Skip to main content
0-Doubt
NewsInvestorsQuestionnairesDeveloperHelp
AnonymousSign in
0-Doubt — neutral IT/Security research
BrowseResellersCertified analystsRFI/RFP questionnairesHow trust worksHelp & FAQAPI
  1. Home/
  2. Akamai

Akamai

enriched
AI / LLM SecurityAPI SecurityAttack Surface Management (ASM)Identity Threat Detection and ResponseMFA & PasswordlessRuntime Application Self-ProtectionSecure Access Service Edge (SASE/SSE)Threat HuntingWAF / DDoS / App Protection

Represented by Carahsoft ↗, Optiv ↗, Trace3 ↗

akamai.com ↗ · required email domain for this vendor's users

Do you work at Akamai?

This profile was built from public sources and hasn't been claimed yet. Claiming it lets you correct what's wrong and add details only you can confirm — and marks that information as vendor-verified for buyers.

Free, and it does not affect ranking, placement, or comparison results. The first person verified on Akamai's email domain becomes the profile admin.

Claim this profileAlready have an account?

Trust profileHow to read thisFive separate questions a buyer actually asks, each answered with its own evidence and a link to the source. There is deliberately no overall score: a single number invites comparison it cannot support, and would mostly reflect how much of Akamai we have managed to scan rather than anything about the vendor.

Not checked means we have not looked yet, and is never counted against a vendor. Limited means we did look, but found only one line of evidence — enough to report, not enough to corroborate.

checked 11 of 16 signals
  • Limited

    Independently verified

    Has anyone other than the vendor confirmed this?

    checked 3 of 4

    Nothing here has been confirmed by an independent third party yet.

    • No third-party certifications found
    • Profile not claimed by the vendor
  • Limited

    Operating durability

    Is this a real, durable business?

    checked 3 of 4

    How long this vendor has been operating, and who stands behind them.

    • Domain registered 1998 — 27 years ago
    • Headquarters location not disclosed on their site
  • Mixed

    Behaviour under stress

    What do they do when something goes wrong?

    checked 2 of 3

    What their public record shows about handling vulnerabilities and outages.

    • 22 published CVE(s) — a public disclosure record exists
    • 2 rated critical
    • Publishes a public status page
  • Limited

    Disclosure posture

    Do they tell you the awkward things unprompted?

    checked 2 of 3

    How much this vendor volunteers before you have to ask.

    • No trust center found
    • No bug bounty or vulnerability disclosure policy found
  • Limited

    Momentum

    Are they still shipping, or coasting?

    checked 1 of 2

    Whether this vendor is visibly still building.

    • Public GitHub org with 206 repositories
Data coverage: 13/100What this measures (and doesn't)

Not a quality rating or endorsement — a measure of how much verified, disclosed data we actually have about this vendor. A low score usually means "we don't have much verified information yet," not "this is a bad vendor." Never used to sort or rank vendor lists.

Verification depth0/100
Security signal0/100
Buyer feedbackno data yet (0 reviews so far)
Profile completeness13/100
claim · HQ · materials · screenshots · integrations · certifications · security check

The platform admin controls the formula's weights.

Data coverage profileHow to read thisThe same four components behind the data coverage score above, shaped instead of listed — a vendor strong on verification but thin on buyer feedback looks visibly different from one that's the other way around. Security and feedback plot at the neutral midpoint (50) when there's no data yet (no products tracked, no reviews), matching how the actual score itself treats missing data — not a guess either way.

VerificationSecurityFeedbackCompletenessThis vendor — Verification: 0This vendor — Security: 0This vendor — Feedback: no data yetThis vendor — Completeness: 13

IntegrationsUI-12 — integration graphDetected from this vendor's own published integration/partner pages by the enrichment loop — each entry links the exact page it was found on. Directional: "integrates with" is claimed by this vendor; "integrated by" is claimed by the other vendor's site. Coverage grows as the scan progresses.

