Skip to main content
0-Doubt
NewsInvestorsQuestionnairesDeveloperHelp
AnonymousSign in
0-Doubt — neutral IT/Security research
BrowseResellersCertified analystsRFI/RFP questionnairesHow trust worksHelp & FAQAPI
  1. Home/
  2. McAfee

McAfee

enriched
Endpoint Detection & Response

mcafee.com ↗ · required email domain for this vendor's users

Do you work at McAfee?

This profile was built from public sources and hasn't been claimed yet. Claiming it lets you correct what's wrong and add details only you can confirm — and marks that information as vendor-verified for buyers.

Free, and it does not affect ranking, placement, or comparison results. The first person verified on McAfee's email domain becomes the profile admin.

Claim this profileAlready have an account?

Trust profileHow to read thisFive separate questions a buyer actually asks, each answered with its own evidence and a link to the source. There is deliberately no overall score: a single number invites comparison it cannot support, and would mostly reflect how much of McAfee we have managed to scan rather than anything about the vendor.

Not checked means we have not looked yet, and is never counted against a vendor. Limited means we did look, but found only one line of evidence — enough to report, not enough to corroborate.

checked 6 of 16 signals
  • Limited

    Independently verified

    Has anyone other than the vendor confirmed this?

    checked 3 of 4

    Nothing here has been confirmed by an independent third party yet.

    • No third-party certifications found
    • Profile not claimed by the vendor
  • Limited

    Operating durability

    Is this a real, durable business?

    checked 2 of 4

    How long this vendor has been operating, and who stands behind them.

    • Headquarters location not disclosed on their site
  • Limited

    Behaviour under stress

    What do they do when something goes wrong?

    checked 1 of 3

    What their public record shows about handling vulnerabilities and outages.

    • 100 published CVE(s) — a public disclosure record exists
  • Not checked

    Disclosure posture

    Do they tell you the awkward things unprompted?

    checked 0 of 3

    We have not checked what this vendor discloses publicly yet.

    Nothing checked here yet — this is not a mark against McAfee.

  • Not checked

    Momentum

    Are they still shipping, or coasting?

    checked 0 of 2

    We have not tracked this vendor's release activity yet.

    Nothing checked here yet — this is not a mark against McAfee.

Data coverage: 13/100What this measures (and doesn't)

Not a quality rating or endorsement — a measure of how much verified, disclosed data we actually have about this vendor. A low score usually means "we don't have much verified information yet," not "this is a bad vendor." Never used to sort or rank vendor lists.

Verification depth0/100
Security signal0/100
Buyer feedbackno data yet (0 reviews so far)
Profile completeness13/100
claim · HQ · materials · screenshots · integrations · certifications · security check

The platform admin controls the formula's weights.

Data coverage profileHow to read thisThe same four components behind the data coverage score above, shaped instead of listed — a vendor strong on verification but thin on buyer feedback looks visibly different from one that's the other way around. Security and feedback plot at the neutral midpoint (50) when there's no data yet (no products tracked, no reviews), matching how the actual score itself treats missing data — not a guess either way.

VerificationSecurityFeedbackCompletenessThis vendor — Verification: 0This vendor — Security: 0This vendor — Feedback: no data yetThis vendor — Completeness: 13

IntegrationsUI-12 — integration graphDetected from this vendor's own published integration/partner pages by the enrichment loop — each entry links the exact page it was found on. Directional: "integrates with" is claimed by this vendor; "integrated by" is claimed by the other vendor's site. Coverage grows as the scan progresses.

13 detected

Integrated by: D3 Security, Expel, Fidelis Security, Gurucul, Loginsoft, OctoXLabs, Seceon Inc, Simbian, Tenzir, Teramind Inc., ThreatDefence, UncommonX, WitFoo

Buyer reviewsUI-14 — verified-buyer reviewsWritten only by domain-verified buyers at other companies, attributed to their company domain (never their identity), and moderated. Buyer-sourced opinion, clearly separate from the neutral catalog facts above — and never an input to search or comparison ordering.

verified buyers only

No buyer reviews yet.

Reputation ratingUI-20 — anonymous ratingA single anonymous 5-star signal from buyers, resellers, and analysts who've engaged with this vendor — separate from the domain-attributed reviews above. No rater identity is ever shown, not even at company level.

anonymous

No ratings in this window yet.

