Skip to main content
0-Doubt
NewsInvestorsQuestionnairesDeveloperHelp
AnonymousSign in
0-Doubt — neutral IT/Security research
BrowseResellersCertified analystsRFI/RFP questionnairesHow trust worksHelp & FAQAPI
  1. Home/
  2. Scanner

Scanner

enriched
SIEM

scanner.dev ↗ · required email domain for this vendor's users

Do you work at Scanner?

This profile was built from public sources and hasn't been claimed yet. Claiming it lets you correct what's wrong and add details only you can confirm — and marks that information as vendor-verified for buyers.

Free, and it does not affect ranking, placement, or comparison results. The first person verified on Scanner's email domain becomes the profile admin.

Claim this profileAlready have an account?

Trust profileHow to read thisFive separate questions a buyer actually asks, each answered with its own evidence and a link to the source. There is deliberately no overall score: a single number invites comparison it cannot support, and would mostly reflect how much of Scanner we have managed to scan rather than anything about the vendor.

Not checked means we have not looked yet, and is never counted against a vendor. Limited means we did look, but found only one line of evidence — enough to report, not enough to corroborate.

checked 6 of 16 signals
  • Limited

    Independently verified

    Has anyone other than the vendor confirmed this?

    checked 3 of 4

    Nothing here has been confirmed by an independent third party yet.

    • No third-party certifications found
    • Profile not claimed by the vendor
  • Limited

    Operating durability

    Is this a real, durable business?

    checked 2 of 4

    How long this vendor has been operating, and who stands behind them.

    • Headquarters location not disclosed on their site
  • Mixed

    Behaviour under stress

    What do they do when something goes wrong?

    checked 1 of 3

    What their public record shows about handling vulnerabilities and outages.

    • 18 published CVE(s) — a public disclosure record exists
    • 1 rated critical
  • Not checked

    Disclosure posture

    Do they tell you the awkward things unprompted?

    checked 0 of 3

    We have not checked what this vendor discloses publicly yet.

    Nothing checked here yet — this is not a mark against Scanner.

  • Not checked

    Momentum

    Are they still shipping, or coasting?

    checked 0 of 2

    We have not tracked this vendor's release activity yet.

    Nothing checked here yet — this is not a mark against Scanner.

Data coverage: 10/100What this measures (and doesn't)

Not a quality rating or endorsement — a measure of how much verified, disclosed data we actually have about this vendor. A low score usually means "we don't have much verified information yet," not "this is a bad vendor." Never used to sort or rank vendor lists.

Verification depth0/100
Security signal0/100
Buyer feedbackno data yet (0 reviews so far)
Profile completeness0/100
claim · HQ · materials · screenshots · integrations · certifications · security check

The platform admin controls the formula's weights.

Data coverage profileHow to read thisThe same four components behind the data coverage score above, shaped instead of listed — a vendor strong on verification but thin on buyer feedback looks visibly different from one that's the other way around. Security and feedback plot at the neutral midpoint (50) when there's no data yet (no products tracked, no reviews), matching how the actual score itself treats missing data — not a guess either way.

VerificationSecurityFeedbackCompletenessThis vendor — Verification: 0This vendor — Security: 0This vendor — Feedback: no data yetThis vendor — Completeness: 0

Buyer reviewsUI-14 — verified-buyer reviewsWritten only by domain-verified buyers at other companies, attributed to their company domain (never their identity), and moderated. Buyer-sourced opinion, clearly separate from the neutral catalog facts above — and never an input to search or comparison ordering.

verified buyers only

No buyer reviews yet.

Reputation ratingUI-20 — anonymous ratingA single anonymous 5-star signal from buyers, resellers, and analysts who've engaged with this vendor — separate from the domain-attributed reviews above. No rater identity is ever shown, not even at company level.

anonymous

No ratings in this window yet.

Security data lake platform for threat detection via S3-native log indexing. AI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →

CVE severity over timeUI-24 — CVE severity timelineEvery known CVE with a disclosure date and severity, plotted by when it was published — lets you see whether disclosures are trending toward more or less severe, not just a raw count. Same NVD-sourced, name-matched data as the list below.

LOWMEDIUMHIGHCRITICAL2000200120022003200420052006CVE-2006-5025 · HIGH 10.0 · 2006-09-28CVE-2006-5024 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2006-09-28CVE-2006-4438 · MEDIUM 6.4 · 2006-09-21CVE-2006-0982 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2006-03-03CVE-2005-3664 · HIGH 7.5 · 2005-11-18CVE-2005-0604 · MEDIUM 4.6 · 2005-05-02CVE-2004-0830 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2004-09-09CVE-2003-1250 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2003-12-31CVE-2002-1938 · HIGH 7.5 · 2002-12-31CVE-2002-1834 · MEDIUM 6.4 · 2002-12-31CVE-2002-1122 · HIGH 7.5 · 2002-09-24CVE-2001-0994 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2001-09-04CVE-2001-0501 · MEDIUM 4.6 · 2001-07-21CVE-2001-1360 · HIGH 7.2 · 2001-07-19CVE-2000-0144 · HIGH 7.5 · 2000-02-07CVE-1999-1512 · HIGH 10.0 · 1999-12-31CVE-2000-0033 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 1999-12-27CVE-1999-1168 · HIGH 7.2 · 1999-02-20

Known CVEs (18)About this listSourced from the public NVD database, matched by vendor name. This is a name-based match, not exact version tracking — always check the linked NVD record for affected versions before drawing conclusions. “New” means published within the last 30 days. “Actively exploited” means CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog confirms real-world exploitation, not just a theoretical severity score.

