Skip to main content
0-Doubt
NewsInvestorsQuestionnairesDeveloperHelp
AnonymousSign in
0-Doubt — neutral IT/Security research
BrowseResellersCertified analystsRFI/RFP questionnairesHow trust worksHelp & FAQAPI
  1. Home/
  2. SolarWinds

SolarWinds

enriched
Security Orchestration, Automation & Response (SOAR)

Represented by Carahsoft ↗, Exclusive Networks ↗

solarwinds.com ↗ · required email domain for this vendor's users

Do you work at SolarWinds?

This profile was built from public sources and hasn't been claimed yet. Claiming it lets you correct what's wrong and add details only you can confirm — and marks that information as vendor-verified for buyers.

Free, and it does not affect ranking, placement, or comparison results. The first person verified on SolarWinds's email domain becomes the profile admin.

Claim this profileAlready have an account?

Trust profileHow to read thisFive separate questions a buyer actually asks, each answered with its own evidence and a link to the source. There is deliberately no overall score: a single number invites comparison it cannot support, and would mostly reflect how much of SolarWinds we have managed to scan rather than anything about the vendor.

Not checked means we have not looked yet, and is never counted against a vendor. Limited means we did look, but found only one line of evidence — enough to report, not enough to corroborate.

checked 6 of 16 signals
  • Limited

    Independently verified

    Has anyone other than the vendor confirmed this?

    checked 3 of 4

    Nothing here has been confirmed by an independent third party yet.

    • No third-party certifications found
    • Profile not claimed by the vendor
  • Limited

    Operating durability

    Is this a real, durable business?

    checked 2 of 4

    How long this vendor has been operating, and who stands behind them.

    • Headquarters location not disclosed on their site
  • Mixed

    Behaviour under stress

    What do they do when something goes wrong?

    checked 1 of 3

    What their public record shows about handling vulnerabilities and outages.

    • 100 published CVE(s) — a public disclosure record exists
    • 17 rated critical
  • Not checked

    Disclosure posture

    Do they tell you the awkward things unprompted?

    checked 0 of 3

    We have not checked what this vendor discloses publicly yet.

    Nothing checked here yet — this is not a mark against SolarWinds.

  • Not checked

    Momentum

    Are they still shipping, or coasting?

    checked 0 of 2

    We have not tracked this vendor's release activity yet.

    Nothing checked here yet — this is not a mark against SolarWinds.

Data coverage: 13/100What this measures (and doesn't)

Not a quality rating or endorsement — a measure of how much verified, disclosed data we actually have about this vendor. A low score usually means "we don't have much verified information yet," not "this is a bad vendor." Never used to sort or rank vendor lists.

Verification depth0/100
Security signal0/100
Buyer feedbackno data yet (0 reviews so far)
Profile completeness13/100
claim · HQ · materials · screenshots · integrations · certifications · security check

The platform admin controls the formula's weights.

Data coverage profileHow to read thisThe same four components behind the data coverage score above, shaped instead of listed — a vendor strong on verification but thin on buyer feedback looks visibly different from one that's the other way around. Security and feedback plot at the neutral midpoint (50) when there's no data yet (no products tracked, no reviews), matching how the actual score itself treats missing data — not a guess either way.

VerificationSecurityFeedbackCompletenessThis vendor — Verification: 0This vendor — Security: 0This vendor — Feedback: no data yetThis vendor — Completeness: 13

IntegrationsUI-12 — integration graphDetected from this vendor's own published integration/partner pages by the enrichment loop — each entry links the exact page it was found on. Directional: "integrates with" is claimed by this vendor; "integrated by" is claimed by the other vendor's site. Coverage grows as the scan progresses.

10 detected

Integrated by: Arctic Wolf, Claroty, Edge Delta, OctoXLabs, Oleria, Plixer, Portnox, Sevco Security, UncommonX, eMudhra

Buyer reviewsUI-14 — verified-buyer reviewsWritten only by domain-verified buyers at other companies, attributed to their company domain (never their identity), and moderated. Buyer-sourced opinion, clearly separate from the neutral catalog facts above — and never an input to search or comparison ordering.

verified buyers only

No buyer reviews yet.

