Skip to main content
0-Doubt
NewsInvestorsQuestionnairesDeveloperHelp
AnonymousSign in
0-Doubt — neutral IT/Security research
BrowseResellersCertified analystsRFI/RFP questionnairesHow trust worksHelp & FAQAPI
  1. Home/
  2. Claroty

Claroty

enriched
CPS ProtectionOT / ICS SecuritySecure Access Service Edge (SASE/SSE)Vulnerability Management

Represented by Carahsoft ↗, Exclusive Networks ↗, Kudelski Security ↗

claroty.com ↗ · required email domain for this vendor's users

Do you work at Claroty?

This profile was built from public sources and hasn't been claimed yet. Claiming it lets you correct what's wrong and add details only you can confirm — and marks that information as vendor-verified for buyers.

Free, and it does not affect ranking, placement, or comparison results. The first person verified on Claroty's email domain becomes the profile admin.

Claim this profileAlready have an account?

Trust profileHow to read thisFive separate questions a buyer actually asks, each answered with its own evidence and a link to the source. There is deliberately no overall score: a single number invites comparison it cannot support, and would mostly reflect how much of Claroty we have managed to scan rather than anything about the vendor.

Not checked means we have not looked yet, and is never counted against a vendor. Limited means we did look, but found only one line of evidence — enough to report, not enough to corroborate.

checked 11 of 16 signals
  • Limited

    Independently verified

    Has anyone other than the vendor confirmed this?

    checked 3 of 4

    Nothing here has been confirmed by an independent third party yet.

    • No third-party certifications found
    • Profile not claimed by the vendor
  • Limited

    Operating durability

    Is this a real, durable business?

    checked 3 of 4

    How long this vendor has been operating, and who stands behind them.

    • Domain registered 2015 — 11 years ago
    • Headquarters location not disclosed on their site
  • Limited

    Behaviour under stress

    What do they do when something goes wrong?

    checked 2 of 3

    What their public record shows about handling vulnerabilities and outages.

    • 3 published CVE(s) — a public disclosure record exists
    • No public status page found
  • Limited

    Disclosure posture

    Do they tell you the awkward things unprompted?

    checked 2 of 3

    How much this vendor volunteers before you have to ask.

    • No trust center found
    • No bug bounty or vulnerability disclosure policy found
  • Limited

    Momentum

    Are they still shipping, or coasting?

    checked 1 of 2

    Whether this vendor is visibly still building.

    • Public GitHub org with 17 repositories
Data coverage: 24/100What this measures (and doesn't)

Not a quality rating or endorsement — a measure of how much verified, disclosed data we actually have about this vendor. A low score usually means "we don't have much verified information yet," not "this is a bad vendor." Never used to sort or rank vendor lists.

Verification depth0/100
Security signal30/100
Buyer feedbackno data yet (0 reviews so far)
Profile completeness25/100
claim · HQ · materials · screenshots · integrations · certifications · security check

The platform admin controls the formula's weights.

Data coverage profileHow to read thisThe same four components behind the data coverage score above, shaped instead of listed — a vendor strong on verification but thin on buyer feedback looks visibly different from one that's the other way around. Security and feedback plot at the neutral midpoint (50) when there's no data yet (no products tracked, no reviews), matching how the actual score itself treats missing data — not a guess either way.

VerificationSecurityFeedbackCompletenessThis vendor — Verification: 0This vendor — Security: 30This vendor — Feedback: no data yetThis vendor — Completeness: 25

IntegrationsUI-12 — integration graphDetected from this vendor's own published integration/partner pages by the enrichment loop — each entry links the exact page it was found on. Directional: "integrates with" is claimed by this vendor; "integrated by" is claimed by the other vendor's site. Coverage grows as the scan progresses.

53 detected

Integrates with: Akamai ↗, Axonius ↗, Check Point Software ↗, Cisco ↗, Corsha ↗, CrowdStrike ↗, Cybereason ↗, DeNexus ↗, EfficientIP ↗, Elisity ↗, Forescout ↗, Fortinet ↗, Frenos ↗, Garland Technology ↗, Gigamon ↗, Google ↗, Infoblox ↗, Ivanti ↗, Lansweeper ↗, Microsoft ↗, OneLayer ↗, OpenNAC Enterprise by Cipherbit ↗, Palo Alto Networks ↗, Qualys ↗, Rapid7 ↗, ReliaQuest ↗, Safe Security ↗, Seemplicity ↗, Sekoia.io ↗, SentinelOne ↗, ServiceNow ↗, SolarWinds ↗, Splunk ↗, Sumo Logic ↗, Tanium ↗, Tenable ↗, Tines ↗, Trend Micro ↗, VMware ↗, Veriti ↗, Zero Networks ↗, preemptive ↗

Integrated by: Critical Start, D3 Security, Gigamon, Nagomi Security, Neeve, OctoXLabs, Safe Security, Saiflow, Seceon Inc, Seemplicity, UncommonX

Buyer reviewsUI-14 — verified-buyer reviewsWritten only by domain-verified buyers at other companies, attributed to their company domain (never their identity), and moderated. Buyer-sourced opinion, clearly separate from the neutral catalog facts above — and never an input to search or comparison ordering.

verified buyers only

No buyer reviews yet.

