Skip to main content
0-Doubt
NewsInvestorsQuestionnairesDeveloperHelp
AnonymousSign in
0-Doubt — neutral IT/Security research
BrowseResellersCertified analystsRFI/RFP questionnairesHow trust worksHelp & FAQAPI
  1. Home/
  2. Nozomi Networks

Nozomi Networks

enriched
CPS ProtectionOT / ICS SecurityThreat Intelligence

Represented by Carahsoft ↗, Exclusive Networks ↗

nozominetworks.com ↗ · required email domain for this vendor's users

Do you work at Nozomi Networks?

This profile was built from public sources and hasn't been claimed yet. Claiming it lets you correct what's wrong and add details only you can confirm — and marks that information as vendor-verified for buyers.

Free, and it does not affect ranking, placement, or comparison results. The first person verified on Nozomi Networks's email domain becomes the profile admin.

Claim this profileAlready have an account?

Trust profileHow to read thisFive separate questions a buyer actually asks, each answered with its own evidence and a link to the source. There is deliberately no overall score: a single number invites comparison it cannot support, and would mostly reflect how much of Nozomi Networks we have managed to scan rather than anything about the vendor.

Not checked means we have not looked yet, and is never counted against a vendor. Limited means we did look, but found only one line of evidence — enough to report, not enough to corroborate.

checked 11 of 16 signals
  • Limited

    Independently verified

    Has anyone other than the vendor confirmed this?

    checked 3 of 4

    Nothing here has been confirmed by an independent third party yet.

    • No third-party certifications found
    • Profile not claimed by the vendor
  • Limited

    Operating durability

    Is this a real, durable business?

    checked 3 of 4

    How long this vendor has been operating, and who stands behind them.

    • Domain registered 2013 — 13 years ago
    • Headquarters location not disclosed on their site
  • Mixed

    Behaviour under stress

    What do they do when something goes wrong?

    checked 2 of 3

    What their public record shows about handling vulnerabilities and outages.

    • 36 published CVE(s) — a public disclosure record exists
    • 9 rated critical
    • No public status page found
  • Limited

    Disclosure posture

    Do they tell you the awkward things unprompted?

    checked 2 of 3

    How much this vendor volunteers before you have to ask.

    • No trust center found
    • No bug bounty or vulnerability disclosure policy found
  • Limited

    Momentum

    Are they still shipping, or coasting?

    checked 1 of 2

    Whether this vendor is visibly still building.

    • Public GitHub org with 68 repositories
Data coverage: 18/100What this measures (and doesn't)

Not a quality rating or endorsement — a measure of how much verified, disclosed data we actually have about this vendor. A low score usually means "we don't have much verified information yet," not "this is a bad vendor." Never used to sort or rank vendor lists.

Verification depth0/100
Security signal0/100
Buyer feedbackno data yet (0 reviews so far)
Profile completeness38/100
claim · HQ · materials · screenshots · integrations · certifications · security check

The platform admin controls the formula's weights.

Data coverage profileHow to read thisThe same four components behind the data coverage score above, shaped instead of listed — a vendor strong on verification but thin on buyer feedback looks visibly different from one that's the other way around. Security and feedback plot at the neutral midpoint (50) when there's no data yet (no products tracked, no reviews), matching how the actual score itself treats missing data — not a guess either way.

VerificationSecurityFeedbackCompletenessThis vendor — Verification: 0This vendor — Security: 0This vendor — Feedback: no data yetThis vendor — Completeness: 38

IntegrationsUI-12 — integration graphDetected from this vendor's own published integration/partner pages by the enrichment loop — each entry links the exact page it was found on. Directional: "integrates with" is claimed by this vendor; "integrated by" is claimed by the other vendor's site. Coverage grows as the scan progresses.

16 detected

Integrates with: Dragos ↗, Fortinet ↗, Hitachi Cyber ↗, Palo Alto Networks ↗, Threat Landscape ↗

Integrated by: Critical Start, Dispel, Gigamon, Nagomi Security, Neeve, OctoXLabs, Seceon Inc, SecurityGate.io, Swimlane, UncommonX, Waterfall Security

Buyer reviewsUI-14 — verified-buyer reviewsWritten only by domain-verified buyers at other companies, attributed to their company domain (never their identity), and moderated. Buyer-sourced opinion, clearly separate from the neutral catalog facts above — and never an input to search or comparison ordering.

verified buyers only

No buyer reviews yet.

Reputation ratingUI-20 — anonymous ratingA single anonymous 5-star signal from buyers, resellers, and analysts who've engaged with this vendor — separate from the domain-attributed reviews above. No rater identity is ever shown, not even at company level.

anonymous

No ratings in this window yet.

