Skip to main content
0-Doubt
NewsInvestorsQuestionnairesDeveloperHelp
AnonymousSign in
0-Doubt — neutral IT/Security research
BrowseResellersCertified analystsRFI/RFP questionnairesHow trust worksHelp & FAQAPI
  1. Home/
  2. Microsoft

Microsoft

enrichedPublic company (MSFT) ↗⚠ 2 disclosed incidentsSEC-disclosed cybersecurity incident(s)

This public company has filed at least one SEC 8-K disclosing a material cybersecurity incident (mandatory since Dec 2023). Not a judgment on their security practices today — many well-run companies have disclosed a real incident.

  • 3/8/2024 8-K/A ↗
  • 1/19/2024 8-K ↗
Attack Surface Management (ASM)Data ClassificationData Loss PreventionDecentralized IdentityEndpoint Detection & ResponseIdentity Threat Detection and ResponseInsider Threat Detection

Represented by AHEAD ↗, CBTS ↗, Carahsoft ↗, Continental Resources ↗, Converge Technology Solutions ↗, GuidePoint Security ↗, Herjavec Group ↗, Kudelski Security ↗, Long View Systems ↗, Netrix Global ↗, TD SYNNEX ↗, Trace3 ↗, World Wide Technology ↗, Zones ↗

microsoft.com ↗ · required email domain for this vendor's users

Headquartered in United StatesHeadquarters countrySourced only from this vendor's own published headquarters address (schema.org structured data on their site) — never guessed from domain TLD. Source ↗

Do you work at Microsoft?

This profile was built from public sources and hasn't been claimed yet. Claiming it lets you correct what's wrong and add details only you can confirm — and marks that information as vendor-verified for buyers.

Free, and it does not affect ranking, placement, or comparison results. The first person verified on Microsoft's email domain becomes the profile admin.

Claim this profileAlready have an account?

Trust profileHow to read thisFive separate questions a buyer actually asks, each answered with its own evidence and a link to the source. There is deliberately no overall score: a single number invites comparison it cannot support, and would mostly reflect how much of Microsoft we have managed to scan rather than anything about the vendor.

Not checked means we have not looked yet, and is never counted against a vendor. Limited means we did look, but found only one line of evidence — enough to report, not enough to corroborate.

checked 11 of 16 signals
  • Limited

    Independently verified

    Has anyone other than the vendor confirmed this?

    checked 3 of 4

    Nothing here has been confirmed by an independent third party yet.

    • No third-party certifications found
    • Profile not claimed by the vendor
  • Strong

    Operating durability

    Is this a real, durable business?

    checked 3 of 4

    How long this vendor has been operating, and who stands behind them.

    • Domain registered 1991 — 35 years ago
    • Headquarters: United States
    • 1 public SEC filing(s) — financials are a matter of record
  • Mixed

    Behaviour under stress

    What do they do when something goes wrong?

    checked 2 of 3

    What their public record shows about handling vulnerabilities and outages.

    • 100 published CVE(s) — a public disclosure record exists
    • 1 rated critical
    • No public status page found
  • Limited

    Disclosure posture

    Do they tell you the awkward things unprompted?

    checked 2 of 3

    How much this vendor volunteers before you have to ask.

    • No trust center found
    • Publishes a vulnerability disclosure policy
  • Limited

    Momentum

    Are they still shipping, or coasting?

    checked 1 of 2

    Whether this vendor is visibly still building.

    • Public GitHub org with 8262 repositories
Data coverage: 23/100What this measures (and doesn't)

Not a quality rating or endorsement — a measure of how much verified, disclosed data we actually have about this vendor. A low score usually means "we don't have much verified information yet," not "this is a bad vendor." Never used to sort or rank vendor lists.

Verification depth0/100
Security signal0/100
Buyer feedbackno data yet (0 reviews so far)
Profile completeness63/100
claim · HQ · materials · screenshots · integrations · certifications · security check

The platform admin controls the formula's weights.

Data coverage profileHow to read thisThe same four components behind the data coverage score above, shaped instead of listed — a vendor strong on verification but thin on buyer feedback looks visibly different from one that's the other way around. Security and feedback plot at the neutral midpoint (50) when there's no data yet (no products tracked, no reviews), matching how the actual score itself treats missing data — not a guess either way.

