Skip to main content
0-Doubt
NewsInvestorsQuestionnairesDeveloperHelp
AnonymousSign in
0-Doubt — neutral IT/Security research
BrowseResellersCertified analystsRFI/RFP questionnairesHow trust worksHelp & FAQAPI
  1. Home/
  2. Omada

Omada

enriched
Identity & Access Management

omadaidentity.com ↗ · required email domain for this vendor's users

Do you work at Omada?

This profile was built from public sources and hasn't been claimed yet. Claiming it lets you correct what's wrong and add details only you can confirm — and marks that information as vendor-verified for buyers.

Free, and it does not affect ranking, placement, or comparison results. The first person verified on Omada's email domain becomes the profile admin.

Claim this profileAlready have an account?

Trust profileHow to read thisFive separate questions a buyer actually asks, each answered with its own evidence and a link to the source. There is deliberately no overall score: a single number invites comparison it cannot support, and would mostly reflect how much of Omada we have managed to scan rather than anything about the vendor.

Not checked means we have not looked yet, and is never counted against a vendor. Limited means we did look, but found only one line of evidence — enough to report, not enough to corroborate.

checked 6 of 16 signals
  • Limited

    Independently verified

    Has anyone other than the vendor confirmed this?

    checked 3 of 4

    Nothing here has been confirmed by an independent third party yet.

    • No third-party certifications found
    • Profile not claimed by the vendor
  • Limited

    Operating durability

    Is this a real, durable business?

    checked 2 of 4

    How long this vendor has been operating, and who stands behind them.

    • Headquarters location not disclosed on their site
  • Mixed

    Behaviour under stress

    What do they do when something goes wrong?

    checked 1 of 3

    What their public record shows about handling vulnerabilities and outages.

    • 35 published CVE(s) — a public disclosure record exists
    • 3 rated critical
  • Not checked

    Disclosure posture

    Do they tell you the awkward things unprompted?

    checked 0 of 3

    We have not checked what this vendor discloses publicly yet.

    Nothing checked here yet — this is not a mark against Omada.

  • Not checked

    Momentum

    Are they still shipping, or coasting?

    checked 0 of 2

    We have not tracked this vendor's release activity yet.

    Nothing checked here yet — this is not a mark against Omada.

Data coverage: 13/100What this measures (and doesn't)

Not a quality rating or endorsement — a measure of how much verified, disclosed data we actually have about this vendor. A low score usually means "we don't have much verified information yet," not "this is a bad vendor." Never used to sort or rank vendor lists.

Verification depth0/100
Security signal0/100
Buyer feedbackno data yet (0 reviews so far)
Profile completeness13/100
claim · HQ · materials · screenshots · integrations · certifications · security check

The platform admin controls the formula's weights.

Data coverage profileHow to read thisThe same four components behind the data coverage score above, shaped instead of listed — a vendor strong on verification but thin on buyer feedback looks visibly different from one that's the other way around. Security and feedback plot at the neutral midpoint (50) when there's no data yet (no products tracked, no reviews), matching how the actual score itself treats missing data — not a guess either way.

VerificationSecurityFeedbackCompletenessThis vendor — Verification: 0This vendor — Security: 0This vendor — Feedback: no data yetThis vendor — Completeness: 13

IntegrationsUI-12 — integration graphDetected from this vendor's own published integration/partner pages by the enrichment loop — each entry links the exact page it was found on. Directional: "integrates with" is claimed by this vendor; "integrated by" is claimed by the other vendor's site. Coverage grows as the scan progresses.

3 detected

Integrates with: Microsoft ↗, Oracle ↗, Threat Landscape ↗

Buyer reviewsUI-14 — verified-buyer reviewsWritten only by domain-verified buyers at other companies, attributed to their company domain (never their identity), and moderated. Buyer-sourced opinion, clearly separate from the neutral catalog facts above — and never an input to search or comparison ordering.

verified buyers only

No buyer reviews yet.

Reputation ratingUI-20 — anonymous ratingA single anonymous 5-star signal from buyers, resellers, and analysts who've engaged with this vendor — separate from the domain-attributed reviews above. No rater identity is ever shown, not even at company level.

anonymous

No ratings in this window yet.

