Skip to main content
0-Doubt
NewsInvestorsQuestionnairesDeveloperHelp
AnonymousSign in
0-Doubt — neutral IT/Security research
BrowseResellersCertified analystsRFI/RFP questionnairesHow trust worksHelp & FAQAPI
  1. Home/
  2. Rapid7

Rapid7

enrichedPublic company (RPD) ↗
Application Security (ASPM)Breach & Attack Simulation / Pen TestingCloud-Native Application Protection (CNAPP)Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM)Digital Risk Protection (DRP)Security Orchestration, Automation & Response (SOAR)SIEMThreat Exposure Management (CTEM)Vulnerability Management

Represented by Carahsoft ↗

rapid7.com ↗ · required email domain for this vendor's users

Headquartered in United StatesHeadquarters countrySourced only from this vendor's own published headquarters address (schema.org structured data on their site) — never guessed from domain TLD. Source ↗

Do you work at Rapid7?

This profile was built from public sources and hasn't been claimed yet. Claiming it lets you correct what's wrong and add details only you can confirm — and marks that information as vendor-verified for buyers.

Free, and it does not affect ranking, placement, or comparison results. The first person verified on Rapid7's email domain becomes the profile admin.

Claim this profileAlready have an account?

Trust profileHow to read thisFive separate questions a buyer actually asks, each answered with its own evidence and a link to the source. There is deliberately no overall score: a single number invites comparison it cannot support, and would mostly reflect how much of Rapid7 we have managed to scan rather than anything about the vendor.

Not checked means we have not looked yet, and is never counted against a vendor. Limited means we did look, but found only one line of evidence — enough to report, not enough to corroborate.

checked 11 of 16 signals
  • Limited

    Independently verified

    Has anyone other than the vendor confirmed this?

    checked 3 of 4

    Nothing here has been confirmed by an independent third party yet.

    • No third-party certifications found
    • Profile not claimed by the vendor
  • Strong

    Operating durability

    Is this a real, durable business?

    checked 3 of 4

    How long this vendor has been operating, and who stands behind them.

    • Domain registered 2000 — 26 years ago
    • Headquarters: United States
    • 1 public SEC filing(s) — financials are a matter of record
  • Mixed

    Behaviour under stress

    What do they do when something goes wrong?

    checked 2 of 3

    What their public record shows about handling vulnerabilities and outages.

    • 85 published CVE(s) — a public disclosure record exists
    • 1 rated critical
    • Publishes a public status page
  • Limited

    Disclosure posture

    Do they tell you the awkward things unprompted?

    checked 2 of 3

    How much this vendor volunteers before you have to ask.

    • No trust center found
    • No bug bounty or vulnerability disclosure policy found
  • Limited

    Momentum

    Are they still shipping, or coasting?

    checked 1 of 2

    Whether this vendor is visibly still building.

    • Public GitHub org with 309 repositories
Data coverage: 20/100What this measures (and doesn't)

Not a quality rating or endorsement — a measure of how much verified, disclosed data we actually have about this vendor. A low score usually means "we don't have much verified information yet," not "this is a bad vendor." Never used to sort or rank vendor lists.

Verification depth0/100
Security signal0/100
Buyer feedbackno data yet (0 reviews so far)
Profile completeness50/100
claim · HQ · materials · screenshots · integrations · certifications · security check

The platform admin controls the formula's weights.

Data coverage profileHow to read thisThe same four components behind the data coverage score above, shaped instead of listed — a vendor strong on verification but thin on buyer feedback looks visibly different from one that's the other way around. Security and feedback plot at the neutral midpoint (50) when there's no data yet (no products tracked, no reviews), matching how the actual score itself treats missing data — not a guess either way.

VerificationSecurityFeedbackCompletenessThis vendor — Verification: 0This vendor — Security: 0This vendor — Feedback: no data yetThis vendor — Completeness: 50

IntegrationsUI-12 — integration graphDetected from this vendor's own published integration/partner pages by the enrichment loop — each entry links the exact page it was found on. Directional: "integrates with" is claimed by this vendor; "integrated by" is claimed by the other vendor's site. Coverage grows as the scan progresses.

