Skip to main content
0-Doubt
NewsInvestorsQuestionnairesDeveloperHelp
AnonymousSign in
0-Doubt — neutral IT/Security research
BrowseResellersCertified analystsRFI/RFP questionnairesHow trust worksHelp & FAQAPI
  1. Home/
  2. Pulse Secure

Pulse Secure

enriched
VPN

pulsesecure.net ↗ · required email domain for this vendor's users

Do you work at Pulse Secure?

This profile was built from public sources and hasn't been claimed yet. Claiming it lets you correct what's wrong and add details only you can confirm — and marks that information as vendor-verified for buyers.

Free, and it does not affect ranking, placement, or comparison results. The first person verified on Pulse Secure's email domain becomes the profile admin.

Claim this profileAlready have an account?

Trust profileHow to read thisFive separate questions a buyer actually asks, each answered with its own evidence and a link to the source. There is deliberately no overall score: a single number invites comparison it cannot support, and would mostly reflect how much of Pulse Secure we have managed to scan rather than anything about the vendor.

Not checked means we have not looked yet, and is never counted against a vendor. Limited means we did look, but found only one line of evidence — enough to report, not enough to corroborate.

checked 6 of 16 signals
  • Limited

    Independently verified

    Has anyone other than the vendor confirmed this?

    checked 3 of 4

    Nothing here has been confirmed by an independent third party yet.

    • No third-party certifications found
    • Profile not claimed by the vendor
  • Limited

    Operating durability

    Is this a real, durable business?

    checked 2 of 4

    How long this vendor has been operating, and who stands behind them.

    • Headquarters location not disclosed on their site
  • Limited

    Behaviour under stress

    What do they do when something goes wrong?

    checked 1 of 3

    What their public record shows about handling vulnerabilities and outages.

    • 10 published CVE(s) — a public disclosure record exists
  • Not checked

    Disclosure posture

    Do they tell you the awkward things unprompted?

    checked 0 of 3

    We have not checked what this vendor discloses publicly yet.

    Nothing checked here yet — this is not a mark against Pulse Secure.

  • Not checked

    Momentum

    Are they still shipping, or coasting?

    checked 0 of 2

    We have not tracked this vendor's release activity yet.

    Nothing checked here yet — this is not a mark against Pulse Secure.

Data coverage: 13/100What this measures (and doesn't)

Not a quality rating or endorsement — a measure of how much verified, disclosed data we actually have about this vendor. A low score usually means "we don't have much verified information yet," not "this is a bad vendor." Never used to sort or rank vendor lists.

Verification depth0/100
Security signal1/100
Buyer feedbackno data yet (0 reviews so far)
Profile completeness13/100
claim · HQ · materials · screenshots · integrations · certifications · security check

The platform admin controls the formula's weights.

Data coverage profileHow to read thisThe same four components behind the data coverage score above, shaped instead of listed — a vendor strong on verification but thin on buyer feedback looks visibly different from one that's the other way around. Security and feedback plot at the neutral midpoint (50) when there's no data yet (no products tracked, no reviews), matching how the actual score itself treats missing data — not a guess either way.

VerificationSecurityFeedbackCompletenessThis vendor — Verification: 0This vendor — Security: 1This vendor — Feedback: no data yetThis vendor — Completeness: 13

IntegrationsUI-12 — integration graphDetected from this vendor's own published integration/partner pages by the enrichment loop — each entry links the exact page it was found on. Directional: "integrates with" is claimed by this vendor; "integrated by" is claimed by the other vendor's site. Coverage grows as the scan progresses.

5 detected

Integrated by: 1Kosmos, Gurucul, OctoXLabs, Segura, WitFoo

Buyer reviewsUI-14 — verified-buyer reviewsWritten only by domain-verified buyers at other companies, attributed to their company domain (never their identity), and moderated. Buyer-sourced opinion, clearly separate from the neutral catalog facts above — and never an input to search or comparison ordering.

verified buyers only

No buyer reviews yet.

Reputation ratingUI-20 — anonymous ratingA single anonymous 5-star signal from buyers, resellers, and analysts who've engaged with this vendor — separate from the domain-attributed reviews above. No rater identity is ever shown, not even at company level.

anonymous

No ratings in this window yet.

Enterprise secure access platform offering VPN, NAC, and zero trust solutions. AI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →

CVE severity over timeUI-24 — CVE severity timelineEvery known CVE with a disclosure date and severity, plotted by when it was published — lets you see whether disclosures are trending toward more or less severe, not just a raw count. Same NVD-sourced, name-matched data as the list below.

