Skip to main content
0-Doubt
NewsInvestorsQuestionnairesDeveloperHelp
AnonymousSign in
0-Doubt — neutral IT/Security research
BrowseResellersCertified analystsRFI/RFP questionnairesHow trust worksHelp & FAQAPI
  1. Home/
  2. ORION

ORION

enriched
Data Loss Prevention

orionsec.io ↗ · required email domain for this vendor's users

Do you work at ORION?

This profile was built from public sources and hasn't been claimed yet. Claiming it lets you correct what's wrong and add details only you can confirm — and marks that information as vendor-verified for buyers.

Free, and it does not affect ranking, placement, or comparison results. The first person verified on ORION's email domain becomes the profile admin.

Claim this profileAlready have an account?

Trust profileHow to read thisFive separate questions a buyer actually asks, each answered with its own evidence and a link to the source. There is deliberately no overall score: a single number invites comparison it cannot support, and would mostly reflect how much of ORION we have managed to scan rather than anything about the vendor.

Not checked means we have not looked yet, and is never counted against a vendor. Limited means we did look, but found only one line of evidence — enough to report, not enough to corroborate.

checked 6 of 16 signals
  • Limited

    Independently verified

    Has anyone other than the vendor confirmed this?

    checked 3 of 4

    Nothing here has been confirmed by an independent third party yet.

    • No third-party certifications found
    • Profile not claimed by the vendor
  • Limited

    Operating durability

    Is this a real, durable business?

    checked 2 of 4

    How long this vendor has been operating, and who stands behind them.

    • Headquarters location not disclosed on their site
  • Mixed

    Behaviour under stress

    What do they do when something goes wrong?

    checked 1 of 3

    What their public record shows about handling vulnerabilities and outages.

    • 18 published CVE(s) — a public disclosure record exists
    • 1 rated critical
  • Not checked

    Disclosure posture

    Do they tell you the awkward things unprompted?

    checked 0 of 3

    We have not checked what this vendor discloses publicly yet.

    Nothing checked here yet — this is not a mark against ORION.

  • Not checked

    Momentum

    Are they still shipping, or coasting?

    checked 0 of 2

    We have not tracked this vendor's release activity yet.

    Nothing checked here yet — this is not a mark against ORION.

Data coverage: 13/100What this measures (and doesn't)

Not a quality rating or endorsement — a measure of how much verified, disclosed data we actually have about this vendor. A low score usually means "we don't have much verified information yet," not "this is a bad vendor." Never used to sort or rank vendor lists.

Verification depth0/100
Security signal0/100
Buyer feedbackno data yet (0 reviews so far)
Profile completeness13/100
claim · HQ · materials · screenshots · integrations · certifications · security check

The platform admin controls the formula's weights.

Data coverage profileHow to read thisThe same four components behind the data coverage score above, shaped instead of listed — a vendor strong on verification but thin on buyer feedback looks visibly different from one that's the other way around. Security and feedback plot at the neutral midpoint (50) when there's no data yet (no products tracked, no reviews), matching how the actual score itself treats missing data — not a guess either way.

VerificationSecurityFeedbackCompletenessThis vendor — Verification: 0This vendor — Security: 0This vendor — Feedback: no data yetThis vendor — Completeness: 13

IntegrationsUI-12 — integration graphDetected from this vendor's own published integration/partner pages by the enrichment loop — each entry links the exact page it was found on. Directional: "integrates with" is claimed by this vendor; "integrated by" is claimed by the other vendor's site. Coverage grows as the scan progresses.

1 detected

Integrated by: Torq

Buyer reviewsUI-14 — verified-buyer reviewsWritten only by domain-verified buyers at other companies, attributed to their company domain (never their identity), and moderated. Buyer-sourced opinion, clearly separate from the neutral catalog facts above — and never an input to search or comparison ordering.

verified buyers only

No buyer reviews yet.

Reputation ratingUI-20 — anonymous ratingA single anonymous 5-star signal from buyers, resellers, and analysts who've engaged with this vendor — separate from the domain-attributed reviews above. No rater identity is ever shown, not even at company level.

anonymous

No ratings in this window yet.

Autonomous, context-aware, agentic data loss prevention AI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →

CVE severity over timeUI-24 — CVE severity timelineEvery known CVE with a disclosure date and severity, plotted by when it was published — lets you see whether disclosures are trending toward more or less severe, not just a raw count. Same NVD-sourced, name-matched data as the list below.

LOWMEDIUMHIGHCRITICAL20032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019CVE-2019-8917 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2019-02-19CVE-2015-8355 · HIGH 8.8 · 2017-08-25CVE-2012-6660 · HIGH 10.0 · 2015-08-04CVE-2014-9566 · HIGH 7.5 · 2015-03-10CVE-2013-2822 · MEDIUM 4.7 · 2013-12-21CVE-2013-2821 · HIGH 7.1 · 2013-12-21CVE-2013-4883 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2013-07-22CVE-2012-4939 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2012-10-31CVE-2012-2602 · MEDIUM 6.8 · 2012-08-12CVE-2012-2577 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2012-08-12CVE-2010-4828 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2011-08-24CVE-2009-4493 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2010-01-14CVE-2007-1471 · HIGH 7.5 · 2007-03-17CVE-2006-0816 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2006-03-24CVE-2005-2981 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2005-09-20CVE-2004-1492 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2004-12-31CVE-2004-1493 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2004-12-31CVE-2002-1859 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2002-12-31

Known CVEs (18)About this listSourced from the public NVD database, matched by vendor name. This is a name-based match, not exact version tracking — always check the linked NVD record for affected versions before drawing conclusions. “New” means published within the last 30 days. “Actively exploited” means CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog confirms real-world exploitation, not just a theoretical severity score.

