Skip to main content
0-Doubt
NewsInvestorsQuestionnairesDeveloperHelp
AnonymousSign in
0-Doubt — neutral IT/Security research
BrowseResellersCertified analystsRFI/RFP questionnairesHow trust worksHelp & FAQAPI
  1. Home/
  2. Raven

Raven

enriched
AI / LLM SecurityApplication Security (ASPM)Cloud Application Detection and ResponseRuntime Application Self-Protection

raven.io ↗ · required email domain for this vendor's users

Do you work at Raven?

This profile was built from public sources and hasn't been claimed yet. Claiming it lets you correct what's wrong and add details only you can confirm — and marks that information as vendor-verified for buyers.

Free, and it does not affect ranking, placement, or comparison results. The first person verified on Raven's email domain becomes the profile admin.

Claim this profileAlready have an account?

Trust profileHow to read thisFive separate questions a buyer actually asks, each answered with its own evidence and a link to the source. There is deliberately no overall score: a single number invites comparison it cannot support, and would mostly reflect how much of Raven we have managed to scan rather than anything about the vendor.

Not checked means we have not looked yet, and is never counted against a vendor. Limited means we did look, but found only one line of evidence — enough to report, not enough to corroborate.

checked 6 of 16 signals
  • Limited

    Independently verified

    Has anyone other than the vendor confirmed this?

    checked 3 of 4

    Nothing here has been confirmed by an independent third party yet.

    • No third-party certifications found
    • Profile not claimed by the vendor
  • Limited

    Operating durability

    Is this a real, durable business?

    checked 2 of 4

    How long this vendor has been operating, and who stands behind them.

    • Headquarters location not disclosed on their site
  • Mixed

    Behaviour under stress

    What do they do when something goes wrong?

    checked 1 of 3

    What their public record shows about handling vulnerabilities and outages.

    • 18 published CVE(s) — a public disclosure record exists
    • 1 rated critical
  • Not checked

    Disclosure posture

    Do they tell you the awkward things unprompted?

    checked 0 of 3

    We have not checked what this vendor discloses publicly yet.

    Nothing checked here yet — this is not a mark against Raven.

  • Not checked

    Momentum

    Are they still shipping, or coasting?

    checked 0 of 2

    We have not tracked this vendor's release activity yet.

    Nothing checked here yet — this is not a mark against Raven.

Data coverage: 10/100What this measures (and doesn't)

Not a quality rating or endorsement — a measure of how much verified, disclosed data we actually have about this vendor. A low score usually means "we don't have much verified information yet," not "this is a bad vendor." Never used to sort or rank vendor lists.

Verification depth0/100
Security signal0/100
Buyer feedbackno data yet (0 reviews so far)
Profile completeness0/100
claim · HQ · materials · screenshots · integrations · certifications · security check

The platform admin controls the formula's weights.

Data coverage profileHow to read thisThe same four components behind the data coverage score above, shaped instead of listed — a vendor strong on verification but thin on buyer feedback looks visibly different from one that's the other way around. Security and feedback plot at the neutral midpoint (50) when there's no data yet (no products tracked, no reviews), matching how the actual score itself treats missing data — not a guess either way.

VerificationSecurityFeedbackCompletenessThis vendor — Verification: 0This vendor — Security: 0This vendor — Feedback: no data yetThis vendor — Completeness: 0

Buyer reviewsUI-14 — verified-buyer reviewsWritten only by domain-verified buyers at other companies, attributed to their company domain (never their identity), and moderated. Buyer-sourced opinion, clearly separate from the neutral catalog facts above — and never an input to search or comparison ordering.

verified buyers only

No buyer reviews yet.

Reputation ratingUI-20 — anonymous ratingA single anonymous 5-star signal from buyers, resellers, and analysts who've engaged with this vendor — separate from the domain-attributed reviews above. No rater identity is ever shown, not even at company level.

anonymous

No ratings in this window yet.

Runtime detection & response for cloud workloads and application libraries AI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →

CVE severity over timeUI-24 — CVE severity timelineEvery known CVE with a disclosure date and severity, plotted by when it was published — lets you see whether disclosures are trending toward more or less severe, not just a raw count. Same NVD-sourced, name-matched data as the list below.

LOWMEDIUMHIGHCRITICAL20072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026CVE-2026-23163 · MEDIUM 5.5 · 2026-02-14CVE-2025-31132 · HIGH 8.1 · 2025-04-01CVE-2023-34168 · HIGH 7.6 · 2023-12-19CVE-2023-34171 · MEDIUM 5.4 · 2023-11-10CVE-2023-45769 · HIGH 7.1 · 2023-10-25CVE-2017-6046 · HIGH 7.5 · 2017-06-30CVE-2017-6044 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2017-06-30CVE-2017-6042 · HIGH 8.8 · 2017-06-30CVE-2014-9490 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2015-01-20CVE-2014-7708 · MEDIUM 5.4 · 2014-10-21CVE-2013-2820 · HIGH 10.0 · 2014-01-15CVE-2013-2819 · HIGH 9.3 · 2014-01-15CVE-2010-2702 · HIGH 9.3 · 2010-07-12CVE-2009-0677 · MEDIUM 6.5 · 2009-02-23CVE-2009-0674 · MEDIUM 6.0 · 2009-02-23CVE-2009-0673 · MEDIUM 6.5 · 2009-02-23CVE-2009-0672 · MEDIUM 6.5 · 2009-02-23CVE-2006-2587 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2006-05-25

Known CVEs (18)About this listSourced from the public NVD database, matched by vendor name. This is a name-based match, not exact version tracking — always check the linked NVD record for affected versions before drawing conclusions. “New” means published within the last 30 days. “Actively exploited” means CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog confirms real-world exploitation, not just a theoretical severity score.