Cloud-based IGA solution for identity lifecycle mgmt and access governance AI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →

CVE severity over timeUI-24 — CVE severity timelineEvery known CVE with a disclosure date and severity, plotted by when it was published — lets you see whether disclosures are trending toward more or less severe, not just a raw count. Same NVD-sourced, name-matched data as the list below.

LOWMEDIUMHIGHCRITICAL20192020202120222023202420252026CVE-2026-1668 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2026-03-13CVE-2025-7375 · MEDIUM 6.5 · 2026-03-06CVE-2025-9292 · HIGH 7.5 · 2026-02-13CVE-2025-9522 · MEDIUM 5.3 · 2026-01-27CVE-2025-9521 · MEDIUM 6.5 · 2026-01-27CVE-2025-9520 · MEDIUM 6.8 · 2026-01-27CVE-2025-9290 · MEDIUM 5.9 · 2026-01-23CVE-2025-9289 · MEDIUM 4.7 · 2026-01-23CVE-2025-7851 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2025-10-21CVE-2025-7850 · HIGH 7.2 · 2025-10-21CVE-2024-52951 · HIGH 8.0 · 2024-11-27CVE-2024-21827 · HIGH 7.2 · 2024-06-25CVE-2024-5244 · MEDIUM 4.2 · 2024-05-24CVE-2024-5243 · HIGH 7.5 · 2024-05-24CVE-2024-5242 · HIGH 7.5 · 2024-05-24CVE-2024-5228 · HIGH 7.5 · 2024-05-24CVE-2024-5227 · HIGH 7.5 · 2024-05-24CVE-2024-1180 · HIGH 8.0 · 2024-04-03CVE-2024-1179 · HIGH 8.8 · 2024-04-02CVE-2024-25139 · CRITICAL 10.0 · 2024-03-14CVE-2023-47618 · HIGH 7.2 · 2024-02-06CVE-2023-47617 · HIGH 7.2 · 2024-02-06CVE-2023-47209 · HIGH 7.2 · 2024-02-06CVE-2023-47167 · HIGH 7.2 · 2024-02-06CVE-2023-46683 · HIGH 7.2 · 2024-02-06CVE-2023-43482 · HIGH 7.2 · 2024-02-06CVE-2023-42664 · HIGH 7.2 · 2024-02-06CVE-2023-36498 · HIGH 7.2 · 2024-02-06CVE-2021-44032 · HIGH 7.5 · 2022-03-10CVE-2020-12475 · MEDIUM 5.5 · 2020-05-04CVE-2018-10168 · HIGH 8.8 · 2018-05-03CVE-2018-10167 · HIGH 7.5 · 2018-05-03CVE-2018-10166 · HIGH 8.8 · 2018-05-03CVE-2018-10165 · MEDIUM 5.4 · 2018-05-03CVE-2018-10164 · MEDIUM 5.4 · 2018-05-03

Known CVEs (35)About this listSourced from the public NVD database, matched by vendor name. This is a name-based match, not exact version tracking — always check the linked NVD record for affected versions before drawing conclusions. “New” means published within the last 30 days. “Actively exploited” means CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog confirms real-world exploitation, not just a theoretical severity score.

RSS ⇢
  • CVE-2026-1668 ↗CRITICAL 9.82026

    The web interface on multiple Omada switches does not adequately validate certain external inputs, which may lead to out-of-bound memory access when processing crafted requests. Under specific condit…

  • CVE-2025-7375 ↗MEDIUM 6.52026

    A denial-of-service (DoS) vulnerability was identified in Omada EAP610 v3. An attacker with adjacent network access can send crafted requests to cause the device’s HTTP service to crash. This result…

  • CVE-2025-9292 ↗HIGH 7.52026

    A permissive web security configuration may allow cross-origin restrictions enforced by modern browsers to be bypassed under specific circumstances. Exploitation requires the presence of an existing …

  • CVE-2025-9522 ↗MEDIUM 5.32026

    Blind Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in Omada Controllers through webhook functionality, enabling crafted requests to internal services, which may lead to enumeration of information.