31 detected

Integrated by: AppOmni, Aqua Security, CheckRed, Cisco, Claroty, Clutch Security, CrowdStrike, Cyera, Expel, FusionAuth, Indusface, Kentik, LMNTRIX, LayerX, Levo, Nagomi Security, OctoXLabs, Optimal IdM, Pentera, Reco, Safe Security, Seceon Inc, Seraphic, Snyk, Stream.Security, Tenzir, Vanta, Wiz, ZEST Security, eSentire, keyfactor

Buyer reviewsUI-14 — verified-buyer reviewsWritten only by domain-verified buyers at other companies, attributed to their company domain (never their identity), and moderated. Buyer-sourced opinion, clearly separate from the neutral catalog facts above — and never an input to search or comparison ordering.

verified buyers only

No buyer reviews yet.

Reputation ratingUI-20 — anonymous ratingA single anonymous 5-star signal from buyers, resellers, and analysts who've engaged with this vendor — separate from the domain-attributed reviews above. No rater identity is ever shown, not even at company level.

anonymous

No ratings in this window yet.

External ratingsUI-22 — third-party ratingsAggregate rating and review count pulled directly from the source site's own published data — never the review text itself, which belongs to that site. Links go to the real page so you can read the actual reviews there.

via third-party review sites
PeerSpot: 4.4/5 (23 reviews) ↗

Edge security, WAF/DDoS, and API security. AI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →

Security & trust signalsAbout these signalsCertifications are keyword-matched from the vendor's own public pages (each claim links to its source — verify directly before relying on it). Security headers are checked live against the vendor's homepage, re-checked every 90 days. Both are independent, automated signals, not a vendor-submitted or audited claim, and are not blended into a single score.

8 of 9 technical checks completed — not a score, just coverage

Infrastructure & transparency signals

Status: degraded ↗GitHub (206 repos) ↗Domain since 1998DNSSEC enabledHSTS preloaded

Status historyAbout this timelineEvery incident detected on this vendor's own public status page since we started watching it — sourced from the same structural check as the status chip above, checked roughly hourly (every 5 minutes while an incident is active), never inferred. A resolution requires a real check confirming "operational" again; an incident with no resolution yet shown is still ongoing as of the most recent check.

  • degraded · ongoingAug 13, 2026, 8:26 PM4h 26m

CVE severity over timeUI-24 — CVE severity timelineEvery known CVE with a disclosure date and severity, plotted by when it was published — lets you see whether disclosures are trending toward more or less severe, not just a raw count. Same NVD-sourced, name-matched data as the list below.

LOWMEDIUMHIGHCRITICAL2008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026CVE-2026-34354 · HIGH 7.4 · 2026-05-08CVE-2026-26365 · MEDIUM 4.0 · 2026-02-23CVE-2025-66373 · MEDIUM 4.8 · 2025-12-04CVE-2025-53841 · HIGH 7.8 · 2025-12-03CVE-2025-54142 · MEDIUM 4.0 · 2025-08-29CVE-2025-32094 · MEDIUM 4.0 · 2025-08-07CVE-2025-54568 · LOW 3.7 · 2025-07-25CVE-2025-52491 · MEDIUM 5.8 · 2025-07-01CVE-2025-49493 · MEDIUM 5.8 · 2025-07-01CVE-2025-30143 · MEDIUM 5.4 · 2025-03-17CVE-2025-24527 · HIGH 8.0 · 2025-01-29CVE-2024-45164 · HIGH 7.1 · 2024-11-04CVE-2021-40683 · HIGH 7.8 · 2021-10-04CVE-2019-11011 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2019-06-21CVE-2017-12256 · MEDIUM 6.5 · 2017-10-05CVE-2016-10157 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2017-01-23CVE-2009-2582 · HIGH 9.3 · 2009-07-24CVE-2008-1106 · HIGH 7.1 · 2008-06-10CVE-2008-1770 · HIGH 9.3 · 2008-06-05CVE-2007-6339 · MEDIUM 6.8 · 2008-05-01CVE-2007-1892 · HIGH 9.3 · 2007-04-18CVE-2007-1891 · HIGH 9.3 · 2007-04-18

Known CVEs (22)About this listSourced from the public NVD database, matched by vendor name. This is a name-based match, not exact version tracking — always check the linked NVD record for affected versions before drawing conclusions. “New” means published within the last 30 days. “Actively exploited” means CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog confirms real-world exploitation, not just a theoretical severity score.

