Skip to main content
0-Doubt
NewsInvestorsQuestionnairesDeveloperHelp
AnonymousSign in
0-Doubt — neutral IT/Security research
BrowseResellersCertified analystsRFI/RFP questionnairesHow trust worksHelp & FAQAPI
  1. Home/
  2. Trend Micro

Trend Micro

enriched
AI / LLM SecurityCloud-Native Application Protection (CNAPP)Container SecurityEmail SecurityEndpoint Detection & ResponseIntrusion Detection and Prevention SystemsManaged Detection & Response (MDR)MLSecOpsNetwork Detection & Response (NDR)OT / ICS SecuritySecure Access Service Edge (SASE/SSE)Security Awareness TrainingThreat Exposure Management (CTEM)Workload Protection

Represented by TD SYNNEX ↗

trendmicro.com ↗ · required email domain for this vendor's users

Headquartered in JapanHeadquarters countrySourced only from this vendor's own published headquarters address (schema.org structured data on their site) — never guessed from domain TLD. Source ↗

Do you work at Trend Micro?

This profile was built from public sources and hasn't been claimed yet. Claiming it lets you correct what's wrong and add details only you can confirm — and marks that information as vendor-verified for buyers.

Free, and it does not affect ranking, placement, or comparison results. The first person verified on Trend Micro's email domain becomes the profile admin.

Claim this profileAlready have an account?

Trust profileHow to read thisFive separate questions a buyer actually asks, each answered with its own evidence and a link to the source. There is deliberately no overall score: a single number invites comparison it cannot support, and would mostly reflect how much of Trend Micro we have managed to scan rather than anything about the vendor.

Not checked means we have not looked yet, and is never counted against a vendor. Limited means we did look, but found only one line of evidence — enough to report, not enough to corroborate.

checked 11 of 16 signals
  • Limited

    Independently verified

    Has anyone other than the vendor confirmed this?

    checked 3 of 4

    Nothing here has been confirmed by an independent third party yet.

    • No third-party certifications found
    • Profile not claimed by the vendor
  • Strong

    Operating durability

    Is this a real, durable business?

    checked 3 of 4

    How long this vendor has been operating, and who stands behind them.

    • Domain registered 1995 — 31 years ago
    • Headquarters: Japan
  • Mixed

    Behaviour under stress

    What do they do when something goes wrong?

    checked 2 of 3

    What their public record shows about handling vulnerabilities and outages.

    • 100 published CVE(s) — a public disclosure record exists
    • 1 rated critical
    • No public status page found
  • Limited

    Disclosure posture

    Do they tell you the awkward things unprompted?

    checked 2 of 3

    How much this vendor volunteers before you have to ask.

    • No trust center found
    • No bug bounty or vulnerability disclosure policy found
  • Limited

    Momentum

    Are they still shipping, or coasting?

    checked 1 of 2

    Whether this vendor is visibly still building.

    • Public GitHub org with 61 repositories
Data coverage: 18/100What this measures (and doesn't)

Not a quality rating or endorsement — a measure of how much verified, disclosed data we actually have about this vendor. A low score usually means "we don't have much verified information yet," not "this is a bad vendor." Never used to sort or rank vendor lists.

Verification depth0/100
Security signal0/100
Buyer feedbackno data yet (0 reviews so far)
Profile completeness38/100
claim · HQ · materials · screenshots · integrations · certifications · security check

The platform admin controls the formula's weights.

Data coverage profileHow to read thisThe same four components behind the data coverage score above, shaped instead of listed — a vendor strong on verification but thin on buyer feedback looks visibly different from one that's the other way around. Security and feedback plot at the neutral midpoint (50) when there's no data yet (no products tracked, no reviews), matching how the actual score itself treats missing data — not a guess either way.

VerificationSecurityFeedbackCompletenessThis vendor — Verification: 0This vendor — Security: 0This vendor — Feedback: no data yetThis vendor — Completeness: 38

IntegrationsUI-12 — integration graphDetected from this vendor's own published integration/partner pages by the enrichment loop — each entry links the exact page it was found on. Directional: "integrates with" is claimed by this vendor; "integrated by" is claimed by the other vendor's site. Coverage grows as the scan progresses.

21 detected

Integrated by: AccuKnox, Brandefense, Cisco, Claroty, CloudDefense.AI, Coalfire, CrowdStrike, D3 Security, Expel, Gurucul, Morphisec, Nagomi Security, OctoXLabs, OutThink, Qevlar AI, Red Canary, Seceon Inc, SentinelOne, ShadowDragon, Simbian, TXOne Networks

Buyer reviewsUI-14 — verified-buyer reviewsWritten only by domain-verified buyers at other companies, attributed to their company domain (never their identity), and moderated. Buyer-sourced opinion, clearly separate from the neutral catalog facts above — and never an input to search or comparison ordering.

verified buyers only

No buyer reviews yet.