Family protection suite with antivirus, VPN, identity monitoring & coverage AI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →

CVE severity over timeUI-24 — CVE severity timelineEvery known CVE with a disclosure date and severity, plotted by when it was published — lets you see whether disclosures are trending toward more or less severe, not just a raw count. Same NVD-sourced, name-matched data as the list below.

LOWMEDIUMHIGHCRITICAL2000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012CVE-2012-4588 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2012-08-22CVE-2012-4587 · LOW 3.5 · 2012-08-22CVE-2012-4586 · LOW 3.5 · 2012-08-22CVE-2012-4585 · MEDIUM 4.0 · 2012-08-22CVE-2012-4584 · LOW 3.5 · 2012-08-22CVE-2012-4583 · MEDIUM 4.0 · 2012-08-22CVE-2012-4582 · MEDIUM 4.9 · 2012-08-22CVE-2012-4581 · MEDIUM 6.8 · 2012-08-22CVE-2012-4580 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2012-08-22CVE-2011-5101 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2012-08-22CVE-2011-5100 · HIGH 7.5 · 2012-08-22CVE-2010-5143 · LOW 2.6 · 2012-08-22CVE-2010-3496 · MEDIUM 6.4 · 2012-08-22CVE-2009-5118 · HIGH 9.3 · 2012-08-22CVE-2009-5117 · LOW 1.9 · 2012-08-22CVE-2009-5116 · MEDIUM 6.5 · 2012-08-22CVE-2009-5115 · MEDIUM 6.5 · 2012-08-22CVE-2012-2212 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2012-04-28CVE-2012-1463 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2012-03-21CVE-2012-1461 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2012-03-21CVE-2012-1459 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2012-03-21CVE-2012-1457 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2012-03-21CVE-2012-1456 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2012-03-21CVE-2012-1454 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2012-03-21CVE-2012-1453 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2012-03-21CVE-2012-1446 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2012-03-21CVE-2012-1443 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2012-03-21CVE-2012-1442 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2012-03-21CVE-2012-1431 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2012-03-21CVE-2012-1430 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2012-03-21CVE-2012-1429 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2012-03-21CVE-2012-1425 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2012-03-21CVE-2011-3007 · MEDIUM 6.8 · 2011-08-11CVE-2011-3006 · MEDIUM 6.8 · 2011-08-11CVE-2010-2290 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2010-06-15CVE-2010-2116 · MEDIUM 6.5 · 2010-05-29CVE-2009-3566 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2009-11-13CVE-2009-3565 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2009-11-13CVE-2009-3339 · HIGH 7.8 · 2009-09-24CVE-2008-7020 · LOW 2.1 · 2009-08-21CVE-2009-1491 · HIGH 9.3 · 2009-05-05CVE-2009-1348 · HIGH 7.6 · 2009-05-01CVE-2008-5257 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2008-11-27CVE-2008-3605 · MEDIUM 6.8 · 2008-08-12CVE-2008-1855 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2008-04-16CVE-2008-1357 · MEDIUM 5.4 · 2008-03-17CVE-2008-0127 · HIGH 8.8 · 2008-01-10CVE-2007-2957 · HIGH 9.3 · 2007-11-01CVE-2006-5273 · HIGH 7.6 · 2007-07-12CVE-2006-5271 · HIGH 7.6 · 2007-07-12CVE-2006-5272 · HIGH 7.5 · 2007-07-12CVE-2006-5274 · HIGH 7.6 · 2007-07-12CVE-2007-2584 · HIGH 10.0 · 2007-05-10CVE-2007-2152 · HIGH 7.9 · 2007-04-19CVE-2007-2151 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2007-04-19CVE-2007-1538 · HIGH 7.5 · 2007-03-21CVE-2007-1498 · HIGH 9.3 · 2007-03-17CVE-2007-1226 · MEDIUM 4.1 · 2007-03-03CVE-2007-1227 · MEDIUM 6.6 · 2007-03-03CVE-2006-6707 · HIGH 7.5 · 2006-12-23CVE-2006-6474 · MEDIUM 4.6 · 2006-12-15CVE-2006-5417 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2006-10-20CVE-2006-5156 · HIGH 10.0 · 2006-10-05CVE-2006-4886 · LOW 3.7 · 2006-09-20CVE-2006-3961 · MEDIUM 6.8 · 2006-08-02CVE-2006-3623 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2006-07-18CVE-2006-3575 · LOW 2.1 · 2006-07-13CVE-2006-0559 · HIGH 10.0 · 2006-04-04CVE-2006-0982 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2006-03-03CVE-2005-4505 · HIGH 7.2 · 2005-12-23CVE-2005-3657 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2005-12-21CVE-2005-3377 · MEDIUM 5.1 · 2005-10-30CVE-2005-3215 · MEDIUM 5.1 · 2005-10-14CVE-2005-2186 · LOW 1.9 · 2005-07-11CVE-2005-2188 · HIGH 7.5 · 2005-07-11CVE-2005-2187 · MEDIUM 4.6 · 2005-07-11CVE-2005-0644 · HIGH 7.5 · 2005-05-02CVE-2005-0643 · HIGH 7.5 · 2005-05-02CVE-2005-1107 · HIGH 7.2 · 2005-04-18CVE-2004-0932 · HIGH 7.5 · 2005-01-27CVE-2004-1094 · HIGH 10.0 · 2005-01-10CVE-2004-1906 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2004-12-31CVE-2004-2635 · HIGH 7.5 · 2004-12-31CVE-2004-1908 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2004-12-31CVE-2004-0831 · HIGH 7.2 · 2004-09-14CVE-2004-0038 · HIGH 7.5 · 2004-06-14CVE-2004-0095 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2004-02-17CVE-2003-0149 · HIGH 7.5 · 2003-08-27CVE-2003-0616 · HIGH 7.5 · 2003-08-27CVE-2003-0610 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2003-08-27CVE-2003-0148 · HIGH 7.2 · 2003-08-27CVE-2002-0690 · HIGH 10.0 · 2003-04-11CVE-2002-2282 · MEDIUM 6.9 · 2002-12-31CVE-2001-0612 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2001-08-22CVE-2001-1144 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2001-07-11CVE-2000-1129 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2001-01-09CVE-2000-1130 · HIGH 7.5 · 2001-01-09CVE-2000-1128 · MEDIUM 4.6 · 2001-01-09CVE-2000-0502 · LOW 2.1 · 2000-06-08CVE-2000-0119 · HIGH 7.2 · 1999-12-22

