Skip to main content
0-Doubt
NewsInvestorsQuestionnairesDeveloperHelp
AnonymousSign in
0-Doubt — neutral IT/Security research
BrowseResellersCertified analystsRFI/RFP questionnairesHow trust worksHelp & FAQAPI
  1. Home/
  2. netsweeper

netsweeper

enriched
Secure Access Service Edge (SASE/SSE)

netsweeper.com ↗ · required email domain for this vendor's users

Do you work at netsweeper?

This profile was built from public sources and hasn't been claimed yet. Claiming it lets you correct what's wrong and add details only you can confirm — and marks that information as vendor-verified for buyers.

Free, and it does not affect ranking, placement, or comparison results. The first person verified on netsweeper's email domain becomes the profile admin.

Claim this profileAlready have an account?

Trust profileHow to read thisFive separate questions a buyer actually asks, each answered with its own evidence and a link to the source. There is deliberately no overall score: a single number invites comparison it cannot support, and would mostly reflect how much of netsweeper we have managed to scan rather than anything about the vendor.

Not checked means we have not looked yet, and is never counted against a vendor. Limited means we did look, but found only one line of evidence — enough to report, not enough to corroborate.

checked 6 of 16 signals
  • Limited

    Independently verified

    Has anyone other than the vendor confirmed this?

    checked 3 of 4

    Nothing here has been confirmed by an independent third party yet.

    • No third-party certifications found
    • Profile not claimed by the vendor
  • Limited

    Operating durability

    Is this a real, durable business?

    checked 2 of 4

    How long this vendor has been operating, and who stands behind them.

    • Headquarters location not disclosed on their site
  • Mixed

    Behaviour under stress

    What do they do when something goes wrong?

    checked 1 of 3

    What their public record shows about handling vulnerabilities and outages.

    • 20 published CVE(s) — a public disclosure record exists
    • 6 rated critical
  • Not checked

    Disclosure posture

    Do they tell you the awkward things unprompted?

    checked 0 of 3

    We have not checked what this vendor discloses publicly yet.

    Nothing checked here yet — this is not a mark against netsweeper.

  • Not checked

    Momentum

    Are they still shipping, or coasting?

    checked 0 of 2

    We have not tracked this vendor's release activity yet.

    Nothing checked here yet — this is not a mark against netsweeper.

Data coverage: 10/100What this measures (and doesn't)

Not a quality rating or endorsement — a measure of how much verified, disclosed data we actually have about this vendor. A low score usually means "we don't have much verified information yet," not "this is a bad vendor." Never used to sort or rank vendor lists.

Verification depth0/100
Security signal0/100
Buyer feedbackno data yet (0 reviews so far)
Profile completeness0/100
claim · HQ · materials · screenshots · integrations · certifications · security check

The platform admin controls the formula's weights.

Data coverage profileHow to read thisThe same four components behind the data coverage score above, shaped instead of listed — a vendor strong on verification but thin on buyer feedback looks visibly different from one that's the other way around. Security and feedback plot at the neutral midpoint (50) when there's no data yet (no products tracked, no reviews), matching how the actual score itself treats missing data — not a guess either way.

VerificationSecurityFeedbackCompletenessThis vendor — Verification: 0This vendor — Security: 0This vendor — Feedback: no data yetThis vendor — Completeness: 0

Buyer reviewsUI-14 — verified-buyer reviewsWritten only by domain-verified buyers at other companies, attributed to their company domain (never their identity), and moderated. Buyer-sourced opinion, clearly separate from the neutral catalog facts above — and never an input to search or comparison ordering.

verified buyers only

No buyer reviews yet.

Reputation ratingUI-20 — anonymous ratingA single anonymous 5-star signal from buyers, resellers, and analysts who've engaged with this vendor — separate from the domain-attributed reviews above. No rater identity is ever shown, not even at company level.

anonymous

No ratings in this window yet.

Web filtering platform with AI-powered categorization for content control AI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →

CVE severity over timeUI-24 — CVE severity timelineEvery known CVE with a disclosure date and severity, plotted by when it was published — lets you see whether disclosures are trending toward more or less severe, not just a raw count. Same NVD-sourced, name-matched data as the list below.

LOWMEDIUMHIGHCRITICAL2013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025CVE-2025-25497 · HIGH 8.1 · 2025-03-07CVE-2020-13167 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2020-05-20CVE-2014-9617 · MEDIUM 6.1 · 2020-02-20CVE-2014-9615 · MEDIUM 6.1 · 2020-02-20CVE-2014-9614 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2020-02-20CVE-2014-9613 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2020-02-20CVE-2014-9612 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2020-02-20CVE-2014-9609 · MEDIUM 5.3 · 2020-02-20CVE-2014-9608 · MEDIUM 6.1 · 2020-02-20CVE-2014-9607 · MEDIUM 6.1 · 2020-02-20CVE-2014-9606 · MEDIUM 6.1 · 2020-02-20CVE-2014-9619 · HIGH 7.2 · 2017-09-19CVE-2014-9618 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2017-09-19CVE-2014-9616 · HIGH 7.5 · 2017-09-19CVE-2014-9611 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2017-09-19CVE-2014-9610 · MEDIUM 5.3 · 2017-09-19CVE-2014-9605 · HIGH 9.4 · 2015-09-04CVE-2012-3859 · HIGH 10.0 · 2012-07-09CVE-2012-2447 · MEDIUM 6.8 · 2012-07-09CVE-2012-2446 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2012-07-09

Known CVEs (20)About this listSourced from the public NVD database, matched by vendor name. This is a name-based match, not exact version tracking — always check the linked NVD record for affected versions before drawing conclusions. “New” means published within the last 30 days. “Actively exploited” means CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog confirms real-world exploitation, not just a theoretical severity score.

