFT Net Inspector 6.5.0.828 and earlier for Windows allows remote attackers to cause a (1) denial of service (exception and crash) via a UDP packet to the SNMP Trap Service (MgWTrap3.exe) or (2) d…

  • CVE-2008-0231 ↗HIGH 7.52008

    Multiple directory traversal vulnerabilities in index.php in Tuned Studios (1) Subwoofer, (2) Freeze Theme, (3) Orange Cutout, (4) Lonely Maple, (5) Endless, (6) Classic Theme, and (7) Music Theme web…

  • CVE-2007-3349 ↗HIGH 7.82007

    The Aastra 9112i SIP Phone with firmware 1.4.0.1048 and boot version 1.1.0.10 allows remote attackers to (1) cause a denial of service (device freeze) via a malformed SIP message of a certain length o…

  • CVE-2006-5783 ↗HIGH 7.82006

    Firefox 1.5.0.7 on Kubuntu Linux allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a long URL in an A tag. NOTE: this issue has been disputed by several vendors, who could not reproduc…

  • CVE-2006-4014 ↗MEDIUM 5.02006

    Symantec Brightmail AntiSpam (SBAS) before 6.0.4, when the Control Center is allowed to connect from any computer, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application freeze) "by sending…

  • CVE-2005-2424 ↗HIGH 7.52005

    The management interface for Siemens SANTIS 50 running firmware 4.2.8.0, and possibly other products including Ericsson HN294dp and Dynalink RTA300W, allows remote attackers to access the Telnet port …

  • CVE-2005-0289 ↗MEDIUM 5.02005

    Apple AirPort Express prior to 6.1.1 and Extreme prior to 5.5.1, configured as a Wireless Data Service (WDS), allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device freeze) by connecting to UDP …

  • CVE-2004-1216 ↗MEDIUM 5.02005

    The scripts that handle players in Kreed 1.05 and earlier allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (server freeze) via a long (1) nickname or (2) model type, which generates dialog boxes on…

  • CVE-2004-1109 ↗MEDIUM 5.02005

    The FWDRV.SYS driver in Kerio Personal Firewall 4.1.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption and system freeze from infinite loop) via a (1) TCP, (2) UDP, or…

  • CVE-2004-1472 ↗MEDIUM 5.02004

    Symantec Enterprise Firewall/VPN Appliances 100, 200, and 200R running firmware before 1.63 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device freeze) via a fast UDP port scan on the WAN inte…

  • CVE-2003-1478 ↗MEDIUM 4.32003

    Konqueror in KDE 3.0.3 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (core dump) via a web page that begins with a "xFFxFE" byte sequence and a large number of CRLF sequences, as demonstrated u…

  • CVE-2003-1143 ↗HIGH 7.52003

    Croteam Serious Sam demo test 2 2.1a, Serious Sam: the First Encounter 1.05, and Serious Sam: the Second Encounter 1.05 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash or freeze) via a TCP …

  • CVE-1999-0087 ↗MEDIUM 5.01998

    Denial of service in AIX telnet can freeze a system and prevent users from accessing the server.

Competitors (12)

full alternatives comparison →
ACID TechnologiesAdverseMonitorAleph NetworksAletheaAllure SecurityAxurBeyGooBforeAIBitdefenderBlackbird.AIBolsterBrandefense

Products (1)

Digital Risk Protection (DRP)

1
  • FreezeAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Proactive attack surface protection preventing info exposure about employees