Skip to main content
0-Doubt
NewsInvestorsQuestionnairesDeveloperHelp
AnonymousSign in
0-Doubt — neutral IT/Security research
BrowseResellersCertified analystsRFI/RFP questionnairesHow trust worksHelp & FAQAPI
  1. Home/
  2. WatchGuard

WatchGuard

enriched
Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM)Endpoint Detection & ResponseNetwork Detection & Response (NDR)Network Firewall (NGFW)Secure Access Service Edge (SASE/SSE)

watchguard.com ↗ · required email domain for this vendor's users

Headquartered in United StatesHeadquarters countrySourced only from this vendor's own published headquarters address (schema.org structured data on their site) — never guessed from domain TLD. Source ↗

Do you work at WatchGuard?

This profile was built from public sources and hasn't been claimed yet. Claiming it lets you correct what's wrong and add details only you can confirm — and marks that information as vendor-verified for buyers.

Free, and it does not affect ranking, placement, or comparison results. The first person verified on WatchGuard's email domain becomes the profile admin.

Claim this profileAlready have an account?

Trust profileHow to read thisFive separate questions a buyer actually asks, each answered with its own evidence and a link to the source. There is deliberately no overall score: a single number invites comparison it cannot support, and would mostly reflect how much of WatchGuard we have managed to scan rather than anything about the vendor.

Not checked means we have not looked yet, and is never counted against a vendor. Limited means we did look, but found only one line of evidence — enough to report, not enough to corroborate.

checked 11 of 16 signals
  • Limited

    Independently verified

    Has anyone other than the vendor confirmed this?

    checked 3 of 4

    Nothing here has been confirmed by an independent third party yet.

    • No third-party certifications found
    • Profile not claimed by the vendor
  • Strong

    Operating durability

    Is this a real, durable business?

    checked 3 of 4

    How long this vendor has been operating, and who stands behind them.

    • Domain registered 1996 — 30 years ago
    • Headquarters: United States
  • Mixed

    Behaviour under stress

    What do they do when something goes wrong?

    checked 2 of 3

    What their public record shows about handling vulnerabilities and outages.

    • 100 published CVE(s) — a public disclosure record exists
    • 10 rated critical
    • Publishes a public status page
  • Limited

    Disclosure posture

    Do they tell you the awkward things unprompted?

    checked 2 of 3

    How much this vendor volunteers before you have to ask.

    • No trust center found
    • Publishes a vulnerability disclosure policy
  • Limited

    Momentum

    Are they still shipping, or coasting?

    checked 1 of 2

    Whether this vendor is visibly still building.

    Nothing checked here yet — this is not a mark against WatchGuard.

Data coverage: 20/100What this measures (and doesn't)

Not a quality rating or endorsement — a measure of how much verified, disclosed data we actually have about this vendor. A low score usually means "we don't have much verified information yet," not "this is a bad vendor." Never used to sort or rank vendor lists.

Verification depth0/100
Security signal0/100
Buyer feedbackno data yet (0 reviews so far)
Profile completeness50/100
claim · HQ · materials · screenshots · integrations · certifications · security check

The platform admin controls the formula's weights.

Data coverage profileHow to read thisThe same four components behind the data coverage score above, shaped instead of listed — a vendor strong on verification but thin on buyer feedback looks visibly different from one that's the other way around. Security and feedback plot at the neutral midpoint (50) when there's no data yet (no products tracked, no reviews), matching how the actual score itself treats missing data — not a guess either way.

VerificationSecurityFeedbackCompletenessThis vendor — Verification: 0This vendor — Security: 0This vendor — Feedback: no data yetThis vendor — Completeness: 50

IntegrationsUI-12 — integration graphDetected from this vendor's own published integration/partner pages by the enrichment loop — each entry links the exact page it was found on. Directional: "integrates with" is claimed by this vendor; "integrated by" is claimed by the other vendor's site. Coverage grows as the scan progresses.

15 detected

Integrates with: Fortinet ↗, Microsoft ↗, Multifactor ↗, Segura ↗, SonicWall ↗, Sophos ↗

Integrated by: Blackpoint Cyber, Gurucul, OctoXLabs, Portnox, Protectimus Limited, SecurEnvoy, SecureW2, Segura, ThreatDefence

Buyer reviewsUI-14 — verified-buyer reviewsWritten only by domain-verified buyers at other companies, attributed to their company domain (never their identity), and moderated. Buyer-sourced opinion, clearly separate from the neutral catalog facts above — and never an input to search or comparison ordering.

verified buyers only

No buyer reviews yet.

