Skip to main content
0-Doubt
NewsInvestorsQuestionnairesDeveloperHelp
AnonymousSign in
0-Doubt — neutral IT/Security research
BrowseResellersCertified analystsRFI/RFP questionnairesHow trust worksHelp & FAQAPI
  1. Home/
  2. Enclave

Enclave

enriched
Secure Access Service Edge (SASE/SSE)

Represented by World Wide Technology ↗

enclave.io ↗ · required email domain for this vendor's users

Do you work at Enclave?

This profile was built from public sources and hasn't been claimed yet. Claiming it lets you correct what's wrong and add details only you can confirm — and marks that information as vendor-verified for buyers.

Free, and it does not affect ranking, placement, or comparison results. The first person verified on Enclave's email domain becomes the profile admin.

Claim this profileAlready have an account?

Trust profileHow to read thisFive separate questions a buyer actually asks, each answered with its own evidence and a link to the source. There is deliberately no overall score: a single number invites comparison it cannot support, and would mostly reflect how much of Enclave we have managed to scan rather than anything about the vendor.

Not checked means we have not looked yet, and is never counted against a vendor. Limited means we did look, but found only one line of evidence — enough to report, not enough to corroborate.

checked 7 of 16 signals
  • Limited

    Independently verified

    Has anyone other than the vendor confirmed this?

    checked 3 of 4

    Nothing here has been confirmed by an independent third party yet.

    • No third-party certifications found
    • Profile not claimed by the vendor
  • Limited

    Operating durability

    Is this a real, durable business?

    checked 2 of 4

    How long this vendor has been operating, and who stands behind them.

    • Headquarters location not disclosed on their site
  • Mixed

    Behaviour under stress

    What do they do when something goes wrong?

    checked 2 of 3

    What their public record shows about handling vulnerabilities and outages.

    • 59 published CVE(s) — a public disclosure record exists
    • 5 rated critical
    • No public status page found
  • Not checked

    Disclosure posture

    Do they tell you the awkward things unprompted?

    checked 0 of 3

    We have not checked what this vendor discloses publicly yet.

    Nothing checked here yet — this is not a mark against Enclave.

  • Not checked

    Momentum

    Are they still shipping, or coasting?

    checked 0 of 2

    We have not tracked this vendor's release activity yet.

    Nothing checked here yet — this is not a mark against Enclave.

Data coverage: 13/100What this measures (and doesn't)

Not a quality rating or endorsement — a measure of how much verified, disclosed data we actually have about this vendor. A low score usually means "we don't have much verified information yet," not "this is a bad vendor." Never used to sort or rank vendor lists.

Verification depth0/100
Security signal0/100
Buyer feedbackno data yet (0 reviews so far)
Profile completeness13/100
claim · HQ · materials · screenshots · integrations · certifications · security check

The platform admin controls the formula's weights.

Data coverage profileHow to read thisThe same four components behind the data coverage score above, shaped instead of listed — a vendor strong on verification but thin on buyer feedback looks visibly different from one that's the other way around. Security and feedback plot at the neutral midpoint (50) when there's no data yet (no products tracked, no reviews), matching how the actual score itself treats missing data — not a guess either way.

VerificationSecurityFeedbackCompletenessThis vendor — Verification: 0This vendor — Security: 0This vendor — Feedback: no data yetThis vendor — Completeness: 13

IntegrationsUI-12 — integration graphDetected from this vendor's own published integration/partner pages by the enrichment loop — each entry links the exact page it was found on. Directional: "integrates with" is claimed by this vendor; "integrated by" is claimed by the other vendor's site. Coverage grows as the scan progresses.

1 detected

Integrated by: Tenable

Buyer reviewsUI-14 — verified-buyer reviewsWritten only by domain-verified buyers at other companies, attributed to their company domain (never their identity), and moderated. Buyer-sourced opinion, clearly separate from the neutral catalog facts above — and never an input to search or comparison ordering.

verified buyers only

No buyer reviews yet.

Reputation ratingUI-20 — anonymous ratingA single anonymous 5-star signal from buyers, resellers, and analysts who've engaged with this vendor — separate from the domain-attributed reviews above. No rater identity is ever shown, not even at company level.

anonymous

No ratings in this window yet.

ZTNA platform replacing VPNs with direct, policy-driven encrypted connectivity. AI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →

Security & trust signalsAbout these signalsCertifications are keyword-matched from the vendor's own public pages (each claim links to its source — verify directly before relying on it). Security headers are checked live against the vendor's homepage, re-checked every 90 days. Both are independent, automated signals, not a vendor-submitted or audited claim, and are not blended into a single score.

4 of 9 technical checks completed — not a score, just coverage

No positive signals detected yet across the checks completed so far.

