Skip to main content
0-Doubt
NewsInvestorsQuestionnairesDeveloperHelp
AnonymousSign in
0-Doubt — neutral IT/Security research
BrowseResellersCertified analystsRFI/RFP questionnairesHow trust worksHelp & FAQAPI
  1. Home/
  2. Aviatrix

Aviatrix

enriched
MicrosegmentationNetwork Detection & Response (NDR)VPN

Represented by Carahsoft ↗, Trace3 ↗

aviatrix.ai ↗ · required email domain for this vendor's users

Do you work at Aviatrix?

This profile was built from public sources and hasn't been claimed yet. Claiming it lets you correct what's wrong and add details only you can confirm — and marks that information as vendor-verified for buyers.

Free, and it does not affect ranking, placement, or comparison results. The first person verified on Aviatrix's email domain becomes the profile admin.

Claim this profileAlready have an account?

Trust profileHow to read thisFive separate questions a buyer actually asks, each answered with its own evidence and a link to the source. There is deliberately no overall score: a single number invites comparison it cannot support, and would mostly reflect how much of Aviatrix we have managed to scan rather than anything about the vendor.

Not checked means we have not looked yet, and is never counted against a vendor. Limited means we did look, but found only one line of evidence — enough to report, not enough to corroborate.

checked 10 of 16 signals
  • Limited

    Independently verified

    Has anyone other than the vendor confirmed this?

    checked 3 of 4

    Nothing here has been confirmed by an independent third party yet.

    • No third-party certifications found
    • Profile not claimed by the vendor
  • Limited

    Operating durability

    Is this a real, durable business?

    checked 3 of 4

    How long this vendor has been operating, and who stands behind them.

    • Domain registered 2024 — 1 year(s) ago
    • Headquarters location not disclosed on their site
  • Mixed

    Behaviour under stress

    What do they do when something goes wrong?

    checked 2 of 3

    What their public record shows about handling vulnerabilities and outages.

    • 23 published CVE(s) — a public disclosure record exists
    • 5 rated critical
    • No public status page found
  • Limited

    Disclosure posture

    Do they tell you the awkward things unprompted?

    checked 2 of 3

    How much this vendor volunteers before you have to ask.

    • No trust center found
    • No bug bounty or vulnerability disclosure policy found
  • Not checked

    Momentum

    Are they still shipping, or coasting?

    checked 0 of 2

    We have not tracked this vendor's release activity yet.

    Nothing checked here yet — this is not a mark against Aviatrix.

Data coverage: 15/100What this measures (and doesn't)

Not a quality rating or endorsement — a measure of how much verified, disclosed data we actually have about this vendor. A low score usually means "we don't have much verified information yet," not "this is a bad vendor." Never used to sort or rank vendor lists.

Verification depth0/100
Security signal0/100
Buyer feedbackno data yet (0 reviews so far)
Profile completeness25/100
claim · HQ · materials · screenshots · integrations · certifications · security check

The platform admin controls the formula's weights.

Data coverage profileHow to read thisThe same four components behind the data coverage score above, shaped instead of listed — a vendor strong on verification but thin on buyer feedback looks visibly different from one that's the other way around. Security and feedback plot at the neutral midpoint (50) when there's no data yet (no products tracked, no reviews), matching how the actual score itself treats missing data — not a guess either way.

VerificationSecurityFeedbackCompletenessThis vendor — Verification: 0This vendor — Security: 0This vendor — Feedback: no data yetThis vendor — Completeness: 25

IntegrationsUI-12 — integration graphDetected from this vendor's own published integration/partner pages by the enrichment loop — each entry links the exact page it was found on. Directional: "integrates with" is claimed by this vendor; "integrated by" is claimed by the other vendor's site. Coverage grows as the scan progresses.

4 detected

Integrates with: Microsoft ↗, Native Security ↗

Integrated by: HiddenLayer, Wiz

Buyer reviewsUI-14 — verified-buyer reviewsWritten only by domain-verified buyers at other companies, attributed to their company domain (never their identity), and moderated. Buyer-sourced opinion, clearly separate from the neutral catalog facts above — and never an input to search or comparison ordering.

verified buyers only

No buyer reviews yet.