Reputation ratingUI-20 — anonymous ratingA single anonymous 5-star signal from buyers, resellers, and analysts who've engaged with this vendor — separate from the domain-attributed reviews above. No rater identity is ever shown, not even at company level.

anonymous

No ratings in this window yet.

Network security appliances. AI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →

Security & trust signalsAbout these signalsCertifications are keyword-matched from the vendor's own public pages (each claim links to its source — verify directly before relying on it). Security headers are checked live against the vendor's homepage, re-checked every 90 days. Both are independent, automated signals, not a vendor-submitted or audited claim, and are not blended into a single score.

9 of 9 technical checks completed — not a score, just coverage

Security headers (5/5) — checked 8/13/2026

  • ✓ Strict-Transport-Security
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy
  • ✓ X-Frame-Options
  • ✓ X-Content-Type-Options
  • ✓ Referrer-Policy
  • ✓ security.txt ↗

Infrastructure & transparency signals

Status: operational ↗Vuln disclosure policy ↗Domain since 1996CAA enabled

Status historyAbout this timelineEvery incident detected on this vendor's own public status page since we started watching it — sourced from the same structural check as the status chip above, checked roughly hourly (every 5 minutes while an incident is active), never inferred. A resolution requires a real check confirming "operational" again; an incident with no resolution yet shown is still ongoing as of the most recent check.

No outages recorded since we started watching (first checked Aug 13, 2026, 8:25 PM).

CVE severity over timeUI-24 — CVE severity timelineEvery known CVE with a disclosure date and severity, plotted by when it was published — lets you see whether disclosures are trending toward more or less severe, not just a raw count. Same NVD-sourced, name-matched data as the list below.

LOWMEDIUMHIGHCRITICAL20012002200320042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026CVE-2026-41288 · HIGH 7.8 · 2026-05-06CVE-2026-41286 · MEDIUM 6.5 · 2026-05-06CVE-2026-41287 · MEDIUM 6.5 · 2026-05-06CVE-2026-3344 · MEDIUM 4.9 · 2026-03-03CVE-2026-3342 · HIGH 7.2 · 2026-03-03CVE-2025-14733 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2025-12-19CVE-2025-6946 · MEDIUM 4.8 · 2025-12-05CVE-2025-1547 · HIGH 7.2 · 2025-12-05CVE-2025-1545 · HIGH 7.5 · 2025-12-05CVE-2025-13940 · MEDIUM 5.5 · 2025-12-05CVE-2025-13939 · MEDIUM 6.1 · 2025-12-05CVE-2025-13938 · MEDIUM 6.1 · 2025-12-05CVE-2025-13937 · MEDIUM 6.1 · 2025-12-05CVE-2025-13936 · MEDIUM 6.1 · 2025-12-05CVE-2025-12196 · HIGH 7.2 · 2025-12-05CVE-2025-12195 · HIGH 7.2 · 2025-12-05CVE-2025-12026 · HIGH 7.2 · 2025-12-05CVE-2025-11838 · HIGH 7.5 · 2025-12-05CVE-2025-9242 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2025-09-17CVE-2025-1071 · MEDIUM 4.8 · 2025-02-14CVE-2025-0178 · MEDIUM 6.1 · 2025-02-14CVE-2022-31749 · MEDIUM 6.5 · 2025-01-28CVE-2024-8424 · HIGH 7.8 · 2024-11-08CVE-2024-6594 · HIGH 7.5 · 2024-09-25CVE-2024-6593 · CRITICAL 9.1 · 2024-09-25CVE-2024-6592 · CRITICAL 9.1 · 2024-09-25CVE-2024-5974 · HIGH 7.2 · 2024-07-09CVE-2024-4944 · HIGH 7.8 · 2024-07-09CVE-2024-1417 · HIGH 7.8 · 2024-05-16CVE-2023-26239 · MEDIUM 5.5 · 2023-10-05CVE-2023-26238 · MEDIUM 5.5 · 2023-10-05CVE-2023-26237 · MEDIUM 6.7 · 2023-10-05CVE-2023-26236 · HIGH 7.8 · 2023-10-05CVE-2022-31792 · MEDIUM 5.4 · 2022-09-06CVE-2022-31791 · HIGH 7.8 · 2022-09-06CVE-2022-31789 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2022-09-06CVE-2022-31790 · HIGH 7.5 · 2022-09-06CVE-2022-25361 · CRITICAL 9.1 · 2022-06-07CVE-2022-26318 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2022-03-04CVE-2022-25363 · MEDIUM 6.5 · 2022-02-24CVE-2022-25360 · HIGH 8.8 · 2022-02-24CVE-2022-25293 · HIGH 8.8 · 2022-02-24CVE-2022-25292 · HIGH 8.8 · 2022-02-24CVE-2022-25291 · HIGH 8.8 · 2022-02-24CVE-2022-25290 · MEDIUM 6.5 · 2022-02-24CVE-2022-23176 · HIGH 8.8 · 2022-02-24CVE-2021-37346 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2021-08-13CVE-2020-10532 · HIGH 7.5 · 2020-03-12CVE-2014-6413 · MEDIUM 6.1 · 2020-02-07CVE-2019-18652 · MEDIUM 6.1 · 2020-01-08CVE-2016-6154 · MEDIUM 6.1 · 2019-08-24CVE-2018-10578 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2018-05-03CVE-2018-10577 · HIGH 8.8 · 2018-05-03CVE-2018-10576 · HIGH 7.8 · 2018-05-01CVE-2018-10575 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2018-05-01CVE-2017-14616 · HIGH 7.5 · 2017-09-21CVE-2017-14615 · MEDIUM 6.1 · 2017-09-21CVE-2017-8056 · MEDIUM 5.3 · 2017-04-23CVE-2017-8055 · MEDIUM 5.3 · 2017-04-23CVE-2016-7089 · HIGH 7.8 · 2016-08-24CVE-2015-5453 · MEDIUM 6.5 · 2015-07-08CVE-2015-5452 · HIGH 7.5 · 2015-07-08CVE-2014-0338 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2014-03-16CVE-2013-6021 · HIGH 9.3 · 2013-10-19CVE-2013-5702 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2013-10-19CVE-2013-5701 · HIGH 7.2 · 2013-10-04CVE-2011-2165 · MEDIUM 6.8 · 2011-05-24CVE-2008-1618 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2008-04-07CVE-2003-0642 · LOW 2.1 · 2003-08-27CVE-2003-0641 · MEDIUM 4.6 · 2003-08-27CVE-2002-1519 · HIGH 10.0 · 2003-04-02CVE-2002-1520 · HIGH 10.0 · 2003-04-02CVE-2002-1979 · HIGH 7.5 · 2002-12-31CVE-2002-1047 · HIGH 7.5 · 2002-10-04CVE-2002-1046 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2002-10-04CVE-2002-0527 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2002-08-12CVE-2002-0528 · HIGH 10.0 · 2002-08-12CVE-2001-0692 · HIGH 7.5 · 2001-09-20CVE-2001-0592 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2001-08-02CVE-2001-0204 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2001-06-02CVE-2001-0203 · HIGH 10.0 · 2001-03-26CVE-2001-0049 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2001-02-16CVE-2000-0895 · HIGH 10.0 · 2001-02-12CVE-2000-0896 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2001-02-12CVE-2000-0894 · HIGH 10.0 · 2001-02-12CVE-2000-1182 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2001-01-09CVE-2000-0783 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2000-10-20