Reputation ratingUI-20 — anonymous ratingA single anonymous 5-star signal from buyers, resellers, and analysts who've engaged with this vendor — separate from the domain-attributed reviews above. No rater identity is ever shown, not even at company level.

anonymous

No ratings in this window yet.

Endpoint and hybrid-cloud security (Vision One). AI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →

Security & trust signalsAbout these signalsCertifications are keyword-matched from the vendor's own public pages (each claim links to its source — verify directly before relying on it). Security headers are checked live against the vendor's homepage, re-checked every 90 days. Both are independent, automated signals, not a vendor-submitted or audited claim, and are not blended into a single score.

9 of 9 technical checks completed — not a score, just coverage

Security headers (2/5) — checked 8/13/2026

  • ✕ Strict-Transport-Security
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy
  • ✕ X-Frame-Options
  • ✓ X-Content-Type-Options
  • ✕ Referrer-Policy
  • ✕ security.txt

Infrastructure & transparency signals

GitHub (61 repos) ↗Domain since 1995DNSSEC enabledCAA enabled

CVE severity over timeUI-24 — CVE severity timelineEvery known CVE with a disclosure date and severity, plotted by when it was published — lets you see whether disclosures are trending toward more or less severe, not just a raw count. Same NVD-sourced, name-matched data as the list below.