Reputation ratingUI-20 — anonymous ratingA single anonymous 5-star signal from buyers, resellers, and analysts who've engaged with this vendor — separate from the domain-attributed reviews above. No rater identity is ever shown, not even at company level.

anonymous

No ratings in this window yet.

External ratingsUI-22 — third-party ratingsAggregate rating and review count pulled directly from the source site's own published data — never the review text itself, which belongs to that site. Links go to the real page so you can read the actual reviews there.

via third-party review sites
PeerSpot: 4/5 (12 reviews) ↗

High-performance IPsec encryption for multicloud & hybrid environments AI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →

Security & trust signalsAbout these signalsCertifications are keyword-matched from the vendor's own public pages (each claim links to its source — verify directly before relying on it). Security headers are checked live against the vendor's homepage, re-checked every 90 days. Both are independent, automated signals, not a vendor-submitted or audited claim, and are not blended into a single score.

8 of 9 technical checks completed — not a score, just coverage

Security headers (5/5) — checked 8/13/2026

  • ✓ Strict-Transport-Security
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy
  • ✓ X-Frame-Options
  • ✓ X-Content-Type-Options
  • ✓ Referrer-Policy
  • ✕ security.txt

Infrastructure & transparency signals

Domain since 2024

CVE severity over timeUI-24 — CVE severity timelineEvery known CVE with a disclosure date and severity, plotted by when it was published — lets you see whether disclosures are trending toward more or less severe, not just a raw count. Same NVD-sourced, name-matched data as the list below.

LOWMEDIUMHIGHCRITICAL202020212022202320242025CVE-2024-50603 · CRITICAL 10.0 · 2025-01-08CVE-2022-38368 · HIGH 8.8 · 2022-08-16CVE-2021-40870 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2021-09-13CVE-2021-31776 · HIGH 7.8 · 2021-04-29CVE-2020-27569 · HIGH 7.5 · 2021-04-22CVE-2020-27568 · HIGH 7.5 · 2021-04-22CVE-2020-26553 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2020-11-18CVE-2020-26552 · HIGH 7.5 · 2020-11-18CVE-2020-26551 · HIGH 7.5 · 2020-11-18CVE-2020-26550 · HIGH 7.5 · 2020-11-18CVE-2020-26549 · HIGH 7.5 · 2020-11-18CVE-2020-26548 · HIGH 8.8 · 2020-11-18CVE-2020-13417 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2020-05-23CVE-2020-13416 · MEDIUM 6.5 · 2020-05-23CVE-2020-13415 · HIGH 7.5 · 2020-05-23CVE-2020-13414 · HIGH 7.5 · 2020-05-23CVE-2020-13413 · MEDIUM 5.3 · 2020-05-23CVE-2020-13412 · HIGH 8.8 · 2020-05-23CVE-2020-7224 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2020-04-16CVE-2019-17388 · HIGH 7.8 · 2019-12-05CVE-2019-17387 · HIGH 7.8 · 2019-12-05

Known CVEs (23)About this listSourced from the public NVD database, matched by vendor name. This is a name-based match, not exact version tracking — always check the linked NVD record for affected versions before drawing conclusions. “New” means published within the last 30 days. “Actively exploited” means CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog confirms real-world exploitation, not just a theoretical severity score.

RSS ⇢
  • CVE-2025-2172 ↗2025

    Aviatrix Controller versions prior to 7.1.4208, 7.2.5090, and 8.0.0 fail to sanitize user input prior to passing the input to command line utilities, allowing command injection via special characters …

  • CVE-2025-2171 ↗2025

    Aviatrix Controller versions prior to 7.1.4208, 7.2.5090, and 8.0.0 do not enforce rate limiting on password reset attempts, allowing adversaries to brute force guess the 6-digit password reset PIN

  • CVE-2024-50603 ↗⚠ actively exploitedCRITICAL 10.02025

    An issue was discovered in Aviatrix Controller before 7.1.4191 and 7.2.x before 7.2.4996. Due to the improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command, an unauthenticated attacker is a…

  • CVE-2022-38368 ↗HIGH 8.82022

    An issue was discovered in Aviatrix Gateway before 6.6.5712 and 6.7.x before 6.7.1376. Because Gateway API functions mishandle authentication, an authenticated VPN user can inject arbitrary commands.

