Skip to main content
0-Doubt
NewsInvestorsQuestionnairesDeveloperHelp
AnonymousSign in
0-Doubt — neutral IT/Security research
BrowseResellersCertified analystsRFI/RFP questionnairesHow trust worksHelp & FAQAPI
  1. Home/
  2. Oracle

Oracle

enriched
Identity & Access ManagementWAF / DDoS / App Protection

Represented by CBTS ↗, Carahsoft ↗

oracle.com ↗ · required email domain for this vendor's users

Do you work at Oracle?

This profile was built from public sources and hasn't been claimed yet. Claiming it lets you correct what's wrong and add details only you can confirm — and marks that information as vendor-verified for buyers.

Free, and it does not affect ranking, placement, or comparison results. The first person verified on Oracle's email domain becomes the profile admin.

Claim this profileAlready have an account?

Trust profileHow to read thisFive separate questions a buyer actually asks, each answered with its own evidence and a link to the source. There is deliberately no overall score: a single number invites comparison it cannot support, and would mostly reflect how much of Oracle we have managed to scan rather than anything about the vendor.

Not checked means we have not looked yet, and is never counted against a vendor. Limited means we did look, but found only one line of evidence — enough to report, not enough to corroborate.

checked 6 of 16 signals
  • Limited

    Independently verified

    Has anyone other than the vendor confirmed this?

    checked 3 of 4

    Nothing here has been confirmed by an independent third party yet.

    • No third-party certifications found
    • Profile not claimed by the vendor
  • Limited

    Operating durability

    Is this a real, durable business?

    checked 2 of 4

    How long this vendor has been operating, and who stands behind them.

    • Headquarters location not disclosed on their site
  • Limited

    Behaviour under stress

    What do they do when something goes wrong?

    checked 1 of 3

    What their public record shows about handling vulnerabilities and outages.

    • 96 published CVE(s) — a public disclosure record exists
  • Not checked

    Disclosure posture

    Do they tell you the awkward things unprompted?

    checked 0 of 3

    We have not checked what this vendor discloses publicly yet.

    Nothing checked here yet — this is not a mark against Oracle.

  • Not checked

    Momentum

    Are they still shipping, or coasting?

    checked 0 of 2

    We have not tracked this vendor's release activity yet.

    Nothing checked here yet — this is not a mark against Oracle.

Data coverage: 13/100What this measures (and doesn't)

Not a quality rating or endorsement — a measure of how much verified, disclosed data we actually have about this vendor. A low score usually means "we don't have much verified information yet," not "this is a bad vendor." Never used to sort or rank vendor lists.

Verification depth0/100
Security signal0/100
Buyer feedbackno data yet (0 reviews so far)
Profile completeness13/100
claim · HQ · materials · screenshots · integrations · certifications · security check

The platform admin controls the formula's weights.

Data coverage profileHow to read thisThe same four components behind the data coverage score above, shaped instead of listed — a vendor strong on verification but thin on buyer feedback looks visibly different from one that's the other way around. Security and feedback plot at the neutral midpoint (50) when there's no data yet (no products tracked, no reviews), matching how the actual score itself treats missing data — not a guess either way.

VerificationSecurityFeedbackCompletenessThis vendor — Verification: 0This vendor — Security: 0This vendor — Feedback: no data yetThis vendor — Completeness: 13

IntegrationsUI-12 — integration graphDetected from this vendor's own published integration/partner pages by the enrichment loop — each entry links the exact page it was found on. Directional: "integrates with" is claimed by this vendor; "integrated by" is claimed by the other vendor's site. Coverage grows as the scan progresses.

71 detected

Integrated by: 1Kosmos, Abbey Labs, AccuKnox, Adaptive Security, Apono, AppOmni, Aqua Security, Arctic Wolf, AuditBoard, Bishop Fox, Britive, CloudDefense.AI, Cloudflare, Coalfire, Duality Technologies, Entro Security, Expel, Gigamon, Greymatter.io, Gurucul, HYCU, Imprivata, Infisical, Intermedia, Jumio, Kentik, Kertos, MetricStream, Mi-Token, Native Security, Nirmata, OctoXLabs, Oleria, Omada, OneSpan, OpenText Cybersecurity, Operant AI, Opscompass, Optimal IdM, Optro, Orca Security, P0 Security, Panorays, Pathlock, Protegrity, Red Canary, SAI360 INC., Sangfor Technologies, Scytale, Seal Security, Seceon Inc, Secret Double Octopus, SecuLore, Seemplicity, Segura, Teleport, Tenzir, Ubiq Security, Upwind, Veza, Waterfall Security, Wiz, eMudhra, hoop.dev, processgene, productiv, simeio, specterops, tetrate, torii, velotix

Buyer reviewsUI-14 — verified-buyer reviewsWritten only by domain-verified buyers at other companies, attributed to their company domain (never their identity), and moderated. Buyer-sourced opinion, clearly separate from the neutral catalog facts above — and never an input to search or comparison ordering.

verified buyers only

No buyer reviews yet.