RSS ⇢
  • CVE-2026-34354 ↗HIGH 7.42026

    Akamai Guardicore Platform Agent (GPA) and Zero Trust Client on Linux and macOS allow TOCTOU-based local privilege escalation. The GPA service creates an IPC socket in the world-writable /tmp director…

  • CVE-2026-26365 ↗MEDIUM 4.02026

    Akamai Ghost on Akamai CDN edge servers before 2026-02-06 mishandles processing of custom hop-by-hop HTTP headers, where an incoming request containing the header "Connection: Transfer-Encoding" could…

  • CVE-2025-66373 ↗MEDIUM 4.82025

    Akamai Ghost on Akamai CDN edge servers before 2025-11-17 has a chunked request body processing error that can result in HTTP request smuggling. When Akamai Ghost receives an invalid chunked body that…

  • CVE-2025-53841 ↗HIGH 7.82025

    The GC-AGENTS-SERVICE running as part of Akamai´s Guardicore Platform Agent for Windows versions prior to v49.20.1, v50.15.0, v51.12.0, v52.2.0 is affected by a local privilege escalation vulnerabilit…

  • CVE-2025-54142 ↗MEDIUM 4.02025

    Akamai Ghost before 2025-07-21 allows HTTP Request Smuggling via an OPTIONS request that has an entity body, because there can be a subsequent request within the persistent connection between an Akama…

  • CVE-2025-32094 ↗MEDIUM 4.02025

    An issue was discovered in Akamai Ghost, as used for the Akamai CDN platform before 2025-03-26. Under certain circumstances, a client making an HTTP/1.x OPTIONS request with an "Expect: 100-continue" …

  • CVE-2025-54568 ↗LOW 3.72025

    Akamai Rate Control alpha before 2025 allows attackers to send requests above the stipulated thresholds because the rate is measured separately for each edge node.

  • CVE-2025-52491 ↗MEDIUM 5.82025

    Akamai CloudTest before 60 2025.06.09 (12989) allows SSRF.

  • CVE-2025-49493 ↗MEDIUM 5.82025

    Akamai CloudTest before 60 2025.06.02 (12988) allows file inclusion via XML External Entity (XXE) injection.

  • CVE-2025-30143 ↗MEDIUM 5.42025

    Rule 3000216 (before version 2) in Akamai App & API Protector (with Akamai ASE) before 2024-12-10 does not properly consider JavaScript variable assignment to built-in functions and properties.

  • CVE-2025-24527 ↗HIGH 8.02025

    An issue was discovered in Akamai Enterprise Application Access (EAA) before 2025-01-17. If an admin knows another tenant's 128-bit connector GUID, they can execute debug commands on that connector.

  • CVE-2024-45164 ↗HIGH 7.12024

    Akamai SIA (Secure Internet Access Enterprise) ThreatAvert, in SPS (Security and Personalization Services) before the latest 19.2.0 patch and Apps Portal before 19.2.0.3 or 19.2.0.20240814, has incorr…

  • CVE-2021-40683 ↗HIGH 7.82021

    In Akamai EAA (Enterprise Application Access) Client before 2.3.1, 2.4.x before 2.4.1, and 2.5.x before 2.5.3, an unquoted path may allow an attacker to hijack the flow of execution.

  • CVE-2019-11011 ↗CRITICAL 9.82019

    Akamai CloudTest before 58.30 allows remote code execution.