LOWMEDIUMHIGHCRITICAL2000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012CVE-2012-1453 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2012-03-21CVE-2012-1448 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2012-03-21CVE-2012-1443 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2012-03-21CVE-2012-1425 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2012-03-21CVE-2011-5001 · HIGH 10.0 · 2011-12-25CVE-2011-1327 · LOW 2.1 · 2011-05-21CVE-2010-3189 · HIGH 9.3 · 2010-09-01CVE-2010-0564 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2010-02-10CVE-2009-1435 · LOW 2.1 · 2009-04-27CVE-2009-0686 · HIGH 7.2 · 2009-04-01CVE-2009-0613 · MEDIUM 6.0 · 2009-02-17CVE-2009-0612 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2009-02-17CVE-2008-3866 · MEDIUM 4.6 · 2009-01-22CVE-2008-3865 · HIGH 10.0 · 2009-01-22CVE-2008-3864 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2009-01-22CVE-2008-2435 · HIGH 9.3 · 2008-12-23CVE-2008-2434 · HIGH 9.3 · 2008-12-23CVE-2008-5545 · HIGH 9.3 · 2008-12-12CVE-2008-0014 · HIGH 10.0 · 2008-11-18CVE-2008-0013 · HIGH 10.0 · 2008-11-18CVE-2008-0012 · HIGH 10.0 · 2008-11-18CVE-2007-0074 · HIGH 10.0 · 2008-11-18CVE-2007-0073 · HIGH 10.0 · 2008-11-18CVE-2007-0072 · HIGH 10.0 · 2008-11-18CVE-2006-5269 · HIGH 10.0 · 2008-11-18CVE-2006-5268 · HIGH 10.0 · 2008-11-18CVE-2008-3862 · HIGH 10.0 · 2008-10-24CVE-2008-4403 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2008-10-03CVE-2008-4402 · HIGH 10.0 · 2008-10-03CVE-2008-2439 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2008-10-03CVE-2008-2437 · HIGH 10.0 · 2008-09-17CVE-2008-2433 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2008-08-28CVE-2008-3364 · HIGH 9.3 · 2008-07-30CVE-2008-1366 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2008-03-18CVE-2008-1365 · MEDIUM 6.4 · 2008-03-18CVE-2007-6507 · HIGH 10.0 · 2007-12-21CVE-2007-6386 · HIGH 7.2 · 2007-12-15CVE-2007-4277 · MEDIUM 6.6 · 2007-10-31CVE-2007-4731 · HIGH 10.0 · 2007-09-12CVE-2007-4218 · HIGH 10.0 · 2007-08-23CVE-2007-4490 · HIGH 10.0 · 2007-08-23CVE-2007-4219 · HIGH 10.0 · 2007-08-23CVE-2007-3873 · MEDIUM 6.9 · 2007-08-23CVE-2007-3454 · HIGH 10.0 · 2007-06-27CVE-2007-3455 · HIGH 10.0 · 2007-06-27CVE-2007-2533 · HIGH 10.0 · 2007-05-09CVE-2007-2508 · HIGH 10.0 · 2007-05-09CVE-2007-2528 · HIGH 10.0 · 2007-05-09CVE-2007-1591 · HIGH 7.8 · 2007-03-22CVE-2007-1169 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2007-03-03CVE-2007-1168 · HIGH 7.5 · 2007-03-03CVE-2007-1070 · HIGH 10.0 · 2007-02-21CVE-2007-0325 · HIGH 9.3 · 2007-02-20CVE-2007-0856 · HIGH 7.2 · 2007-02-08CVE-2007-0851 · HIGH 9.3 · 2007-02-08CVE-2007-0602 · MEDIUM 6.9 · 2007-01-30CVE-2006-6458 · HIGH 7.8 · 2006-12-11CVE-2006-6179 · HIGH 7.5 · 2006-12-01CVE-2006-6178 · HIGH 7.5 · 2006-12-01CVE-2006-5211 · MEDIUM 6.4 · 2006-10-10CVE-2006-5212 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2006-10-10CVE-2006-3261 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2006-06-28CVE-2006-1379 · HIGH 7.2 · 2006-03-24CVE-2006-1381 · HIGH 10.0 · 2006-03-24CVE-2006-1380 · HIGH 7.2 · 2006-03-24CVE-2006-0642 · MEDIUM 5.1 · 2006-02-10CVE-2005-1928 · HIGH 7.8 · 2005-12-15CVE-2005-1929 · HIGH 7.5 · 2005-12-15CVE-2005-1930 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2005-12-15CVE-2005-3360 · HIGH 7.2 · 2005-12-15CVE-2005-3379 · MEDIUM 5.1 · 2005-10-30CVE-2005-0383 · HIGH 7.5 · 2005-05-02CVE-2005-0533 · HIGH 7.5 · 2005-05-02CVE-2004-2006 · MEDIUM 4.6 · 2004-05-07CVE-2004-1859 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2004-03-24CVE-2003-1342 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2003-12-31CVE-2003-1344 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2003-12-31CVE-2003-1343 · HIGH 7.5 · 2003-12-31CVE-2003-1341 · HIGH 7.5 · 2003-12-31CVE-2003-0646 · HIGH 7.5 · 2003-08-27CVE-2002-1839 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2002-12-31CVE-2002-0440 · HIGH 7.5 · 2002-07-26CVE-2001-1574 · HIGH 10.0 · 2001-12-31CVE-2001-1573 · HIGH 10.0 · 2001-12-31CVE-2001-0791 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2001-10-18CVE-2001-0761 · HIGH 7.5 · 2001-10-18CVE-2001-1151 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2001-10-15CVE-2001-0678 · MEDIUM 4.6 · 2001-09-20CVE-2001-0958 · HIGH 7.5 · 2001-09-12CVE-2001-1150 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2001-08-22CVE-2001-1026 · HIGH 7.5 · 2001-07-09CVE-2001-0432 · HIGH 10.0 · 2001-07-02CVE-2001-0410 · HIGH 7.5 · 2001-06-18CVE-2001-0174 · HIGH 7.6 · 2001-05-03CVE-2000-1106 · MEDIUM 4.6 · 2001-01-09CVE-2000-0205 · MEDIUM 6.4 · 2000-03-03CVE-2000-0204 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2000-02-28CVE-2000-0203 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2000-02-28CVE-2000-0007 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 1999-12-29CVE-1999-1529 · HIGH 7.5 · 1999-11-07

Known CVEs (100)About this listSourced from the public NVD database, matched by vendor name. This is a name-based match, not exact version tracking — always check the linked NVD record for affected versions before drawing conclusions. “New” means published within the last 30 days. “Actively exploited” means CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog confirms real-world exploitation, not just a theoretical severity score.