CVE severity over timeUI-24 — CVE severity timelineEvery known CVE with a disclosure date and severity, plotted by when it was published — lets you see whether disclosures are trending toward more or less severe, not just a raw count. Same NVD-sourced, name-matched data as the list below.

LOWMEDIUMHIGHCRITICAL20192020202120222023202420252026CVE-2026-32220 · MEDIUM 4.4 · 2026-04-14CVE-2026-23670 · MEDIUM 5.7 · 2026-04-14CVE-2026-27597 · CRITICAL 10.0 · 2026-02-25CVE-2026-25533 · HIGH 8.8 · 2026-02-07CVE-2026-22686 · CRITICAL 10.0 · 2026-01-14CVE-2026-20938 · HIGH 7.8 · 2026-01-13CVE-2026-20935 · MEDIUM 6.2 · 2026-01-13CVE-2026-20876 · MEDIUM 6.7 · 2026-01-13CVE-2026-20819 · MEDIUM 5.5 · 2026-01-13CVE-2025-64186 · HIGH 8.7 · 2025-11-13CVE-2025-53717 · HIGH 7.0 · 2025-10-14CVE-2025-39722 · MEDIUM 5.5 · 2025-09-05CVE-2025-38334 · MEDIUM 5.5 · 2025-07-10CVE-2025-48811 · MEDIUM 6.7 · 2025-07-08CVE-2025-48803 · MEDIUM 6.7 · 2025-07-08CVE-2025-47159 · HIGH 7.8 · 2025-07-08CVE-2025-27735 · MEDIUM 6.0 · 2025-04-08CVE-2019-8900 · MEDIUM 6.8 · 2025-02-22CVE-2025-21370 · HIGH 7.8 · 2025-01-14CVE-2024-29970 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2025-01-10CVE-2024-49076 · HIGH 7.8 · 2024-12-12CVE-2023-52568 · MEDIUM 4.7 · 2024-03-03CVE-2021-46927 · MEDIUM 5.5 · 2024-02-27CVE-2022-46487 · HIGH 7.8 · 2023-12-30CVE-2023-37479 · MEDIUM 5.3 · 2023-07-18CVE-2021-36647 · MEDIUM 4.7 · 2023-01-18CVE-2022-46392 · MEDIUM 5.3 · 2022-12-16CVE-2021-41094 · MEDIUM 4.2 · 2021-10-04CVE-2021-36219 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2021-09-27CVE-2021-36218 · HIGH 7.5 · 2021-09-27CVE-2021-22552 · MEDIUM 5.3 · 2021-08-02CVE-2020-36421 · MEDIUM 5.3 · 2021-07-19CVE-2021-33767 · HIGH 8.2 · 2021-07-14CVE-2021-22550 · MEDIUM 6.5 · 2021-06-08CVE-2021-3543 · MEDIUM 6.7 · 2021-06-01CVE-2021-28653 · MEDIUM 6.5 · 2021-03-19CVE-2020-8944 · MEDIUM 5.3 · 2020-12-15CVE-2020-8943 · MEDIUM 5.3 · 2020-12-15CVE-2020-8942 · MEDIUM 5.3 · 2020-12-15CVE-2020-8941 · MEDIUM 5.3 · 2020-12-15CVE-2020-8940 · MEDIUM 5.3 · 2020-12-15CVE-2020-8939 · MEDIUM 5.3 · 2020-12-15CVE-2020-8938 · MEDIUM 5.3 · 2020-12-15CVE-2020-8937 · MEDIUM 5.3 · 2020-12-15CVE-2020-8936 · MEDIUM 5.3 · 2020-12-15CVE-2020-8935 · MEDIUM 5.3 · 2020-12-15CVE-2020-29438 · MEDIUM 6.5 · 2020-12-01CVE-2020-15224 · MEDIUM 6.8 · 2020-10-14CVE-2019-18619 · HIGH 7.8 · 2020-07-22CVE-2020-15107 · MEDIUM 5.3 · 2020-07-16CVE-2020-10932 · MEDIUM 4.7 · 2020-04-15CVE-2020-5499 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2020-01-04CVE-2019-1370 · MEDIUM 5.5 · 2019-11-13CVE-2019-1369 · MEDIUM 5.5 · 2019-10-10CVE-2019-0876 · MEDIUM 5.5 · 2019-04-10CVE-2018-20742 · HIGH 7.5 · 2019-01-24CVE-2018-3615 · HIGH 7.3 · 2018-08-14

Known CVEs (59)About this listSourced from the public NVD database, matched by vendor name. This is a name-based match, not exact version tracking — always check the linked NVD record for affected versions before drawing conclusions. “New” means published within the last 30 days. “Actively exploited” means CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog confirms real-world exploitation, not just a theoretical severity score.

