Skip to main content
0-Doubt
NewsInvestorsQuestionnairesDeveloperHelp
AnonymousSign in
0-Doubt — neutral IT/Security research
BrowseResellersCertified analystsRFI/RFP questionnairesHow trust worksHelp & FAQAPI
  1. Home/
  2. Google

Google

enriched
Attack Surface Management (ASM)Cloud-Native Application Protection (CNAPP)Detection EngineeringManaged Detection & Response (MDR)Secure Access Service Edge (SASE/SSE)Threat Intelligence

Represented by AHEAD ↗, Carahsoft ↗, GuidePoint Security ↗, Kudelski Security ↗, Optiv ↗, Presidio ↗, TD SYNNEX ↗, World Wide Technology ↗

google.com ↗ · required email domain for this vendor's users

Do you work at Google?

This profile was built from public sources and hasn't been claimed yet. Claiming it lets you correct what's wrong and add details only you can confirm — and marks that information as vendor-verified for buyers.

Free, and it does not affect ranking, placement, or comparison results. The first person verified on Google's email domain becomes the profile admin.

Claim this profileAlready have an account?

Trust profileHow to read thisFive separate questions a buyer actually asks, each answered with its own evidence and a link to the source. There is deliberately no overall score: a single number invites comparison it cannot support, and would mostly reflect how much of Google we have managed to scan rather than anything about the vendor.

Not checked means we have not looked yet, and is never counted against a vendor. Limited means we did look, but found only one line of evidence — enough to report, not enough to corroborate.

checked 7 of 16 signals
  • Limited

    Independently verified

    Has anyone other than the vendor confirmed this?

    checked 3 of 4

    Nothing here has been confirmed by an independent third party yet.

    • No third-party certifications found
    • Profile not claimed by the vendor
  • Limited

    Operating durability

    Is this a real, durable business?

    checked 2 of 4

    How long this vendor has been operating, and who stands behind them.

    • Headquarters location not disclosed on their site
  • Limited

    Behaviour under stress

    What do they do when something goes wrong?

    checked 2 of 3

    What their public record shows about handling vulnerabilities and outages.

    • 19 published CVE(s) — a public disclosure record exists
    • No public status page found
  • Not checked

    Disclosure posture

    Do they tell you the awkward things unprompted?

    checked 0 of 3

    We have not checked what this vendor discloses publicly yet.

    Nothing checked here yet — this is not a mark against Google.

  • Not checked

    Momentum

    Are they still shipping, or coasting?

    checked 0 of 2

    We have not tracked this vendor's release activity yet.

    Nothing checked here yet — this is not a mark against Google.

Data coverage: 13/100What this measures (and doesn't)

Not a quality rating or endorsement — a measure of how much verified, disclosed data we actually have about this vendor. A low score usually means "we don't have much verified information yet," not "this is a bad vendor." Never used to sort or rank vendor lists.

Verification depth0/100
Security signal0/100
Buyer feedbackno data yet (0 reviews so far)
Profile completeness13/100
claim · HQ · materials · screenshots · integrations · certifications · security check

The platform admin controls the formula's weights.

Data coverage profileHow to read thisThe same four components behind the data coverage score above, shaped instead of listed — a vendor strong on verification but thin on buyer feedback looks visibly different from one that's the other way around. Security and feedback plot at the neutral midpoint (50) when there's no data yet (no products tracked, no reviews), matching how the actual score itself treats missing data — not a guess either way.

VerificationSecurityFeedbackCompletenessThis vendor — Verification: 0This vendor — Security: 0This vendor — Feedback: no data yetThis vendor — Completeness: 13

IntegrationsUI-12 — integration graphDetected from this vendor's own published integration/partner pages by the enrichment loop — each entry links the exact page it was found on. Directional: "integrates with" is claimed by this vendor; "integrated by" is claimed by the other vendor's site. Coverage grows as the scan progresses.