VerificationSecurityFeedbackCompletenessThis vendor — Verification: 0This vendor — Security: 0This vendor — Feedback: no data yetThis vendor — Completeness: 63

IntegrationsUI-12 — integration graphDetected from this vendor's own published integration/partner pages by the enrichment loop — each entry links the exact page it was found on. Directional: "integrates with" is claimed by this vendor; "integrated by" is claimed by the other vendor's site. Coverage grows as the scan progresses.

312 detected

Integrated by: 1Kosmos, 42Crunch, A10 Networks, ACI Learning, ALTR, Abbey Labs, Above Security, Abstract Security, Adaptive Security, Aembit, AiStrike, Aikido Security, Allot, Andesite, Apono, AppOmni, Aqua Security, Arcanna.ai, Arctic Wolf, Arnica, AuditBoard, Aviatrix, Axiomatics, Axoflow, Bitsight, Black Duck, Blackpoint Cyber, Brandefense, Cakewalk, Carbide, Censys, Cequence Security, CheckRed, Checkmarx, Cisco, Claroty, CloudDefense.AI, Cloudlytics, Coalfire, Cobalt, Cogent Security, Conviso, Cribl, Critical Start, CrowdStrike, CultureAI, CyCognito, Cyberhaven, Cyera, D3 Security, Darktrace, Data Theorem, Delinea, Device Authority, Devolutions, Dispel, Doppel, Dropzone AI, Duality Technologies, ELLIO, Echo, Edge Delta, Edgescan, Elastic, Embed Security, Engage Black, Entro Security, Exabeam, Exaforce, Expel, ExtraHop, F5, Fidelis Security, First Recon AI, Flare, Flashpoint, Forescout, Frame Security, FusionAuth, GTB Technologies, Gigamon, GlobalSign, GoodAccess, Group IB, Gurucul, HYCU, Hadrian, Hicomply, HiddenLayer, Huntress, IDEE, IRONSCALES, IS Decisions, ISARA, ISMS.online, Illumio, Imprivata, Infisical, Infoblox, InterVision, Intercede, Intermedia, Intezer, Intruder, Invary, IriusRisk, Island, Itential, Jit, Jumio, JumpCloud, Keepnet Labs, Kentik, Konvu, Kusari, LMNTRIX, Lansweeper, LastPass, Lema, Lightbeam, Loginsoft, Lumos, Lumu Technologies, ManagedMethods, Material Security, Mend, MergeBase, Mesh Security, Metomic, Mi-Token, Mindflow, Mitigant, Monad, Morphisec, Nagomi Security, NetBird, NetSfere, Netmaker, Netwrix, NightVision, Nightfall AI, Nile Secure, NinjaOne, Nirmata, NopSec, Nubo Software, Nudge Security, OLOID, OPAQUE, Obsidian Security, OctoXLabs, Offensive360, Offroad, Oleria, Omada, OneSpan, OneTrust, Onyx Security, OpenText Cybersecurity, Operant AI, Opscompass, Optimal IdM, Optro, Orca Security, OutThink, Oxford Computer Group, P0 Security, PKWARE, Inc., Panther, Pathlock, Patrowl, Pentera, PhishingBox, Phoenix Security, Phosphorus Cybersecurity, PlaxidityX, Plerion, PlexTrac, Plexicus, Plixer, PointGuard AI, Portal26, Portkey, Portnox, Prelude Security, Promptfoo, Proofpoint, Prophet Security, Protegrity, Prowler, Qevlar AI, QuilrAI, Rapid7, RapidFort, Realm.Security, Reco, Red Canary, Redjack, RegScale, ReversingLabs, Ridge Security, Root.io, SAI360 INC., SMARTFENSE, SOC Jedi.AI, Safe Security, Saporo, ScalePad, Scylos, Scytale, SecLogic, Seceon Inc, Secret Double Octopus, SecurEnvoy, Secure Code Warrior, SecureW2, Secureframe, Seemplicity, Segura, Sekoia.io, SenseOn, SentinelOne, Sentra, SentryBay, Seraphic, Serval, Sevco Security, ShareFile, Simbian, Siren, Skyhigh Security, Sn1perSecurity LLC, SoSafe, Sonatype, Sophos, SpamExperts, SpyCloud, Stellar Cyber, Stream.Security, Strobes Security, Sumo Logic, SurePath AI, Swimlane, Sydekick, Synqly, TCPWave, Tanium, Team Cymru, Teleport, Teleskope, Tenzir, Teramind Inc., Terralogic, ThreatDefence, ThreatDown by Malwarebytes, Token Security, Torq, Tracebit, Traceless, Transmit Security, Trust3 AI, TrustLayer, TrustWorks, Twingate, Ubiq Security, Ubisecure, UncommonX, Uniqkey, Uno, UpGuard, Upstream Security, Upwind, Valence Security, Valimail, Vamu, Veriato, Verosint, Versa Networks, Veza, Vijil, Vipre, Vircom, Virtru, Vorlon, WatchGuard, Webz.io, Wiz, Zero Networks, ZeroFox, Zscaler, Zynap, authID, eMudhra, eSentire, enclaive, hoop.dev, iVerify, isMalicious, keepit, netcraft, productiv, rebasoft, recordpoint, runZero, simeio, smartertools, specterops, spin.ai, torii, utimaco, viso trust, yubico

