Skip to main content
0-Doubt
NewsInvestorsQuestionnairesDeveloperHelp
AnonymousSign in
0-Doubt — neutral IT/Security research
BrowseResellersCertified analystsRFI/RFP questionnairesHow trust worksHelp & FAQAPI
  1. Home/
  2. OpenVPN

OpenVPN

enriched
VPN

Represented by Carahsoft ↗

openvpn.net ↗ · required email domain for this vendor's users

Do you work at OpenVPN?

This profile was built from public sources and hasn't been claimed yet. Claiming it lets you correct what's wrong and add details only you can confirm — and marks that information as vendor-verified for buyers.

Free, and it does not affect ranking, placement, or comparison results. The first person verified on OpenVPN's email domain becomes the profile admin.

Claim this profileAlready have an account?

Trust profileHow to read thisFive separate questions a buyer actually asks, each answered with its own evidence and a link to the source. There is deliberately no overall score: a single number invites comparison it cannot support, and would mostly reflect how much of OpenVPN we have managed to scan rather than anything about the vendor.

Not checked means we have not looked yet, and is never counted against a vendor. Limited means we did look, but found only one line of evidence — enough to report, not enough to corroborate.

checked 6 of 16 signals
  • Limited

    Independently verified

    Has anyone other than the vendor confirmed this?

    checked 3 of 4

    Nothing here has been confirmed by an independent third party yet.

    • No third-party certifications found
    • Profile not claimed by the vendor
  • Limited

    Operating durability

    Is this a real, durable business?

    checked 2 of 4

    How long this vendor has been operating, and who stands behind them.

    • Headquarters location not disclosed on their site
  • Limited

    Behaviour under stress

    What do they do when something goes wrong?

    checked 1 of 3

    What their public record shows about handling vulnerabilities and outages.

    • 19 published CVE(s) — a public disclosure record exists
  • Not checked

    Disclosure posture

    Do they tell you the awkward things unprompted?

    checked 0 of 3

    We have not checked what this vendor discloses publicly yet.

    Nothing checked here yet — this is not a mark against OpenVPN.

  • Not checked

    Momentum

    Are they still shipping, or coasting?

    checked 0 of 2

    We have not tracked this vendor's release activity yet.

    Nothing checked here yet — this is not a mark against OpenVPN.

Data coverage: 13/100What this measures (and doesn't)

Not a quality rating or endorsement — a measure of how much verified, disclosed data we actually have about this vendor. A low score usually means "we don't have much verified information yet," not "this is a bad vendor." Never used to sort or rank vendor lists.

Verification depth0/100
Security signal0/100
Buyer feedbackno data yet (0 reviews so far)
Profile completeness13/100
claim · HQ · materials · screenshots · integrations · certifications · security check

The platform admin controls the formula's weights.

Data coverage profileHow to read thisThe same four components behind the data coverage score above, shaped instead of listed — a vendor strong on verification but thin on buyer feedback looks visibly different from one that's the other way around. Security and feedback plot at the neutral midpoint (50) when there's no data yet (no products tracked, no reviews), matching how the actual score itself treats missing data — not a guess either way.

VerificationSecurityFeedbackCompletenessThis vendor — Verification: 0This vendor — Security: 0This vendor — Feedback: no data yetThis vendor — Completeness: 13

IntegrationsUI-12 — integration graphDetected from this vendor's own published integration/partner pages by the enrichment loop — each entry links the exact page it was found on. Directional: "integrates with" is claimed by this vendor; "integrated by" is claimed by the other vendor's site. Coverage grows as the scan progresses.

9 detected

Integrated by: 1Kosmos, Devolutions, Portnox, Protectimus Limited, Seceon Inc, Secret Double Octopus, UncommonX, WitFoo, torii

Buyer reviewsUI-14 — verified-buyer reviewsWritten only by domain-verified buyers at other companies, attributed to their company domain (never their identity), and moderated. Buyer-sourced opinion, clearly separate from the neutral catalog facts above — and never an input to search or comparison ordering.

verified buyers only

No buyer reviews yet.

Reputation ratingUI-20 — anonymous ratingA single anonymous 5-star signal from buyers, resellers, and analysts who've engaged with this vendor — separate from the domain-attributed reviews above. No rater identity is ever shown, not even at company level.

anonymous

No ratings in this window yet.

External ratingsUI-22 — third-party ratingsAggregate rating and review count pulled directly from the source site's own published data — never the review text itself, which belongs to that site. Links go to the real page so you can read the actual reviews there.

via third-party review sites
PeerSpot: 4.2/5 (70 reviews) ↗

Self-hosted business VPN with zero-trust controls and flexible auth. AI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →

CVE severity over timeUI-24 — CVE severity timelineEvery known CVE with a disclosure date and severity, plotted by when it was published — lets you see whether disclosures are trending toward more or less severe, not just a raw count. Same NVD-sourced, name-matched data as the list below.

