Skip to main content
0-Doubt
NewsInvestorsQuestionnairesDeveloperHelp
AnonymousSign in
0-Doubt — neutral IT/Security research
BrowseResellersCertified analystsRFI/RFP questionnairesHow trust worksHelp & FAQAPI
  1. Home/
  2. HashiCorp

HashiCorp

enriched
Non-Human Identity & Secrets

Represented by Carahsoft ↗, Exclusive Networks ↗

hashicorp.com ↗ · required email domain for this vendor's users

Do you work at HashiCorp?

This profile was built from public sources and hasn't been claimed yet. Claiming it lets you correct what's wrong and add details only you can confirm — and marks that information as vendor-verified for buyers.

Free, and it does not affect ranking, placement, or comparison results. The first person verified on HashiCorp's email domain becomes the profile admin.

Claim this profileAlready have an account?

Trust profileHow to read thisFive separate questions a buyer actually asks, each answered with its own evidence and a link to the source. There is deliberately no overall score: a single number invites comparison it cannot support, and would mostly reflect how much of HashiCorp we have managed to scan rather than anything about the vendor.

Not checked means we have not looked yet, and is never counted against a vendor. Limited means we did look, but found only one line of evidence — enough to report, not enough to corroborate.

checked 6 of 16 signals
  • Limited

    Independently verified

    Has anyone other than the vendor confirmed this?

    checked 3 of 4

    Nothing here has been confirmed by an independent third party yet.

    • No third-party certifications found
    • Profile not claimed by the vendor
  • Limited

    Operating durability

    Is this a real, durable business?

    checked 2 of 4

    How long this vendor has been operating, and who stands behind them.

    • Headquarters location not disclosed on their site
  • Mixed

    Behaviour under stress

    What do they do when something goes wrong?

    checked 1 of 3

    What their public record shows about handling vulnerabilities and outages.

    • 100 published CVE(s) — a public disclosure record exists
    • 11 rated critical
  • Not checked

    Disclosure posture

    Do they tell you the awkward things unprompted?

    checked 0 of 3

    We have not checked what this vendor discloses publicly yet.

    Nothing checked here yet — this is not a mark against HashiCorp.

  • Not checked

    Momentum

    Are they still shipping, or coasting?

    checked 0 of 2

    We have not tracked this vendor's release activity yet.

    Nothing checked here yet — this is not a mark against HashiCorp.

Data coverage: 13/100What this measures (and doesn't)

Not a quality rating or endorsement — a measure of how much verified, disclosed data we actually have about this vendor. A low score usually means "we don't have much verified information yet," not "this is a bad vendor." Never used to sort or rank vendor lists.

Verification depth0/100
Security signal0/100
Buyer feedbackno data yet (0 reviews so far)
Profile completeness13/100
claim · HQ · materials · screenshots · integrations · certifications · security check

The platform admin controls the formula's weights.

Data coverage profileHow to read thisThe same four components behind the data coverage score above, shaped instead of listed — a vendor strong on verification but thin on buyer feedback looks visibly different from one that's the other way around. Security and feedback plot at the neutral midpoint (50) when there's no data yet (no products tracked, no reviews), matching how the actual score itself treats missing data — not a guess either way.

VerificationSecurityFeedbackCompletenessThis vendor — Verification: 0This vendor — Security: 0This vendor — Feedback: no data yetThis vendor — Completeness: 13

IntegrationsUI-12 — integration graphDetected from this vendor's own published integration/partner pages by the enrichment loop — each entry links the exact page it was found on. Directional: "integrates with" is claimed by this vendor; "integrated by" is claimed by the other vendor's site. Coverage grows as the scan progresses.

20 detected

Integrated by: Apono, Aqua Security, D3 Security, Devolutions, Entro Security, Exaforce, ExtraHop, GlobalSign, IriusRisk, Mesh Security, Nirmata, Offroad, Snyk, Teleport, Tenzir, Token Security, Torq, UncommonX, Wiz, Zscaler

Buyer reviewsUI-14 — verified-buyer reviewsWritten only by domain-verified buyers at other companies, attributed to their company domain (never their identity), and moderated. Buyer-sourced opinion, clearly separate from the neutral catalog facts above — and never an input to search or comparison ordering.

verified buyers only

No buyer reviews yet.

Reputation ratingUI-20 — anonymous ratingA single anonymous 5-star signal from buyers, resellers, and analysts who've engaged with this vendor — separate from the domain-attributed reviews above. No rater identity is ever shown, not even at company level.

anonymous

No ratings in this window yet.

