Skip to main content
0-Doubt
NewsInvestorsQuestionnairesDeveloperHelp
AnonymousSign in
0-Doubt — neutral IT/Security research
BrowseResellersCertified analystsRFI/RFP questionnairesHow trust worksHelp & FAQAPI
  1. Home/
  2. 42Crunch

42Crunch

enriched
API Security

42crunch.com ↗ · required email domain for this vendor's users

Do you work at 42Crunch?

This profile was built from public sources and hasn't been claimed yet. Claiming it lets you correct what's wrong and add details only you can confirm — and marks that information as vendor-verified for buyers.

Free, and it does not affect ranking, placement, or comparison results. The first person verified on 42Crunch's email domain becomes the profile admin.

Claim this profileAlready have an account?

Trust profileHow to read thisFive separate questions a buyer actually asks, each answered with its own evidence and a link to the source. There is deliberately no overall score: a single number invites comparison it cannot support, and would mostly reflect how much of 42Crunch we have managed to scan rather than anything about the vendor.

Not checked means we have not looked yet, and is never counted against a vendor. Limited means we did look, but found only one line of evidence — enough to report, not enough to corroborate.

checked 11 of 16 signals
  • Limited

    Independently verified

    Has anyone other than the vendor confirmed this?

    checked 3 of 4

    Nothing here has been confirmed by an independent third party yet.

    • No third-party certifications found
    • Profile not claimed by the vendor
  • Limited

    Operating durability

    Is this a real, durable business?

    checked 3 of 4

    How long this vendor has been operating, and who stands behind them.

    • Domain registered 2015 — 11 years ago
    • Headquarters location not disclosed on their site
  • Limited

    Behaviour under stress

    What do they do when something goes wrong?

    checked 2 of 3

    What their public record shows about handling vulnerabilities and outages.

    • No published CVEs on record
    • Publishes a public status page
  • Limited

    Disclosure posture

    Do they tell you the awkward things unprompted?

    checked 2 of 3

    How much this vendor volunteers before you have to ask.

    • No trust center found
    • No bug bounty or vulnerability disclosure policy found
  • Limited

    Momentum

    Are they still shipping, or coasting?

    checked 1 of 2

    Whether this vendor is visibly still building.

    • Public GitHub org with 34 repositories
Data coverage: 33/100What this measures (and doesn't)

Not a quality rating or endorsement — a measure of how much verified, disclosed data we actually have about this vendor. A low score usually means "we don't have much verified information yet," not "this is a bad vendor." Never used to sort or rank vendor lists.

Verification depth0/100
Security signal50/100
Buyer feedbackno data yet (0 reviews so far)
Profile completeness38/100
claim · HQ · materials · screenshots · integrations · certifications · security check

The platform admin controls the formula's weights.

Data coverage profileHow to read thisThe same four components behind the data coverage score above, shaped instead of listed — a vendor strong on verification but thin on buyer feedback looks visibly different from one that's the other way around. Security and feedback plot at the neutral midpoint (50) when there's no data yet (no products tracked, no reviews), matching how the actual score itself treats missing data — not a guess either way.

VerificationSecurityFeedbackCompletenessThis vendor — Verification: 0This vendor — Security: 50This vendor — Feedback: no data yetThis vendor — Completeness: 38

IntegrationsUI-12 — integration graphDetected from this vendor's own published integration/partner pages by the enrichment loop — each entry links the exact page it was found on. Directional: "integrates with" is claimed by this vendor; "integrated by" is claimed by the other vendor's site. Coverage grows as the scan progresses.

3 detected

Integrates with: Google ↗, Microsoft ↗

Integrated by: Nucleus Security

Buyer reviewsUI-14 — verified-buyer reviewsWritten only by domain-verified buyers at other companies, attributed to their company domain (never their identity), and moderated. Buyer-sourced opinion, clearly separate from the neutral catalog facts above — and never an input to search or comparison ordering.

verified buyers only

No buyer reviews yet.

Reputation ratingUI-20 — anonymous ratingA single anonymous 5-star signal from buyers, resellers, and analysts who've engaged with this vendor — separate from the domain-attributed reviews above. No rater identity is ever shown, not even at company level.

anonymous

No ratings in this window yet.

API security testing and protection. AI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →

Product screenshots (8)

from their products
42Crunch API Security Platformauto42Crunch API Scanauto42Crunch API Protectionauto42Crunch Secure MCP Serverauto42Crunch API Protection (Micro-firewall)auto42Crunch API Runtime Threat Protectionauto42Crunch API Discoveryauto42Crunch API Security Testingauto

Security & trust signalsAbout these signalsCertifications are keyword-matched from the vendor's own public pages (each claim links to its source — verify directly before relying on it). Security headers are checked live against the vendor's homepage, re-checked every 90 days. Both are independent, automated signals, not a vendor-submitted or audited claim, and are not blended into a single score.