  • CVE-2017-12256 ↗MEDIUM 6.52017

    A vulnerability in the Akamai Connect feature of Cisco Wide Area Application Services (WAAS) Appliances could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a denial-of-service (DoS) condition on …

  • CVE-2016-10157 ↗CRITICAL 9.82017

    Akamai NetSession 1.9.3.1 is vulnerable to DLL Hijacking: it tries to load CSUNSAPI.dll without supplying the complete path. The issue is aggravated because the mentioned DLL is missing from the insta…

  • CVE-2009-2582 ↗HIGH 9.32009

    Stack-based buffer overflow in manager.exe in Akamai Download Manager (aka DLM or dlmanager) before 2.2.4.8 allows remote web servers to execute arbitrary code via a malformed HTTP response during a R…

  • CVE-2008-1106 ↗HIGH 7.12008

    The management interface in Akamai Client (formerly Red Swoosh) 3322 and earlier allows remote attackers to bypass authentication via an HTTP request that contains (1) no Referer header, or (2) a spoo…

  • CVE-2008-1770 ↗HIGH 9.32008

    CRLF injection vulnerability in Akamai Download Manager ActiveX control before 2.2.3.6 allows remote attackers to force the download and execution of arbitrary files via a URL parameter containing an …

  • CVE-2007-6339 ↗MEDIUM 6.82008

    The Akamai Download Manager (aka DLM or dlmanager) ActiveX control (DownloadManagerV2.ocx) before 2.2.3.5 allows remote attackers to force the download and execution of arbitrary code via unspecified …

  • …and 2 more

Competitors (12)

full alternatives comparison →
Alibaba CloudArray NetworksCloudMatosCyCraft TechnologyDuo SecurityFortinetImpart SecurityIvantiPalo Alto NetworksSilverfortWallarmZscaler

Strengths & gaps by category

neutral · vendor-sourced

Drawn from this vendor's own public materials and authored to keep category questionnaires balanced. Gaps reflect capabilities not emphasized in public materials, not rankings.

API Security (source)

Strengths: API security delivered on a global edge/CDN with integrated WAAP and large-scale traffic protection.

Gaps: Edge-platform context; deep API behavioral discovery/posture is one part of a broad portfolio.

Products (17)

Network Firewall (NGFW)

1
  • Akamai Guardicore SegmentationMicrosegmentationAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Microsegmentation and network access controls.

API Security

2
  • Akamai API SecurityAPI securityAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Discover and protect APIs.
  • Noname Security PlatformAPI SecurityAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →
    API security (Akamai).

Attack Surface Management (ASM)

1
  • Akamai DNS Posture ManagementAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    DNS security posture management across multicloud and on-prem environments

WAF / DDoS / App Protection

6
  • Akamai App & API ProtectorWAFAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    WAF and API protection for web applications.
  • Akamai Bot & Abuse ProtectionAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Bot detection & mitigation platform protecting against abuse & scraping
  • Akamai Bot ManagerBot managementAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Control malicious bot traffic.
  • Akamai Edge DNSAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Cloud-based DNS service with DDoS protection and traffic management
  • Akamai ProlexicDDoSAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    DDoS mitigation platform.
  • Instart Web Performance (Legacy)AI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    A legacy web application security and performance optimization solution that combines security controls with performance enhancement features.

Secure Access Service Edge (SASE/SSE)

2
  • Akamai Enterprise Application AccessAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    ZTNA solution providing identity-based access to private apps
  • Akamai Secure Internet Access EnterpriseAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Cloud-based DNS firewall protecting users and IoT devices from threats

AI / LLM Security

1
  • Akamai Firewall for AIAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Firewall protecting LLMs from prompt attacks, data leaks, and harmful outputs

MFA & Passwordless

1
  • Akamai MFAAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    FIDO2-based MFA solution using smartphone push notifications for authentication

Identity Threat Detection and Response

1
  • Akamai Account ProtectorAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Protects against account abuse across lifecycle using ML and risk indicators

Runtime Application Self-Protection

1
  • Akamai Client-Side Protection & ComplianceAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Akamai Client-Side Protection & Compliance is a security tool that monitors and protects against client-side threats on websites, aiding in PCI DSS v4.0 compliance.

Threat Hunting

1
  • Akamai HuntAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Managed threat hunting service detecting evasive threats in network environments