54 detected

Integrates with: Microsoft ↗

Integrated by: Analyst1, Arcanna.ai, Bitsight, Claroty, Cogent Security, CrowdStrike, CyCognito, D3 Security, Detectify, Dispel, Dropzone AI, Embed Security, Expel, Intruder, Kentik, Konvu, Levo, MetricStream, Nagomi Security, NopSec, OctoXLabs, Orca Security, OutThink, Panther, Pentera, Phoenix Security, PlexTrac, Portnox, Prelude Security, Prophet Security, Ridge Security, SAI360 INC., Safe Security, Saporo, Seemplicity, Simbian, Sn1perSecurity LLC, Stream.Security, Strobes Security, Tenzir, ThreatDefence, Torq, UncommonX, Uno, UpGuard, Wiz, ZeroFox, Zscaler, eSentire, furl, ipqualityscore, runZero, torii

Buyer reviewsUI-14 — verified-buyer reviewsWritten only by domain-verified buyers at other companies, attributed to their company domain (never their identity), and moderated. Buyer-sourced opinion, clearly separate from the neutral catalog facts above — and never an input to search or comparison ordering.

verified buyers only

No buyer reviews yet.

Reputation ratingUI-20 — anonymous ratingA single anonymous 5-star signal from buyers, resellers, and analysts who've engaged with this vendor — separate from the domain-attributed reviews above. No rater identity is ever shown, not even at company level.

anonymous

No ratings in this window yet.

External ratingsUI-22 — third-party ratingsAggregate rating and review count pulled directly from the source site's own published data — never the review text itself, which belongs to that site. Links go to the real page so you can read the actual reviews there.

via third-party review sites
PeerSpot: 4/5 (2 reviews) ↗

Product screenshots (8)

from their products
Rapid7 Threat CommandautoRapid7 Surface CommandautoRapid7 NexposeautoRapid7 MetasploitautoRapid7 InsightCloudSecautoRapid7 InsightAppSecautoRapid7 Incident CommandautoRapid7 Command Platformauto

Security & trust signalsAbout these signalsCertifications are keyword-matched from the vendor's own public pages (each claim links to its source — verify directly before relying on it). Security headers are checked live against the vendor's homepage, re-checked every 90 days. Both are independent, automated signals, not a vendor-submitted or audited claim, and are not blended into a single score.

9 of 9 technical checks completed — not a score, just coverage

Security headers (5/5) — checked 8/13/2026

  • ✓ Strict-Transport-Security
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy
  • ✓ X-Frame-Options
  • ✓ X-Content-Type-Options
  • ✓ Referrer-Policy
  • ✕ security.txt

Infrastructure & transparency signals

Status: maintenance ↗GitHub (309 repos) ↗Domain since 2000CAA enabled

Status historyAbout this timelineEvery incident detected on this vendor's own public status page since we started watching it — sourced from the same structural check as the status chip above, checked roughly hourly (every 5 minutes while an incident is active), never inferred. A resolution requires a real check confirming "operational" again; an incident with no resolution yet shown is still ongoing as of the most recent check.

No outages recorded since we started watching (first checked Aug 13, 2026, 8:23 PM).

CVE severity over timeUI-24 — CVE severity timelineEvery known CVE with a disclosure date and severity, plotted by when it was published — lets you see whether disclosures are trending toward more or less severe, not just a raw count. Same NVD-sourced, name-matched data as the list below.

