Skip to main content
0-Doubt
NewsInvestorsQuestionnairesDeveloperHelp
AnonymousSign in
0-Doubt — neutral IT/Security research
BrowseResellersCertified analystsRFI/RFP questionnairesHow trust worksHelp & FAQAPI
  1. Home/
  2. Intrusion

Intrusion

enrichedPublic company (INTZ) ↗
Intrusion Detection and Prevention Systems

Represented by Carahsoft ↗, Kudelski Security ↗

intrusion.com ↗ · required email domain for this vendor's users

Do you work at Intrusion?

This profile was built from public sources and hasn't been claimed yet. Claiming it lets you correct what's wrong and add details only you can confirm — and marks that information as vendor-verified for buyers.

Free, and it does not affect ranking, placement, or comparison results. The first person verified on Intrusion's email domain becomes the profile admin.

Claim this profileAlready have an account?

Trust profileHow to read thisFive separate questions a buyer actually asks, each answered with its own evidence and a link to the source. There is deliberately no overall score: a single number invites comparison it cannot support, and would mostly reflect how much of Intrusion we have managed to scan rather than anything about the vendor.

Not checked means we have not looked yet, and is never counted against a vendor. Limited means we did look, but found only one line of evidence — enough to report, not enough to corroborate.

checked 6 of 16 signals
  • Limited

    Independently verified

    Has anyone other than the vendor confirmed this?

    checked 3 of 4

    Nothing here has been confirmed by an independent third party yet.

    • No third-party certifications found
    • Profile not claimed by the vendor
  • Limited

    Operating durability

    Is this a real, durable business?

    checked 2 of 4

    How long this vendor has been operating, and who stands behind them.

    • Headquarters location not disclosed on their site
    • 1 public SEC filing(s) — financials are a matter of record
  • Mixed

    Behaviour under stress

    What do they do when something goes wrong?

    checked 1 of 3

    What their public record shows about handling vulnerabilities and outages.

    • 99 published CVE(s) — a public disclosure record exists
    • 2 rated critical
  • Not checked

    Disclosure posture

    Do they tell you the awkward things unprompted?

    checked 0 of 3

    We have not checked what this vendor discloses publicly yet.

    Nothing checked here yet — this is not a mark against Intrusion.

  • Not checked

    Momentum

    Are they still shipping, or coasting?

    checked 0 of 2

    We have not tracked this vendor's release activity yet.

    Nothing checked here yet — this is not a mark against Intrusion.

Data coverage: 15/100What this measures (and doesn't)

Not a quality rating or endorsement — a measure of how much verified, disclosed data we actually have about this vendor. A low score usually means "we don't have much verified information yet," not "this is a bad vendor." Never used to sort or rank vendor lists.

Verification depth0/100
Security signal0/100
Buyer feedbackno data yet (0 reviews so far)
Profile completeness25/100
claim · HQ · materials · screenshots · integrations · certifications · security check

The platform admin controls the formula's weights.

Data coverage profileHow to read thisThe same four components behind the data coverage score above, shaped instead of listed — a vendor strong on verification but thin on buyer feedback looks visibly different from one that's the other way around. Security and feedback plot at the neutral midpoint (50) when there's no data yet (no products tracked, no reviews), matching how the actual score itself treats missing data — not a guess either way.

VerificationSecurityFeedbackCompletenessThis vendor — Verification: 0This vendor — Security: 0This vendor — Feedback: no data yetThis vendor — Completeness: 25

IntegrationsUI-12 — integration graphDetected from this vendor's own published integration/partner pages by the enrichment loop — each entry links the exact page it was found on. Directional: "integrates with" is claimed by this vendor; "integrated by" is claimed by the other vendor's site. Coverage grows as the scan progresses.

11 detected

Integrated by: Acme Security EDR, Bastille Networks, Corelight, Endace, Expel, ExtraHop, HiddenLayer, Mamori.io, PlaxidityX, Seceon Inc, Versa Networks

Buyer reviewsUI-14 — verified-buyer reviewsWritten only by domain-verified buyers at other companies, attributed to their company domain (never their identity), and moderated. Buyer-sourced opinion, clearly separate from the neutral catalog facts above — and never an input to search or comparison ordering.

verified buyers only

No buyer reviews yet.

