Skip to main content
0-Doubt
NewsInvestorsQuestionnairesDeveloperHelp
AnonymousSign in
0-Doubt — neutral IT/Security research
BrowseResellersCertified analystsRFI/RFP questionnairesHow trust worksHelp & FAQAPI
  1. Home/
  2. Riot

Riot

enriched
GRC & Compliance Automation

tryriot.com ↗ · required email domain for this vendor's users

Do you work at Riot?

This profile was built from public sources and hasn't been claimed yet. Claiming it lets you correct what's wrong and add details only you can confirm — and marks that information as vendor-verified for buyers.

Free, and it does not affect ranking, placement, or comparison results. The first person verified on Riot's email domain becomes the profile admin.

Claim this profileAlready have an account?

Trust profileHow to read thisFive separate questions a buyer actually asks, each answered with its own evidence and a link to the source. There is deliberately no overall score: a single number invites comparison it cannot support, and would mostly reflect how much of Riot we have managed to scan rather than anything about the vendor.

Not checked means we have not looked yet, and is never counted against a vendor. Limited means we did look, but found only one line of evidence — enough to report, not enough to corroborate.

checked 6 of 16 signals
  • Limited

    Independently verified

    Has anyone other than the vendor confirmed this?

    checked 3 of 4

    Nothing here has been confirmed by an independent third party yet.

    • No third-party certifications found
    • Profile not claimed by the vendor
  • Limited

    Operating durability

    Is this a real, durable business?

    checked 2 of 4

    How long this vendor has been operating, and who stands behind them.

    • Headquarters location not disclosed on their site
  • Mixed

    Behaviour under stress

    What do they do when something goes wrong?

    checked 1 of 3

    What their public record shows about handling vulnerabilities and outages.

    • 18 published CVE(s) — a public disclosure record exists
    • 6 rated critical
  • Not checked

    Disclosure posture

    Do they tell you the awkward things unprompted?

    checked 0 of 3

    We have not checked what this vendor discloses publicly yet.

    Nothing checked here yet — this is not a mark against Riot.

  • Not checked

    Momentum

    Are they still shipping, or coasting?

    checked 0 of 2

    We have not tracked this vendor's release activity yet.

    Nothing checked here yet — this is not a mark against Riot.

Data coverage: 10/100What this measures (and doesn't)

Not a quality rating or endorsement — a measure of how much verified, disclosed data we actually have about this vendor. A low score usually means "we don't have much verified information yet," not "this is a bad vendor." Never used to sort or rank vendor lists.

Verification depth0/100
Security signal0/100
Buyer feedbackno data yet (0 reviews so far)
Profile completeness0/100
claim · HQ · materials · screenshots · integrations · certifications · security check

The platform admin controls the formula's weights.

Data coverage profileHow to read thisThe same four components behind the data coverage score above, shaped instead of listed — a vendor strong on verification but thin on buyer feedback looks visibly different from one that's the other way around. Security and feedback plot at the neutral midpoint (50) when there's no data yet (no products tracked, no reviews), matching how the actual score itself treats missing data — not a guess either way.

VerificationSecurityFeedbackCompletenessThis vendor — Verification: 0This vendor — Security: 0This vendor — Feedback: no data yetThis vendor — Completeness: 0

Buyer reviewsUI-14 — verified-buyer reviewsWritten only by domain-verified buyers at other companies, attributed to their company domain (never their identity), and moderated. Buyer-sourced opinion, clearly separate from the neutral catalog facts above — and never an input to search or comparison ordering.

verified buyers only

No buyer reviews yet.

Reputation ratingUI-20 — anonymous ratingA single anonymous 5-star signal from buyers, resellers, and analysts who've engaged with this vendor — separate from the domain-attributed reviews above. No rater identity is ever shown, not even at company level.

anonymous

No ratings in this window yet.

Employee security posture mgmt platform with awareness training & scoring. AI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →

CVE severity over timeUI-24 — CVE severity timelineEvery known CVE with a disclosure date and severity, plotted by when it was published — lets you see whether disclosures are trending toward more or less severe, not just a raw count. Same NVD-sourced, name-matched data as the list below.

LOWMEDIUMHIGHCRITICAL2018201920202021CVE-2021-41061 · MEDIUM 5.5 · 2021-09-15CVE-2021-31664 · HIGH 7.5 · 2021-06-19CVE-2021-31663 · HIGH 7.5 · 2021-06-19CVE-2021-31662 · HIGH 7.5 · 2021-06-19CVE-2021-31661 · HIGH 7.5 · 2021-06-19CVE-2021-31660 · HIGH 7.5 · 2021-06-19CVE-2021-27698 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2021-04-06CVE-2021-27697 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2021-04-06CVE-2021-27357 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2021-04-06CVE-2020-15350 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2020-07-07CVE-2020-1627 · HIGH 7.5 · 2020-04-09CVE-2019-17389 · HIGH 7.5 · 2019-10-09CVE-2019-16754 · HIGH 7.5 · 2019-09-24CVE-2019-15702 · HIGH 7.5 · 2019-08-27CVE-2019-15134 · HIGH 7.5 · 2019-08-17CVE-2019-1000006 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2019-02-05CVE-2016-10527 · HIGH 7.5 · 2018-06-01CVE-2017-8289 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2017-04-27

Known CVEs (18)About this listSourced from the public NVD database, matched by vendor name. This is a name-based match, not exact version tracking — always check the linked NVD record for affected versions before drawing conclusions. “New” means published within the last 30 days. “Actively exploited” means CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog confirms real-world exploitation, not just a theoretical severity score.