Buyer reviewsUI-14 — verified-buyer reviewsWritten only by domain-verified buyers at other companies, attributed to their company domain (never their identity), and moderated. Buyer-sourced opinion, clearly separate from the neutral catalog facts above — and never an input to search or comparison ordering.

verified buyers only

No buyer reviews yet.

Reputation ratingUI-20 — anonymous ratingA single anonymous 5-star signal from buyers, resellers, and analysts who've engaged with this vendor — separate from the domain-attributed reviews above. No rater identity is ever shown, not even at company level.

anonymous

No ratings in this window yet.

External ratingsUI-22 — third-party ratingsAggregate rating and review count pulled directly from the source site's own published data — never the review text itself, which belongs to that site. Links go to the real page so you can read the actual reviews there.

via third-party review sites
PeerSpot: 4.1/5 (212 reviews) ↗

Product screenshots (1)

from their products
Microsoft Defender for Identityauto

Security & trust signalsAbout these signalsCertifications are keyword-matched from the vendor's own public pages (each claim links to its source — verify directly before relying on it). Security headers are checked live against the vendor's homepage, re-checked every 90 days. Both are independent, automated signals, not a vendor-submitted or audited claim, and are not blended into a single score.

9 of 9 technical checks completed — not a score, just coverage

Security headers (1/5) — checked 8/13/2026

  • ✓ Strict-Transport-Security
  • ✕ Content-Security-Policy
  • ✕ X-Frame-Options
  • ✕ X-Content-Type-Options
  • ✕ Referrer-Policy
  • ✓ security.txt ↗

Infrastructure & transparency signals

Vuln disclosure policy ↗GitHub (8262 repos) ↗Domain since 1991CAA enabled

CVE severity over timeUI-24 — CVE severity timelineEvery known CVE with a disclosure date and severity, plotted by when it was published — lets you see whether disclosures are trending toward more or less severe, not just a raw count. Same NVD-sourced, name-matched data as the list below.

