arcade.dev ↗ · required email domain for this vendor's users
Trust profileHow to read thisFive separate questions a buyer actually asks, each answered with its own evidence and a link to the source. There is deliberately no overall score: a single number invites comparison it cannot support, and would mostly reflect how much of Arcade we have managed to scan rather than anything about the vendor.
Not checked means we have not looked yet, and is never counted against a vendor. Limited means we did look, but found only one line of evidence — enough to report, not enough to corroborate.
checked 9 of 16 signals
Limited
Independently verified
Has anyone other than the vendor confirmed this?
checked 3 of 4
Nothing here has been confirmed by an independent third party yet.
No third-party certifications found
Profile not claimed by the vendor
Limited
Operating durability
Is this a real, durable business?
checked 2 of 4
How long this vendor has been operating, and who stands behind them.
Headquarters location not disclosed on their site
Strong
Behaviour under stress
What do they do when something goes wrong?
checked 2 of 3
What their public record shows about handling vulnerabilities and outages.
15 published CVE(s) — a public disclosure record exists
We have not tracked this vendor's release activity yet.
Nothing checked here yet — this is not a mark against Arcade.
Data coverage: 15/100What this measures (and doesn't)
Not a quality rating or endorsement — a measure of how much verified, disclosed data we actually have about this vendor. A low score usually means "we don't have much verified information yet," not "this is a bad vendor." Never used to sort or rank vendor lists.
The platform admin controls the formula's weights.
Data coverage profileHow to read thisThe same four components behind the data coverage score above, shaped instead of listed — a vendor strong on verification but thin on buyer feedback looks visibly different from one that's the other way around. Security and feedback plot at the neutral midpoint (50) when there's no data yet (no products tracked, no reviews), matching how the actual score itself treats missing data — not a guess either way.
Buyer reviewsUI-14 — verified-buyer reviewsWritten only by domain-verified buyers at other companies, attributed to their company domain (never their identity), and moderated. Buyer-sourced opinion, clearly separate from the neutral catalog facts above — and never an input to search or comparison ordering.
verified buyers only
No buyer reviews yet.
Reputation ratingUI-20 — anonymous ratingA single anonymous 5-star signal from buyers, resellers, and analysts who've engaged with this vendor — separate from the domain-attributed reviews above. No rater identity is ever shown, not even at company level.
anonymous
No ratings in this window yet.
MCP runtime for securing and governing AI agents in production deployments. AI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →
Security & trust signalsAbout these signalsCertifications are keyword-matched from the vendor's own public pages (each claim links to its source — verify directly before relying on it). Security headers are checked live against the vendor's homepage, re-checked every 90 days. Both are independent, automated signals, not a vendor-submitted or audited claim, and are not blended into a single score.
7 of 9 technical checks completed — not a score, just coverage
Status historyAbout this timelineEvery incident detected on this vendor's own public status page since we started watching it — sourced from the same structural check as the status chip above, checked roughly hourly (every 5 minutes while an incident is active), never inferred. A resolution requires a real check confirming "operational" again; an incident with no resolution yet shown is still ongoing as of the most recent check.
No outages recorded since we started watching (first checked Aug 13, 2026, 9:55 PM).
CVE severity over timeUI-24 — CVE severity timelineEvery known CVE with a disclosure date and severity, plotted by when it was published — lets you see whether disclosures are trending toward more or less severe, not just a raw count. Same NVD-sourced, name-matched data as the list below.
Known CVEs (15)About this listSourced from the public NVD database, matched by vendor name. This is a name-based match, not exact version tracking — always check the linked NVD record for affected versions before drawing conclusions. “New” means published within the last 30 days. “Actively exploited” means CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog confirms real-world exploitation, not just a theoretical severity score.
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in register.php in Arcadwy Arcade Script CMS allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the username field (user_name parameter).
Directory traversal vulnerability in pages/play.php in Free Arcade Script 1.0 allows remote attackers to include and execute arbitrary local files via a .. (dot dot) in the template parameter.
SQL injection vulnerability in index.php in Turnkey Arcade Script allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the id parameter in a play action.
SQL injection vulnerability in index.php in PHPArcadeScript (PHP Arcade Script) 4.0 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the cat parameter in a browse action.
SQL injection vulnerability in puarcade.class.php 2.2 and earlier in the Pragmatic Utopia PU Arcade (com_puarcade) component for Joomla! allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via t…
SQL injection vulnerability in arcade.php in ibProArcade 3.3.0 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the g_display_order cookie parameter.
SQL injection vulnerability in (1) Puarcade.php and (2) PUarcade.html.php in Pragmatic Utopia PU Arcade (com_puarcade) 2.0.3, 2.1.2, and 2.1.3 Beta component for Joomla! allows remote attackers to ex…
Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in index.php in ProfileCMS 1.0 and earlier allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the id parameter in a (1) codes action in the profile-cod…
SQL injection vulnerability in index.php in the Arcade module in bcoos 1.0.10 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the gid parameter in a play_game action. NOTE: the provenan…
admin/index.php in AV Arcade 2.1b grants administrative privileges when the ava_userid cookie value is 1, which allows remote attackers to perform certain administrative actions.
SQL injection vulnerability in includes/view_page.php in AV Arcade 2.1b allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the id parameter in a view_page action to index.php.
SQL injection vulnerability in index.php in the Arcade 1.00 module for PHP-Fusion allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the cid parameter in a view_game_list action.
SQL injection vulnerability in the show_stats module in Arcade.php in IbProArcade allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL code via the gameid parameter.
Directory traversal vulnerability in GSAPAK.EXE for GameSpy Arcade, possibly versions before 1.3e, allows remote attackers to overwrite arbitrary files and execute arbitrary code via .. (dot dot) sequ…
Arcade MCP RuntimeAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
MCP runtime for securing and governing AI agents in production deployments.
