Skip to main content
0-Doubt
NewsInvestorsQuestionnairesDeveloperHelp
AnonymousSign in
0-Doubt — neutral IT/Security research
BrowseResellersCertified analystsRFI/RFP questionnairesHow trust worksHelp & FAQAPI
  1. Home/
  2. NetApp

NetApp

enrichedPublic company (NTAP) ↗
Backup as a Service

Represented by AHEAD ↗, Carahsoft ↗, Converge Technology Solutions ↗, Exclusive Networks ↗, Mainline Information Systems ↗, Trace3 ↗, World Wide Technology ↗, ePlus ↗

netapp.com ↗ · required email domain for this vendor's users

Do you work at NetApp?

This profile was built from public sources and hasn't been claimed yet. Claiming it lets you correct what's wrong and add details only you can confirm — and marks that information as vendor-verified for buyers.

Free, and it does not affect ranking, placement, or comparison results. The first person verified on NetApp's email domain becomes the profile admin.

Claim this profileAlready have an account?

Trust profileHow to read thisFive separate questions a buyer actually asks, each answered with its own evidence and a link to the source. There is deliberately no overall score: a single number invites comparison it cannot support, and would mostly reflect how much of NetApp we have managed to scan rather than anything about the vendor.

Not checked means we have not looked yet, and is never counted against a vendor. Limited means we did look, but found only one line of evidence — enough to report, not enough to corroborate.

checked 6 of 16 signals
  • Limited

    Independently verified

    Has anyone other than the vendor confirmed this?

    checked 3 of 4

    Nothing here has been confirmed by an independent third party yet.

    • No third-party certifications found
    • Profile not claimed by the vendor
  • Limited

    Operating durability

    Is this a real, durable business?

    checked 2 of 4

    How long this vendor has been operating, and who stands behind them.

    • Headquarters location not disclosed on their site
    • 1 public SEC filing(s) — financials are a matter of record
  • Mixed

    Behaviour under stress

    What do they do when something goes wrong?

    checked 1 of 3

    What their public record shows about handling vulnerabilities and outages.

    • 18 published CVE(s) — a public disclosure record exists
    • 1 rated critical
  • Not checked

    Disclosure posture

    Do they tell you the awkward things unprompted?

    checked 0 of 3

    We have not checked what this vendor discloses publicly yet.

    Nothing checked here yet — this is not a mark against NetApp.

  • Not checked

    Momentum

    Are they still shipping, or coasting?

    checked 0 of 2

    We have not tracked this vendor's release activity yet.

    Nothing checked here yet — this is not a mark against NetApp.

Data coverage: 13/100What this measures (and doesn't)

Not a quality rating or endorsement — a measure of how much verified, disclosed data we actually have about this vendor. A low score usually means "we don't have much verified information yet," not "this is a bad vendor." Never used to sort or rank vendor lists.

Verification depth0/100
Security signal0/100
Buyer feedbackno data yet (0 reviews so far)
Profile completeness13/100
claim · HQ · materials · screenshots · integrations · certifications · security check

The platform admin controls the formula's weights.

Data coverage profileHow to read thisThe same four components behind the data coverage score above, shaped instead of listed — a vendor strong on verification but thin on buyer feedback looks visibly different from one that's the other way around. Security and feedback plot at the neutral midpoint (50) when there's no data yet (no products tracked, no reviews), matching how the actual score itself treats missing data — not a guess either way.

VerificationSecurityFeedbackCompletenessThis vendor — Verification: 0This vendor — Security: 0This vendor — Feedback: no data yetThis vendor — Completeness: 13

IntegrationsUI-12 — integration graphDetected from this vendor's own published integration/partner pages by the enrichment loop — each entry links the exact page it was found on. Directional: "integrates with" is claimed by this vendor; "integrated by" is claimed by the other vendor's site. Coverage grows as the scan progresses.

9 detected

Integrated by: Elastio, F5, Gurucul, HYCU, Nirmata, Odaseva, Segura, ShardSecure, SurePath AI

Buyer reviewsUI-14 — verified-buyer reviewsWritten only by domain-verified buyers at other companies, attributed to their company domain (never their identity), and moderated. Buyer-sourced opinion, clearly separate from the neutral catalog facts above — and never an input to search or comparison ordering.

verified buyers only

No buyer reviews yet.

Reputation ratingUI-20 — anonymous ratingA single anonymous 5-star signal from buyers, resellers, and analysts who've engaged with this vendor — separate from the domain-attributed reviews above. No rater identity is ever shown, not even at company level.

anonymous

No ratings in this window yet.

Enterprise data storage platform with hybrid cloud mgmt & data services. AI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →

CVE severity over timeUI-24 — CVE severity timelineEvery known CVE with a disclosure date and severity, plotted by when it was published — lets you see whether disclosures are trending toward more or less severe, not just a raw count. Same NVD-sourced, name-matched data as the list below.