External ratingsUI-22 — third-party ratingsAggregate rating and review count pulled directly from the source site's own published data — never the review text itself, which belongs to that site. Links go to the real page so you can read the actual reviews there.

via third-party review sites
PeerSpot: 4.3/5 (26 reviews) ↗

OT and IoT security. AI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →

Product screenshots (8)

from their products
Nozomi Networks Threat IntelligenceautoNozomi Networks Nozomi Smart PollingautoNozomi Networks Nozomi Networks PlatformautoNozomi Threat IntelligenceautoNozomi Guardian AirautoNozomi ArcautoNozomi GuardianautoNozomi Vantageauto

Security & trust signalsAbout these signalsCertifications are keyword-matched from the vendor's own public pages (each claim links to its source — verify directly before relying on it). Security headers are checked live against the vendor's homepage, re-checked every 90 days. Both are independent, automated signals, not a vendor-submitted or audited claim, and are not blended into a single score.

9 of 9 technical checks completed — not a score, just coverage

Security headers (5/5) — checked 8/13/2026

  • ✓ Strict-Transport-Security
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy
  • ✓ X-Frame-Options
  • ✓ X-Content-Type-Options
  • ✓ Referrer-Policy
  • ✕ security.txt

Infrastructure & transparency signals

GitHub (68 repos) ↗Domain since 2013

CVE severity over timeUI-24 — CVE severity timelineEvery known CVE with a disclosure date and severity, plotted by when it was published — lets you see whether disclosures are trending toward more or less severe, not just a raw count. Same NVD-sourced, name-matched data as the list below.

LOWMEDIUMHIGHCRITICAL202120222023202420252026CVE-2025-41281 · HIGH 7.8 · 2026-05-29CVE-2025-41280 · HIGH 7.8 · 2026-05-29CVE-2025-41279 · HIGH 7.2 · 2026-05-29CVE-2025-41278 · HIGH 7.8 · 2026-05-29CVE-2025-41277 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2026-05-29CVE-2025-41276 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2026-05-29CVE-2025-41275 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2026-05-29CVE-2025-41274 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2026-05-29CVE-2025-41273 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2026-05-29CVE-2025-41272 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2026-05-29CVE-2025-41271 · HIGH 7.5 · 2026-05-29CVE-2025-41270 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2026-05-29CVE-2025-41269 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2026-05-29CVE-2025-41268 · CRITICAL 9.1 · 2026-05-29CVE-2025-41267 · HIGH 7.2 · 2026-05-29CVE-2025-41266 · HIGH 7.2 · 2026-05-29CVE-2025-41265 · HIGH 7.2 · 2026-05-29CVE-2025-8075 · MEDIUM 5.4 · 2025-12-26CVE-2025-52601 · HIGH 7.8 · 2025-12-26CVE-2025-52600 · HIGH 7.2 · 2025-12-26CVE-2025-52599 · MEDIUM 6.5 · 2025-12-26CVE-2025-52598 · LOW 3.7 · 2025-12-26CVE-2024-13089 · HIGH 7.2 · 2025-06-10CVE-2024-0218 · HIGH 7.5 · 2024-04-10CVE-2023-5253 · MEDIUM 5.3 · 2024-01-15CVE-2023-32649 · HIGH 7.5 · 2023-09-19CVE-2023-2567 · HIGH 8.8 · 2023-09-19CVE-2023-29245 · HIGH 8.1 · 2023-09-19CVE-2023-23574 · HIGH 8.8 · 2023-08-09CVE-2023-22378 · HIGH 8.8 · 2023-08-09CVE-2022-4259 · HIGH 8.8 · 2023-05-04CVE-2022-0551 · HIGH 7.2 · 2022-03-24CVE-2022-0550 · HIGH 7.2 · 2022-03-24CVE-2021-26725 · HIGH 7.2 · 2021-02-23CVE-2021-26724 · HIGH 7.2 · 2021-02-23CVE-2020-7049 · HIGH 7.3 · 2020-06-30

Known CVEs (36)About this listSourced from the public NVD database, matched by vendor name. This is a name-based match, not exact version tracking — always check the linked NVD record for affected versions before drawing conclusions. “New” means published within the last 30 days. “Actively exploited” means CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog confirms real-world exploitation, not just a theoretical severity score.

RSS ⇢
  • CVE-2025-41281 ↗HIGH 7.82026

    Nozomi Networks Labs identified a CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') in Waterfall WF-500 RX Host in version 7.9.1.0 R2502171040 that all…

  • CVE-2025-41280 ↗HIGH 7.82026

    Nozomi Networks Labs identified a CWE-23: Relative Path Traversal (Zip Slip) in Waterfall WF-500 RX Host in version 7.9.1.0 R2502171040 that allows attackers with access to the TX Host to execute code…

  • CVE-2025-41279 ↗HIGH 7.22026

    Nozomi Networks Labs identified a CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') in the Administration WebUI in Waterfall WF-500 RX Host in version …

  • CVE-2025-41278 ↗HIGH 7.82026

    Nozomi Networks Labs identified a CWE-125: Out-of-bounds Read in Waterfall WF-500 RX Host in version 7.10.0.0 R2601141040 that allows attackers with access to the TX Host to execute code on the RX Hos…