Reputation ratingUI-20 — anonymous ratingA single anonymous 5-star signal from buyers, resellers, and analysts who've engaged with this vendor — separate from the domain-attributed reviews above. No rater identity is ever shown, not even at company level.

anonymous

No ratings in this window yet.

Oracle Access Governance is an identity and access management solution that helps organizations control, monitor, and audit user access privileges across their IT environment. AI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →

CVE severity over timeUI-24 — CVE severity timelineEvery known CVE with a disclosure date and severity, plotted by when it was published — lets you see whether disclosures are trending toward more or less severe, not just a raw count. Same NVD-sourced, name-matched data as the list below.

LOWMEDIUMHIGHCRITICAL1998199920002001200220032004CVE-2004-1877 · LOW 2.6 · 2004-03-30CVE-2004-2134 · MEDIUM 4.6 · 2004-01-28CVE-2003-1563 · MEDIUM 4.0 · 2003-12-31CVE-2003-1116 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2003-12-31CVE-2003-0894 · MEDIUM 4.6 · 2003-11-17CVE-2003-1193 · HIGH 7.5 · 2003-11-03CVE-2003-1183 · MEDIUM 4.6 · 2003-10-28CVE-2003-0727 · LOW 2.1 · 2003-10-20CVE-2003-0632 · HIGH 7.5 · 2003-08-27CVE-2003-0634 · HIGH 7.5 · 2003-08-27CVE-2003-0633 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2003-08-27CVE-2003-0222 · HIGH 9.0 · 2003-05-12CVE-2003-0096 · HIGH 9.0 · 2003-03-03CVE-2003-0095 · HIGH 10.0 · 2003-03-03CVE-2002-1630 · HIGH 7.5 · 2002-12-31CVE-2002-2347 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2002-12-31CVE-2002-2345 · HIGH 7.5 · 2002-12-31CVE-2002-2153 · HIGH 7.5 · 2002-12-31CVE-2002-1882 · HIGH 7.5 · 2002-12-31CVE-2002-1858 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2002-12-31CVE-2002-1767 · HIGH 7.2 · 2002-12-31CVE-2002-1666 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2002-12-31CVE-2002-1636 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2002-12-31CVE-2002-1635 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2002-12-31CVE-2002-1632 · MEDIUM 6.4 · 2002-12-31CVE-2002-1631 · HIGH 7.5 · 2002-12-31CVE-2002-1264 · HIGH 7.5 · 2002-11-12CVE-2002-0386 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2002-11-04CVE-2002-1118 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2002-10-28CVE-2002-0965 · HIGH 7.5 · 2002-10-04CVE-2002-1089 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2002-10-04CVE-2002-0947 · HIGH 7.5 · 2002-10-04CVE-2002-0856 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2002-09-05CVE-2002-0858 · HIGH 7.5 · 2002-09-05CVE-2002-0857 · HIGH 7.5 · 2002-09-05CVE-2002-0509 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2002-08-12CVE-2002-0559 · HIGH 7.5 · 2002-07-03CVE-2002-0560 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2002-07-03CVE-2002-0561 · HIGH 7.5 · 2002-07-03CVE-2002-0562 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2002-07-03CVE-2002-0563 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2002-07-03CVE-2002-0564 · HIGH 7.5 · 2002-07-03CVE-2002-0565 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2002-07-03CVE-2002-0566 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2002-07-03CVE-2002-0567 · HIGH 7.5 · 2002-07-03CVE-2002-0568 · LOW 2.1 · 2002-07-03CVE-2002-0569 · HIGH 7.5 · 2002-07-03CVE-2002-0571 · HIGH 7.5 · 2002-07-03CVE-2002-1641 · HIGH 10.0 · 2002-05-27CVE-2002-1640 · MEDIUM 6.8 · 2002-04-01CVE-2002-1639 · HIGH 7.5 · 2002-04-01CVE-2002-1637 · MEDIUM 4.6 · 2002-02-26CVE-2001-1371 · HIGH 7.5 · 2002-02-06CVE-2001-1372 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2002-02-06CVE-2001-1217 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2001-12-21CVE-2001-1216 · HIGH 7.5 · 2001-12-21CVE-2001-0832 · LOW 2.1 · 2001-12-06CVE-2001-0833 · HIGH 7.2 · 2001-12-06CVE-2001-0831 · MEDIUM 4.6 · 2001-12-06CVE-2001-0941 · MEDIUM 4.6 · 2001-11-30CVE-2001-0942 · MEDIUM 4.6 · 2001-11-29CVE-2001-1041 · LOW 2.1 · 2001-08-31CVE-2001-0943 · HIGH 7.2 · 2001-08-31CVE-2001-0591 · HIGH 7.5 · 2001-08-22CVE-2001-0528 · HIGH 7.2 · 2001-08-14CVE-2001-0518 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2001-07-21CVE-2001-0517 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2001-07-21CVE-2001-0516 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2001-07-21CVE-2001-0515 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2001-07-21CVE-2001-0513 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2001-07-21CVE-2001-0499 · HIGH 10.0 · 2001-07-21CVE-2001-0498 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2001-07-21CVE-2001-0974 · HIGH 7.5 · 2001-07-17CVE-2001-1321 · HIGH 7.5 · 2001-07-16CVE-2001-0975 · HIGH 7.5 · 2001-07-16CVE-2001-0419 · HIGH 7.5 · 2001-07-02CVE-2001-0300 · LOW 2.1 · 2001-06-02CVE-2001-0326 · HIGH 7.5 · 2001-05-03CVE-1999-0784 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2001-03-12CVE-2001-0126 · HIGH 7.5 · 2001-03-12CVE-2000-1180 · MEDIUM 4.6 · 2001-01-09CVE-2000-1236 · HIGH 7.5 · 2000-12-31CVE-2000-1235 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2000-12-31CVE-2000-0818 · HIGH 10.0 · 2000-12-19CVE-2000-0987 · MEDIUM 4.6 · 2000-12-19CVE-2000-0986 · MEDIUM 4.6 · 2000-12-19CVE-2000-0576 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2000-07-05CVE-2000-0169 · HIGH 7.5 · 2000-03-15CVE-2000-0206 · MEDIUM 6.2 · 2000-03-05CVE-1999-1547 · HIGH 7.5 · 1999-11-25CVE-1999-0888 · MEDIUM 4.6 · 1999-08-16CVE-1999-0711 · MEDIUM 4.6 · 1999-04-29CVE-1999-1256 · MEDIUM 4.6 · 1999-03-04CVE-1999-1125 · HIGH 10.0 · 1997-09-19CVE-1999-1068 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 1997-07-23