9 of 9 technical checks completed — not a score, just coverage

Security headers (3/5) — checked 8/13/2026

  • ✓ Strict-Transport-Security
  • ✕ Content-Security-Policy
  • ✓ X-Frame-Options
  • ✓ X-Content-Type-Options
  • ✕ Referrer-Policy
  • ✕ security.txt

Infrastructure & transparency signals

Status: operational ↗GitHub (34 repos) ↗Domain since 2015CAA enabled

Status historyAbout this timelineEvery incident detected on this vendor's own public status page since we started watching it — sourced from the same structural check as the status chip above, checked roughly hourly (every 5 minutes while an incident is active), never inferred. A resolution requires a real check confirming "operational" again; an incident with no resolution yet shown is still ongoing as of the most recent check.

No outages recorded since we started watching (first checked Aug 13, 2026, 8:26 PM).

Resources & materials (30)

discovered on their site

Datasheets, whitepapers, and case studies found on 42crunch.com by the enrichment loop. Links open the original documents on the vendor's own site.

  • pdfProtect Your APIs With Microsoft Azure Sentinel And 42Crunch Platforms↗
  • pdf42Crunch Investment Banking Customer Case Study↗
  • pdf42Crunch Insurance Customer Case Study↗
  • pdf42Crunch Automotive Customer Case Study↗
  • pdf42Crunch Telcom Customer Case Study↗
  • pdf42c Versus Waap Data Sheet New Design↗
  • pdf42C API Inventory Datasheet 2023 1p V1↗
  • pdf42C API Governance Datasheet 2023 1p V1↗
  • pdf42C API Threat Protection Datasheet 2023 1p V1↗
  • pdf42C API Security Testing Datasheet 2023 1p V1↗
  • pdf42C API Development Datasheet 2023 1p V1↗
  • pdf42C API Design Datasheet 2023 1p V1↗
  • pdf42Crunch OWASP Datasheet↗
  • pdf42Crunch OWASP 2023 Datasheet 4p V1↗
  • pdf42C CLoudFlare Solution Brief FIN Web↗
  • pdfMicrosoft Azure Pipelines↗
  • pdf42Crunch GitHub Datasheet 1↗
  • pdf42Crunch And Microsoft Defender For Cloud Datasheet 2024↗
  • pdf42Crunch Microsoft Datasheet↗
  • pdfMicroservices↗
  • pdf42C Whitepaper Why A Quality OpenAPI Contract Matters↗
  • pdf42C API Protection Datasheet↗
  • pdf42Crunch Secure MCP Server Long A4 FINweb 2↗
  • pdf42C API Platform Datasheet 2023 4p FIN↗
  • pdf42C Microsoft Datasheet FIN V2 Link↗
  • pdf42C WSO2 API Security Integration Brief↗
  • pdf42C Kong API Security Integration Brief↗
  • pdf42C Azure API Security Integration Brief↗
  • pdf42C Axway API Security Integration Brief↗
  • pdf42C Apigee API Security Integration Brief↗

Competitors (12)

full alternatives comparison →
AcunetixAkamaiAktoAmmune.aiAPIsecCequence SecurityCloudflareCloudMatosCorshaData TheoremEdgescanEquixly

Strengths & gaps by category

neutral · vendor-sourced

Drawn from this vendor's own public materials and authored to keep category questionnaires balanced. Gaps reflect capabilities not emphasized in public materials, not rankings.

API Security (source)

Strengths: Developer-first API security: OpenAPI audit/conformance scanning and contract-anchored runtime protection (shift-left).

Gaps: Spec/contract-centric; broad runtime behavioral threat detection is less central than posture and testing.

Products (9)

API Security

9
  • 42Crunch API AuditAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    API security audit tool for OpenAPI contracts with 300+ security checks
  • 42Crunch API DiscoveryDiscoveryAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Identify and catalog APIs across the organization.
  • 42Crunch API ProtectionAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    API runtime protection with content validation, threat detection & throttling
  • 42Crunch API Protection (Micro-firewall)FirewallAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Micro-firewall enforcement based on API specifications.
  • 42Crunch API Runtime Threat ProtectionProtectionAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Real-time detection and blocking of threats against APIs.
  • 42Crunch API ScanAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Dynamic API security testing tool for OpenAPI contract conformance validation
  • 42Crunch API Security PlatformAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Platform for automated API security testing and runtime threat protection
  • 42Crunch API Security TestingTestingAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Automated API security testing to identify vulnerabilities.
  • 42Crunch Secure MCP ServerMCPAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Validate and control AI agent access to enterprise APIs.