LOWMEDIUMHIGHCRITICAL1998199920002001CVE-2000-1081 · MEDIUM 4.6 · 2001-01-09CVE-2000-0983 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2000-12-19CVE-2000-0817 · HIGH 7.5 · 2000-12-19CVE-2000-0942 · MEDIUM 5.1 · 2000-12-19CVE-2000-0929 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2000-12-19CVE-2000-0885 · HIGH 7.5 · 2000-12-19CVE-2000-0980 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2000-12-19CVE-2000-1006 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2000-12-11CVE-2000-1061 · MEDIUM 5.1 · 2000-12-11CVE-2000-1217 · MEDIUM 4.6 · 2000-11-21CVE-2000-0854 · HIGH 10.0 · 2000-11-14CVE-2000-0858 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2000-11-14CVE-2000-0849 · LOW 2.6 · 2000-11-14CVE-2000-0765 · MEDIUM 5.1 · 2000-10-20CVE-2000-0790 · MEDIUM 4.6 · 2000-10-20CVE-2000-0788 · HIGH 10.0 · 2000-10-20CVE-2000-0777 · HIGH 7.2 · 2000-10-20CVE-2000-0771 · LOW 2.1 · 2000-10-20CVE-2000-0756 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2000-10-20CVE-2000-0753 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2000-10-20CVE-2000-0742 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2000-10-20CVE-2000-0710 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2000-10-20CVE-2000-0709 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2000-10-20CVE-2000-0563 · HIGH 10.0 · 2000-10-20CVE-2000-1079 · HIGH 7.5 · 2000-08-29CVE-2000-0637 · MEDIUM 4.6 · 2000-07-26CVE-2000-0653 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2000-07-20CVE-2000-0621 · HIGH 7.5 · 2000-07-20CVE-2000-0567 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2000-07-18CVE-2000-0662 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2000-07-14CVE-2000-0654 · MEDIUM 4.6 · 2000-07-11CVE-2000-0603 · MEDIUM 4.6 · 2000-07-07CVE-2000-0596 · HIGH 7.5 · 2000-06-27CVE-2000-0597 · HIGH 7.5 · 2000-06-27CVE-2000-0524 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2000-06-05CVE-2000-0402 · LOW 2.1 · 2000-05-30CVE-2000-0495 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2000-05-30CVE-2000-0485 · LOW 2.1 · 2000-05-30CVE-2000-0400 · HIGH 7.5 · 2000-05-13CVE-2000-0304 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2000-05-10CVE-2000-0331 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2000-04-20CVE-2000-1218 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2000-04-14CVE-2000-0260 · HIGH 7.5 · 2000-04-14CVE-2000-0277 · HIGH 7.2 · 2000-04-03CVE-2000-0302 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2000-03-31CVE-2000-0232 · LOW 2.1 · 2000-03-30CVE-2000-0228 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2000-03-17CVE-2000-0199 · HIGH 7.2 · 2000-03-14CVE-2000-0202 · HIGH 7.5 · 2000-03-08CVE-2000-0200 · MEDIUM 5.1 · 2000-03-06CVE-2000-0168 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2000-03-04CVE-2000-0201 · MEDIUM 5.1 · 2000-03-01CVE-2000-0216 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2000-02-29CVE-2000-0160 · HIGH 7.6 · 2000-02-21CVE-2000-0161 · HIGH 7.5 · 2000-02-18CVE-2000-0162 · MEDIUM 5.1 · 2000-02-18CVE-2000-0089 · LOW 2.1 · 2000-02-04CVE-2000-0132 · LOW 2.6 · 2000-01-31CVE-2000-0097 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2000-01-26CVE-2000-0098 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2000-01-26CVE-2000-0053 · HIGH 7.5 · 2000-01-04CVE-1999-1055 · HIGH 7.5 · 1999-12-31CVE-1999-1591 · HIGH 7.5 · 1999-12-31CVE-1999-1279 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 1999-12-31CVE-1999-1259 · LOW 2.1 · 1999-12-31CVE-1999-1246 · HIGH 7.5 · 1999-12-31CVE-1999-1043 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 1999-12-31CVE-1999-0993 · HIGH 7.5 · 1999-12-13CVE-1999-0999 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 1999-11-19CVE-2000-0073 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 1999-11-17CVE-2000-0329 · MEDIUM 5.1 · 1999-11-11CVE-1999-0766 · HIGH 9.3 · 1999-10-21CVE-2000-0327 · HIGH 7.6 · 1999-10-21CVE-1999-0794 · MEDIUM 4.6 · 1999-10-01CVE-1999-0910 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 1999-09-10CVE-1999-1016 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 1999-08-27CVE-1999-1052 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 1999-08-24CVE-2000-0325 · HIGH 7.2 · 1999-08-20CVE-1999-0749 · LOW 2.6 · 1999-08-16CVE-1999-0682 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 1999-08-06CVE-1999-0700 · MEDIUM 6.2 · 1999-07-29CVE-2000-0323 · HIGH 7.6 · 1999-07-28CVE-1999-1011 · HIGH 10.0 · 1999-07-19CVE-1999-1164 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 1999-06-25CVE-1999-1368 · HIGH 7.5 · 1999-05-12CVE-1999-1033 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 1999-05-11CVE-1999-1520 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 1999-05-11CVE-1999-0717 · LOW 2.6 · 1999-05-07CVE-1999-1097 · MEDIUM 6.4 · 1999-05-04CVE-1999-0468 · HIGH 8.2 · 1999-04-09CVE-1999-0419 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 1999-03-01CVE-1999-0386 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 1999-03-01CVE-1999-0379 · HIGH 7.5 · 1999-02-22CVE-1999-1544 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 1999-01-24CVE-1999-0364 · HIGH 10.0 · 1999-01-01CVE-1999-1291 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 1998-10-05CVE-1999-0288 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 1998-08-01CVE-1999-1556 · HIGH 7.2 · 1998-06-29CVE-1999-0012 · HIGH 7.0 · 1998-02-06CVE-1999-0280 · HIGH 7.5 · 1997-04-01

Known CVEs (100)About this listSourced from the public NVD database, matched by vendor name. This is a name-based match, not exact version tracking — always check the linked NVD record for affected versions before drawing conclusions. “New” means published within the last 30 days. “Actively exploited” means CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog confirms real-world exploitation, not just a theoretical severity score.