LOWMEDIUMHIGHCRITICAL200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017CVE-2017-7479 · MEDIUM 6.5 · 2017-05-15CVE-2017-7478 · HIGH 7.5 · 2017-05-15CVE-2016-6329 · MEDIUM 5.9 · 2017-02-01CVE-2014-8104 · MEDIUM 6.8 · 2014-12-03CVE-2014-9104 · MEDIUM 6.8 · 2014-11-26CVE-2014-5455 · MEDIUM 5.3 · 2014-08-25CVE-2013-2692 · MEDIUM 6.8 · 2014-05-13CVE-2014-2264 · HIGH 7.8 · 2014-03-02CVE-2013-2061 · LOW 2.6 · 2013-11-18CVE-2012-3486 · MEDIUM 6.9 · 2012-08-26CVE-2008-3459 · HIGH 7.6 · 2008-08-04CVE-2006-2229 · MEDIUM 4.0 · 2006-05-05CVE-2006-1629 · HIGH 9.0 · 2006-04-07CVE-2005-3409 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2005-11-02CVE-2005-3393 · HIGH 7.5 · 2005-11-01CVE-2005-2532 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2005-08-24CVE-2005-2534 · LOW 2.6 · 2005-08-24CVE-2005-2533 · LOW 2.1 · 2005-08-24CVE-2005-2531 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2005-08-24

Known CVEs (19)About this listSourced from the public NVD database, matched by vendor name. This is a name-based match, not exact version tracking — always check the linked NVD record for affected versions before drawing conclusions. “New” means published within the last 30 days. “Actively exploited” means CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog confirms real-world exploitation, not just a theoretical severity score.

RSS ⇢
  • CVE-2017-7479 ↗MEDIUM 6.52017

    OpenVPN versions before 2.3.15 and before 2.4.2 are vulnerable to reachable assertion when packet-ID counter rolls over resulting into Denial of Service of server by authenticated attacker.

  • CVE-2017-7478 ↗HIGH 7.52017

    OpenVPN version 2.3.12 and newer is vulnerable to unauthenticated Denial of Service of server via received large control packet. Note that this issue is fixed in 2.3.15 and 2.4.2.

  • CVE-2016-6329 ↗MEDIUM 5.92017

    OpenVPN, when using a 64-bit block cipher, makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain cleartext data via a birthday attack against a long-duration encrypted session, as demonstrated by an HTTP-ove…

  • CVE-2014-8104 ↗MEDIUM 6.82014

    OpenVPN 2.x before 2.0.11, 2.1.x, 2.2.x before 2.2.3, and 2.3.x before 2.3.6 allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (server crash) via a small control channel packet.

  • CVE-2014-9104 ↗MEDIUM 6.82014

    Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the XML-RPC API in the Desktop Client in OpenVPN Access Server 1.5.6 and earlier allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of ad…

  • CVE-2014-5455 ↗MEDIUM 5.32014

    Unquoted Windows search path vulnerability in the ptservice service prior to PrivateTunnel version 3.0 (Windows) and OpenVPN Connect version 3.1 (Windows) allows local users to gain privileges via a c…

  • CVE-2013-2692 ↗MEDIUM 6.82014

    Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Admin web interface in OpenVPN Access Server before 1.8.5 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests tha…

  • CVE-2014-2264 ↗HIGH 7.82014

    The OpenVPN module in Synology DiskStation Manager (DSM) 4.3-3810 update 1 has a hardcoded root password of synopass, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain access via a VPN session.

  • CVE-2013-2061 ↗LOW 2.62013

    The openvpn_decrypt function in crypto.c in OpenVPN 2.3.0 and earlier, when running in UDP mode, allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via a timing attack involving an HMAC compariso…

  • CVE-2012-3486 ↗MEDIUM 6.92012

    Tunnelblick 3.3beta20 and earlier allows local users to gain privileges via an OpenVPN configuration file that specifies execution of a script upon occurrence of an OpenVPN event.

  • CVE-2008-3459 ↗HIGH 7.62008

    Unspecified vulnerability in OpenVPN 2.1-beta14 through 2.1-rc8, when running on non-Windows systems, allows remote servers to execute arbitrary commands via crafted (1) lladdr and (2) iproute configu…

  • CVE-2006-2229 ↗MEDIUM 4.02006

    OpenVPN 2.0.7 and earlier, when configured to use the --management option with an IP that is not 127.0.0.1, uses a cleartext password for TCP sessions to the management interface, which might allow re…

  • CVE-2006-1629 ↗HIGH 9.02006

    OpenVPN 2.0 through 2.0.5 allows remote malicious servers to execute arbitrary code on the client by using setenv with the LD_PRELOAD environment variable.

  • CVE-2005-3409 ↗MEDIUM 5.02005

    OpenVPN 2.x before 2.0.4, when running in TCP mode, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (segmentation fault) by forcing the accept function call to return an error status, which leads…

  • CVE-2005-3393 ↗HIGH 7.52005

    Format string vulnerability in the foreign_option function in options.c for OpenVPN 2.0.x allows remote clients to execute arbitrary code via format string specifiers in a push of the dhcp-option comm…

  • CVE-2005-2532 ↗MEDIUM 5.02005

    OpenVPN before 2.0.1 does not properly flush the OpenSSL error queue when a packet can not be decrypted by the server, which allows remote authenticated attackers to cause a denial of service (client …

  • CVE-2005-2534 ↗LOW 2.62005

    Race condition in OpenVPN before 2.0.1, when --duplicate-cn is not enabled, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (server crash) via simultaneous TCP connections from multiple clients t…

  • CVE-2005-2533 ↗LOW 2.12005

    OpenVPN before 2.0.1, when running in "dev tap" Ethernet bridging mode, allows remote authenticated clients to cause a denial of service (memory exhaustion) via a flood of packets with a large number …

  • CVE-2005-2531 ↗MEDIUM 5.02005

    OpenVPN before 2.0.1, when running with "verb 0" and without TLS authentication, does not properly flush the OpenSSL error queue when a client fails certificate authentication to the server and causes…

Competitors (12)

full alternatives comparison →
Array NetworksAVGAviatrixAviraCloudbricCohesive NetworksCyberGhostCYSECDashlaneDefguardDispersiveExpressVPN

Products (1)

VPN

1
  • OpenVPN Access ServerAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Self-hosted business VPN with zero-trust controls and flexible auth.