LOWMEDIUMHIGHCRITICAL201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026CVE-2026-14172 · HIGH 7.8 · 2026-07-24CVE-2026-8661 · MEDIUM 4.8 · 2026-06-26CVE-2026-8662 · LOW 3.3 · 2026-06-25CVE-2026-8658 · MEDIUM 6.0 · 2026-06-25CVE-2026-8666 · HIGH 7.7 · 2026-06-25CVE-2026-8665 · HIGH 7.7 · 2026-06-25CVE-2026-8664 · MEDIUM 6.0 · 2026-06-25CVE-2026-8660 · HIGH 7.7 · 2026-06-25CVE-2026-8592 · HIGH 7.7 · 2026-06-25CVE-2026-9155 · HIGH 8.8 · 2026-06-25CVE-2026-9154 · HIGH 7.1 · 2026-06-25CVE-2026-9153 · MEDIUM 6.5 · 2026-06-25CVE-2026-8663 · MEDIUM 6.0 · 2026-06-25CVE-2026-8659 · MEDIUM 6.0 · 2026-06-25CVE-2026-8795 · HIGH 7.8 · 2026-06-09CVE-2026-6482 · HIGH 7.8 · 2026-04-17CVE-2026-5329 · HIGH 8.5 · 2026-04-09CVE-2026-4837 · MEDIUM 6.6 · 2026-04-08CVE-2026-1568 · CRITICAL 9.6 · 2026-02-03CVE-2025-14728 · MEDIUM 6.8 · 2025-12-30CVE-2025-11195 · LOW 3.3 · 2025-09-30CVE-2025-36857 · LOW 3.3 · 2025-09-25CVE-2025-4951 · MEDIUM 4.6 · 2025-05-20CVE-2024-8042 · LOW 2.4 · 2024-09-09CVE-2024-6504 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2024-07-18CVE-2024-3185 · MEDIUM 6.8 · 2024-04-23CVE-2024-0394 · HIGH 7.8 · 2024-04-03CVE-2024-2745 · LOW 3.3 · 2024-04-02CVE-2023-5950 · HIGH 8.6 · 2023-11-06CVE-2023-2273 · MEDIUM 5.8 · 2023-04-26CVE-2023-2226 · LOW 3.3 · 2023-04-21CVE-2023-1699 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2023-03-30CVE-2021-3844 · MEDIUM 5.7 · 2023-03-24CVE-2023-0681 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2023-03-21CVE-2023-0599 · MEDIUM 6.1 · 2023-02-02CVE-2022-3913 · MEDIUM 5.3 · 2023-02-02CVE-2023-0290 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2023-01-19CVE-2023-0242 · HIGH 8.8 · 2023-01-19CVE-2022-4261 · MEDIUM 4.4 · 2022-12-08CVE-2019-5641 · LOW 3.3 · 2022-09-21CVE-2022-0758 · LOW 3.3 · 2022-03-18CVE-2022-0757 · MEDIUM 5.5 · 2022-03-18CVE-2022-0237 · MEDIUM 4.0 · 2022-03-18CVE-2021-4016 · MEDIUM 4.0 · 2022-01-21CVE-2021-4007 · HIGH 7.8 · 2021-12-14CVE-2019-5640 · LOW 3.3 · 2021-11-22CVE-2021-31868 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2021-08-19CVE-2021-3619 · LOW 3.5 · 2021-07-22CVE-2021-3535 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2021-06-16CVE-2020-7384 · HIGH 7.0 · 2020-10-29CVE-2020-7383 · MEDIUM 6.5 · 2020-10-15CVE-2020-7382 · MEDIUM 6.8 · 2020-09-03CVE-2020-7381 · MEDIUM 5.8 · 2020-09-03CVE-2019-5645 · HIGH 7.5 · 2020-09-01CVE-2020-7355 · MEDIUM 6.1 · 2020-06-25CVE-2020-7354 · MEDIUM 6.1 · 2020-06-25CVE-2020-7350 · MEDIUM 6.1 · 2020-04-23CVE-2012-6494 · MEDIUM 6.1 · 2020-01-26CVE-2019-5647 · MEDIUM 4.4 · 2020-01-22CVE-2019-5642 · LOW 3.3 · 2019-11-07CVE-2019-5638 · HIGH 8.7 · 2019-08-22CVE-2019-5631 · HIGH 7.8 · 2019-08-19CVE-2019-5629 · HIGH 7.8 · 2019-07-13CVE-2019-5630 · MEDIUM 5.9 · 2019-07-03CVE-2019-5624 · HIGH 7.3 · 2019-04-30CVE-2019-5615 · MEDIUM 6.5 · 2019-04-09CVE-2018-5559 · LOW 3.4 · 2018-11-29CVE-2017-15084 · MEDIUM 6.5 · 2017-10-07CVE-2017-5243 · HIGH 8.5 · 2017-06-06CVE-2017-5240 · HIGH 7.5 · 2017-05-03CVE-2017-5236 · HIGH 7.8 · 2017-05-03CVE-2017-5235 · HIGH 7.8 · 2017-03-03CVE-2017-5234 · HIGH 7.8 · 2017-03-03CVE-2017-5233 · HIGH 7.8 · 2017-03-03CVE-2017-5232 · HIGH 7.8 · 2017-03-03CVE-2017-5231 · HIGH 7.1 · 2017-03-03CVE-2017-5230 · HIGH 7.2 · 2017-03-03CVE-2017-5229 · HIGH 7.1 · 2017-03-03CVE-2017-5228 · HIGH 7.1 · 2017-03-03CVE-2016-9757 · MEDIUM 5.4 · 2016-12-21CVE-2012-6493 · MEDIUM 6.8 · 2014-02-05