RSS ⇢
  • CVE-2019-8917 ↗CRITICAL 9.82019

    SolarWinds Orion NPM before 12.4 suffers from a SYSTEM remote code execution vulnerability in the OrionModuleEngine service. This service establishes a NetTcpBinding endpoint that allows remote, unaut…

  • CVE-2015-8355 ↗HIGH 8.82017

    Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in the orion.extfeedbackform module before 2.1.3 for Bitrix allow remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the (1) order or (2) "by" para…

  • CVE-2012-6660 ↗HIGH 10.02015

    GE Healthcare Precision MPi has a password of (1) orion for the serviceapp user, (2) orion for the clinical operator user, and (3) PlatinumOne for the administrator user, which has unspecified impact …

  • CVE-2014-9566 ↗HIGH 7.52015

    Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in the Manage Accounts page in the AccountManagement.asmx service in the Solarwinds Orion Platform 2015.1, as used in Network Performance Monitor (NPM) before 11…

  • CVE-2013-2822 ↗MEDIUM 4.72013

    NovaTech Orion Substation Automation Platform OrionLX DNP Master 1.27.38 and DNP Slave 1.23.10 and earlier and Orion5/Orion5r DNP Master 1.27.38 and DNP Slave 1.23.10 and earlier allow physically prox…

  • CVE-2013-2821 ↗HIGH 7.12013

    NovaTech Orion Substation Automation Platform OrionLX DNP Master 1.27.38 and DNP Slave 1.23.10 and earlier and Orion5/Orion5r DNP Master 1.27.38 and DNP Slave 1.23.10 and earlier allow remote attacker…

  • CVE-2013-4883 ↗MEDIUM 4.32013

    Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator 4.6.6 and earlier, and the ePO Extension for the McAfee Agent (MA) 4.5 through 4.6, allow remote attackers to inject …

  • CVE-2012-4939 ↗MEDIUM 4.32012

    Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in IPAMSummaryView.aspx in the IPAM web interface before 3.0-HotFix1 in SolarWinds Orion Network Performance Monitor might allow remote attackers to inject arb…

  • CVE-2012-2602 ↗MEDIUM 6.82012

    Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in SolarWinds Orion Network Performance Monitor (NPM) before 10.3.1 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for…

  • CVE-2012-2577 ↗MEDIUM 4.32012

    Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in SolarWinds Orion Network Performance Monitor (NPM) before 10.3.1 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) sysloc…

  • CVE-2010-4828 ↗MEDIUM 4.32011

    Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in SolarWinds Orion Network Performance Monitor (NPM) 10.1 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) Title parameter…

  • CVE-2009-4493 ↗MEDIUM 5.02010

    Orion Application Server 2.0.7 writes data to a log file without sanitizing non-printable characters, which might allow remote attackers to modify a window's title, or possibly execute arbitrary comma…

  • CVE-2007-1471 ↗HIGH 7.52007

    admin/default.asp in Orion-Blog 2.0 allows remote attackers to bypass authentication controls and gain privileges via a direct URL request for admin/AdminBlogNewsEdit.asp.

  • CVE-2006-0816 ↗MEDIUM 5.02006

    Orion Application Server before 2.0.7, when running on Windows, allows remote attackers to obtain the source code of JSP files via (1) . (dot) and (2) space characters in the extension of a URL.

  • CVE-2005-2981 ↗MEDIUM 4.32005

    Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Orion 1.3.8 and 1.4.5 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the URL, which is not properly quoted in the resulting 404 error pa…

  • CVE-2004-1492 ↗MEDIUM 5.02004

    Master of Orion III 1.2.5 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (game exit) via a data packet that contains a large size specifier, which causes a large memory allocation to…

  • CVE-2004-1493 ↗MEDIUM 5.02004

    Master of Orion III 1.2.5 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (server crash) via multiple connections with long nicknames, possibly triggering a buffer overflow.

  • CVE-2002-1859 ↗MEDIUM 5.02002

    Orion Application Server 1.5.3, when running on Windows, allows remote attackers to retrieve files in the WEB-INF directory, which contains Java class files and configuration information, via a reques…

Competitors (12)

full alternatives comparison →
Acronis International GmbHActifileAnySecuraArray NetworksAtakamaBeachhead SolutionsBlanccoBold SecurityBonfyBroadcomCalamuCato Networks

Products (1)

Data Loss Prevention

1
  • ORION - DLP Beyond PoliciesAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Autonomous, context-aware, agentic data loss prevention