Skip to main content
0-Doubt
NewsInvestorsQuestionnairesDeveloperHelp
AnonymousSign in
0-Doubt — neutral IT/Security research
BrowseResellersCertified analystsRFI/RFP questionnairesHow trust worksHelp & FAQAPI
  1. Home/
  2. keyfactor

keyfactor

enriched
Certificate Lifecycle ManagementIoT Security

keyfactor.com ↗ · required email domain for this vendor's users

Do you work at keyfactor?

This profile was built from public sources and hasn't been claimed yet. Claiming it lets you correct what's wrong and add details only you can confirm — and marks that information as vendor-verified for buyers.

Free, and it does not affect ranking, placement, or comparison results. The first person verified on keyfactor's email domain becomes the profile admin.

Claim this profileAlready have an account?

Trust profileHow to read thisFive separate questions a buyer actually asks, each answered with its own evidence and a link to the source. There is deliberately no overall score: a single number invites comparison it cannot support, and would mostly reflect how much of keyfactor we have managed to scan rather than anything about the vendor.

Not checked means we have not looked yet, and is never counted against a vendor. Limited means we did look, but found only one line of evidence — enough to report, not enough to corroborate.

checked 6 of 16 signals
  • Limited

    Independently verified

    Has anyone other than the vendor confirmed this?

    checked 3 of 4

    Nothing here has been confirmed by an independent third party yet.

    • No third-party certifications found
    • Profile not claimed by the vendor
  • Limited

    Operating durability

    Is this a real, durable business?

    checked 2 of 4

    How long this vendor has been operating, and who stands behind them.

    • Headquarters location not disclosed on their site
  • Mixed

    Behaviour under stress

    What do they do when something goes wrong?

    checked 1 of 3

    What their public record shows about handling vulnerabilities and outages.

    • 14 published CVE(s) — a public disclosure record exists
    • 2 rated critical
  • Not checked

    Disclosure posture

    Do they tell you the awkward things unprompted?

    checked 0 of 3

    We have not checked what this vendor discloses publicly yet.

    Nothing checked here yet — this is not a mark against keyfactor.

  • Not checked

    Momentum

    Are they still shipping, or coasting?

    checked 0 of 2

    We have not tracked this vendor's release activity yet.

    Nothing checked here yet — this is not a mark against keyfactor.

Data coverage: 13/100What this measures (and doesn't)

Not a quality rating or endorsement — a measure of how much verified, disclosed data we actually have about this vendor. A low score usually means "we don't have much verified information yet," not "this is a bad vendor." Never used to sort or rank vendor lists.

Verification depth0/100
Security signal0/100
Buyer feedbackno data yet (0 reviews so far)
Profile completeness13/100
claim · HQ · materials · screenshots · integrations · certifications · security check

The platform admin controls the formula's weights.

Data coverage profileHow to read thisThe same four components behind the data coverage score above, shaped instead of listed — a vendor strong on verification but thin on buyer feedback looks visibly different from one that's the other way around. Security and feedback plot at the neutral midpoint (50) when there's no data yet (no products tracked, no reviews), matching how the actual score itself treats missing data — not a guess either way.

VerificationSecurityFeedbackCompletenessThis vendor — Verification: 0This vendor — Security: 0This vendor — Feedback: no data yetThis vendor — Completeness: 13

IntegrationsUI-12 — integration graphDetected from this vendor's own published integration/partner pages by the enrichment loop — each entry links the exact page it was found on. Directional: "integrates with" is claimed by this vendor; "integrated by" is claimed by the other vendor's site. Coverage grows as the scan progresses.

8 detected

Integrates with: 1Password ↗, 1touch.io ↗, A10 Networks ↗, Akamai ↗, BeyondTrust ↗, Black Duck ↗, Castle ↗, Safe Security ↗

Buyer reviewsUI-14 — verified-buyer reviewsWritten only by domain-verified buyers at other companies, attributed to their company domain (never their identity), and moderated. Buyer-sourced opinion, clearly separate from the neutral catalog facts above — and never an input to search or comparison ordering.

verified buyers only

No buyer reviews yet.

Reputation ratingUI-20 — anonymous ratingA single anonymous 5-star signal from buyers, resellers, and analysts who've engaged with this vendor — separate from the domain-attributed reviews above. No rater identity is ever shown, not even at company level.

anonymous

No ratings in this window yet.

PKI and certificate lifecycle automation platform for discovery and management AI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →

CVE severity over timeUI-24 — CVE severity timelineEvery known CVE with a disclosure date and severity, plotted by when it was published — lets you see whether disclosures are trending toward more or less severe, not just a raw count. Same NVD-sourced, name-matched data as the list below.