Reputation ratingUI-20 — anonymous ratingA single anonymous 5-star signal from buyers, resellers, and analysts who've engaged with this vendor — separate from the domain-attributed reviews above. No rater identity is ever shown, not even at company level.

anonymous

No ratings in this window yet.

External ratingsUI-22 — third-party ratingsAggregate rating and review count pulled directly from the source site's own published data — never the review text itself, which belongs to that site. Links go to the real page so you can read the actual reviews there.

via third-party review sites
PeerSpot: 4.3/5 (11 reviews) ↗

Incident response platform for alert management, collaboration, and remediation AI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →

CVE severity over timeUI-24 — CVE severity timelineEvery known CVE with a disclosure date and severity, plotted by when it was published — lets you see whether disclosures are trending toward more or less severe, not just a raw count. Same NVD-sourced, name-matched data as the list below.

LOWMEDIUMHIGHCRITICAL2003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021CVE-2021-25275 · HIGH 7.8 · 2021-02-03CVE-2021-25274 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2021-02-03CVE-2020-35482 · MEDIUM 5.4 · 2021-02-03CVE-2020-35481 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2021-02-03CVE-2020-28001 · MEDIUM 5.4 · 2021-02-03CVE-2020-27994 · MEDIUM 6.5 · 2021-02-03CVE-2019-16961 · MEDIUM 5.4 · 2021-01-15CVE-2019-16954 · MEDIUM 5.4 · 2021-01-06CVE-2019-16960 · MEDIUM 5.4 · 2021-01-04CVE-2019-16956 · MEDIUM 5.4 · 2021-01-04CVE-2020-10148 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2020-12-30CVE-2019-16959 · MEDIUM 6.5 · 2020-12-21CVE-2019-16957 · MEDIUM 5.4 · 2020-12-18CVE-2019-16955 · MEDIUM 5.4 · 2020-12-18CVE-2020-25622 · HIGH 8.8 · 2020-12-16CVE-2020-25621 · HIGH 8.4 · 2020-12-16CVE-2020-25620 · HIGH 7.8 · 2020-12-16CVE-2020-25619 · MEDIUM 4.4 · 2020-12-16CVE-2020-25618 · HIGH 8.8 · 2020-12-16CVE-2020-25617 · HIGH 8.8 · 2020-12-16CVE-2018-16243 · MEDIUM 5.4 · 2020-12-16CVE-2019-16958 · MEDIUM 5.4 · 2020-12-01CVE-2020-15910 · MEDIUM 4.7 · 2020-10-19CVE-2020-15909 · HIGH 8.8 · 2020-10-19CVE-2020-13169 · CRITICAL 9.0 · 2020-09-17CVE-2020-15576 · HIGH 7.5 · 2020-07-07CVE-2020-15575 · MEDIUM 6.1 · 2020-07-07CVE-2020-15574 · HIGH 7.5 · 2020-07-07CVE-2020-15573 · MEDIUM 6.1 · 2020-07-07CVE-2020-15543 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2020-07-06CVE-2020-15542 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2020-07-06CVE-2020-15541 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2020-07-06CVE-2020-14007 · MEDIUM 5.4 · 2020-06-24CVE-2020-14006 · MEDIUM 5.4 · 2020-06-24CVE-2020-14005 · HIGH 8.8 · 2020-06-24CVE-2020-13912 · HIGH 7.3 · 2020-06-08CVE-2020-12608 · HIGH 7.8 · 2020-05-07CVE-2019-12864 · MEDIUM 5.5 · 2020-05-04CVE-2019-20002 · HIGH 7.8 · 2020-04-27CVE-2020-5734 · HIGH 7.5 · 2020-04-07CVE-2019-12769 · HIGH 8.8 · 2020-03-18CVE-2019-12863 · MEDIUM 4.8 · 2020-02-25CVE-2019-12954 · MEDIUM 5.4 · 2020-02-17CVE-2020-7984 · HIGH 7.5 · 2020-01-27CVE-2019-17127 · MEDIUM 6.1 · 2020-01-17CVE-2019-17125 · MEDIUM 6.1 · 2020-01-17CVE-2019-19829 · MEDIUM 5.4 · 2019-12-18CVE-2019-13182 · MEDIUM 5.4 · 2019-12-17CVE-2019-13181 · MEDIUM 6.5 · 2019-12-17CVE-2019-3980 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2019-10-09CVE-2018-19386 · MEDIUM 6.1 · 2019-08-15CVE-2018-13442 · HIGH 8.8 · 2019-07-16CVE-2019-12181 · HIGH 8.8 · 