plextrac.com ↗ · required email domain for this vendor's users
Trust profileHow to read thisFive separate questions a buyer actually asks, each answered with its own evidence and a link to the source. There is deliberately no overall score: a single number invites comparison it cannot support, and would mostly reflect how much of PlexTrac we have managed to scan rather than anything about the vendor.
Not checked means we have not looked yet, and is never counted against a vendor. Limited means we did look, but found only one line of evidence — enough to report, not enough to corroborate.
checked 6 of 16 signals
Limited
Independently verified
Has anyone other than the vendor confirmed this?
checked 3 of 4
Nothing here has been confirmed by an independent third party yet.
No third-party certifications found
Profile not claimed by the vendor
Limited
Operating durability
Is this a real, durable business?
checked 2 of 4
How long this vendor has been operating, and who stands behind them.
Headquarters location not disclosed on their site
Mixed
Behaviour under stress
What do they do when something goes wrong?
checked 1 of 3
What their public record shows about handling vulnerabilities and outages.
11 published CVE(s) — a public disclosure record exists
5 rated critical
Not checked
Disclosure posture
Do they tell you the awkward things unprompted?
checked 0 of 3
We have not checked what this vendor discloses publicly yet.
Nothing checked here yet — this is not a mark against PlexTrac.
Not checked
Momentum
Are they still shipping, or coasting?
checked 0 of 2
We have not tracked this vendor's release activity yet.
Nothing checked here yet — this is not a mark against PlexTrac.
Data coverage: 15/100What this measures (and doesn't)
Not a quality rating or endorsement — a measure of how much verified, disclosed data we actually have about this vendor. A low score usually means "we don't have much verified information yet," not "this is a bad vendor." Never used to sort or rank vendor lists.
The platform admin controls the formula's weights.
Data coverage profileHow to read thisThe same four components behind the data coverage score above, shaped instead of listed — a vendor strong on verification but thin on buyer feedback looks visibly different from one that's the other way around. Security and feedback plot at the neutral midpoint (50) when there's no data yet (no products tracked, no reviews), matching how the actual score itself treats missing data — not a guess either way.
IntegrationsUI-12 — integration graphDetected from this vendor's own published integration/partner pages by the enrichment loop — each entry links the exact page it was found on. Directional: "integrates with" is claimed by this vendor; "integrated by" is claimed by the other vendor's site. Coverage grows as the scan progresses.
Buyer reviewsUI-14 — verified-buyer reviewsWritten only by domain-verified buyers at other companies, attributed to their company domain (never their identity), and moderated. Buyer-sourced opinion, clearly separate from the neutral catalog facts above — and never an input to search or comparison ordering.
verified buyers only
No buyer reviews yet.
Reputation ratingUI-20 — anonymous ratingA single anonymous 5-star signal from buyers, resellers, and analysts who've engaged with this vendor — separate from the domain-attributed reviews above. No rater identity is ever shown, not even at company level.
anonymous
No ratings in this window yet.
Pentest reporting & exposure mgmt platform for vulnerability remediation AI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →
CVE severity over timeUI-24 — CVE severity timelineEvery known CVE with a disclosure date and severity, plotted by when it was published — lets you see whether disclosures are trending toward more or less severe, not just a raw count. Same NVD-sourced, name-matched data as the list below.
Known CVEs (11)About this listSourced from the public NVD database, matched by vendor name. This is a name-based match, not exact version tracking — always check the linked NVD record for affected versions before drawing conclusions. “New” means published within the last 30 days. “Actively exploited” means CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog confirms real-world exploitation, not just a theoretical severity score.
Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in PlexTrac (Runbooks modules) which allows Object Injection and arbitrary file writes.
This issue affects PlexTrac: from 1.61.3 before 2.8.1.
Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in PlexTrac (Runbooks modules) which allows Object Injection and arbitrary file writes.This issue affects PlexTrac: from 1.61.3 before 2.8.1.
External Control of File Name or Path vulnerability in PlexTrac allows Local Code Inclusion through use of an undocumented API endpoint.This issue affects PlexTrac: from 1.61.3 before 2.8.1.
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an N1QL Command ('N1QL Injection') vulnerability in PlexTrac allows N1QL Injection.This issue affects PlexTrac: from 1.61.3 before 2.8.1.
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in PlexTrac allowing requests to internal system resources.This issue affects PlexTrac: from 1.61.3 before 2.8.1.
Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability in PlexTrac allows arbitrary file writes.This issue affects PlexTrac: from 1.61.3 before 2.8.1.
Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability in PlexTrac allows arbitrary file writes.This issue affects PlexTrac: from 1.61.3 before 2.8.1.
The PlexTrac platform prior to version 1.28.0 allows for username enumeration via HTTP response times on invalid login attempts for users configured to use the PlexTrac authentication provider. Login …
The PlexTrac platform prior to version 1.17.0 does not restrict excessive authentication attempts for accounts configured to use the PlexTrac authentication provider. An unauthenticated remote attacke…
The PlexTrac platform prior to API version 1.17.0 does not restrict excessive MFA TOTP submission attempts. An unauthenticated remote attacker in possession of a valid username and password can brutef…
Resources & materials (2)
discovered on their site
Datasheets, whitepapers, and case studies found on plextrac.com by the enrichment loop. Links open the original documents on the vendor's own site.
PlexTrac Pentest ReportingAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
Pentest reporting & exposure mgmt platform for vulnerability remediation