  • CVE-2025-9521 ↗MEDIUM 6.52026

    Password Confirmation Bypass vulnerability in Omada Controllers, allowing an attacker with a valid session token to bypass secondary verification, and change the user’s password without proper confirm…

  • CVE-2025-9520 ↗MEDIUM 6.82026

    An IDOR vulnerability exists in Omada Controllers that allows an attacker with Administrator permissions to manipulate requests and potentially hijack the Owner account.

  • CVE-2025-9290 ↗MEDIUM 5.92026

    An authentication weakness was identified in Omada Controllers, Gateways and Access Points, controller-device adoption due to improper handling of random values. Exploitation requires advanced network…

  • CVE-2025-9289 ↗MEDIUM 4.72026

    A Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability was identified in a parameter in Omada Controllers due to improper input sanitization. Exploitation requires advanced conditions, such as network positioning…

  • CVE-2025-7851 ↗CRITICAL 9.82025

    An attacker may obtain the root shell on the underlying OS system with the restricted conditions on Omada gateways.

  • CVE-2025-7850 ↗HIGH 7.22025

    A command injection vulnerability may be exploited after the admin's authentication on the web portal on Omada gateways.

  • CVE-2024-52951 ↗HIGH 8.02024

    Stored Cross-Site Scripting in the Access Request History in Omada Identity before version 15 update 1 allows an authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code in the browser of a victim via a speci…

  • CVE-2024-21827 ↗HIGH 7.22024

    A leftover debug code vulnerability exists in the cli_server debug functionality of Tp-Link ER7206 Omada Gigabit VPN Router 1.4.1 Build 20240117 Rel.57421. A specially crafted series of network reques…

  • CVE-2024-5244 ↗MEDIUM 4.22024

    TP-Link Omada ER605 Reliance on Security Through Obscurity Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows network-adjacent attackers to access or spoof DDNS messages on affected installations of TP-Link Oma…

  • CVE-2024-5243 ↗HIGH 7.52024

    TP-Link Omada ER605 Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows network-adjacent attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of TP-Link Omada ER605…

  • CVE-2024-5242 ↗HIGH 7.52024

    TP-Link Omada ER605 Stack-based Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows network-adjacent attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of TP-Link…

  • CVE-2024-5228 ↗HIGH 7.52024

    TP-Link Omada ER605 Comexe DDNS Response Handling Heap-based Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows network-adjacent attackers to execute arbitrary code on aff…

  • CVE-2024-5227 ↗HIGH 7.52024

    TP-Link Omada ER605 PPTP VPN username Command Injection Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows network-adjacent attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of…

  • CVE-2024-1180 ↗HIGH 8.02024

    TP-Link Omada ER605 Access Control Command Injection Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows network-adjacent attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of TP…

  • CVE-2024-1179 ↗HIGH 8.82024

    TP-Link Omada ER605 DHCPv6 Client Options Stack-based Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows network-adjacent attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected in…

  • CVE-2024-25139 ↗CRITICAL 10.02024

    In TP-Link Omada er605 1.0.1 through (v2.6) 2.2.3, a cloud-brd binary is susceptible to an integer overflow that leads to a heap-based buffer overflow. After heap shaping, an attacker can achieve code…

  • …and 15 more

Resources & materials (6)

discovered on their site

Datasheets, whitepapers, and case studies found on omadaidentity.com by the enrichment loop. Links open the original documents on the vendor's own site.

  • pdfMigrate From Oracle To Omada↗
  • pdfProcess Security Breach Management↗
  • pdfProcess Administration↗
  • pdfSolution Brief IdentityProcess Auditing↗
  • pdfProcess Access Management↗
  • pdfProcess Identity Lifecycle Management↗

Competitors (12)

full alternatives comparison →
1PasswordAbbey LabsAceissAirrivedAkeyless SecurityAlcorAlibaba CloudAndromeda SecurityAponoAqueraARCONArexdata

Products (3)

Identity & Access Management

3
  • Omada Identity CloudAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Cloud-based IGA solution for identity lifecycle mgmt and access governance
  • Omada Identity Omada Identity CloudAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    SaaS IGA platform with AI-powered automation for identity lifecycle management
  • Omada Identity On-Premises Identity GovernanceAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    On-premises IGA solution for identity lifecycle and access management