Known CVEs (100)About this listSourced from the public NVD database, matched by vendor name. This is a name-based match, not exact version tracking — always check the linked NVD record for affected versions before drawing conclusions. “New” means published within the last 30 days. “Actively exploited” means CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog confirms real-world exploitation, not just a theoretical severity score.

RSS ⇢
  • CVE-2012-4588 ↗MEDIUM 4.32012

    McAfee Enterprise Mobility Manager (EMM) Agent before 4.8 and Server before 10.1 record all invalid usernames presented in failed login attempts, and place them on a list of accounts that an administr…

  • CVE-2012-4587 ↗LOW 3.52012

    McAfee Enterprise Mobility Manager (EMM) Agent before 4.8 and Server before 10.1, when one-time provisioning (OTP) mode is enabled, have an improper dependency on DNS SRV records, which makes it easie…

  • CVE-2012-4586 ↗LOW 3.52012

    McAfee Email and Web Security (EWS) 5.x before 5.5 Patch 6 and 5.6 before Patch 3, and McAfee Email Gateway (MEG) 7.0 before Patch 1, accesses files with the privileges of the root user, which allows …

  • CVE-2012-4585 ↗MEDIUM 4.02012

    McAfee Email and Web Security (EWS) 5.x before 5.5 Patch 6 and 5.6 before Patch 3, and McAfee Email Gateway (MEG) 7.0 before Patch 1, allows remote authenticated users to read arbitrary files via a cr…

  • CVE-2012-4584 ↗LOW 3.52012

    McAfee Email and Web Security (EWS) 5.x before 5.5 Patch 6 and 5.6 before Patch 3, and McAfee Email Gateway (MEG) 7.0 before Patch 1, does not properly encrypt system-backup data, which makes it easie…

  • CVE-2012-4583 ↗MEDIUM 4.02012

    McAfee Email and Web Security (EWS) 5.x before 5.5 Patch 6 and 5.6 before Patch 3, and McAfee Email Gateway (MEG) 7.0 before Patch 1, allows remote authenticated users to obtain the session tokens of …