Reputation ratingUI-20 — anonymous ratingA single anonymous 5-star signal from buyers, resellers, and analysts who've engaged with this vendor — separate from the domain-attributed reviews above. No rater identity is ever shown, not even at company level.

anonymous

No ratings in this window yet.

External ratingsUI-22 — third-party ratingsAggregate rating and review count pulled directly from the source site's own published data — never the review text itself, which belongs to that site. Links go to the real page so you can read the actual reviews there.

via third-party review sites
PeerSpot: 4.1/5 (18 reviews) ↗

OT/ICS and cyber-physical systems security. AI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →

Security & trust signalsAbout these signalsCertifications are keyword-matched from the vendor's own public pages (each claim links to its source — verify directly before relying on it). Security headers are checked live against the vendor's homepage, re-checked every 90 days. Both are independent, automated signals, not a vendor-submitted or audited claim, and are not blended into a single score.

9 of 9 technical checks completed — not a score, just coverage

Security headers (5/5) — checked 8/13/2026

  • ✓ Strict-Transport-Security
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy
  • ✓ X-Frame-Options
  • ✓ X-Content-Type-Options
  • ✓ Referrer-Policy
  • ✕ security.txt

Infrastructure & transparency signals

GitHub (17 repos) ↗Domain since 2015

CVE severity over timeUI-24 — CVE severity timelineEvery known CVE with a disclosure date and severity, plotted by when it was published — lets you see whether disclosures are trending toward more or less severe, not just a raw count. Same NVD-sourced, name-matched data as the list below.

LOWMEDIUMHIGHCRITICAL202320242025CVE-2025-54603 · MEDIUM 6.5 · 2025-10-14CVE-2024-7847 · HIGH 7.7 · 2024-10-14CVE-2021-32958 · MEDIUM 5.5 · 2022-05-24

Known CVEs (3)About this listSourced from the public NVD database, matched by vendor name. This is a name-based match, not exact version tracking — always check the linked NVD record for affected versions before drawing conclusions. “New” means published within the last 30 days. “Actively exploited” means CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog confirms real-world exploitation, not just a theoretical severity score.

RSS ⇢
  • CVE-2025-54603 ↗MEDIUM 6.52025

    An incorrect OIDC authentication flow in Claroty Secure Access 3.3.0 through 4.0.2 can result in unauthorized user creation or impersonation of existing OIDC users.

  • CVE-2024-7847 ↗HIGH 7.72024

    VULNERABILITY DETAILS Rockwell Automation used the latest versions of the CVSS scoring system to assess the following vulnerabilities. The following vulnerabilities were reported to us by Sharon Briz…

  • CVE-2021-32958 ↗MEDIUM 5.52022

    Successful exploitation of this vulnerability on Claroty Secure Remote Access (SRA) Site versions 3.0 through 3.2 allows an attacker with local command line interface access to gain the secret key, su…

Competitors (12)

full alternatives comparison →
AbsoluteArmisAsimilyAUTOCRYPTBlue Ridge NetworksDispersiveFortraIvantiKaramba SecurityNeeveNozomi NetworksRedinent Innovations

Products (8)

OT / ICS Security

4
  • Claroty PlatformOT / ICS SecurityAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →
    OT/ICS and cyber-physical systems security.
  • Claroty xDomeCPS protectionAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Modular SaaS platform for cyber-physical systems (CPS) protection.
  • Continuous Threat Detection (CTD)OT threat detectionAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    OT cybersecurity controls with on-premise deployment.
  • xDome Secure AccessOT secure accessAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Secure third-party/remote access for CPS/OT environments.

Secure Access Service Edge (SASE/SSE)

1
  • Claroty xDome Secure AccessAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Secure remote access solution for cyber-physical systems (CPS)

Vulnerability Management

1
  • Claroty Exposure ManagementAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Exposure management platform for cyber-physical systems (CPS) security

AI / LLM Security

1
  • Claire (AI Security Agent)AI securityAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    AI-powered visibility and orchestration for CPS security.

CPS Protection

1
  • Claroty xDome Network ProtectionAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Network protection for cyber-physical systems in industrial environments