RSS ⇢
  • CVE-2026-32220 ↗MEDIUM 4.42026

    Improper access control in Windows Virtualization-Based Security (VBS) Enclave allows an authorized attacker to bypass a security feature locally.

  • CVE-2026-23670 ↗MEDIUM 5.72026

    Untrusted pointer dereference in Windows Virtualization-Based Security (VBS) Enclave allows an authorized attacker to bypass a security feature locally.

  • CVE-2026-27597 ↗CRITICAL 10.02026

    Enclave is a secure JavaScript sandbox designed for safe AI agent code execution. Prior to version 2.11.1, it is possible to escape the security boundraries set by `@enclave-vm/core`, which can be use…

  • CVE-2026-25533 ↗HIGH 8.82026

    Enclave is a secure JavaScript sandbox designed for safe AI agent code execution. Prior to 2.10.1, the existing layers of security in enclave-vm are insufficient: The AST sanitization can be bypassed …

  • CVE-2026-22696 ↗2026

    dcap-qvl implements the quote verification logic for DCAP (Data Center Attestation Primitives). A vulnerability present in versions prior to 0.3.9 involves a critical gap in the cryptographic verifica…

  • CVE-2026-22686 ↗CRITICAL 10.02026

    Enclave is a secure JavaScript sandbox designed for safe AI agent code execution. Prior to 2.7.0, there is a critical sandbox escape vulnerability in enclave-vm that allows untrusted, sandboxed JavaSc…

  • CVE-2026-20938 ↗HIGH 7.82026

    Untrusted pointer dereference in Windows Virtualization-Based Security (VBS) Enclave allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.

  • CVE-2026-20935 ↗MEDIUM 6.22026

    Untrusted pointer dereference in Windows Virtualization-Based Security (VBS) Enclave allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information locally.

  • CVE-2026-20876 ↗MEDIUM 6.72026

    Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows Virtualization-Based Security (VBS) Enclave allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.

  • CVE-2026-20819 ↗MEDIUM 5.52026

    Untrusted pointer dereference in Windows Virtualization-Based Security (VBS) Enclave allows an authorized attacker to disclose information locally.

  • CVE-2022-50720 ↗2025

    In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: x86/apic: Don't disable x2APIC if locked The APIC supports two modes, legacy APIC (or xAPIC), and Extended APIC (or x2APIC). X2AP…

  • CVE-2025-64186 ↗HIGH 8.72025

    Evervault is a payment security solution. A vulnerability was identified in the `evervault-go` SDK’s attestation verification logic in versions of `evervault-go` prior to 1.3.2 that may allow incomple…

  • CVE-2025-53717 ↗HIGH 7.02025

    Reliance on untrusted inputs in a security decision in Windows Virtualization-Based Security (VBS) Enclave allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.

  • CVE-2025-39722 ↗MEDIUM 5.52025

    In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: crypto: caam - Prevent crash on suspend with iMX8QM / iMX8ULP Since the CAAM on these SoCs is managed by another ARM core, called …

  • CVE-2025-38334 ↗MEDIUM 5.52025

    In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: x86/sgx: Prevent attempts to reclaim poisoned pages TL;DR: SGX page reclaim touches the page to copy its contents to secondary sto…

  • CVE-2025-48811 ↗MEDIUM 6.72025

    Missing support for integrity check in Windows Virtualization-Based Security (VBS) Enclave allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.

  • CVE-2025-48803 ↗MEDIUM 6.72025

    Missing support for integrity check in Windows Virtualization-Based Security (VBS) Enclave allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.

  • CVE-2025-47159 ↗HIGH 7.82025

    Protection mechanism failure in Windows Virtualization-Based Security (VBS) Enclave allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.

  • CVE-2025-27735 ↗MEDIUM 6.02025

    Insufficient verification of data authenticity in Windows Virtualization-Based Security (VBS) Enclave allows an authorized attacker to bypass a security feature locally.

  • CVE-2019-8900 ↗MEDIUM 6.82025

    A vulnerability in the SecureROM of some Apple devices can be exploited by an unauthenticated local attacker to execute arbitrary code upon booting those devices. This vulnerability allows arbitrary c…

  • …and 39 more

Competitors (12)

full alternatives comparison →
1PasswordAbsoluteAgilicusAkamaiAlibaba CloudAlkiraAmazon Web Services, Inc.AppGateArmisArray NetworksAryakaBBT.live (BeBroadband)

Products (1)

Secure Access Service Edge (SASE/SSE)

1
  • EnclaveAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    ZTNA platform replacing VPNs with direct, policy-driven encrypted connectivity.