External ratingsUI-22 — third-party ratingsAggregate rating and review count pulled directly from the source site's own published data — never the review text itself, which belongs to that site. Links go to the real page so you can read the actual reviews there.

via third-party review sites
PeerSpot: 4.2/5 (28 reviews) ↗

Identity-based secrets mgmt platform for credentials, certs, keys & encryption AI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →

CVE severity over timeUI-24 — CVE severity timelineEvery known CVE with a disclosure date and severity, plotted by when it was published — lets you see whether disclosures are trending toward more or less severe, not just a raw count. Same NVD-sourced, name-matched data as the list below.

LOWMEDIUMHIGHCRITICAL20182019202020212022CVE-2022-3920 · MEDIUM 5.3 · 2022-11-16CVE-2022-3867 · LOW 2.7 · 2022-11-10CVE-2022-3866 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2022-11-10CVE-2022-36182 · MEDIUM 6.1 · 2022-10-27CVE-2022-41316 · MEDIUM 5.3 · 2022-10-13CVE-2022-41606 · MEDIUM 6.5 · 2022-10-12CVE-2022-42717 · HIGH 7.8 · 2022-10-12CVE-2022-40716 · MEDIUM 6.5 · 2022-09-23CVE-2021-41803 · HIGH 7.1 · 2022-09-23CVE-2022-40186 · CRITICAL 9.1 · 2022-09-22CVE-2022-36130 · CRITICAL 9.9 · 2022-09-01CVE-2022-38149 · HIGH 7.5 · 2022-08-17CVE-2022-36888 · MEDIUM 6.5 · 2022-07-27CVE-2022-36129 · CRITICAL 9.1 · 2022-07-27CVE-2022-30324 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2022-06-02CVE-2022-30689 · MEDIUM 5.3 · 2022-05-17CVE-2022-29810 · MEDIUM 5.5 · 2022-04-27CVE-2022-29153 · HIGH 7.5 · 2022-04-19CVE-2022-24685 · HIGH 7.5 · 2022-02-28CVE-2022-25374 · HIGH 7.5 · 2022-02-25CVE-2022-24687 · MEDIUM 6.5 · 2022-02-24CVE-2022-24683 · HIGH 7.5 · 2022-02-17CVE-2022-25197 · MEDIUM 6.5 · 2022-02-15CVE-2022-25186 · MEDIUM 6.5 · 2022-02-15CVE-2022-24684 · MEDIUM 6.5 · 2022-02-15CVE-2022-24686 · MEDIUM 5.9 · 2022-02-14CVE-2022-23109 · MEDIUM 6.5 · 2022-01-13CVE-2021-45042 · MEDIUM 4.9 · 2021-12-17CVE-2021-43837 · HIGH 8.4 · 2021-12-17CVE-2021-41805 · HIGH 8.8 · 2021-12-12CVE-2021-43415 · HIGH 8.8 · 2021-12-04CVE-2021-43998 · MEDIUM 6.5 · 2021-11-30CVE-2021-42135 · HIGH 8.1 · 2021-10-11CVE-2021-41802 · LOW 2.9 · 2021-10-08CVE-2021-41865 · MEDIUM 6.5 · 2021-10-07CVE-2021-40862 · HIGH 8.8 · 2021-09-15CVE-2021-38698 · MEDIUM 6.5 · 2021-09-07CVE-2021-37219 · HIGH 8.8 · 2021-09-07CVE-2021-37218 · HIGH 8.8 · 2021-09-07CVE-2021-27668 · MEDIUM 5.3 · 2021-08-31CVE-2021-38554 · MEDIUM 5.3 · 