RSS ⇢
  • CVE-2021-41061 ↗MEDIUM 5.52021

    In RIOT-OS 2021.01, nonce reuse in 802.15.4 encryption in the ieee820154_security component allows attackers to break encryption by triggering reboots.

  • CVE-2021-31664 ↗HIGH 7.52021

    RIOT-OS 2021.01 before commit 44741ff99f7a71df45420635b238b9c22093647a contains a buffer overflow which could allow attackers to obtain sensitive information.

  • CVE-2021-31663 ↗HIGH 7.52021

    RIOT-OS 2021.01 before commit bc59d60be60dfc0a05def57d74985371e4f22d79 contains a buffer overflow which could allow attackers to obtain sensitive information.

  • CVE-2021-31662 ↗HIGH 7.52021

    RIOT-OS 2021.01 before commit 07f1254d8537497552e7dce80364aaead9266bbe contains a buffer overflow which could allow attackers to obtain sensitive information.

  • CVE-2021-31661 ↗HIGH 7.52021

    RIOT-OS 2021.01 before commit 609c9ada34da5546cffb632a98b7ba157c112658 contains a buffer overflow that could allow attackers to obtain sensitive information.

  • CVE-2021-31660 ↗HIGH 7.52021

    RIOT-OS 2021.01 before commit 85da504d2dc30188b89f44c3276fc5a25b31251f contains a buffer overflow which could allow attackers to obtain sensitive information.

  • CVE-2021-27698 ↗CRITICAL 9.82021

    RIOT-OS 2021.01 contains a buffer overflow vulnerability in /sys/net/gnrc/routing/rpl/gnrc_rpl_control_messages.c through the _parse_options() function.

  • CVE-2021-27697 ↗CRITICAL 9.82021

    RIOT-OS 2021.01 contains a buffer overflow vulnerability in sys/net/gnrc/routing/rpl/gnrc_rpl_validation.c through the gnrc_rpl_validation_options() function.

  • CVE-2021-27357 ↗CRITICAL 9.82021

    RIOT-OS 2020.01 contains a buffer overflow vulnerability in /sys/net/gnrc/routing/rpl/gnrc_rpl_control_messages.c.

  • CVE-2020-15350 ↗CRITICAL 9.82020

    RIOT 2020.04 has a buffer overflow in the base64 decoder. The decoding function base64_decode() uses an output buffer estimation function to compute the required buffer capacity and validate against t…

  • CVE-2020-1627 ↗HIGH 7.52020

    A vulnerability in Juniper Networks Junos OS on vMX and MX150 devices may allow an attacker to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending specific packets requiring special processing in microcode tha…

  • CVE-2019-17389 ↗HIGH 7.52019

    In RIOT 2019.07, the MQTT-SN implementation (asymcute) mishandles errors occurring during a read operation on a UDP socket. The receive loop ends. This allows an attacker (via a large packet) to preve…

  • CVE-2019-16754 ↗HIGH 7.52019

    RIOT 2019.07 contains a NULL pointer dereference in the MQTT-SN implementation (asymcute), potentially allowing an attacker to crash a network node running RIOT. This requires spoofing an MQTT server …

  • CVE-2019-15702 ↗HIGH 7.52019

    In the TCP implementation (gnrc_tcp) in RIOT through 2019.07, the parser for TCP options does not terminate on all inputs, allowing a denial-of-service, because sys/net/gnrc/transport_layer/tcp/gnrc_t…

  • CVE-2019-15134 ↗HIGH 7.52019

    RIOT through 2019.07 contains a memory leak in the TCP implementation (gnrc_tcp), allowing an attacker to consume all memory available for network packets and thus effectively stopping all network thr…

  • CVE-2019-1000006 ↗CRITICAL 9.82019

    RIOT RIOT-OS version after commit 7af03ab624db0412c727eed9ab7630a5282e2fd3 contains a Buffer Overflow vulnerability in sock_dns, an implementation of the DNS protocol utilizing the RIOT sock API that …

  • CVE-2016-10527 ↗HIGH 7.52018

    The riot-compiler version version 2.3.21 has an issue in a regex (Catastrophic Backtracking) thats make it unusable under certain conditions.

  • CVE-2017-8289 ↗CRITICAL 9.82017

    Stack-based buffer overflow in the ipv6_addr_from_str function in sys/net/network_layer/ipv6/addr/ipv6_addr_from_str.c in RIOT prior to 2017-04-25 allows local attackers, and potentially remote attack…

Competitors (12)

full alternatives comparison →
3rdcomply3rdRisk Solutions B.V.6clicksA-LIGNAcuity Risk ManagementAdaptive SecurityAirrivedAllgressAmpcusAmplifier SecurityAnecdotesAnitian

Products (1)

GRC & Compliance Automation

1
  • RiotAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Employee security posture mgmt platform with awareness training & scoring.