Skip to main content
0-Doubt
NewsInvestorsQuestionnairesDeveloperHelp
AnonymousSign in
0-Doubt — neutral IT/Security research
BrowseResellersCertified analystsRFI/RFP questionnairesHow trust worksHelp & FAQAPI
  1. Home/
  2. OPAQUE

OPAQUE

enriched
AI / LLM SecurityConfidential Computing

opaque.co ↗ · required email domain for this vendor's users

Do you work at OPAQUE?

This profile was built from public sources and hasn't been claimed yet. Claiming it lets you correct what's wrong and add details only you can confirm — and marks that information as vendor-verified for buyers.

Free, and it does not affect ranking, placement, or comparison results. The first person verified on OPAQUE's email domain becomes the profile admin.

Claim this profileAlready have an account?

Trust profileHow to read thisFive separate questions a buyer actually asks, each answered with its own evidence and a link to the source. There is deliberately no overall score: a single number invites comparison it cannot support, and would mostly reflect how much of OPAQUE we have managed to scan rather than anything about the vendor.

Not checked means we have not looked yet, and is never counted against a vendor. Limited means we did look, but found only one line of evidence — enough to report, not enough to corroborate.

checked 8 of 16 signals
  • Limited

    Independently verified

    Has anyone other than the vendor confirmed this?

    checked 3 of 4

    Nothing here has been confirmed by an independent third party yet.

    • No third-party certifications found
    • Profile not claimed by the vendor
  • Limited

    Operating durability

    Is this a real, durable business?

    checked 2 of 4

    How long this vendor has been operating, and who stands behind them.

    • Headquarters location not disclosed on their site
  • Mixed

    Behaviour under stress

    What do they do when something goes wrong?

    checked 2 of 3

    What their public record shows about handling vulnerabilities and outages.

    • 19 published CVE(s) — a public disclosure record exists
    • 2 rated critical
    • No public status page found
  • Limited

    Disclosure posture

    Do they tell you the awkward things unprompted?

    checked 1 of 3

    How much this vendor volunteers before you have to ask.

    • No bug bounty or vulnerability disclosure policy found
  • Not checked

    Momentum

    Are they still shipping, or coasting?

    checked 0 of 2

    We have not tracked this vendor's release activity yet.

    Nothing checked here yet — this is not a mark against OPAQUE.

Data coverage: 15/100What this measures (and doesn't)

Not a quality rating or endorsement — a measure of how much verified, disclosed data we actually have about this vendor. A low score usually means "we don't have much verified information yet," not "this is a bad vendor." Never used to sort or rank vendor lists.

Verification depth0/100
Security signal0/100
Buyer feedbackno data yet (0 reviews so far)
Profile completeness25/100
claim · HQ · materials · screenshots · integrations · certifications · security check

The platform admin controls the formula's weights.

Data coverage profileHow to read thisThe same four components behind the data coverage score above, shaped instead of listed — a vendor strong on verification but thin on buyer feedback looks visibly different from one that's the other way around. Security and feedback plot at the neutral midpoint (50) when there's no data yet (no products tracked, no reviews), matching how the actual score itself treats missing data — not a guess either way.

VerificationSecurityFeedbackCompletenessThis vendor — Verification: 0This vendor — Security: 0This vendor — Feedback: no data yetThis vendor — Completeness: 25

IntegrationsUI-12 — integration graphDetected from this vendor's own published integration/partner pages by the enrichment loop — each entry links the exact page it was found on. Directional: "integrates with" is claimed by this vendor; "integrated by" is claimed by the other vendor's site. Coverage grows as the scan progresses.

3 detected

Integrates with: Cisco ↗, Microsoft ↗, ServiceNow ↗

Buyer reviewsUI-14 — verified-buyer reviewsWritten only by domain-verified buyers at other companies, attributed to their company domain (never their identity), and moderated. Buyer-sourced opinion, clearly separate from the neutral catalog facts above — and never an input to search or comparison ordering.

verified buyers only

No buyer reviews yet.