Known CVEs (100)About this listSourced from the public NVD database, matched by vendor name. This is a name-based match, not exact version tracking — always check the linked NVD record for affected versions before drawing conclusions. “New” means published within the last 30 days. “Actively exploited” means CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog confirms real-world exploitation, not just a theoretical severity score.

RSS ⇢
  • CVE-2026-41288 ↗HIGH 7.82026

    Incorrect permission assignment for a resource in the patch management component of the WatchGuard Agent on Windows allows an authenticated local user to elevate their privileges to NT AUTHORITY\\SYST…

  • CVE-2026-41286 ↗MEDIUM 6.52026

    Stack-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability in the WatchGuard Agent discovery service on Windows allows Overflow Buffers. An unauthenticated attacker on the same local network could exploit this vulnera…

  • CVE-2026-41287 ↗MEDIUM 6.52026

    Stack-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability in the WatchGuard Agent discovery service on Windows allows Overflow Buffers. An unauthenticated attacker on the same local network could exploit this vulnera…

  • CVE-2026-3987 ↗2026

    A path traversal vulnerability in the Fireware OS Web UI on WatchGuard Firebox systems may allow a privileged authenticated remote attacker to execute arbitrary code in the context of an elevated syst…

  • CVE-2026-4315 ↗2026

    A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the WatchGuard Fireware OS WebUI could allow a remote attacker to trigger a denial-of-service (DoS) condition in the Fireware Web UI by convincing …

  • CVE-2026-4266 ↗2026

    An Insecure Deserialization vulnerability in WatchGuard Fireware OS allows an attacker that has obtained write access to the local filesystem through another vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in…