2021-08-13CVE-2021-38553 · MEDIUM 4.4 · 2021-08-13CVE-2021-36230 · HIGH 8.8 · 2021-07-21CVE-2021-36213 · HIGH 7.5 · 2021-07-17CVE-2021-32574 · HIGH 7.5 · 2021-07-17CVE-2021-32575 · MEDIUM 6.5 · 2021-06-17CVE-2021-32923 · HIGH 7.4 · 2021-06-03CVE-2021-32074 · HIGH 7.5 · 2021-05-07CVE-2021-30476 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2021-04-22CVE-2021-29653 · HIGH 7.5 · 2021-04-22CVE-2021-27400 · HIGH 7.5 · 2021-04-22CVE-2021-28156 · HIGH 7.5 · 2021-04-20CVE-2020-25864 · MEDIUM 6.1 · 2021-04-20CVE-2021-3153 · MEDIUM 6.5 · 2021-03-26CVE-2021-3283 · HIGH 7.5 · 2021-02-01CVE-2021-3282 · HIGH 7.5 · 2021-02-01CVE-2021-3024 · MEDIUM 5.3 · 2021-02-01CVE-2020-25594 · MEDIUM 5.3 · 2021-02-01CVE-2020-35453 · MEDIUM 5.3 · 2020-12-17CVE-2020-35177 · MEDIUM 5.3 · 2020-12-17CVE-2020-29529 · HIGH 7.5 · 2020-12-04CVE-2020-28348 · MEDIUM 6.5 · 2020-11-24CVE-2020-28053 · MEDIUM 6.5 · 2020-11-23CVE-2020-25201 · HIGH 7.5 · 2020-11-05CVE-2020-27195 · CRITICAL 9.1 · 2020-10-22CVE-2020-25816 · MEDIUM 6.8 · 2020-10-01CVE-2020-16251 · HIGH 8.2 · 2020-08-26CVE-2020-16250 · HIGH 8.2 · 2020-08-26CVE-2020-24359 · HIGH 7.5 · 2020-08-20CVE-2020-15511 · MEDIUM 5.3 · 2020-07-30CVE-2020-13250 · HIGH 7.5 · 2020-06-12CVE-2020-13170 · HIGH 7.5 · 2020-06-12CVE-2020-12797 · MEDIUM 5.3 · 2020-06-12CVE-2020-12758 · HIGH 7.5 · 2020-06-12CVE-2020-13223 · HIGH 7.5 · 2020-06-10CVE-2020-12757 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2020-06-10CVE-2020-10944 · MEDIUM 5.4 · 2020-04-28CVE-2020-10661 · CRITICAL 9.1 · 2020-03-23CVE-2020-10660 · MEDIUM 5.3 · 2020-03-23CVE-2019-19879 · HIGH 7.5 · 2020-02-14CVE-2020-7956 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2020-01-31CVE-2020-7955 · MEDIUM 5.3 · 2020-01-31CVE-2020-7219 · HIGH 7.5 · 2020-01-31CVE-2020-7218 · HIGH 7.5 · 2020-01-31CVE-2020-7220 · HIGH 7.5 · 2020-01-23CVE-2019-12618 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2019-08-12CVE-2019-12291 · HIGH 7.5 · 2019-06-06CVE-2019-9764 · HIGH 7.4 · 2019-03-26CVE-2019-8336 · HIGH 8.1 · 2019-03-06CVE-2018-19653 · MEDIUM 5.9 · 2018-12-10CVE-2018-19786 · HIGH 8.1 · 2018-12-05CVE-2017-16839 · HIGH 7.0 · 2018-03-30CVE-2017-16512 · HIGH 7.8 · 2018-03-30CVE-2018-9057 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2018-03-27CVE-2017-16777 · HIGH 7.8 · 2017-11-16CVE-2017-16001 · HIGH 7.8 · 2017-11-06CVE-2017-15884 · HIGH 7.0 · 2017-10-31CVE-2017-12579 · HIGH 7.8 · 2017-10-19CVE-2017-11741 · HIGH 8.8 · 2017-08-08CVE-2017-7642 · HIGH 7.8 · 2017-08-02

