Skip to main content
0-Doubt
NewsInvestorsQuestionnairesDeveloperHelp
AnonymousSign in
0-Doubt — neutral IT/Security research
BrowseResellersCertified analystsRFI/RFP questionnairesHow trust worksHelp & FAQAPI
  1. Home/
  2. Trellix

Trellix

enriched
AI / LLM SecurityEndpoint Detection & ResponseIntrusion Detection and Prevention SystemsSIEM

Represented by Carahsoft ↗, Exclusive Networks ↗, World Wide Technology ↗

trellix.com ↗ · required email domain for this vendor's users

Headquartered in United StatesHeadquarters countrySourced only from this vendor's own published headquarters address (schema.org structured data on their site) — never guessed from domain TLD. Source ↗

Do you work at Trellix?

This profile was built from public sources and hasn't been claimed yet. Claiming it lets you correct what's wrong and add details only you can confirm — and marks that information as vendor-verified for buyers.

Free, and it does not affect ranking, placement, or comparison results. The first person verified on Trellix's email domain becomes the profile admin.

Claim this profileAlready have an account?

Trust profileHow to read thisFive separate questions a buyer actually asks, each answered with its own evidence and a link to the source. There is deliberately no overall score: a single number invites comparison it cannot support, and would mostly reflect how much of Trellix we have managed to scan rather than anything about the vendor.

Not checked means we have not looked yet, and is never counted against a vendor. Limited means we did look, but found only one line of evidence — enough to report, not enough to corroborate.

checked 9 of 16 signals
  • Limited

    Independently verified

    Has anyone other than the vendor confirmed this?

    checked 3 of 4

    Nothing here has been confirmed by an independent third party yet.

    • No third-party certifications found
    • Profile not claimed by the vendor
  • Limited

    Operating durability

    Is this a real, durable business?

    checked 2 of 4

    How long this vendor has been operating, and who stands behind them.

    • Headquarters: United States
  • Mixed

    Behaviour under stress

    What do they do when something goes wrong?

    checked 2 of 3

    What their public record shows about handling vulnerabilities and outages.

    • 17 published CVE(s) — a public disclosure record exists
    • 1 rated critical
    • No public status page found
  • Limited

    Disclosure posture

    Do they tell you the awkward things unprompted?

    checked 2 of 3

    How much this vendor volunteers before you have to ask.

    • No trust center found
    • No bug bounty or vulnerability disclosure policy found
  • Not checked

    Momentum

    Are they still shipping, or coasting?

    checked 0 of 2

    We have not tracked this vendor's release activity yet.

    Nothing checked here yet — this is not a mark against Trellix.

Data coverage: 15/100What this measures (and doesn't)

Not a quality rating or endorsement — a measure of how much verified, disclosed data we actually have about this vendor. A low score usually means "we don't have much verified information yet," not "this is a bad vendor." Never used to sort or rank vendor lists.

Verification depth0/100
Security signal0/100
Buyer feedbackno data yet (0 reviews so far)
Profile completeness25/100
claim · HQ · materials · screenshots · integrations · certifications · security check

The platform admin controls the formula's weights.

Data coverage profileHow to read thisThe same four components behind the data coverage score above, shaped instead of listed — a vendor strong on verification but thin on buyer feedback looks visibly different from one that's the other way around. Security and feedback plot at the neutral midpoint (50) when there's no data yet (no products tracked, no reviews), matching how the actual score itself treats missing data — not a guess either way.

VerificationSecurityFeedbackCompletenessThis vendor — Verification: 0This vendor — Security: 0This vendor — Feedback: no data yetThis vendor — Completeness: 25

IntegrationsUI-12 — integration graphDetected from this vendor's own published integration/partner pages by the enrichment loop — each entry links the exact page it was found on. Directional: "integrates with" is claimed by this vendor; "integrated by" is claimed by the other vendor's site. Coverage grows as the scan progresses.