Reputation ratingUI-20 — anonymous ratingA single anonymous 5-star signal from buyers, resellers, and analysts who've engaged with this vendor — separate from the domain-attributed reviews above. No rater identity is ever shown, not even at company level.

anonymous

No ratings in this window yet.

Confidential AI platform for deploying AI agents on sensitive data securely AI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →

Security & trust signalsAbout these signalsCertifications are keyword-matched from the vendor's own public pages (each claim links to its source — verify directly before relying on it). Security headers are checked live against the vendor's homepage, re-checked every 90 days. Both are independent, automated signals, not a vendor-submitted or audited claim, and are not blended into a single score.

6 of 9 technical checks completed — not a score, just coverage

Security headers (3/5) — checked 8/14/2026

  • ✓ Strict-Transport-Security
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy
  • ✓ X-Frame-Options
  • ✕ X-Content-Type-Options
  • ✕ Referrer-Policy
  • ✕ security.txt

Infrastructure & transparency signals

DNSSEC enabled

CVE severity over timeUI-24 — CVE severity timelineEvery known CVE with a disclosure date and severity, plotted by when it was published — lets you see whether disclosures are trending toward more or less severe, not just a raw count. Same NVD-sourced, name-matched data as the list below.

LOWMEDIUMHIGHCRITICAL20172018201920202021202220232024CVE-2024-0947 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2024-06-27CVE-2024-5966 · MEDIUM 6.4 · 2024-06-22CVE-2024-31951 · MEDIUM 6.5 · 2024-04-08CVE-2023-48309 · MEDIUM 5.3 · 2023-11-21CVE-2023-4956 · MEDIUM 6.5 · 2023-11-08CVE-2023-5722 · MEDIUM 5.3 · 2023-10-25CVE-2023-38873 · MEDIUM 6.5 · 2023-09-28CVE-2023-23343 · LOW 2.4 · 2023-06-23CVE-2022-45403 · MEDIUM 6.5 · 2022-12-23CVE-2021-38491 · MEDIUM 6.5 · 2021-11-03CVE-2020-26268 · MEDIUM 4.4 · 2020-12-11CVE-2020-12391 · HIGH 7.5 · 2020-05-26CVE-2018-12391 · HIGH 8.8 · 2019-02-28CVE-2018-20742 · HIGH 7.5 · 2019-01-24CVE-2018-12358 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2018-10-18CVE-2018-1000088 · MEDIUM 6.1 · 2018-03-13CVE-2017-11213 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2017-12-09CVE-2017-8031 · MEDIUM 5.3 · 2017-11-27CVE-2015-6432 · HIGH 7.5 · 2016-01-05

Known CVEs (19)About this listSourced from the public NVD database, matched by vendor name. This is a name-based match, not exact version tracking — always check the linked NVD record for affected versions before drawing conclusions. “New” means published within the last 30 days. “Actively exploited” means CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog confirms real-world exploitation, not just a theoretical severity score.

RSS ⇢
  • CVE-2024-0947 ↗CRITICAL 9.82024

    Reliance on Cookies without Validation and Integrity Checking vulnerability in Talya Informatics Elektraweb allows Session Credential Falsification through Manipulation, Accessing/Intercepting/Modifyi…

  • CVE-2024-5966 ↗MEDIUM 6.42024

    The Grey Opaque theme for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the ‘url’ parameter within the theme's Download-Button shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 2.0.1 due to…

  • CVE-2024-31951 ↗MEDIUM 6.52024

    In the Opaque LSA Extended Link parser in FRRouting (FRR) through 9.1, there can be a buffer overflow and daemon crash in ospf_te_parse_ext_link for OSPF LSA packets during an attempt to read Segment …

  • CVE-2023-48309 ↗MEDIUM 5.32023

    NextAuth.js provides authentication for Next.js. `next-auth` applications prior to version 4.24.5 that rely on the default Middleware authorization are affected by a vulnerability. A bad actor could c…

  • CVE-2023-4956 ↗MEDIUM 6.52023

    A flaw was found in Quay. Clickjacking is when an attacker uses multiple transparent or opaque layers to trick a user into clicking on a button or link on another page when they intend to click on the…

  • CVE-2023-5722 ↗MEDIUM 5.32023

    Using iterative requests an attacker was able to learn the size of an opaque response, as well as the contents of a server-supplied Vary header. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 119.