  • CVE-2021-40870 ↗⚠ actively exploitedCRITICAL 9.82021

    An issue was discovered in Aviatrix Controller 6.x before 6.5-1804.1922. Unrestricted upload of a file with a dangerous type is possible, which allows an unauthenticated user to execute arbitrary code…

  • CVE-2021-31776 ↗HIGH 7.82021

    Aviatrix VPN Client before 2.14.14 on Windows has an unquoted search path that enables local privilege escalation to the SYSTEM user, if the machine is misconfigured to allow unprivileged users to wri…

  • CVE-2020-27569 ↗HIGH 7.52021

    Arbitrary File Write exists in Aviatrix VPN Client 2.8.2 and earlier. The VPN service writes logs to a location that is world writable and can be leveraged to gain write access to any file on the syst…

  • CVE-2020-27568 ↗HIGH 7.52021

    Insecure File Permissions exist in Aviatrix Controller 5.3.1516. Several world writable files and directories were found in the controller resource. Note: All Aviatrix appliances are fully encrypted. …

  • CVE-2020-26553 ↗CRITICAL 9.82020

    An issue was discovered in Aviatrix Controller before R6.0.2483. Several APIs contain functions that allow arbitrary files to be uploaded to the web tree.

  • CVE-2020-26552 ↗HIGH 7.52020

    An issue was discovered in Aviatrix Controller before R6.0.2483. Multiple executable files, that implement API endpoints, do not require a valid session ID for access.

  • CVE-2020-26551 ↗HIGH 7.52020

    An issue was discovered in Aviatrix Controller before R5.3.1151. Encrypted key values are stored in a readable file.

  • CVE-2020-26550 ↗HIGH 7.52020

    An issue was discovered in Aviatrix Controller before R5.3.1151. An encrypted file containing credentials to unrelated systems is protected by a three-character key.

  • CVE-2020-26549 ↗HIGH 7.52020

    An issue was discovered in Aviatrix Controller before R5.4.1290. The htaccess protection mechanism to prevent requests to directories can be bypassed for file downloading.

  • CVE-2020-26548 ↗HIGH 8.82020

    An issue was discovered in Aviatrix Controller before R5.4.1290. There is an insecure sudo rule: a user exists that can execute all commands as any user on the system.

  • CVE-2020-13417 ↗CRITICAL 9.82020

    An Elevation of Privilege issue was discovered in Aviatrix VPN Client before 2.10.7, because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-7224. This affects Linux, macOS, and Windows installations for certain Op…

  • CVE-2020-13416 ↗MEDIUM 6.52020

    An issue was discovered in Aviatrix Controller before 5.4.1066. A Controller Web Interface session token parameter is not required on an API call, which opens the application up to a Cross Site Reques…

  • CVE-2020-13415 ↗HIGH 7.52020

    An issue was discovered in Aviatrix Controller through 5.1. An attacker with any signed SAML assertion from the Identity Provider can establish a connection (even if that SAML assertion has expired or…

  • CVE-2020-13414 ↗HIGH 7.52020

    An issue was discovered in Aviatrix Controller before 5.4.1204. It contains credentials unused by the software.

  • CVE-2020-13413 ↗MEDIUM 5.32020

    An issue was discovered in Aviatrix Controller before 5.4.1204. There is a Observable Response Discrepancy from the API, which makes it easier to perform user enumeration via brute force.

  • CVE-2020-13412 ↗HIGH 8.82020

    An issue was discovered in Aviatrix Controller before 5.4.1204. An API call on the web interface lacked a session token check to control access, leading to CSRF.

  • …and 3 more

Competitors (12)

full alternatives comparison →
AbsoluteAI EdgeLabsAireyeAllentisArray NetworksAVGAviraAvocado SystemsByosCienaga SystemsDuskRiseGarland Technology

Products (3)

Network Detection & Response (NDR)

1
  • Aviatrix Workload Threat VisibilityAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Transforms NAT gateways into security sensors for cross-cloud egress visibility

VPN

1
  • Aviatrix High-Performance EncryptionAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    High-performance IPsec encryption for multicloud & hybrid environments

Microsegmentation

1
  • Aviatrix Zero Trust for WorkloadsAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Zero trust workload protection for VMs, containers, K8s, and serverless