RSS ⇢
  • CVE-2012-1453 ↗MEDIUM 4.32012

    The CAB file parser in Dr.Web 5.0.2.03300, Trend Micro HouseCall 9.120.0.1004, Kaspersky Anti-Virus 7.0.0.125, Sophos Anti-Virus 4.61.0, Trend Micro AntiVirus 9.120.0.1004, McAfee Gateway (formerly We…

  • CVE-2012-1448 ↗MEDIUM 4.32012

    The CAB file parser in Quick Heal (aka Cat QuickHeal) 11.00, Trend Micro AntiVirus 9.120.0.1004, Ikarus Virus Utilities T3 Command Line Scanner 1.1.97.0, Trend Micro HouseCall 9.120.0.1004, and Emsiso…

  • CVE-2012-1443 ↗MEDIUM 4.32012

    The RAR file parser in ClamAV 0.96.4, Rising Antivirus 22.83.00.03, Quick Heal (aka Cat QuickHeal) 11.00, G Data AntiVirus 21, AVEngine 20101.3.0.103 in Symantec Endpoint Protection 11, Command Antivi…

  • CVE-2012-1425 ↗MEDIUM 4.32012

    The TAR file parser in Avira AntiVir 7.11.1.163, Antiy Labs AVL SDK 2.0.3.7, Quick Heal (aka Cat QuickHeal) 11.00, Emsisoft Anti-Malware 5.1.0.1, Fortinet Antivirus 4.2.254.0, Ikarus Virus Utilities T…

  • CVE-2011-5001 ↗HIGH 10.02011

    Stack-based buffer overflow in the CGenericScheduler::AddTask function in cmdHandlerRedAlertController.dll in CmdProcessor.exe in Trend Micro Control Manager 5.5 before Build 1613 allows remote attack…

  • CVE-2011-1327 ↗LOW 2.12011

    The Keystroke Encryption feature in Trend Micro Internet Security 2009 (aka Virus Buster 2009 and PC-cillin 2009) does not completely encrypt passwords, which allows local users to obtain sensitive in…

  • CVE-2010-3189 ↗HIGH 9.32010

    The extSetOwner function in the UfProxyBrowserCtrl ActiveX control (UfPBCtrl.dll) in Trend Micro Internet Security Pro 2010 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via an invalid address tha…

  • CVE-2010-0564 ↗MEDIUM 5.02010

    Buffer overflow in Trend Micro URL Filtering Engine (TMUFE) in OfficeScan 8.0 before SP1 Patch 5 - Build 3510, possibly tmufeng.dll before 3.0.0.1029, allows attackers to cause a denial of service (cr…

  • CVE-2009-1435 ↗LOW 2.12009

    NTRtScan.exe in Trend Micro OfficeScan Client 8.0 SP1 and 8.0 SP1 Patch 1 allows local users to cause a denial of service (application crash) via directories with long pathnames. NOTE: some of these …

  • CVE-2009-0686 ↗HIGH 7.22009

    The TrendMicro Activity Monitor Module (tmactmon.sys) 2.52.0.1002 in Trend Micro Internet Pro 2008 and 2009, and Security Pro 2008 and 2009, allows local users to gain privileges via a crafted IRP in …

  • CVE-2009-0613 ↗MEDIUM 6.02009

    Trend Micro InterScan Web Security Suite (IWSS) 3.1 before build 1237 allows remote authenticated Auditor and Report Only users to bypass intended permission settings, and modify the system configurat…

  • CVE-2009-0612 ↗MEDIUM 4.32009

    Trend Micro InterScan Web Security Virtual Appliance (IWSVA) 3.x and InterScan Web Security Suite (IWSS) 3.x, when basic authorization is enabled on the standalone proxy, forwards the Proxy-Authorizat…

  • CVE-2008-3866 ↗MEDIUM 4.62009

    The Trend Micro Personal Firewall service (aka TmPfw.exe) in Trend Micro Network Security Component (NSC) modules, as used in Trend Micro OfficeScan 8.0 SP1 Patch 1 and Internet Security 2007 and 2008…

  • CVE-2008-3865 ↗HIGH 10.02009

    Multiple heap-based buffer overflows in the ApiThread function in the firewall service (aka TmPfw.exe) in Trend Micro Network Security Component (NSC) modules, as used in Trend Micro OfficeScan 8.0 SP…

  • CVE-2008-3864 ↗MEDIUM 5.02009

    The ApiThread function in the firewall service (aka TmPfw.exe) in Trend Micro Network Security Component (NSC) modules, as used in Trend Micro OfficeScan 8.0 SP1 Patch 1 and Internet Security 2007 and…

  • CVE-2008-2435 ↗HIGH 9.32008

    Use-after-free vulnerability in the Trend Micro HouseCall ActiveX control 6.51.0.1028 and 6.6.0.1278 in Housecall_ActiveX.dll allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted notifyOnLo…

  • CVE-2008-2434 ↗HIGH 9.32008

    The Trend Micro HouseCall ActiveX control 6.51.0.1028 and 6.6.0.1278 in Housecall_ActiveX.dll allows remote attackers to download an arbitrary library file onto a client system via a "custom update se…