LOWMEDIUMHIGHCRITICAL20072008200920102011201220132014201520162017CVE-2016-3063 · HIGH 7.5 · 2017-02-07CVE-2016-1894 · HIGH 8.1 · 2017-02-07CVE-2016-1502 · HIGH 7.3 · 2017-02-07CVE-2015-8544 · HIGH 7.5 · 2017-02-07CVE-2015-8322 · HIGH 8.8 · 2017-02-07CVE-2017-5600 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2017-02-02CVE-2016-7172 · HIGH 7.5 · 2016-12-22CVE-2016-7171 · MEDIUM 5.6 · 2016-12-05CVE-2016-5047 · MEDIUM 6.5 · 2016-09-01CVE-2016-3064 · MEDIUM 6.5 · 2016-09-01CVE-2016-1563 · MEDIUM 6.8 · 2016-04-07CVE-2015-7886 · LOW 3.7 · 2016-01-18CVE-2015-3292 · HIGH 10.0 · 2015-05-31CVE-2014-9354 · MEDIUM 4.0 · 2015-02-06CVE-2014-9353 · HIGH 10.0 · 2015-02-06CVE-2008-3349 · HIGH 10.0 · 2008-07-28CVE-2008-0960 · HIGH 10.0 · 2008-06-10CVE-2006-3569 · MEDIUM 4.6 · 2006-07-13

Known CVEs (18)About this listSourced from the public NVD database, matched by vendor name. This is a name-based match, not exact version tracking — always check the linked NVD record for affected versions before drawing conclusions. “New” means published within the last 30 days. “Actively exploited” means CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog confirms real-world exploitation, not just a theoretical severity score.

RSS ⇢
  • CVE-2016-3063 ↗HIGH 7.52017

    Multiple functions in NetApp OnCommand System Manager before 8.3.2 do not properly escape special characters, which allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary API calls via unspecified vec…

  • CVE-2016-1894 ↗HIGH 8.12017

    NetApp OnCommand Workflow Automation before 3.1P2 allows remote attackers to bypass authentication via unspecified vectors.

  • CVE-2016-1502 ↗HIGH 7.32017

    NetApp SnapCenter Server 1.0 and 1.0P1 allows remote attackers to partially bypass authentication and then list and delete backups via unspecified vectors.

  • CVE-2015-8544 ↗HIGH 7.52017

    NetApp SnapDrive for Windows before 7.0.2P4, 7.0.3, and 7.1 before 7.1.3P1 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via unspecified vectors.

  • CVE-2015-8322 ↗HIGH 8.82017

    NetApp OnCommand System Manager 8.3.x before 8.3.2 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors.

  • CVE-2017-5600 ↗CRITICAL 9.82017

    The Data Warehouse component in NetApp OnCommand Insight before 7.2.3 allows remote attackers to obtain administrative access by leveraging a default privileged account.

  • CVE-2016-7172 ↗HIGH 7.52016

    NetApp Snap Creator Framework before 4.3.1 discloses sensitive information which could be viewed by an unauthorized user.

  • CVE-2016-7171 ↗MEDIUM 5.62016

    NetApp Plug-in for Symantec NetBackup prior to version 2.0.1 makes use of a non-unique server certificate, making it vulnerable to impersonation.

  • CVE-2016-5047 ↗MEDIUM 6.52016

    NetApp OnCommand System Manager 8.3.x before 8.3.2P5 allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service via unspecified vectors.

  • CVE-2016-3064 ↗MEDIUM 6.52016

    NetApp Clustered Data ONTAP before 8.2.4P4 and 8.3.x before 8.3.2P2 allows remote authenticated users to obtain sensitive cluster and tenant information via unspecified vectors.

  • CVE-2016-1563 ↗MEDIUM 6.82016

    NetApp Clustered Data ONTAP 8.3.1 does not properly verify X.509 certificates from TLS servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted…

  • CVE-2015-7886 ↗LOW 3.72016

    NetApp Data ONTAP before 8.2.4P1, when 7-Mode and HTTP access are enabled, allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive volume information via unspecified vectors.

  • CVE-2015-3292 ↗HIGH 10.02015

    The installer in NetApp OnCommand Workflow Automation before 2.2.1P1 and 3.x before 3.0P1 sets up the Java Debugging Wire Protocol (JDWP) service, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary co…

  • CVE-2014-9354 ↗MEDIUM 4.02015

    NetApp OnCommand Balance before 4.2P3 allows local users to obtain sensitive information via unspecified vectors related to cleartext storage.

  • CVE-2014-9353 ↗HIGH 10.02015

    NetApp OnCommand Balance before 4.2P2 contains a "default privileged account," which allows remote attackers to gain privileges via unspecified vectors.

  • CVE-2008-3349 ↗HIGH 10.02008

    Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in NetApp Data ONTAP, as used on NetApp and IBM eServer platforms, allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands, cause a denial of service (system crash), …

  • CVE-2008-0960 ↗HIGH 10.02008

    SNMPv3 HMAC verification in (1) Net-SNMP 5.2.x before 5.2.4.1, 5.3.x before 5.3.2.1, and 5.4.x before 5.4.1.1; (2) UCD-SNMP; (3) eCos; (4) Juniper Session and Resource Control (SRC) C-series 1.0.0 thr…

  • CVE-2006-3569 ↗MEDIUM 4.62006

    Unspecified vulnerability in NetApp Data ONTAP 7.0x through 7.0.4P8D9, 7.1x, 7.1.0.1x, and 7.2RC1, RC2, and RC3, as used in IBM N series Filers and other products, allows unauthorized users to gain ac…

Competitors (12)

full alternatives comparison →
AcsenseAhsay Systems CorporationArcserveArpioAvePointAxcientBarracudaCohesityCommvaultCyberSentriqDattoDruva

Products (1)

Backup as a Service

1
  • NetApp Backup and RecoveryAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Enterprise data storage platform with hybrid cloud mgmt & data services.