  • CVE-2012-4582 ↗MEDIUM 4.92012

    McAfee Email and Web Security (EWS) 5.x before 5.5 Patch 6 and 5.6 before Patch 3, and McAfee Email Gateway (MEG) 7.0 before Patch 1, allows remote authenticated users to reset the passwords of arbitr…

  • CVE-2012-4581 ↗MEDIUM 6.82012

    McAfee Email and Web Security (EWS) 5.x before 5.5 Patch 6 and 5.6 before Patch 3, and McAfee Email Gateway (MEG) 7.0 before Patch 1, does not disable the server-side session token upon the closing of…

  • CVE-2012-4580 ↗MEDIUM 4.32012

    Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in McAfee Email and Web Security (EWS) 5.x before 5.5 Patch 6 and 5.6 before Patch 3, and McAfee Email Gateway (MEG) 7.0 before Patch 1, allows remote attacker…

  • CVE-2011-5101 ↗MEDIUM 5.02012

    The Rumor technology in McAfee SaaS Endpoint Protection before 5.2.4 allows remote attackers to relay e-mail messages via unspecified vectors, as demonstrated by relaying spam.

  • CVE-2011-5100 ↗HIGH 7.52012

    The web interface in McAfee Firewall Reporter before 5.1.0.13 does not properly implement cookie authentication, which allows remote attackers to obtain access, and disable anti-virus functionality, v…

  • CVE-2010-5143 ↗LOW 2.62012

    McAfee VirusScan Enterprise before 8.8 allows local users to disable the product by leveraging administrative privileges to execute an unspecified Metasploit Framework module.

  • CVE-2010-3496 ↗MEDIUM 6.42012

    McAfee VirusScan Enterprise 8.5i and 8.7i does not properly interact with the processing of hcp:// URLs by the Microsoft Help and Support Center, which makes it easier for remote attackers to execute …

  • CVE-2009-5118 ↗HIGH 9.32012

    Untrusted search path vulnerability in McAfee VirusScan Enterprise before 8.7i allows local users to gain privileges via a Trojan horse DLL in an unspecified directory, as demonstrated by scanning a d…

  • CVE-2009-5117 ↗LOW 1.92012

    The Web Post Protection feature in McAfee Host Data Loss Prevention (DLP) 3.x before 3.0.100.10 and 9.x before 9.0.0.422, when HTTP Capture mode is enabled, allows local users to obtain sensitive info…

  • CVE-2009-5116 ↗MEDIUM 6.52012

    McAfee LinuxShield 1.5.1 and earlier does not properly implement client authentication, which allows remote authenticated users to obtain Admin access to the statistics server by leveraging a client a…

  • CVE-2009-5115 ↗MEDIUM 6.52012

    McAfee Common Management Agent (CMA) 3.5.5 through 3.5.5.588 and 3.6.0 through 3.6.0.608, and McAfee Agent 4.0 before Patch 3, allows remote authenticated users to overwrite arbitrary files by accessi…

  • CVE-2012-2212 ↗MEDIUM 5.02012

    McAfee Web Gateway 7.0 allows remote attackers to bypass the access configuration for the CONNECT method by providing an arbitrary allowed hostname in the Host HTTP header. NOTE: this issue might not…

  • CVE-2012-1463 ↗MEDIUM 4.32012

    The ELF file parser in AhnLab V3 Internet Security 2011.01.18.00, Bitdefender 7.2, Quick Heal (aka Cat QuickHeal) 11.00, Command Antivirus 5.2.11.5, Comodo Antivirus 7424, eSafe 7.0.17.0, F-Prot Antiv…

  • CVE-2012-1461 ↗MEDIUM 4.32012

    The Gzip file parser in AVG Anti-Virus 10.0.0.1190, Bitdefender 7.2, Command Antivirus 5.2.11.5, Emsisoft Anti-Malware 5.1.0.1, F-Secure Anti-Virus 9.0.16160.0, Fortinet Antivirus 4.2.254.0, Ikarus Vi…

  • …and 80 more

Competitors (12)

full alternatives comparison →
360 Security Group (Qihoo 360)AbatisAbsoluteAcme Security EDRAcronis International GmbHAction1AdawareAgileBlueAhnLabAI EdgeLabsAntiy LabsApozy

Products (1)

Endpoint Detection & Response

1
  • McAfee McAfee+™ Ultimate FamilyAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Family protection suite with antivirus, VPN, identity monitoring & coverage