17 detected

Integrated by: AiStrike, Andesite, D3 Security, Expel, ExtraHop, Fidelis Security, Gigamon, Gurucul, OctoXLabs, OutThink, Portal26, Ridge Security, Seceon Inc, SentinelOne, Tenzir, UncommonX, tychon

Buyer reviewsUI-14 — verified-buyer reviewsWritten only by domain-verified buyers at other companies, attributed to their company domain (never their identity), and moderated. Buyer-sourced opinion, clearly separate from the neutral catalog facts above — and never an input to search or comparison ordering.

verified buyers only

No buyer reviews yet.

Reputation ratingUI-20 — anonymous ratingA single anonymous 5-star signal from buyers, resellers, and analysts who've engaged with this vendor — separate from the domain-attributed reviews above. No rater identity is ever shown, not even at company level.

anonymous

No ratings in this window yet.

External ratingsUI-22 — third-party ratingsAggregate rating and review count pulled directly from the source site's own published data — never the review text itself, which belongs to that site. Links go to the real page so you can read the actual reviews there.

via third-party review sites
PeerSpot: 4.2/5 (16 reviews) ↗

Endpoint and XDR security (former McAfee Enterprise + FireEye). AI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →

Security & trust signalsAbout these signalsCertifications are keyword-matched from the vendor's own public pages (each claim links to its source — verify directly before relying on it). Security headers are checked live against the vendor's homepage, re-checked every 90 days. Both are independent, automated signals, not a vendor-submitted or audited claim, and are not blended into a single score.

6 of 9 technical checks completed — not a score, just coverage

Infrastructure & transparency signals

CAA enabled

CVE severity over timeUI-24 — CVE severity timelineEvery known CVE with a disclosure date and severity, plotted by when it was published — lets you see whether disclosures are trending toward more or less severe, not just a raw count. Same NVD-sourced, name-matched data as the list below.

LOWMEDIUMHIGHCRITICAL202320242025CVE-2025-3771 · HIGH 7.1 · 2025-06-26CVE-2024-5955 · MEDIUM 5.4 · 2024-12-20CVE-2024-5956 · MEDIUM 6.5 · 2024-09-05CVE-2024-5671 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2024-06-14CVE-2024-4844 · HIGH 7.5 · 2024-05-16CVE-2023-6072 · MEDIUM 4.6 · 2024-02-13CVE-2024-0206 · HIGH 7.1 · 2024-01-09CVE-2023-6119 · MEDIUM 6.5 · 2023-11-16CVE-2023-3665 · MEDIUM 5.5 · 2023-10-04CVE-2023-4814 · HIGH 7.1 · 2023-09-14CVE-2023-0977 · MEDIUM 6.7 · 2023-04-03CVE-2023-0975 · HIGH 8.2 · 2023-04-03CVE-2023-0978 · MEDIUM 6.4 · 2023-03-13CVE-2022-4326 · MEDIUM 5.5 · 2022-12-16CVE-2022-3859 · MEDIUM 6.7 · 2022-11-30CVE-2022-3340 · MEDIUM 5.9 · 2022-11-04

Known CVEs (17)About this listSourced from the public NVD database, matched by vendor name. This is a name-based match, not exact version tracking — always check the linked NVD record for affected versions before drawing conclusions. “New” means published within the last 30 days. “Actively exploited” means CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog confirms real-world exploitation, not just a theoretical severity score.

RSS ⇢
  • CVE-2025-7958 ↗2026

    A Code Injection vulnerability existed in Trellix Network Security CM and NX. A locally authenticated admin user can execute arbitrary code using the web interface and Alert artifact details.

  • CVE-2025-3771 ↗HIGH 7.12025

    A path or symbolic link manipulation vulnerability in SIR 1.0.3 and prior versions allows an authenticated non-admin local user to overwrite system files with SIR backup files, which can potentially c…

  • CVE-2024-5955 ↗MEDIUM 5.42024

    Cross-site scripting vulnerability in Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator prior to ePO 5.10 Service Pack 1 Update 3 allows a remote authenticated attacker to craft requests causing arbitrary content to be in…

  • CVE-2024-5956 ↗MEDIUM 6.52024

    This vulnerability allows unauthenticated remote attackers to bypass authentication and gain partial data access to the vulnerable Trellix IPS Manager with garbage data in response mostly

  • CVE-2024-5671 ↗CRITICAL 9.82024

    Insecure Deserialization in some workflows of the IPS Manager allows unauthenticated remote attackers to perform arbitrary code execution and access to the vulnerable Trellix IPS Manager.