Known CVEs (85)1 newAbout this listSourced from the public NVD database, matched by vendor name. This is a name-based match, not exact version tracking — always check the linked NVD record for affected versions before drawing conclusions. “New” means published within the last 30 days. “Actively exploited” means CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog confirms real-world exploitation, not just a theoretical severity score.

RSS ⇢
  • CVE-2026-14172 ↗HIGH 7.8new2026

    Rapid7 InsightVM, Nexpose, and the Insight Agent execute discovered executables during authenticated assessment without validating file ownership, allowing a local low-privileged user to run code as t…

  • CVE-2026-8661 ↗MEDIUM 4.82026

    Server-Side Cross-Site Scripting and Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability in the markdown_to_pdf action of Rapid7 InsightConnect Markdown Plugin version 3.1.4 and earlier on Linux allows remote a…

  • CVE-2026-8662 ↗LOW 3.32026

    Path Traversal vulnerability in the create_archive function of Rapid7 InsightConnect Compression Plugin on Linux allows authenticated attackers to write to unintended file paths via crafted filename i…

  • CVE-2026-8658 ↗MEDIUM 6.02026

    OS Command Injection vulnerability in Rapid7 InsightConnect Tcpdump Plugin on Linux allows authenticated attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands via the options or filter parameters due to insuffic…

  • CVE-2026-8666 ↗HIGH 7.72026

    OS Command Injection vulnerability in the traceroute action of Rapid7 InsightConnect Traceroute Plugin on Linux allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands via the host, port, max_ttl, co…

  • CVE-2026-8665 ↗HIGH 7.72026

    OS Command Injection vulnerability in the TR action of Rapid7 InsightConnect Translate Plugin on Linux allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands via the text or expression parameters du…

  • CVE-2026-8664 ↗MEDIUM 6.02026

    OS Command Injection vulnerability in Rapid7 InsightConnect Finger Plugin on Linux allows authenticated attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands via the user or host parameters due to insufficient i…

  • CVE-2026-8660 ↗HIGH 7.72026

    OS Command Injection vulnerability in the ping action of Rapid7 InsightConnect Ping Plugin on Linux allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands via the host parameter due to insufficient …

  • CVE-2026-8592 ↗HIGH 7.72026

    OS Command Injection vulnerability in the process_string action of Rapid7 InsightConnect AWK Plugin on Linux allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands via the text or expression paramet…

  • CVE-2026-9155 ↗HIGH 8.82026

    OS Command Injection vulnerability in Rapid7 InsightConnect Sed Plugin on Linux allows authenticated attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands via the expression parameter due to insufficient input v…

  • CVE-2026-9154 ↗HIGH 7.12026

    Arbitrary File Write vulnerability in Rapid7 InsightConnect Sed Plugin on Linux allows authenticated attackers to write attacker-controlled content to arbitrary file paths via the expression parameter…

  • CVE-2026-9153 ↗MEDIUM 6.52026

    Arbitrary File Read vulnerability in Rapid7 InsightConnect Sed Plugin on Linux allows authenticated attackers to read arbitrary files via the expression parameter due to insufficient input validation.