RSS ⇢
  • CVE-2026-23163 ↗MEDIUM 5.52026

    In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amdgpu: fix NULL pointer dereference in amdgpu_gmc_filter_faults_remove On APUs such as Raven and Renoir (GC 9.1.0, 9.2.2, 9.3…

  • CVE-2025-31132 ↗HIGH 8.12025

    Raven is an open-source messaging platform. A vulnerability allowed any logged in user to execute code via an API endpoint. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.1.10.

  • CVE-2023-34168 ↗HIGH 7.62023

    Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in Alex Raven WP Report Post allows SQL Injection.This issue affects WP Report Post: from n/a through…

  • CVE-2023-34171 ↗MEDIUM 5.42023

    Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Alex Raven WP Report Post plugin <= 2.1.2 versions.

  • CVE-2023-45769 ↗HIGH 7.12023

    Unauth. Reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Alex Raven WP Report Post plugin <= 2.1.2 versions.

  • CVE-2017-6046 ↗HIGH 7.52017

    An Insufficiently Protected Credentials issue was discovered in Sierra Wireless AirLink Raven XE, all versions prior to 4.0.14, and AirLink Raven XT, all versions prior to 4.0.11. Sensitive informatio…

  • CVE-2017-6044 ↗CRITICAL 9.82017

    An Improper Authorization issue was discovered in Sierra Wireless AirLink Raven XE, all versions prior to 4.0.14, and AirLink Raven XT, all versions prior to 4.0.11. Several files and directories can …

  • CVE-2017-6042 ↗HIGH 8.82017

    A Cross-Site Request Forgery issue was discovered in Sierra Wireless AirLink Raven XE, all versions prior to 4.0.14, and AirLink Raven XT, all versions prior to 4.0.11. Affected devices do not verify …

  • CVE-2014-9490 ↗MEDIUM 5.02015

    The numtok function in lib/raven/okjson.rb in the raven-ruby gem before 0.12.2 for Ruby allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a large exponent value in a scientific number.

  • CVE-2014-7708 ↗MEDIUM 5.42014

    The Raven - The Culture Lover (aka com.booksbyraven) application 1.60 for Android does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obt…

  • CVE-2013-2820 ↗HIGH 10.02014

    The Sierra Wireless AirLink Raven X EV-DO gateway 4221_4.0.11.003 and 4228_4.0.11.003 allows remote attackers to reprogram the firmware via a replay attack using UDP ports 17336 and 17388.

  • CVE-2013-2819 ↗HIGH 9.32014

    The Sierra Wireless AirLink Raven X EV-DO gateway 4221_4.0.11.003 and 4228_4.0.11.003 allows remote attackers to install Trojan horse firmware by leveraging cleartext credentials in a crafted (1) upda…

  • CVE-2010-2702 ↗HIGH 9.32010

    Buffer overflow in the UGameEngine::UpdateConnectingMessage function in the Unreal engine 1, 2, and 2.5, as used in multiple games including Unreal Tournament 2004, Unreal tournament 2003, Postal 2, R…

  • CVE-2009-0677 ↗MEDIUM 6.52009

    avatarlist.php in the Your Account module, reached through modules.php, in Raven Web Services RavenNuke 2.30 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary code via PHP sequences in an element…

  • CVE-2009-0674 ↗MEDIUM 6.02009

    images/captcha.php in Raven Web Services RavenNuke 2.30, when register_globals and display_errors are enabled, allows remote attackers to determine the existence of local files by sending requests wit…

  • CVE-2009-0673 ↗MEDIUM 6.52009

    Eval injection vulnerability in the Custom Fields feature in the Your Account module in Raven Web Services RavenNuke 2.30 allows remote authenticated administrators to execute arbitrary PHP code via t…

  • CVE-2009-0672 ↗MEDIUM 6.52009

    SQL injection vulnerability in the Resend_Email module in Raven Web Services RavenNuke 2.30 allows remote authenticated administrators to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the user_prefix parameter t…

  • CVE-2006-2587 ↗MEDIUM 5.02006

    Buffer overflow in the WebTool HTTP server component in (1) PunkBuster before 1.229, as used by multiple products including (2) America's Army 1.228 and earlier, (3) Battlefield 1942 1.158 and earlier…

Competitors (12)

full alternatives comparison →
AkamaiCloudMatosContrast SecurityFYEOGrammaTechManifestMiggoObsidian SecurityOligo SecurityOperant AISonarUpwind

Products (5)

Application Security (ASPM)

1
  • Raven Runtime SCAAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Runtime SCA tool that identifies exploitable vulnerabilities in cloud environments

AI / LLM Security

1
  • Raven Runtime AI AgentsAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Runtime platform to discover, monitor, and control AI agents in production apps.

Runtime Application Self-Protection

2
  • Raven Runtime Application ProtectionAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Runtime app protection with function-level reachability and exploit prevention
  • Raven Runtime PreventionAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Runtime protection preventing supply-chain attacks & exploits via library-level policies

Cloud Application Detection and Response

1
  • Raven Runtime ADRAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Runtime detection & response for cloud workloads and application libraries