Reputation ratingUI-20 — anonymous ratingA single anonymous 5-star signal from buyers, resellers, and analysts who've engaged with this vendor — separate from the domain-attributed reviews above. No rater identity is ever shown, not even at company level.

anonymous

No ratings in this window yet.

Network threat protection platform blocking malicious IPs using reputation intelligence. AI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →

CVE severity over timeUI-24 — CVE severity timelineEvery known CVE with a disclosure date and severity, plotted by when it was published — lets you see whether disclosures are trending toward more or less severe, not just a raw count. Same NVD-sourced, name-matched data as the list below.

LOWMEDIUMHIGHCRITICAL2000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024CVE-2024-47187 · HIGH 7.5 · 2024-10-16CVE-2024-45796 · MEDIUM 5.3 · 2024-10-16CVE-2024-45795 · HIGH 7.5 · 2024-10-16CVE-2024-20508 · MEDIUM 5.8 · 2024-09-25CVE-2024-38877 · HIGH 8.2 · 2024-08-02CVE-2024-38536 · HIGH 7.5 · 2024-07-11CVE-2024-38535 · HIGH 7.5 · 2024-07-11CVE-2024-38534 · HIGH 7.5 · 2024-07-11CVE-2024-37151 · MEDIUM 5.3 · 2024-07-11CVE-2022-48750 · MEDIUM 5.5 · 2024-06-20CVE-2024-4344 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2024-06-02CVE-2024-20363 · MEDIUM 5.8 · 2024-05-22CVE-2024-32867 · MEDIUM 5.3 · 2024-05-07CVE-2024-32664 · MEDIUM 5.3 · 2024-05-07CVE-2024-32663 · HIGH 7.5 · 2024-05-07CVE-2024-28870 · HIGH 7.5 · 2024-04-04CVE-2024-24568 · MEDIUM 5.3 · 2024-02-26CVE-2024-23839 · HIGH 7.1 · 2024-02-26CVE-2024-23836 · HIGH 7.5 · 2024-02-26CVE-2024-23835 · HIGH 7.5 · 2024-02-26CVE-2022-48220 · MEDIUM 6.4 · 2024-02-15CVE-2022-48219 · MEDIUM 6.4 · 2024-02-15CVE-2023-6989 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2024-02-06CVE-2024-22163 · HIGH 7.1 · 2024-01-31CVE-2023-28985 · HIGH 7.5 · 2023-07-14CVE-2022-23466 · MEDIUM 5.4 · 2022-12-06CVE-2022-20918 · HIGH 7.5 · 2022-11-16CVE-2022-31041 · HIGH 7.6 · 2022-06-13CVE-2021-34754 · MEDIUM 5.8 · 2021-10-27CVE-2020-1684 · HIGH 7.5 · 2020-10-17CVE-2020-7279 · MEDIUM 4.6 · 2020-06-10CVE-2019-14261 · HIGH 7.5 · 2019-09-03CVE-2018-15452 · MEDIUM 5.5 · 2018-11-13CVE-2018-15443 · MEDIUM 5.8 · 2018-11-08CVE-2018-15437 · MEDIUM 5.5 · 2018-11-08CVE-2017-12244 · HIGH 8.6 · 2017-10-05CVE-2016-6368 · HIGH 8.6 · 2017-04-21CVE-2015-8954 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2017-03-20CVE-2016-8007 · MEDIUM 6.3 · 2017-03-15CVE-2017-3842 · MEDIUM 5.3 · 2017-02-22CVE-2016-9209 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2016-12-14CVE-2016-6376 · MEDIUM 6.5 · 2016-09-02CVE-2016-5308 · MEDIUM 5.5 · 2016-07-12CVE-2016-3984 · MEDIUM 