  • CVE-2008-5545 ↗HIGH 9.32008

    Trend Micro VSAPI 8.700.0.1004 in Trend Micro AntiVirus, when Internet Explorer 6 or 7 is used, allows remote attackers to bypass detection of malware in an HTML document by placing an MZ header (aka …

  • CVE-2008-0014 ↗HIGH 10.02008

    Heap-based buffer overflow in an unspecified procedure in Trend Micro ServerProtect 5.7 and 5.58 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unknown vectors, possibly related to the product'…

  • CVE-2008-0013 ↗HIGH 10.02008

    Heap-based buffer overflow in an unspecified procedure in Trend Micro ServerProtect 5.7 and 5.58 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unknown vectors, possibly related to the product'…

  • …and 80 more

Competitors (12)

full alternatives comparison →
CrowdStrikeAI EdgeLabsArctic WolfBitdefenderDarktraceESETFortinetGoSecureGuardzKaseyaOpenText CybersecurityPalo Alto Networks

Strengths & gaps by category

neutral · vendor-sourced

Drawn from this vendor's own public materials and authored to keep category questionnaires balanced. Gaps reflect capabilities not emphasized in public materials, not rankings.

Cloud-Native Application Protection (CNAPP) (source)

Strengths: Trend Vision One cloud security builds on long workload-protection heritage spanning posture and runtime.

Gaps: Public product pages are hard to access programmatically, and portfolio breadth can complicate scoping a focused CNAPP purchase.

Endpoint Detection & Response (source)

Strengths: Trend Vision One XDR with long endpoint heritage (Apex One) spanning endpoint, email, and cloud.

Gaps: Public product pages are difficult to access programmatically; portfolio breadth can complicate scoping a focused EDR purchase.

Products (21)

Endpoint Detection & Response

5
  • Apex OneEndpointAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →
    Endpoint protection.
  • Trend Micro Trend Vision One™ Endpoint SecurityAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Endpoint security platform with EDR/XDR, threat detection, and risk mgmt
  • Trend Micro Vision OneAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    XDR platform for endpoints, servers, and cloud workloads with EDR capabilities
  • Trend Trend Vision One™ Security OperationsAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    XDR platform with Agentic SIEM and SOAR for unified threat detection & response
  • Trend Vision OneEDR/XDRAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →
    Unified cybersecurity / XDR platform.

Managed Detection & Response (MDR)

1
  • Trend Micro Trend Service One™AI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    24/7/365 managed XDR service with incident response and premium support

OT / ICS Security

1
  • Trend Micro Industrial Network SecurityAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    ICS/OT network security solution with IPS, firewall, and segmentation

Security Awareness Training

1
  • Trend Micro Security AwarenessAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Security awareness training platform with phishing simulations and risk-based training

Cloud-Native Application Protection (CNAPP)

2
  • Trend Micro Trend Vision One™ Cloud SecurityAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    CNAPP platform for multi-cloud security with risk mgmt and threat detection
  • Trend Vision One – Cloud SecurityCNAPPAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →
    Cloud security posture and workload (CNAPP).

Secure Access Service Edge (SASE/SSE)

1
  • Trend Micro Zero Trust Secure AccessAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Zero trust secure access platform with continuous risk assessment and control

Email Security

1
  • Trend Micro Trend Vision One™AI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    AI-powered email and collaboration security platform for threat detection

AI / LLM Security

2
  • Trend Micro Trend CompanionAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    AI-powered cybersecurity assistant integrated into Trend Vision One platform
  • Trend Micro Trend Vision One™ AI SecurityAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    AI-powered threat detection & response platform with predictive capabilities

Threat Exposure Management (CTEM)

1
  • Trend Micro Cyber Risk Exposure ManagementAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Proactive cyber risk exposure mgmt platform for asset discovery & mitigation

Network Detection & Response (NDR)

2
  • Trend Micro Deep Discovery InspectorAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Network appliance detecting advanced threats via sandboxing & traffic analysis
  • Trend Micro Network Detection and ResponseAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    NDR solution providing network visibility, threat detection, and intrusion prevention

MLSecOps

1
  • Trend Micro Secure AI FactoryAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    End-to-end platform for secure enterprise AI deployment with compliance controls

Container Security

1
  • Trend Micro Container SecurityAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Container security platform with image scanning, admission control, and runtime

Workload Protection

1
  • Trend Micro Deep SecurityAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Runtime security for physical, virtual, cloud, and container workloads

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Systems

1
  • Trend Micro TippingPoint Threat Protection SystemAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Inline network detection and response system with IPS capabilities