2019-06-17CVE-2018-19999 · HIGH 7.8 · 2019-06-07CVE-2019-9017 · HIGH 7.5 · 2019-05-02CVE-2018-19934 · MEDIUM 4.8 · 2019-03-21CVE-2018-15906 · HIGH 7.2 · 2019-03-21CVE-2019-9546 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2019-03-02CVE-2019-8917 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2019-02-19CVE-2018-16792 · CRITICAL 9.1 · 2018-12-06CVE-2018-16791 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2018-12-06CVE-2018-12897 · HIGH 7.8 · 2018-09-08CVE-2018-10241 · MEDIUM 6.5 · 2018-05-16CVE-2018-10240 · HIGH 7.3 · 2018-05-16CVE-2012-2576 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2017-12-21CVE-2017-9538 · MEDIUM 4.9 · 2017-10-03CVE-2017-9537 · MEDIUM 4.8 · 2017-10-03CVE-2017-7722 · CRITICAL 10.0 · 2017-04-12CVE-2017-7647 · HIGH 8.8 · 2017-04-10CVE-2017-7646 · MEDIUM 6.5 · 2017-04-10CVE-2017-5199 · HIGH 8.8 · 2017-03-24CVE-2017-5198 · HIGH 8.8 · 2017-03-24CVE-2017-6803 · HIGH 8.8 · 2017-03-20CVE-2016-5709 · MEDIUM 4.7 · 2016-06-24CVE-2016-3643 · HIGH 7.8 · 2016-06-17CVE-2016-3642 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2016-06-17CVE-2016-4350 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2016-05-10CVE-2016-2345 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2016-03-18CVE-2015-8220 · HIGH 7.5 · 2015-11-17CVE-2015-7840 · HIGH 7.5 · 2015-10-16CVE-2015-7839 · HIGH 7.5 · 2015-10-16CVE-2015-7838 · HIGH 10.0 · 2015-10-16CVE-2015-5610 · MEDIUM 4.0 · 2015-07-21CVE-2015-5371 · HIGH 10.0 · 2015-07-06CVE-2015-2284 · HIGH 10.0 · 2015-03-24CVE-2014-9566 · HIGH 7.5 · 2015-03-10CVE-2015-1501 · MEDIUM 6.8 · 2015-02-16CVE-2015-1500 · MEDIUM 6.8 · 2015-02-16CVE-2014-5504 · HIGH 7.5 · 2014-09-04CVE-2014-3459 · MEDIUM 6.8 · 2014-08-07CVE-2012-4939 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2012-10-31CVE-2012-2602 · MEDIUM 6.8 · 2012-08-12CVE-2012-2577 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2012-08-12CVE-2010-4828 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2011-08-24CVE-2010-2310 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2010-06-17CVE-2010-2115 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2010-05-29CVE-2009-3115 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2009-09-10CVE-2006-1951 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2006-04-25CVE-2002-1542 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2003-03-31CVE-2002-1209 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2002-11-04

Known CVEs (100)About this listSourced from the public NVD database, matched by vendor name. This is a name-based match, not exact version tracking — always check the linked NVD record for affected versions before drawing conclusions. “New” means published within the last 30 days. “Actively exploited” means CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog confirms real-world exploitation, not just a theoretical severity score.

RSS ⇢
  • CVE-2021-25275 ↗HIGH 7.82021

    SolarWinds Orion Platform before 2020.2.4, as used by various SolarWinds products, installs and uses a SQL Server backend, and stores database credentials to access this backend in a file readable by …

  • CVE-2021-25274 ↗CRITICAL 9.82021

    The Collector Service in SolarWinds Orion Platform before 2020.2.4 uses MSMQ (Microsoft Message Queue) and doesn't set permissions on its private queues. As a result, remote unauthenticated clients ca…

  • CVE-2020-35482 ↗MEDIUM 5.42021

    SolarWinds Serv-U before 15.2.2 allows authenticated reflected XSS.