5.1 · 2016-04-08CVE-2015-0654 · HIGH 7.1 · 2015-03-13CVE-2015-0631 · HIGH 7.1 · 2015-02-21CVE-2015-0622 · HIGH 7.1 · 2015-02-19CVE-2014-3406 · HIGH 7.1 · 2014-10-19CVE-2014-3402 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2014-10-10CVE-2011-5249 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2014-05-14CVE-2014-2103 · MEDIUM 6.8 · 2014-02-28CVE-2013-5497 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2013-09-19CVE-2013-3411 · HIGH 7.8 · 2013-07-18CVE-2013-3410 · HIGH 7.8 · 2013-07-18CVE-2013-1243 · HIGH 7.8 · 2013-07-18CVE-2013-1218 · HIGH 7.8 · 2013-07-18CVE-2013-1219 · MEDIUM 4.4 · 2013-04-29CVE-2013-1102 · HIGH 7.8 · 2013-01-25CVE-2012-3950 · HIGH 7.1 · 2012-09-27CVE-2011-4022 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2012-05-03CVE-2011-3140 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2011-08-16CVE-2011-1036 · HIGH 8.8 · 2011-02-25CVE-2010-1329 · HIGH 7.8 · 2010-04-15CVE-2009-2740 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2009-08-19CVE-2005-4878 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2009-02-19CVE-2008-2739 · HIGH 7.8 · 2008-09-26CVE-2008-2926 · HIGH 7.2 · 2008-08-13CVE-2008-3174 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2008-08-13CVE-2008-2060 · HIGH 7.8 · 2008-06-18CVE-2007-5472 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2007-10-22CVE-2007-3849 · LOW 1.9 · 2007-09-05CVE-2007-3302 · HIGH 9.3 · 2007-07-26CVE-2007-3279 · HIGH 10.0 · 2007-06-20CVE-2007-2688 · HIGH 7.8 · 2007-05-16CVE-2007-1005 · HIGH 7.8 · 2007-03-03CVE-2006-5276 · HIGH 10.0 · 2007-02-20CVE-2007-0918 · HIGH 7.1 · 2007-02-14CVE-2007-0917 · MEDIUM 6.4 · 2007-02-14CVE-2006-6952 · HIGH 7.2 · 2007-01-25CVE-2006-3596 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2006-07-18CVE-2006-1590 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2006-04-03CVE-2006-0362 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2006-01-23CVE-2005-3325 · HIGH 7.5 · 2005-10-27CVE-2005-2695 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2005-08-26CVE-2005-2681 · HIGH 7.2 · 2005-08-23CVE-2005-1693 · HIGH 10.0 · 2005-05-24CVE-2005-0968 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2005-05-02CVE-2004-0933 · HIGH 7.5 · 2005-01-27CVE-2004-1193 · MEDIUM 6.6 · 2005-01-10CVE-2003-0011 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2003-03-24CVE-2002-2199 · MEDIUM 4.6 · 2002-12-31CVE-2001-0669 · HIGH 7.5 · 2001-10-30CVE-2000-0712 · HIGH 7.2 · 2000-10-20CVE-2000-0559 · LOW 2.1 · 2000-06-07CVE-1999-0599 · HIGH 10.0 · 1999-01-01CVE-1999-0602 · HIGH 10.0 · 1999-01-01CVE-1999-0601 · HIGH 10.0 · 1999-01-01CVE-1999-0600 · HIGH 10.0 · 1999-01-01CVE-1999-0598 · HIGH 10.0 · 1999-01-01