Known CVEs (96)About this listSourced from the public NVD database, matched by vendor name. This is a name-based match, not exact version tracking — always check the linked NVD record for affected versions before drawing conclusions. “New” means published within the last 30 days. “Actively exploited” means CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog confirms real-world exploitation, not just a theoretical severity score.

RSS ⇢
  • CVE-2004-1877 ↗LOW 2.62004

    The p_submit_url value in the sample login form in the Oracle 9i Application Server (9iAS) Single Sign-on Administrators Guide, Release 2(9.0.2) for Oracle SSO allows remote attackers to spoof the log…

  • CVE-2004-2134 ↗MEDIUM 4.62004

    Oracle toplink mapping workBench uses a weak encryption algorithm for passwords, which allows local users to decrypt the passwords.

  • CVE-2003-1563 ↗MEDIUM 4.02003

    Sun Cluster 2.2 through 3.2 for Oracle Parallel Server / Real Application Clusters (OPS/RAC) allows local users to cause a denial of service (cluster node panic or abort) by launching a daemon listeni…

  • CVE-2003-1116 ↗MEDIUM 5.02003

    The communications protocol for the Report Review Agent (RRA), aka FND File Server (FNDFS) program, in Oracle E-Business Suite 10.7, 11.0, and 11.5.1 to 11.5.8 allows remote attackers to bypass authen…

  • CVE-2003-0894 ↗MEDIUM 4.62003

    Buffer overflow in the (1) oracle and (2) oracleO programs in Oracle 9i Database 9.0.x and 9.2.x before 9.2.0.4 allows local users to execute arbitrary code via a long command line argument.