LOWMEDIUMHIGHCRITICAL2014CVE-2014-3824 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2014-09-29CVE-2014-3823 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2014-09-29CVE-2014-3820 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2014-09-29CVE-2014-3812 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2014-06-13CVE-2014-2292 · HIGH 7.2 · 2014-03-14CVE-2014-2291 · LOW 3.5 · 2014-03-14CVE-2013-6956 · LOW 2.1 · 2013-12-13CVE-2013-5650 · MEDIUM 5.4 · 2013-09-16CVE-2013-5649 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2013-09-13CVE-2013-3970 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2013-06-13

Known CVEs (10)About this listSourced from the public NVD database, matched by vendor name. This is a name-based match, not exact version tracking — always check the linked NVD record for affected versions before drawing conclusions. “New” means published within the last 30 days. “Actively exploited” means CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog confirms real-world exploitation, not just a theoretical severity score.

RSS ⇢
  • CVE-2014-3824 ↗MEDIUM 4.32014

    Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the web server in the Juniper Junos Pulse Secure Access Service (SSL VPN) devices with IVE OS 8.0 before 8.0r6, 7.4 before 7.4r13, and 7.1 before 7.1r20 all…

  • CVE-2014-3823 ↗MEDIUM 4.32014

    The Juniper Junos Pulse Secure Access Service (SSL VPN) devices with IVE OS 8.0 before 8.0r1, 7.4 before 7.4r5, and 7.1 before 7.1r18 allows remote attackers to conduct clickjacking attacks via unspec…

  • CVE-2014-3820 ↗MEDIUM 4.32014

    Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the SSL VPN/UAC web server in the Juniper Junos Pulse Secure Access Service (SSL VPN) devices with IVE OS 7.1 before 7.1r16, 7.4 before 7.4r3, and 8.0 befor…

  • CVE-2014-3812 ↗MEDIUM 5.02014

    The Juniper Junos Pulse Secure Access Service (SSL VPN) devices with IVE OS before 7.4r5 and 8.x before 8.0r1 and Junos Pulse Access Control Service (UAC) before 4.4r5 and 5.x before 5.0r1 enable ciph…

  • CVE-2014-2292 ↗HIGH 7.22014

    Unspecified vulnerability in the Linux Network Connect client in Juniper Junos Pulse Secure Access Service (aka SSL VPN) with IVE OS before 7.1r18, 7.3 before 7.3r10, 7.4 before 7.4r8, and 8.0 before …

  • CVE-2014-2291 ↗LOW 3.52014

    Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Pulse Collaboration (Secure Meeting) user pages in Juniper Junos Pulse Secure Access Service (aka SSL VPN) with IVE OS before 7.1r18, 7.3 before 7.3r10,…

  • CVE-2013-6956 ↗LOW 2.12013

    Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Secure Access Service Web rewriting feature in Juniper Junos Pulse Secure Access Service (aka SSL VPN) with IVE OS before 7.1r17, 7.3 before 7.3r8, 7.4 …

  • CVE-2013-5650 ↗MEDIUM 5.42013

    Junos Pulse Secure Access Service (IVE) 7.1 before 7.1r5, 7.2 before 7.2r10, 7.3 before 7.3r6, and 7.4 before 7.4r3 and Junos Pulse Access Control Service (UAC) 4.1 before 4.1r8.1, 4.2 before 4.2r5, 4…

  • CVE-2013-5649 ↗MEDIUM 4.32013

    Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Juniper Junos Pulse Secure Access Service (aka SSL VPN) with IVE OS 7.1 before 7.1r15, 7.2 before 7.2r11, 7.3 before 7.3r6, and 7.4 before 7.4r3 …

  • CVE-2013-3970 ↗MEDIUM 4.32013

    Juniper Junos Pulse Secure Access Service (aka SSL VPN) with IVE OS 7.0r2 through 7.0r8 and 7.1r1 through 7.1r5 and Junos Pulse Access Control Service (aka UAC) with UAC OS 4.1r1 through 4.1r5 include…

Competitors (12)

full alternatives comparison →
Array NetworksAVGAviatrixAviraCloudbricCohesive NetworksCyberGhostCYSECDashlaneDefguardDispersiveExpressVPN

Products (1)

VPN

1
  • Pulse Secure (Ivanti)AI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Enterprise secure access platform offering VPN, NAC, and zero trust solutions.