Known CVEs (99)About this listSourced from the public NVD database, matched by vendor name. This is a name-based match, not exact version tracking — always check the linked NVD record for affected versions before drawing conclusions. “New” means published within the last 30 days. “Actively exploited” means CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog confirms real-world exploitation, not just a theoretical severity score.

RSS ⇢
  • CVE-2024-47187 ↗HIGH 7.52024

    Suricata is a network Intrusion Detection System, Intrusion Prevention System and Network Security Monitoring engine. Prior to version 7.0.7, missing initialization of the random seed for "thash" lead…

  • CVE-2024-45796 ↗MEDIUM 5.32024

    Suricata is a network Intrusion Detection System, Intrusion Prevention System and Network Security Monitoring engine. Prior to version 7.0.7, a logic error during fragment reassembly can lead to faile…

  • CVE-2024-45795 ↗HIGH 7.52024

    Suricata is a network Intrusion Detection System, Intrusion Prevention System and Network Security Monitoring engine. Prior to version 7.0.7, rules using datasets with the non-functional / unimplement…

  • CVE-2024-20508 ↗MEDIUM 5.82024

    A vulnerability in Cisco Unified Threat Defense (UTD) Snort Intrusion Prevention System (IPS) Engine for Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass configured secu…

  • CVE-2024-38877 ↗HIGH 8.22024

    A vulnerability has been identified in Omnivise T3000 Application Server R9.2 (All versions), Omnivise T3000 Domain Controller R9.2 (All versions), Omnivise T3000 Network Intrusion Detection System (N…

  • CVE-2024-38536 ↗HIGH 7.52024

    Suricata is a network Intrusion Detection System, Intrusion Prevention System and Network Security Monitoring engine. A memory allocation failure due to `http.memcap` being reached leads to a NULL-ptr…

  • CVE-2024-38535 ↗HIGH 7.52024

    Suricata is a network Intrusion Detection System, Intrusion Prevention System and Network Security Monitoring engine. Suricata can run out of memory when parsing crafted HTTP/2 traffic. Upgrade to 6.0…

  • CVE-2024-38534 ↗HIGH 7.52024

    Suricata is a network Intrusion Detection System, Intrusion Prevention System and Network Security Monitoring engine. Crafted modbus traffic can lead to unlimited resource accumulation within a flow. …

  • CVE-2024-37151 ↗MEDIUM 5.32024

    Suricata is a network Intrusion Detection System, Intrusion Prevention System and Network Security Monitoring engine. Mishandling of multiple fragmented packets using the same IP ID value can lead to…

  • CVE-2022-48750 ↗MEDIUM 5.52024

    In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: hwmon: (nct6775) Fix crash in clear_caseopen Paweł Marciniak reports the following crash, observed when clearing the chassis intru…

  • CVE-2024-4344 ↗MEDIUM 4.32024

    The Shield Security – Smart Bot Blocking & Intrusion Prevention Security plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 19.1.13. This is due to …

  • CVE-2024-20363 ↗MEDIUM 5.82024

    Multiple Cisco products are affected by a vulnerability in the Snort Intrusion Prevention System (IPS) rule engine that could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass the configured rules o…

  • CVE-2024-32867 ↗MEDIUM 5.32024

    Suricata is a network Intrusion Detection System, Intrusion Prevention System and Network Security Monitoring engine. Prior to 7.0.5 and 6.0.19, various problems in handling of fragmentation anomalies…

  • CVE-2024-32664 ↗MEDIUM 5.32024

    Suricata is a network Intrusion Detection System, Intrusion Prevention System and Network Security Monitoring engine. Prior to 7.0.5 and 6.0.19, specially crafted traffic or datasets can cause a limit…

  • CVE-2024-32663 ↗HIGH 7.52024

    Suricata is a network Intrusion Detection System, Intrusion Prevention System and Network Security Monitoring engine. Prior to 7.0.5 and 6.0.19, a small amount of HTTP/2 traffic can lead to Suricata u…

  • CVE-2024-28870 ↗HIGH 7.52024

    Suricata is a network Intrusion Detection System, Intrusion Prevention System and Network Security Monitoring engine developed by the OISF and the Suricata community. When parsing an overly long SSH b…

  • CVE-2024-24568 ↗MEDIUM 5.32024

    Suricata is a network Intrusion Detection System, Intrusion Prevention System and Network Security Monitoring engine. Prior to 7.0.3, the rules inspecting HTTP2 headers can get bypassed by crafted tr…

  • CVE-2024-23839 ↗HIGH 7.12024

    Suricata is a network Intrusion Detection System, Intrusion Prevention System and Network Security Monitoring engine. Prior to 7.0.3, specially crafted traffic can cause a heap use after free if the …

  • CVE-2024-23836 ↗HIGH 7.52024

    Suricata is a network Intrusion Detection System, Intrusion Prevention System and Network Security Monitoring engine. Prior to versions 6.0.16 and 7.0.3, an attacker can craft traffic to cause Suricat…

  • CVE-2024-23835 ↗HIGH 7.52024

    Suricata is a network Intrusion Detection System, Intrusion Prevention System and Network Security Monitoring engine. Prior to version 7.0.3, excessive memory use during pgsql parsing could lead to O…

  • …and 79 more

Competitors (12)

full alternatives comparison →
AkherosAxiom Cyber SolutionsBackBoxBastille NetworksBlueCat NetworksCentripetalCiscoCybermercDigital Arts Inc.DNSSenseGuardian360HYAS

Products (1)

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Systems

1
  • Intrusion ShieldAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Network threat protection platform blocking malicious IPs using reputation intelligence.