  • CVE-2003-1193 ↗HIGH 7.52003

    Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in the Portal DB (1) List of Values (LOVs), (2) Forms, (3) Hierarchy, and (4) XML components packages in Oracle Oracle9i Application Server 9.0.2.00 through 3.0.…

  • CVE-2003-1183 ↗MEDIUM 4.62003

    The WebCache component in Oracle Files 9.0.3.1.0, 9.0.3.2.0, and 9.0.3.3.0 of Oracle Collaboration Suite Release 1 caches files despite the cacheability rules imposed by Oracle Files, which allows loc…

  • CVE-2003-0727 ↗LOW 2.12003

    Multiple buffer overflows in the XML Database (XDB) functionality for Oracle 9i Database Release 2 allow local users to cause a denial of service or hijack user sessions.

  • CVE-2003-0632 ↗HIGH 7.52003

    Buffer overflow in the Oracle Applications Web Report Review (FNDWRR) CGI program (FNDWRR.exe) of Oracle E-Business Suite 11.0 and 11.5.1 through 11.5.8 may allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary…

  • CVE-2003-0634 ↗HIGH 7.52003

    Stack-based buffer overflow in the PL/SQL EXTPROC functionality for Oracle9i Database Release 2 and 1, and Oracle 8i, allows authenticated database users, and arbitrary database users in some cases, t…

  • CVE-2003-0633 ↗MEDIUM 5.02003

    Multiple vulnerabilities in aoljtest.jsp of Oracle Applications AOL/J Setup Test Suite in Oracle E-Business Suite 11.5.1 through 11.5.8 allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information without …

  • CVE-2003-0222 ↗HIGH 9.02003

    Stack-based buffer overflow in Oracle Net Services for Oracle Database Server 9i release 2 and earlier allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via a "CREATE DATABASE LINK" query containing a connec…

  • CVE-2003-0096 ↗HIGH 9.02003

    Multiple buffer overflows in Oracle 9i Database release 2, Release 1, 8i, 8.1.7, and 8.0.6 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via (1) a long conversion string argument to the TO_TIMESTAM…

  • CVE-2003-0095 ↗HIGH 10.02003

    Buffer overflow in ORACLE.EXE for Oracle Database Server 9i, 8i, 8.1.7, and 8.0.6 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long username that is provided during login, as exploitable th…

  • CVE-2002-1630 ↗HIGH 7.52002

    The sendmail.jsp sample page in Oracle 9i Application Server (9iAS) allows remote attackers to send arbitrary emails.

  • CVE-2002-2347 ↗MEDIUM 4.32002

    Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Oracle Java Server Page (OJSP) demo files (1) hellouser.jsp, (2) welcomeuser.jsp and (3) usebean.jsp in Oracle 9i Application Server 9.0.2, 1.0.2.2, 1.0.2.1…

  • CVE-2002-2345 ↗HIGH 7.52002

    Oracle 9i Application Server 9.0.2 stores the web cache administrator interface password in plaintext, which allows remote attackers to gain access.

  • CVE-2002-2153 ↗HIGH 7.52002

    Format string vulnerability in the administrative pages of the PL/SQL module for Oracle Application Server 4.0.8 and 4.0.8 2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code.

  • CVE-2002-1882 ↗HIGH 7.52002

    Unknown vulnerability in AolSecurityPrivate.class in Oracle E-Business Suite 11i 11.1 through 11.6 allows remote attackers to bypass user authentication checks via unknown attack vectors.

  • CVE-2002-1858 ↗MEDIUM 5.02002

    Oracle Oracle9i Application Server 1.0.2.2 and 9.0.2 through 9.0.2.0.1, when running on Windows, allows remote attackers to retrieve files in the WEB-INF directory, which contains Java class files and…

  • …and 76 more

Competitors (12)

full alternatives comparison →
1PasswordA10 NetworksAbbey LabsAceissAirrivedAkamaiAkeyless SecurityAlcorAlibaba CloudAllotDBAPP SecurityHENZ ICT

Products (2)

WAF / DDoS / App Protection

1
  • Oracle Cloud Infrastructure WAFAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    A cloud-based web application firewall service that protects web applications from malicious traffic through threat intelligence, access controls, and bot management capabilities.

Identity & Access Management

1
  • Oracle Access GovernanceAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Oracle Access Governance is an identity and access management solution that helps organizations control, monitor, and audit user access privileges across their IT environment.