RSS ⇢
  • CVE-2000-1081 ↗MEDIUM 4.62001

    The xp_displayparamstmt function in SQL Server and Microsoft SQL Server Desktop Engine (MSDE) does not properly restrict the length of a buffer before calling the srv_paraminfo function in the SQL Ser…

  • CVE-2000-0983 ↗MEDIUM 5.02000

    Microsoft NetMeeting with Remote Desktop Sharing enabled allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU utilization) via a sequence of null bytes to the NetMeeting port, aka the "NetMeeting…

  • CVE-2000-0817 ↗HIGH 7.52000

    Buffer overflow in the HTTP protocol parser for Microsoft Network Monitor (Netmon) allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via malformed data, aka the "Netmon Protocol Parsing" vulnerabi…

  • CVE-2000-0942 ↗MEDIUM 5.12000

    The CiWebHitsFile component in Microsoft Indexing Services for Windows 2000 allows remote attackers to conduct a cross site scripting (CSS) attack via a CiRestriction parameter in a .htw request, aka …

  • CVE-2000-0929 ↗MEDIUM 5.02000

    Microsoft Windows Media Player 7 allows attackers to cause a denial of service in RTF-enabled email clients via an embedded OCX control that is not closed properly, aka the "OCX Attachment" vulnerabil…

  • CVE-2000-0885 ↗HIGH 7.52000

    Buffer overflows in Microsoft Network Monitor (Netmon) allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a long Browser Name in a CIFS Browse Frame, a long SNMP community name, or a long userna…

  • CVE-2000-0980 ↗MEDIUM 5.02000

    NMPI (Name Management Protocol on IPX) listener in Microsoft NWLink does not properly filter packets from a broadcast address, which allows remote attackers to cause a broadcast storm and flood the ne…

  • CVE-2000-1006 ↗MEDIUM 5.02000

    Microsoft Exchange Server 5.5 does not properly handle a MIME header with a blank charset specified, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a charset="" command, aka the "Malfo…

  • CVE-2000-1061 ↗MEDIUM 5.12000

    Microsoft Virtual Machine (VM) in Internet Explorer 4.x and 5.x allows an unsigned applet to create and use ActiveX controls, which allows a remote attacker to bypass Internet Explorer's security sett…

  • CVE-2000-1217 ↗MEDIUM 4.62000

    Microsoft Windows 2000 before Service Pack 2 (SP2), when running in a non-Windows 2000 domain and using NTLM authentication, and when credentials of an account are locally cached, allows local users t…

  • CVE-2000-0854 ↗HIGH 10.02000

    When a Microsoft Office 2000 document is launched, the directory of that document is first used to locate DLL's such as riched20.dll and msi.dll, which could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary com…

  • CVE-2000-0858 ↗MEDIUM 5.02000

    Vulnerability in Microsoft Windows NT 4.0 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service in IIS by sending it a series of malformed requests which cause INETINFO.EXE to fail, aka the "Invalid UR…

  • CVE-2000-0849 ↗LOW 2.62000

    Race condition in Microsoft Windows Media server allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service in the Windows Media Unicast Service via a malformed request, aka the "Unicast Service Race Condit…

  • CVE-2000-0765 ↗MEDIUM 5.12000

    Buffer overflow in the HTML interpreter in Microsoft Office 2000 allows an attacker to execute arbitrary commands via a long embedded object tag, aka the "Microsoft Office HTML Object Tag" vulnerabili…

  • CVE-2000-0790 ↗MEDIUM 4.62000

    The web-based folder display capability in Microsoft Internet Explorer 5.5 on Windows 98 allows local users to insert Trojan horse programs by modifying the Folder.htt file and using the InvokeVerb me…

  • CVE-2000-0788 ↗HIGH 10.02000

    The Mail Merge tool in Microsoft Word does not prompt the user before executing Visual Basic (VBA) scripts in an Access database, which could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary commands.

  • CVE-2000-0777 ↗HIGH 7.22000

    The password protection feature of Microsoft Money can store the password in plaintext, which allows attackers with physical access to the system to obtain the password, aka the "Money Password" vulne…

  • CVE-2000-0771 ↗LOW 2.12000

    Microsoft Windows 2000 allows local users to cause a denial of service by corrupting the local security policy via malformed RPC traffic, aka the "Local Security Policy Corruption" vulnerability.