  • CVE-2020-35481 ↗CRITICAL 9.82021

    SolarWinds Serv-U before 15.2.2 allows Unauthenticated Macro Injection.

  • CVE-2020-28001 ↗MEDIUM 5.42021

    SolarWinds Serv-U before 15.2.2 allows Authenticated Stored XSS.

  • CVE-2020-27994 ↗MEDIUM 6.52021

    SolarWinds Serv-U before 15.2.2 allows Authenticated Directory Traversal.

  • CVE-2019-16961 ↗MEDIUM 5.42021

    SolarWinds Web Help Desk 12.7.0 allows XSS via a Schedule Name.

  • CVE-2019-16954 ↗MEDIUM 5.42021

    SolarWinds Web Help Desk 12.7.0 allows HTML injection via a Comment in a Help Request ticket.

  • CVE-2019-16960 ↗MEDIUM 5.42021

    SolarWinds Web Help Desk 12.7.0 allows XSS via a CSV template file with a crafted Location Name field.

  • CVE-2019-16956 ↗MEDIUM 5.42021

    SolarWinds Web Help Desk 12.7.0 allows XSS via the Request Type parameter of a ticket.

  • CVE-2020-10148 ↗⚠ actively exploitedCRITICAL 9.82020

    The SolarWinds Orion API is vulnerable to an authentication bypass that could allow a remote attacker to execute API commands. This vulnerability could allow a remote attacker to bypass authentication…

  • CVE-2019-16959 ↗MEDIUM 6.52020

    SolarWinds Web Help Desk 12.7.0 allows CSV Injection, also known as Formula Injection, via a file attached to a ticket.

  • CVE-2019-16957 ↗MEDIUM 5.42020

    SolarWinds Web Help Desk 12.7.0 allows XSS via the First Name field of a User Account.

  • CVE-2019-16955 ↗MEDIUM 5.42020

    SolarWinds Web Help Desk 12.7.0 allows XSS via an uploaded SVG document in a request.

  • CVE-2020-25622 ↗HIGH 8.82020

    An issue was discovered in SolarWinds N-Central 12.3.0.670. The AdvancedScripts HTTP endpoint allows CSRF.

  • CVE-2020-25621 ↗HIGH 8.42020

    An issue was discovered in SolarWinds N-Central 12.3.0.670. The local database does not require authentication: security is only based on ability to access a network interface. The database has keys a…

  • CVE-2020-25620 ↗HIGH 7.82020

    An issue was discovered in SolarWinds N-Central 12.3.0.670. Hard-coded Credentials exist by default for local user accounts named [email protected] and [email protected]. These allow logins to th…

  • CVE-2020-25619 ↗MEDIUM 4.42020

    An issue was discovered in SolarWinds N-Central 12.3.0.670. The SSH component does not restrict the Communication Channel to Intended Endpoints. An attacker can leverage an SSH feature (port forwardin…

  • CVE-2020-25618 ↗HIGH 8.82020

    An issue was discovered in SolarWinds N-Central 12.3.0.670. The sudo configuration has incorrect access control because the nable web user account is effectively able to run arbitrary OS commands as r…

  • CVE-2020-25617 ↗HIGH 8.82020

    An issue was discovered in SolarWinds N-Central 12.3.0.670. The AdvancedScripts HTTP endpoint allows Relative Path Traversal by an authenticated user of the N-Central Administration Console (NAC), lea…

  • …and 80 more

Competitors (12)

full alternatives comparison →
7AIAbusixAI EdgeLabsAirrivedAiStrikeAlertFusionAndesiteArcanna.aiASPIA Infotech Pvt. Ltd.BitLyftBlink OpsBlockAPT

Products (1)

Security Orchestration, Automation & Response (SOAR)

1
  • SolarWinds Incident ResponseAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Incident response platform for alert management, collaboration, and remediation