  • CVE-2025-41277 ↗CRITICAL 9.82026

    Nozomi Networks Labs identified a CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') in the Console WebUI in Waterfall WF-500 TX and RX Hosts in version…

  • CVE-2025-41276 ↗CRITICAL 9.82026

    Nozomi Networks Labs identified a CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') in the Console WebUI in Waterfall WF-500 TX and RX Hosts in version…

  • CVE-2025-41275 ↗CRITICAL 9.82026

    Nozomi Networks Labs identified a CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') in the Console WebUI in Waterfall WF-500 TX and RX Hosts in version…

  • CVE-2025-41274 ↗CRITICAL 9.82026

    Nozomi Networks Labs identified a CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') in the Console WebUI in Waterfall WF-500 TX and RX Hosts in version…

  • CVE-2025-41273 ↗CRITICAL 9.82026

    Nozomi Networks Labs identified a CWE-288: Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel in the Console WebUI in Waterfall WF-500 TX and RX Hosts in version 7.9.1.0 R2502171040 that allows …

  • CVE-2025-41272 ↗CRITICAL 9.82026

    Nozomi Networks Labs identified a CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') in the Console WebUI in Waterfall WF-500 TX and RX Hosts in version…

  • CVE-2025-41271 ↗HIGH 7.52026

    Nozomi Networks Labs identified a CWE-23: Relative Path Traversal in the Console WebUI in Waterfall WF-500 TX and RX Hosts in version 7.9.1.0 R2502171040 that allows remote unauthenticated attackers t…

  • CVE-2025-41270 ↗CRITICAL 9.82026

    Nozomi Networks Labs identified a CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') in the Console WebUI in Waterfall WF-500 TX and RX Hosts in version…

  • CVE-2025-41269 ↗CRITICAL 9.82026

    Nozomi Networks Labs identified a CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') in the Console WebUI in Waterfall WF-500 TX and RX Hosts in version…

  • CVE-2025-41268 ↗CRITICAL 9.12026

    Nozomi Networks Labs identified a CWE-23: Relative Path Traversal in the Administration WebUI in Waterfall WF-500 TX and RX Hosts in version 7.9.1.0 R2502171040 that allows remote unauthenticated atta…

  • CVE-2025-41267 ↗HIGH 7.22026

    Nozomi Networks Labs identified a CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') in the Administration WebUI in Waterfall WF-500 TX Host in version …

  • CVE-2025-41266 ↗HIGH 7.22026

    Nozomi Networks Labs identified a CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') in the Administration WebUI in Waterfall WF-500 TX Host in version …

  • CVE-2025-41265 ↗HIGH 7.22026

    Nozomi Networks Labs identified a CWE-78: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') in the Administration WebUI in Waterfall WF-500 TX Host in version …

  • CVE-2025-8075 ↗MEDIUM 5.42025

    Cybersecurity Nozomi Networks Labs, a specialized security company focused on Industrial Control Systems (ICS) and OT/IoT security, has discovered that validation of incoming XML format request messag…

  • CVE-2025-52601 ↗HIGH 7.82025

    Cybersecurity Nozomi Networks Labs, a specialized security company focused on Industrial Control Systems (ICS) and OT/IoT security, has discovered a vulnerability in Device Manager that a hardcoded en…

  • CVE-2025-52600 ↗HIGH 7.22025

    Cybersecurity Nozomi Networks Labs, a specialized security company focused on Industrial Control Systems (ICS) and OT/IoT security, has discovered a vulnerability in camera video analytics that Improp…

  • …and 16 more

Competitors (12)

full alternatives comparison →
ArmisClarotyCrowdStrikeCydomeDragosGambit CyberOPSWATPhosphorus CybersecurityPlaxidityXRedinent InnovationsUpstream SecurityVicOne

Products (10)

Threat Intelligence

2
  • Nozomi Networks Threat IntelligenceAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    OT/IoT threat intelligence feed for vulnerability and malware detection
  • Nozomi Threat IntelligenceThreat intelAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Be first to know about OT and IoT zero-day vulnerabilities.

OT / ICS Security

7
  • Nozomi ArcEndpoint sensorAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Endpoint sensor extending visibility across operational endpoints.
  • Nozomi GuardianSensorAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Asset inventory and wired network visibility for OT and IoT.
  • Nozomi Guardian AirWirelessAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Visibility into the wireless communication spectrum in operational environments.
  • Nozomi Networks NOZOMI ARC™AI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Host-based security sensor for OT endpoints with threat prevention capabilities
  • Nozomi Networks Nozomi GuardianAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Passive network monitoring for OT/IoT asset visibility and threat detection
  • Nozomi Networks Nozomi Smart PollingAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Active polling add-on for OT/IoT asset discovery and configuration data
  • Nozomi VantageCloud managerAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Cloud-based OT and IoT risk management and operational resilience.

CPS Protection

1
  • Nozomi Networks Nozomi Networks PlatformAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    OT/IoT/IT asset discovery & threat detection platform for cyber-physical systems