  • CVE-2000-0756 ↗MEDIUM 5.02000

    Microsoft Outlook 2000 does not properly process long or malformed fields in vCard (.vcf) files, which allows attackers to cause a denial of service.

  • CVE-2000-0753 ↗MEDIUM 5.02000

    The Microsoft Outlook mail client identifies the physical path of the sender's machine within a winmail.dat attachment to Rich Text Format (RTF) files.

  • …and 80 more

Competitors (13)

full alternatives comparison →
CrowdStrikeOktaAcronis International GmbHAkamaiArexdataBitdefenderCiscoComodoCyberhavenCyCraft TechnologyGuardzPalo Alto Networkssafend ltd.

Strengths & gaps by category

neutral · vendor-sourced

Drawn from this vendor's own public materials and authored to keep category questionnaires balanced. Gaps reflect capabilities not emphasized in public materials, not rankings.

Cloud-Native Application Protection (CNAPP) (source)

Strengths: Defender for Cloud integrates CNAPP capabilities tightly with Azure and the broader Microsoft security stack.

Gaps: Deepest value lands within the Azure/Microsoft ecosystem; multi-cloud parity is emphasized less than Azure-native coverage.

Data Security Posture Management (DSPM) (source)

Strengths: Purview delivers data classification, DLP, and governance deeply integrated with Microsoft 365 and Azure.

Gaps: Deepest value lands within the Microsoft ecosystem; multi-cloud/heterogeneous parity is emphasized less.

Endpoint Detection & Response (source)

Strengths: Deep Windows and Microsoft 365 integration, EDR plus XDR, and bundling within E5 licensing.

Gaps: Full value is tied to Microsoft licensing and ecosystem; cross-platform (macOS/Linux) parity is emphasized less.

Identity & Access Management (source)

Strengths: Entra ID delivers deep workforce IAM integrated with Microsoft 365/Azure — SSO, MFA, conditional access, governance, and PIM.

Gaps: Deepest value lands within the Microsoft ecosystem; heterogeneous/multi-cloud depth is emphasized less.

SIEM (source)

Strengths: Sentinel is a cloud-native SIEM deeply integrated with Azure, M365, and Defender XDR, with consumption pricing.

Gaps: Value is concentrated in the Microsoft ecosystem; multi-cloud/heterogeneous parity is emphasized less.

Products (16)

Endpoint Detection & Response

3
  • Microsoft DefenderAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Security app for individuals/families protecting devices from online threats
  • Microsoft Defender XDRAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    XDR solution for unified detection and response across Microsoft 365
  • Microsoft Defender for EndpointEDR/XDRAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →
    Enterprise endpoint detection and response.

SIEM

1
  • Microsoft SentinelSIEMAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →
    Cloud-native SIEM and SOAR.

Attack Surface Management (ASM)

1
  • Microsoft Defender EASMAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Discovers and monitors external-facing assets and vulnerabilities

Cloud-Native Application Protection (CNAPP)

1
  • Microsoft Defender for CloudCNAPPAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →
    Cloud security posture and workload protection (CNAPP).

Secure Access Service Edge (SASE/SSE)

1
  • Microsoft Entra Internet/Private AccessSSEAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →
    Security Service Edge (SSE).

Identity & Access Management

1
  • Microsoft Entra IDIAMAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →
    Cloud identity and access management.

Email Security

1
  • Microsoft Defender for Office 365Email securityAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →
    Email and collaboration security.

Vulnerability Management

1
  • Microsoft Defender Vulnerability ManagementVuln mgmtAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →
    Vulnerability assessment and remediation.

Data Security Posture Management (DSPM)

1
  • Microsoft PurviewDSPM/DLPAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →
    Data security, governance, and compliance.

Identity Threat Detection and Response

1
  • Microsoft Defender for IdentityAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Identity threat detection and response solution for Active Directory

Insider Threat Detection

1
  • Microsoft Purview Insider Risk ManagementAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Identifies and remediates insider risks using machine learning templates

Data Loss Prevention

1
  • Microsoft Purview Data Loss PreventionAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Prevents unauthorized sharing and transfer of sensitive data across devices

Decentralized Identity

1
  • Microsoft Entra Verified IDAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Verifiable credential service for digital identity verification

Data Classification

1
  • Microsoft Purview Information ProtectionAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Data classification and protection solution for Microsoft environments