RSS ⇢
  • CVE-2025-25497 ↗HIGH 8.12025

    An issue in account management interface in Netsweeper Server v.8.2.6 and earlier (fixed in v.8.2.7) allows unauthorized changes to the "Account Owner" field due to client-side-only restrictions and a…

  • CVE-2020-13167 ↗CRITICAL 9.82020

    Netsweeper through 6.4.3 allows unauthenticated remote code execution because webadmin/tools/unixlogin.php (with certain Referer headers) launches a command line with client-supplied parameters, and a…

  • CVE-2014-9617 ↗MEDIUM 6.12020

    Open redirect vulnerability in remotereporter/load_logfiles.php in Netsweeper before 4.0.5 allows remote attackers to redirect users to arbitrary web sites and conduct phishing attacks via a URL in th…

  • CVE-2014-9615 ↗MEDIUM 6.12020

    Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Netsweeper 4.0.4 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the url parameter to webadmin/deny/index.php.

  • CVE-2014-9614 ↗CRITICAL 9.82020

    The Web Panel in Netsweeper before 4.0.5 has a default password of branding for the branding account, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain access via a request to webadmin/.

  • CVE-2014-9613 ↗CRITICAL 9.82020

    Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in Netsweeper before 2.6.29.10 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the (1) login parameter to webadmin/auth/verification.php or (2) dpid…

  • CVE-2014-9612 ↗CRITICAL 9.82020

    SQL injection vulnerability in remotereporter/load_logfiles.php in Netsweeper before 3.1.10, 4.0.x before 4.0.9, and 4.1.x before 4.1.2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via th…

  • CVE-2014-9609 ↗MEDIUM 5.32020

    Directory traversal vulnerability in webadmin/reporter/view_server_log.php in Netsweeper before 3.1.10, 4.0.x before 4.0.9, and 4.1.x before 4.1.2 allows remote attackers to list directory contents vi…

  • CVE-2014-9608 ↗MEDIUM 6.12020

    Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in webadmin/policy/group_table_ajax.php/ in Netsweeper before 3.1.10, 4.0.x before 4.0.9, and 4.1.x before 4.1.2 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary we…

  • CVE-2014-9607 ↗MEDIUM 6.12020

    Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in remotereporter/load_logfiles.php in Netsweeper 4.0.3 and 4.0.4 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the url parameter.

  • CVE-2014-9606 ↗MEDIUM 6.12020

    Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Netsweeper before 3.1.10, 4.0.x before 4.0.9, and 4.1.x before 4.1.2 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) se…

  • CVE-2014-9619 ↗HIGH 7.22017

    Unrestricted file upload vulnerability in webadmin/ajaxfilemanager/ajaxfilemanager.php in Netsweeper before 3.1.10, 4.0.x before 4.0.9, and 4.1.x before 4.1.2 allows remote authenticated users with ad…

  • CVE-2014-9618 ↗CRITICAL 9.82017

    The Client Filter Admin portal in Netsweeper before 3.1.10, 4.0.x before 4.0.9, and 4.1.x before 4.1.2 allows remote attackers to bypass authentication and subsequently create arbitrary profiles via a…

  • CVE-2014-9616 ↗HIGH 7.52017

    Netsweeper before 3.1.10, 4.0.x before 4.0.9, and 4.1.x before 4.1.2 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information by making a request that redirects to the deny page.

  • CVE-2014-9611 ↗CRITICAL 9.82017

    Netsweeper before 4.0.5 allows remote attackers to bypass authentication and create arbitrary accounts and policies via a request to webadmin/nslam/index.php.

  • CVE-2014-9610 ↗MEDIUM 5.32017

    Netsweeper before 3.1.10, 4.0.x before 4.0.9, and 4.1.x before 4.1.2 allows remote attackers to bypass authentication and remove IP addresses from the quarantine via the ip parameter to webadmin/user/…

  • CVE-2014-9605 ↗HIGH 9.42015

    WebUpgrade in Netsweeper before 3.1.10, 4.0.x before 4.0.9, and 4.1.x before 4.1.2 allows remote attackers to bypass authentication and create a system backup tarball, restart the server, or stop the …

  • CVE-2012-3859 ↗HIGH 10.02012

    Unspecified vulnerability in the WebAdmin Portal in Netsweeper has unknown impact and attack vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2012-2446 and CVE-2012-2447.

  • CVE-2012-2447 ↗MEDIUM 6.82012

    Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in accountmgr/adminupdate.php in the WebAdmin Portal in Netsweeper allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests t…

  • CVE-2012-2446 ↗MEDIUM 4.32012

    Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in tools/local_lookup.php in the WebAdmin Portal in Netsweeper allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the group parameter in a look…

Competitors (12)

full alternatives comparison →
1PasswordAbsoluteAgilicusAkamaiAlibaba CloudAlkiraAmazon Web Services, Inc.AppGateArmisArray NetworksAryakaBBT.live (BeBroadband)

Products (4)

Secure Access Service Edge (SASE/SSE)

4
  • Netsweeper Real-time Web FilteringAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Real-time web filtering solution for educational institutions
  • Netsweeper Web FilteringAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Web filtering solution for blocking threats and enforcing content policies
  • Netsweeper nFilterAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Web filtering platform with AI-powered categorization for content control
  • Netsweeper onGuard+ Digital SafeguardingAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Web filtering and digital safeguarding platform for educational institutions