rubrik.com ↗ · required email domain for this vendor's users
Trust profileHow to read thisFive separate questions a buyer actually asks, each answered with its own evidence and a link to the source. There is deliberately no overall score: a single number invites comparison it cannot support, and would mostly reflect how much of Rubrik we have managed to scan rather than anything about the vendor.
Not checked means we have not looked yet, and is never counted against a vendor. Limited means we did look, but found only one line of evidence — enough to report, not enough to corroborate.
checked 6 of 16 signals
Limited
Independently verified
Has anyone other than the vendor confirmed this?
checked 3 of 4
Nothing here has been confirmed by an independent third party yet.
No third-party certifications found
Profile not claimed by the vendor
Limited
Operating durability
Is this a real, durable business?
checked 2 of 4
How long this vendor has been operating, and who stands behind them.
Headquarters location not disclosed on their site
1 public SEC filing(s) — financials are a matter of record
Mixed
Behaviour under stress
What do they do when something goes wrong?
checked 1 of 3
What their public record shows about handling vulnerabilities and outages.
8 published CVE(s) — a public disclosure record exists
1 rated critical
Not checked
Disclosure posture
Do they tell you the awkward things unprompted?
checked 0 of 3
We have not checked what this vendor discloses publicly yet.
Nothing checked here yet — this is not a mark against Rubrik.
Not checked
Momentum
Are they still shipping, or coasting?
checked 0 of 2
We have not tracked this vendor's release activity yet.
Nothing checked here yet — this is not a mark against Rubrik.
Data coverage: 13/100What this measures (and doesn't)
Not a quality rating or endorsement — a measure of how much verified, disclosed data we actually have about this vendor. A low score usually means "we don't have much verified information yet," not "this is a bad vendor." Never used to sort or rank vendor lists.
The platform admin controls the formula's weights.
Data coverage profileHow to read thisThe same four components behind the data coverage score above, shaped instead of listed — a vendor strong on verification but thin on buyer feedback looks visibly different from one that's the other way around. Security and feedback plot at the neutral midpoint (50) when there's no data yet (no products tracked, no reviews), matching how the actual score itself treats missing data — not a guess either way.
IntegrationsUI-12 — integration graphDetected from this vendor's own published integration/partner pages by the enrichment loop — each entry links the exact page it was found on. Directional: "integrates with" is claimed by this vendor; "integrated by" is claimed by the other vendor's site. Coverage grows as the scan progresses.
Buyer reviewsUI-14 — verified-buyer reviewsWritten only by domain-verified buyers at other companies, attributed to their company domain (never their identity), and moderated. Buyer-sourced opinion, clearly separate from the neutral catalog facts above — and never an input to search or comparison ordering.
verified buyers only
No buyer reviews yet.
Reputation ratingUI-20 — anonymous ratingA single anonymous 5-star signal from buyers, resellers, and analysts who've engaged with this vendor — separate from the domain-attributed reviews above. No rater identity is ever shown, not even at company level.
anonymous
No ratings in this window yet.
External ratingsUI-22 — third-party ratingsAggregate rating and review count pulled directly from the source site's own published data — never the review text itself, which belongs to that site. Links go to the real page so you can read the actual reviews there.
Platform for monitoring, governing, and remediating AI agent actions AI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →
CVE severity over timeUI-24 — CVE severity timelineEvery known CVE with a disclosure date and severity, plotted by when it was published — lets you see whether disclosures are trending toward more or less severe, not just a raw count. Same NVD-sourced, name-matched data as the list below.
Known CVEs (8)About this listSourced from the public NVD database, matched by vendor name. This is a name-based match, not exact version tracking — always check the linked NVD record for affected versions before drawing conclusions. “New” means published within the last 30 days. “Actively exploited” means CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog confirms real-world exploitation, not just a theoretical severity score.
An incorrect access control vulnerability in Rubrik CDM versions prior to 9.1.2-p1, 9.0.3-p6 and 8.1.3-p12, allows an attacker with network access to execute arbitrary code.
A buffer overflow vulnerability in the Rubrik Backup Service (RBS) Agent for Linux or Unix-based systems in Rubrik CDM 7.0.1, 7.0.1-p1, 7.0.1-p2 or 7.0.1-p3 before CDM 7.0.2-p2 could allow a local att…
An issue was discovered in Rubrik 5.0.3-2296. An OS command injection vulnerability allows an authenticated attacker to remotely execute arbitrary code on Rubrik-managed systems.
A man-in-the-middle vulnerability related to vCenter access was found in Rubrik CDM 3.x and 4.x before 4.0.4-p2. This vulnerability might expose Rubrik user credentials configured to access vCenter as…
SQL injection vulnerability in anzeiger/start.php in Swinger Club Portal allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the id parameter in a rubrik action.
SQL injection vulnerability in start.php in Eros Webkatalog allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the id parameter in a rubrik action.
SQL injection vulnerability in start.php in Webace-Linkscript (wls) 1.3 Special Edition (SE) allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the id parameter in a rubrik go action.
Directory traversal vulnerability in theme/acgv.php in ACGVannu 1.3 and earlier allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via a .. (dot dot) in the rubrik parameter.
Rubrik Rubrik Agent CloudAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
Platform for monitoring, governing, and remediating AI agent actions