  • CVE-2024-4844 ↗HIGH 7.52024

    Hardcoded credentials vulnerability in Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator (ePO) on Premise prior to 5.10 Service Pack 1 Update 2 allows an attacker with admin privileges on the ePO server to read the conten…

  • CVE-2023-6072 ↗MEDIUM 4.62024

    A cross-site scripting vulnerability in Trellix Central Management (CM) prior to 9.1.3.97129 allows a remote authenticated attacker to craft CM dashboard internal requests causing arbitrary content t…

  • CVE-2024-0206 ↗HIGH 7.12024

    A symbolic link manipulation vulnerability in Trellix Anti-Malware Engine prior to the January 2024 release allows an authenticated local user to potentially gain an escalation of privileges. This wa…

  • CVE-2023-6119 ↗MEDIUM 6.52023

    An Improper Privilege Management vulnerability in Trellix GetSusp prior to version 5.0.0.27 allows a local, low privilege attacker to gain access to files that usually require a higher privilege leve…

  • CVE-2023-3665 ↗MEDIUM 5.52023

    A code injection vulnerability in Trellix ENS 10.7.0 April 2023 release and earlier, allowed a local user to disable the ENS AMSI component via environment variables, leading to denial of service and…

  • CVE-2023-4814 ↗HIGH 7.12023

    A Privilege escalation vulnerability exists in Trellix Windows DLP endpoint for windows which can be abused to delete any file/folder for which the user does not have permission to.

  • CVE-2023-0977 ↗MEDIUM 6.72023

    A heap-based overflow vulnerability in Trellix Agent (Windows and Linux) version 5.7.8 and earlier, allows a remote user to alter the page heap in the macmnsvc process memory block resulting in the s…

  • CVE-2023-0975 ↗HIGH 8.22023

    A vulnerability exists in Trellix Agent for Windows version 5.7.8 and earlier, that allows local users, during install/upgrade workflow, to replace one of the Agent’s executables before it can be exe…

  • CVE-2023-0978 ↗MEDIUM 6.42023

    A command injection vulnerability in Trellix Intelligent Sandbox CLI for version 5.2 and earlier, allows a local user to inject and execute arbitrary operating system commands using specially crafted…

  • CVE-2022-4326 ↗MEDIUM 5.52022

    Improper preservation of permissions vulnerability in Trellix Endpoint Agent (xAgent) prior to V35.31.22 on Windows allows a local user with administrator privileges to bypass the product protection t…

  • CVE-2022-3859 ↗MEDIUM 6.72022

    An uncontrolled search path vulnerability exists in Trellix Agent (TA) for Windows in versions prior to 5.7.8. This allows an attacker with admin access, which is required to place the DLL in the res…

  • CVE-2022-3340 ↗MEDIUM 5.92022

    XML External Entity (XXE) vulnerability in Trellix IPS Manager prior to 10.1 M8 allows a remote authenticated administrator to perform XXE attack in the administrator interface part of the interface, …

Competitors (12)

full alternatives comparison →
CrowdStrikeAgileBlueAI EdgeLabsAntiy LabsBluSapphire Cyber SystemsBluSapphire Cyber Systems Pvt LimitedCiscoCyCraft TechnologyGuruculPalo Alto NetworksSentinelOneTrend Micro

Strengths & gaps by category

neutral · vendor-sourced

Drawn from this vendor's own public materials and authored to keep category questionnaires balanced. Gaps reflect capabilities not emphasized in public materials, not rankings.

Endpoint Detection & Response (source)

Strengths: Broad endpoint and XDR portfolio combining McAfee Enterprise and FireEye heritage.

Gaps: Post-merger portfolio integration and product naming can make scoping and parity assessment harder.

Products (2)

AI / LLM Security

1
  • Trellix WiseAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    GenAI-powered security operations platform for automated alert investigation

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Systems

1
  • Trellix Intrusion Prevention SystemAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Next-gen IPS detecting & blocking network threats via signatures & behavior