Known CVEs (100)About this listSourced from the public NVD database, matched by vendor name. This is a name-based match, not exact version tracking — always check the linked NVD record for affected versions before drawing conclusions. “New” means published within the last 30 days. “Actively exploited” means CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog confirms real-world exploitation, not just a theoretical severity score.

RSS ⇢
  • CVE-2022-3920 ↗MEDIUM 5.32022

    HashiCorp Consul and Consul Enterprise 1.13.0 up to 1.13.3 do not filter cluster filtering's imported nodes and services for HTTP or RPC endpoints used by the UI. Fixed in 1.14.0.

  • CVE-2022-3867 ↗LOW 2.72022

    HashiCorp Nomad and Nomad Enterprise 1.4.0 up to 1.4.1 event stream subscribers using a token with TTL receive updates until token garbage is collected. Fixed in 1.4.2.

  • CVE-2022-3866 ↗MEDIUM 5.02022

    HashiCorp Nomad and Nomad Enterprise 1.4.0 up to 1.4.1 workload identity token can list non-sensitive metadata for paths under nomad/ that belong to other jobs in the same namespace. Fixed in 1.4.2.

  • CVE-2022-36182 ↗MEDIUM 6.12022

    Hashicorp Boundary v0.8.0 is vulnerable to Clickjacking which allow for the interception of login credentials, re-direction of users to malicious sites, or causing users to perform malicious actions o…

  • CVE-2022-41316 ↗MEDIUM 5.32022

    HashiCorp Vault and Vault Enterprise’s TLS certificate auth method did not initially load the optionally configured CRL issued by the role's CA into memory on startup, resulting in the revocation list…

  • CVE-2022-41606 ↗MEDIUM 6.52022

    HashiCorp Nomad and Nomad Enterprise 1.0.2 up to 1.2.12, and 1.3.5 jobs submitted with an artifact stanza using invalid S3 or GCS URLs can be used to crash client agents. Fixed in 1.2.13, 1.3.6, and 1…

  • CVE-2022-42717 ↗HIGH 7.82022

    An issue was discovered in Hashicorp Packer before 2.3.1. The recommended sudoers configuration for Vagrant on Linux is insecure. If the host has been configured according to this documentation, non-p…

  • CVE-2022-40716 ↗MEDIUM 6.52022

    HashiCorp Consul and Consul Enterprise up to 1.11.8, 1.12.4, and 1.13.1 do not check for multiple SAN URI values in a CSR on the internal RPC endpoint, enabling leverage of privileged access to bypass…

  • CVE-2021-41803 ↗HIGH 7.12022

    HashiCorp Consul 1.8.1 up to 1.11.8, 1.12.4, and 1.13.1 do not properly validate the node or segment names prior to interpolation and usage in JWT claim assertions with the auto config RPC. Fixed in 1…

  • CVE-2022-40186 ↗CRITICAL 9.12022

    An issue was discovered in HashiCorp Vault and Vault Enterprise before 1.11.3. A vulnerability in the Identity Engine was found where, in a deployment where an entity has multiple mount accessors with…

  • CVE-2022-36130 ↗CRITICAL 9.92022

    HashiCorp Boundary up to 0.10.1 did not properly perform data integrity checks to ensure the resources were associated with the correct scopes, allowing potential privilege escalation for authorized u…

  • CVE-2022-38149 ↗HIGH 7.52022

    HashiCorp Consul Template up to 0.27.2, 0.28.2, and 0.29.1 may expose the contents of Vault secrets in the error returned by the *template.Template.Execute method, when given a template using Vault se…

  • CVE-2022-36888 ↗MEDIUM 6.52022

    A missing permission check in Jenkins HashiCorp Vault Plugin 354.vdb_858fd6b_f48 and earlier allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to obtain credentials stored in Vault with attacker-specified…

  • CVE-2022-36129 ↗CRITICAL 9.12022

    HashiCorp Vault Enterprise 1.7.0 through 1.9.7, 1.10.4, and 1.11.0 clusters using Integrated Storage expose an unauthenticated API endpoint that could be abused to override the voter status of a node …

  • CVE-2022-30324 ↗CRITICAL 9.82022

    HashiCorp Nomad and Nomad Enterprise version 0.2.0 up to 1.3.0 were impacted by go-getter vulnerabilities enabling privilege escalation through the artifact stanza in submitted jobs onto the client ag…

  • CVE-2022-30689 ↗MEDIUM 5.32022

    HashiCorp Vault and Vault Enterprise from 1.10.0 to 1.10.2 did not correctly configure and enforce MFA on login after server restarts. This affects the Login MFA feature introduced in Vault and Vault …

  • CVE-2022-29810 ↗MEDIUM 5.52022

    The Hashicorp go-getter library before 1.5.11 does not redact an SSH key from a URL query parameter.

  • CVE-2022-29153 ↗HIGH 7.52022

    HashiCorp Consul and Consul Enterprise up to 1.9.16, 1.10.9, and 1.11.4 may allow server side request forgery when the Consul client agent follows redirects returned by HTTP health check endpoints. Fi…

  • CVE-2022-24685 ↗HIGH 7.52022

    HashiCorp Nomad and Nomad Enterprise 1.0.17, 1.1.11, and 1.2.5 allow invalid HCL for the jobs parse endpoint, which may cause excessive CPU usage. Fixed in 1.0.18, 1.1.12, and 1.2.6.

  • CVE-2022-25374 ↗HIGH 7.52022

    HashiCorp Terraform Enterprise v202112-1, v202112-2, v202201-1, and v202201-2 were configured to log inbound HTTP requests in a manner that may capture sensitive data. Fixed in v202202-1.

  • …and 80 more

Competitors (12)

full alternatives comparison →
AembitAkeyless SecurityANGOKAAppViewXAstrix SecurityauthIDBlueFlag SecurityBritiveCipherStashClearVectorClutch SecurityCodezero

Products (1)

Non-Human Identity & Secrets

1
  • HashiCorp VaultAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Identity-based secrets mgmt platform for credentials, certs, keys & encryption