  • CVE-2026-3344 ↗MEDIUM 4.92026

    A vulnerability in WatchGuard Fireware OS may allow an attacker to bypass the Fireware OS filesystem integrity check and maintain limited persistence via a maliciously-crafted firmware update package.…

  • CVE-2026-3342 ↗HIGH 7.22026

    An Out-of-bounds Write vulnerability in WatchGuard Fireware OS may allow an authenticated privileged administrator to execute arbitrary code with root permissions via an exposed management interface. …

  • CVE-2026-1498 ↗2026

    An LDAP Injection vulnerability in WatchGuard Fireware OS may allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to retrieve sensitive information from a connected LDAP authentication server through an exposed a…

  • CVE-2025-14733 ↗⚠ actively exploitedCRITICAL 9.82025

    An Out-of-bounds Write vulnerability in WatchGuard Fireware OS may allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code. This vulnerability affects both the Mobile User VPN with IKEv2 and…

  • CVE-2025-6946 ↗MEDIUM 4.82025

    Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in WatchGuard Fireware OS allows Stored XSS via the IPS module. This vulnerability requires an…

  • CVE-2025-1910 ↗2025

    The WatchGuard Mobile VPN with SSL Client on Windows allows a locally authenticated non-administrative Windows user to escalate their privileges to NT AUTHORITY/SYSTEM on the Windows machine where t…

  • CVE-2025-1547 ↗HIGH 7.22025

    A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability [CWE-121] in WatchGuard Fireware OS's certificate request command could allow an authenticated privileged user to execute arbitrary code via specially craft…

  • CVE-2025-1545 ↗HIGH 7.52025

    An XPath Injection vulnerability in WatchGuard Fireware OS may allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to retrieve sensitive information from the Firebox configuration through an exposed authenticatio…

  • CVE-2025-13940 ↗MEDIUM 5.52025

    An Expected Behavior Violation [CWE-440] vulnerability in WatchGuard Fireware OS may allow an attacker to bypass the Fireware OS boot time system integrity check and prevent the Firebox from shutting …

  • CVE-2025-13939 ↗MEDIUM 6.12025

    Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in WatchGuard Fireware OS (Gateway Wireless Controller module) allows Stored XSS.This issue af…

  • CVE-2025-13938 ↗MEDIUM 6.12025

    Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in WatchGuard Fireware OS (Autotask Technology Integration module) allows Stored XSS.This issu…

  • CVE-2025-13937 ↗MEDIUM 6.12025

    Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in WatchGuard Fireware OS (ConnectWise Technology Integration module) allows Stored XSS.This i…

  • CVE-2025-13936 ↗MEDIUM 6.12025

    Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in WatchGuard Fireware OS (Tigerpaw Technology Integration module) allows Stored XSS.This issu…

  • CVE-2025-12196 ↗HIGH 7.22025

    An Out-of-bounds Write vulnerability in WatchGuard Fireware OS's CLI could allow an authenticated privileged user to execute arbitrary code via a specially crafted CLI command.This vulnerability affec…

  • …and 80 more

Competitors (12)

full alternatives comparison →
AbsoluteAhnLabAI EdgeLabsArray NetworksFortinetGeniansIvantiPalo Alto NetworksSangfor TechnologiesSonicWallTEHTRISTrend Micro

Products (10)

Endpoint Detection & Response

2
  • WatchGuard Endpoint SecurityEndpointAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    AI-powered endpoint protection with detection and response.
  • WatchGuard ThreatSyncAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    AI-based XDR platform for threat detection and automated response

Network Firewall (NGFW)

2
  • WatchGuard Firebox M295AI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Rack-mount NGFW appliance for branch offices and distributed networks
  • WatchGuard Network Security (Firebox)FirewallAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Firewall appliances protecting wired and wireless environments.

Managed Detection & Response (MDR)

1
  • WatchGuard MDRMDRAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    24x7 monitoring, threat hunting, detection, and guided remediation.

Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM)

1
  • WatchGuard CloudAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Centralized cloud mgmt platform for WatchGuard security solutions

Secure Access Service Edge (SASE/SSE)

1
  • WatchGuard FireCloud Total AccessAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Cloud-based SASE solution combining FWaaS, SWG, and ZTNA for remote access

Identity & Access Management

1
  • WatchGuard AuthPointMFAAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Multi-factor authentication and zero-trust risk policies.

Network Detection & Response (NDR)

1
  • WatchGuard ThreatSync NDRAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Cloud-native NDR with AI-based threat detection for SMBs

Other

1
  • WatchGuard ZTNAZTNAAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Identity-based zero trust network access with session-level enforcement.