  • CVE-2023-38873 ↗MEDIUM 6.52023

    The commit 3730880 (April 2023) and v.0.9-beta1 of gugoan Economizzer is vulnerable to Clickjacking. Clickjacking, also known as a "UI redress attack", is when an attacker uses multiple transparent or…

  • CVE-2023-23343 ↗LOW 2.42023

    A clickjacking vulnerability in the HCL BigFix OSD Bare Metal Server version 311.12 or lower allows attacker to use transparent or opaque layers to trick a user into clicking on a button or link on an…

  • CVE-2022-45403 ↗MEDIUM 6.52022

    Service Workers should not be able to infer information about opaque cross-origin responses; but timing information for cross-origin media combined with Range requests might have allowed them to deter…

  • CVE-2021-38491 ↗MEDIUM 6.52021

    Mixed-content checks were unable to analyze opaque origins which led to some mixed content being loaded. This vulnerability affects Firefox < 92.

  • CVE-2020-26268 ↗MEDIUM 4.42020

    In affected versions of TensorFlow the tf.raw_ops.ImmutableConst operation returns a constant tensor created from a memory mapped file which is assumed immutable. However, if the type of the tensor is…

  • CVE-2020-12391 ↗HIGH 7.52020

    Documents formed using data: URLs in an OBJECT element failed to inherit the CSP of the creating context. This allowed the execution of scripts that should have been blocked, albeit with a unique opaq…

  • CVE-2018-12391 ↗HIGH 8.82019

    During HTTP Live Stream playback on Firefox for Android, audio data can be accessed across origins in violation of security policies. Because the problem is in the underlying Android service, this iss…

  • CVE-2018-20742 ↗HIGH 7.52019

    An issue was discovered in UC Berkeley RISE Opaque before 2018-12-01. There is no boundary check on ocall_malloc. The return value could be a pointer to enclave memory. It could cause an arbitrary enc…

  • CVE-2018-12358 ↗MEDIUM 4.32018

    Service workers can use redirection to avoid the tainting of cross-origin resources in some instances, allowing a malicious site to read responses which are supposed to be opaque. This vulnerability a…

  • CVE-2018-1000088 ↗MEDIUM 6.12018

    Doorkeeper version 2.1.0 through 4.2.5 contains a Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in web view's OAuth app form, user authorization prompt web view that can result in Stored XSS on the OAuth C…

  • CVE-2017-11213 ↗CRITICAL 9.82017

    An issue was discovered in Adobe Flash Player 27.0.0.183 and earlier versions. This vulnerability occurs as a result of a computation that reads data that is past the end of the target buffer due to a…

  • CVE-2017-8031 ↗MEDIUM 5.32017

    An issue was discovered in Cloud Foundry Foundation cf-release (all versions prior to v279) and UAA (30.x versions prior to 30.6, 45.x versions prior to 45.4, 52.x versions prior to 52.1). In some cas…

  • CVE-2015-6432 ↗HIGH 7.52016

    Cisco IOS XR 4.2.0, 4.3.0, 5.0.0, 5.1.0, 5.2.0, 5.2.2, 5.2.4, 5.3.0, and 5.3.2 does not properly restrict the number of Path Computation Elements (PCEs) for OSPF LSA opaque area updates, which allows …

Competitors (12)

full alternatives comparison →
AcompanyAcuvityAdeptiv AIAdversa AIAGAT SoftwareAI EdgeLabsAI ScoreDataKryptoDuality TechnologiesEnveilObliviousProtopia AI

Products (3)

AI / LLM Security

1
  • Confidential AgentsAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Confidential AI platform for deploying AI agents on sensitive data securely

Confidential Computing

2
  • Confidential Agents for RAGAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Confidential computing platform for secure RAG and AI agent workflows
  • OPAQUE for Secure AnalyticsAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Enables secure analytics across data silos using cryptographic verification