  • CVE-2026-8663 ↗MEDIUM 6.02026

    OS Command Injection vulnerability in Rapid7 InsightConnect RPM Plugin on Linux allows authenticated attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands via the repo, key, or name parameters due to insufficien…

  • CVE-2026-8659 ↗MEDIUM 6.02026

    OS Command Injection vulnerability in Rapid7 InsightConnect SQLmap Plugin on Linux allows authenticated attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands via the api_host or api_port parameters during connec…

  • CVE-2026-8795 ↗HIGH 7.82026

    A YAML injection vulnerability exists in the Windows.Collectors.Remapping artifact of Rapid7 Velociraptor before version 0.76.6. The hostname field in client_info.json inside a collection ZIP is inser…

  • CVE-2026-7373 ↗2026

    Rapid7 Metasploit Pro is vulnerable to a local privilege escalation attack that allows a user to gain SYSTEM level control of a Windows host. When started the metasploitPostgreSQL service would start …

  • CVE-2026-6482 ↗HIGH 7.82026

    The Rapid7 Insight Agent (versions > 4.1.0.2) is vulnerable to a local privilege escalation attack that allows users to gain SYSTEM level control of a Windows host. Upon startup the agent service atte…

  • CVE-2026-5329 ↗HIGH 8.52026

    Rapid7 Velociraptor versions prior to 0.76.2 contain an improper input validation vulnerability in the client monitoring message handler on the Velociraptor server (primarily Linux) that allows an aut…

  • CVE-2026-4837 ↗MEDIUM 6.62026

    An eval() injection vulnerability in the Rapid7 Insight Agent beaconing logic for Linux versions could theoretically allow an attacker to achieve remote code execution as root via a crafted beacon res…

  • CVE-2026-1568 ↗CRITICAL 9.62026

    Rapid7 InsightVM versions before 8.34.0 contain a signature verification issue on the Assertion Consumer Service (ACS) cloud endpoint that could allow an attacker to gain unauthorized access to Insigh…

  • …and 65 more

Competitors (12)

full alternatives comparison →
AgileBlueCredShieldsCrowdStrikeDatadogEntersoft SecurityFortraFYEOGoSecureHalo SecurityHorizon3.aiSentinelOneStart Left® Security

Strengths & gaps by category

neutral · vendor-sourced

Drawn from this vendor's own public materials and authored to keep category questionnaires balanced. Gaps reflect capabilities not emphasized in public materials, not rankings.

SIEM (source)

Strengths: InsightIDR cloud SIEM with built-in user behavior analytics, curated detections, and an MDR option for lean teams.

Gaps: Positioned for mid-market simplicity; very large custom-analytics use cases are less central.

Products (16)

SIEM

2
  • InsightIDRSIEMAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →
    SIEM and XDR.
  • Rapid7 Incident CommandAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    AI-powered cloud-native SIEM with unified visibility and automated response

Threat Intelligence

1
  • Threat CommandDRPAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Digital risk protection.

Breach & Attack Simulation / Pen Testing

2
  • MetasploitPen testingAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Penetration testing framework.
  • Rapid7 MetasploitAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Penetration testing software for simulating attacks and validating vulnerabilities

Cyber Asset Attack Surface Management (CAASM)

1
  • Rapid7 Surface CommandAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Attack surface management platform providing continuous asset discovery and monitoring

Cloud-Native Application Protection (CNAPP)

2
  • InsightCloudSecCNAPPAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Cloud-native application protection (CNAPP).
  • Rapid7 InsightCloudSecAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Cloud-native application protection platform for multi-cloud security & compliance

Vulnerability Management

3
  • InsightVMVuln mgmtAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Vulnerability management across environments.
  • Rapid7 InsightVMAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    VM solution with AI-driven prioritization and automated remediation workflows
  • Rapid7 NexposeAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    On-premise vulnerability scanner with asset discovery and risk prioritization

Application Security (ASPM)

2
  • InsightAppSecAppSecAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Application security testing.
  • Rapid7 InsightAppSecAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    DAST tool for automated web app and API vulnerability scanning and testing

Threat Exposure Management (CTEM)

2
  • Rapid7 Command PlatformAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Unified platform for attack surface visibility, exposure mgmt & response
  • Rapid7 Exposure CommandAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Hybrid exposure mgmt platform for attack surface visibility & risk prioritization

Digital Risk Protection (DRP)

1
  • Rapid7 Threat CommandAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Digital risk protection platform monitoring clear, deep, and dark web threats