RSS ⇢
  • CVE-2006-5025 ↗HIGH 10.02006

    Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Paisterist Simple HTTP Scanner (sHTTPScanner) before 0.2 have unknown impact and attack vectors.

  • CVE-2006-5024 ↗CRITICAL 9.82006

    Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Paisterist Simple HTTP Scanner (sHTTPScanner) before 0.4 have unknown impact and attack vectors.

  • CVE-2006-4438 ↗MEDIUM 6.42006

    Heap-based buffer overflow in SpIDer for Dr.Web Scanner for Linux 4.33, and possibly earlier versions, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via an LHA archive with an extended header that…

  • CVE-2006-0982 ↗MEDIUM 5.02006

    The on-access scanner for McAfee Virex 7.7 for Macintosh, in some circumstances, might not activate when malicious content is accessed from the web browser, and might not prevent the content from bein…

  • CVE-2005-3664 ↗HIGH 7.52005

    Heap-based buffer overflow in Kaspersky Anti-Virus Engine, as used in Kaspersky Personal 5.0.227, Anti-Virus On-Demand Scanner for Linux 5.0.5, and F-Secure Anti-Virus for Linux 4.50 allows remote att…

  • CVE-2005-0604 ↗MEDIUM 4.62005

    lnss.exe in GFI Languard Network Security Scanner 5.0 stores the username and password in memory in plaintext, which could allow local administrators to obtain domain administrator credentials.

  • CVE-2004-0830 ↗MEDIUM 5.02004

    The Content Scanner Server in F-Secure Anti-Virus for Microsoft Exchange 6.21 and earlier, F-Secure Anti-Virus for Microsoft Exchange 6.01 and earlier, and F-Secure Internet Gatekeeper 6.32 and earlie…

  • CVE-2003-1250 ↗MEDIUM 5.02003

    Efficient Networks 5861 DSL router, when running firmware 5.3.80 configured to block incoming TCP SYN, packets allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a flood of TCP SYN packe…

  • CVE-2002-1938 ↗HIGH 7.52002

    Virgil CGI Scanner 0.9 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via the (1) tar (TARGET) or (2) zielport (ZIELPORT) parameters.

  • CVE-2002-1834 ↗MEDIUM 6.42002

    The default configuration of Xerox DocuTech 6110 and DocuTech 6115 allows remote attackers to connect to the web server and (1) submit print jobs directly into the "print now" queue or (2) read the sc…

  • CVE-2002-1122 ↗HIGH 7.52002

    Buffer overflow in the parsing mechanism for ISS Internet Scanner 6.2.1, when using the license banner HTTP check, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long web server response.

  • CVE-2001-0994 ↗MEDIUM 5.02001

    Marconi ForeThought 7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service by causing both telnet sessions to be locked via unusual input (e.g., from a port scanner), which prevents others from logg…

  • CVE-2001-0501 ↗MEDIUM 4.62001

    Microsoft Word 2002 and earlier allows attackers to automatically execute macros without warning the user by embedding the macros in a manner that escapes detection by the security scanner.

  • CVE-2001-1360 ↗HIGH 7.22001

    Vulnerability in Scanner Access Now Easy (SANE) before 1.0.5, related to pnm and saned.

  • CVE-2000-0144 ↗HIGH 7.52000

    Axis 700 Network Scanner does not properly restrict access to administrator URLs, which allows users to bypass the password protection via a .. (dot dot) attack.

  • CVE-1999-1512 ↗HIGH 10.01999

    The AMaViS virus scanner 0.2.0-pre4 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands as root via an infected mail message with shell metacharacters in the reply-to field.

  • CVE-2000-0033 ↗MEDIUM 5.01999

    InterScan VirusWall SMTP scanner does not properly scan messages with malformed attachments.

  • CVE-1999-1168 ↗HIGH 7.21999

    install.iss installation script for Internet Security Scanner (ISS) for Linux, version 5.3, allows local users to change the permissions of arbitrary files via a symlink attack on a temporary file.

Competitors (12)

full alternatives comparison →
Abstract SecurityAgileBlueAntiy LabsAuguriaAxoflowBlockAPTBluSapphire Cyber SystemsBluSapphire Cyber Systems Pvt LimitedCoralogixCriblCrowdStrikeDarkscope

Products (1)

SIEM

1
  • ScannerAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Security data lake platform for threat detection via S3-native log indexing.