LOWMEDIUMHIGHCRITICAL202320242025CVE-2025-26787 · MEDIUM 4.7 · 2025-12-23CVE-2025-47222 · MEDIUM 6.5 · 2025-11-14CVE-2025-47221 · MEDIUM 5.3 · 2025-11-14CVE-2025-47220 · MEDIUM 5.3 · 2025-11-14CVE-2025-11073 · MEDIUM 4.7 · 2025-09-27CVE-2024-49202 · HIGH 7.6 · 2024-12-19CVE-2024-49201 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2024-12-19CVE-2024-36066 · LOW 3.1 · 2024-09-12CVE-2024-42006 · HIGH 7.5 · 2024-08-20CVE-2024-34458 · HIGH 7.5 · 2024-08-20CVE-2024-33872 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2024-08-20CVE-2023-34196 · HIGH 8.2 · 2023-08-03CVE-2022-42954 · MEDIUM 5.4 · 2022-11-17CVE-2022-34831 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2022-09-14

Known CVEs (14)About this listSourced from the public NVD database, matched by vendor name. This is a name-based match, not exact version tracking — always check the linked NVD record for affected versions before drawing conclusions. “New” means published within the last 30 days. “Actively exploited” means CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog confirms real-world exploitation, not just a theoretical severity score.

RSS ⇢
  • CVE-2025-26787 ↗MEDIUM 4.72025

    An error in the SignServer container startup logic was found in Keyfactor SignServer versions prior to 7.2. The Admin CLI command used to configure Certificate access to the initial startup of the con…

  • CVE-2025-47222 ↗MEDIUM 6.52025

    A class name enumeration was found in Keyfactor SignServer versions prior to 7.3.2. Setting any chosen class name to any of the properties requiring a class path and the provided class is not expected…

  • CVE-2025-47221 ↗MEDIUM 5.32025

    An arbitrary file write was found in Keyfactor SignServer versions prior to 7.3.2. The properties ARCHIVETODISK_FILENAME-PATTERN, ARCHIVETODISK_PATH_BASE, ARCHIVETODISK_PATH_PATTERN can be set to any …

  • CVE-2025-47220 ↗MEDIUM 5.32025

    A local file enumeration was found in Keyfactor SignServer versions prior to 7.3.2 .The property VISIBLE_SIGNATURE_CUSTOM_IMAGE_PATH, which exists in the PDFSigner and the PAdESSigner, can be set to a…

  • CVE-2025-11073 ↗MEDIUM 4.72025

    A vulnerability was detected in Keyfactor RG-EW5100BE EW_3.0B11P280_EW5100BE-PRO_12183019. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /cgi-bin/luci/api/cmd of the component HTTP POST Requ…

  • CVE-2024-49202 ↗HIGH 7.62024

    Keyfactor Command before 12.5.0 has Incorrect Access Control: access tokens are over permissioned, aka 64099. The fixed versions are 11.5.1.1, 11.5.2.1, 11.5.3.1, 11.5.4.5, 11.5.6.1, 11.6.0, 12.2.0.1,…

  • CVE-2024-49201 ↗MEDIUM 4.32024

    Keyfactor Remote File Orchestrator (aka remote-file-orchestrator) 2.8 before 2.8.1 allows Information Disclosure: sensitive information could be exposed at the debug logging level.

  • CVE-2024-36066 ↗LOW 3.12024

    The CMP CLI client in KeyFactor EJBCA before 8.3.1 has only 6 octets of salt, and is thus not compliant with the security requirements of RFC 4211, and might make man-in-the-middle attacks easier. CMP…

  • CVE-2024-42006 ↗HIGH 7.52024

    Keyfactor AWS Orchestrator through 2.0 allows Information Disclosure.

  • CVE-2024-34458 ↗HIGH 7.52024

    Keyfactor Command 10.5.x before 10.5.1 and 11.5.x before 11.5.1 allows SQL Injection which could result in information disclosure.

  • CVE-2024-33872 ↗CRITICAL 9.82024

    Keyfactor Command 10.5.x before 10.5.1 and 11.5.x before 11.5.1 allows SQL Injection which could result in code execution and escalation of privileges.

  • CVE-2023-34196 ↗HIGH 8.22023

    In the Keyfactor EJBCA before 8.0.0, the RA web certificate distribution servlet /ejbca/ra/cert allows partial denial of service due to an authentication issue. In configurations using OAuth, disclosu…

  • CVE-2022-42954 ↗MEDIUM 5.42022

    Keyfactor EJBCA before 7.10.0 allows XSS.

  • CVE-2022-34831 ↗CRITICAL 9.82022

    An issue was discovered in Keyfactor PrimeKey EJBCA before 7.9.0, related to possible inconsistencies in DNS identifiers submitted in an ACME order and the corresponding CSR submitted during finalizat…

Resources & materials (1)

discovered on their site

Datasheets, whitepapers, and case studies found on keyfactor.com by the enrichment loop. Links open the original documents on the vendor's own site.

  • pdfKEYFACTOR GLOBAL PARTNER PROGRAM↗

Competitors (12)

full alternatives comparison →
Akeyless SecurityAlibaba CloudAllegro Software DevelopmentAllotasvinAttifyAxiadCyleraDevice AuthorityDigiCertGlobalSignSEALSQ

Products (2)

Certificate Lifecycle Management

1
  • Keyfactor CommandAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    PKI and certificate lifecycle automation platform for discovery and management

IoT Security

1
  • Keyfactor Command for IoTAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    End-to-end IoT identity platform for device cert & key lifecycle mgmt.