270 detected

Integrated by: 1Kosmos, 1Password, 42Crunch, ACI Learning, Abbey Labs, Above Security, Abstract Security, AccuKnox, Acme Security EDR, Adaptive Security, AiStrike, Aikido Security, Alice, Andesite, Apono, AppOmni, Apptega, Aqua Security, Astrix Security, AuditBoard, Axoflow, Black Duck, Blackpoint Cyber, Britive, Cakewalk, Carbide, Censys, Cequence Security, Chainguard, CheckRed, Cisco, Claroty, CloudDefense.AI, Coalfire, Conviso, Corelight, Credas, Cribl, CrowdStrike, Cyberhaven, Cyera, D3 Security, Darktrace, Data Theorem, Descope, Devolutions, Devtron, Dispel, Doppel, Dropzone AI, Duality Technologies, ELLIO, Echo, Echoworx, Edge Delta, Edgescan, Elastic, Embed Security, Engage Black, Entro Security, Equixly, Exabeam, Exaforce, Exeon, Expel, ExtraHop, F5, Fastly, Fiddler AI, Fidelis Security, First Recon AI, Fleet Device Management, Frame Security, FusionAuth, GTB Technologies, Gigamon, GoodAccess, Group IB, Gurucul, HYCU, Hicomply, HiddenLayer, Hideez, Huntress, IDEE, IRONSCALES, ISMS.online, Imperva, Indusface, Infisical, Infoblox, Intermedia, Intruder, Jit, JumpCloud, Kaseya, Keepnet Labs, Kentik, Kertos, Konvu, LMNTRIX, LastPass, LayerX, Lema, Lightbeam, Loginsoft, ManagedMethods, Material Security, Mesh Security, Metomic, MindTheHack, Mindflow, Mitigant, Monad, Nagomi Security, Native Security, NetBird, Netenrich, Netmaker, NightVision, Nightfall AI, Nirmata, Nubo Software, Nudge Security, Obsidian Security, OctoXLabs, Offroad, Oleria, OneSpan, Onspring, Onyx Security, Operant AI, Optimal IdM, Optro, Orca Security, Ory Corp, OutThink, Owl Browser, PII Tools, Panther, Pathlock, Pentera, PhishFirewall, PhishingBox, Phoenix Security, PlaxidityX, Plerion, Plexicus, Ploy, PointGuard AI, Pomerium, Portkey, Prelude Security, Privacera, Privado, Promptfoo, Proofpoint, Prophet Security, Protegrity, Prowler, Qevlar AI, QuilrAI, Reco, Red Canary, RedSeal, RegScale, Resecurity, Rhebo, Risk Cognizance, SAI360 INC., SMARTFENSE, SOC Jedi.AI, SOFTwarfare, Safe Security, Sandfly Security, Saporo, ScalePad, Scalekit, Scrut Automation, Scytale, SecLogic, Seceon Inc, SecurEnvoy, Secureframe, SecurelyShare, Seemplicity, Sekoia.io, SentinelOne, Seraphic, Serval, ShardSecure, ShareFile, Signaturit, Simbian, Skyhigh Security, Smallstep, Sn1perSecurity LLC, Snyk, SoSafe, Sola Security, SpyCloud, Stairwell, Stellar Cyber, Stream.Security, Strobes Security, Sumo Logic, SurePath AI, Swif, TCPWave, TRaViS ASM, Team Cymru, Teleport, Teleskope, Tenable, Tenzir, Terralogic, ThreatDefence, ThreatDown by Malwarebytes, Token Security, Torq, Tracebit, Trust3 AI, TrustLayer, TrustWorks, Tuskira, Twingate, Ubiq Security, Ubisecure, UncommonX, Uno, UpGuard, Upstream Security, Upwind, Valence Security, Vali Cyber, Valimail, Vamu, Vanta, Vaultree, Versa Networks, Very Good Security (VGS), Veza, Vijil, Virtru, Vorlon, Webz.io, Willow, Wiz, ZeroFox, Zscaler, Zynap, eMudhra, eSentire, enclaive, furl, hoop.dev, ipqualityscore, keepit, netcraft, productiv, rebasoft, runZero, smartertools, specterops, spin.ai, tetrate, torii, utimaco, velotix, viso trust

Buyer reviewsUI-14 — verified-buyer reviewsWritten only by domain-verified buyers at other companies, attributed to their company domain (never their identity), and moderated. Buyer-sourced opinion, clearly separate from the neutral catalog facts above — and never an input to search or comparison ordering.

verified buyers only

No buyer reviews yet.

Reputation ratingUI-20 — anonymous ratingA single anonymous 5-star signal from buyers, resellers, and analysts who've engaged with this vendor — separate from the domain-attributed reviews above. No rater identity is ever shown, not even at company level.

anonymous

No ratings in this window yet.

External ratingsUI-22 — third-party ratingsAggregate rating and review count pulled directly from the source site's own published data — never the review text itself, which belongs to that site. Links go to the real page so you can read the actual reviews there.

via third-party review sites
PeerSpot: 4.4/5 (6 reviews) ↗

Google's zero trust implementation for secure access without VPN AI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →

Security & trust signalsAbout these signalsCertifications are keyword-matched from the vendor's own public pages (each claim links to its source — verify directly before relying on it). Security headers are checked live against the vendor's homepage, re-checked every 90 days. Both are independent, automated signals, not a vendor-submitted or audited claim, and are not blended into a single score.

1 of 9 technical checks completed — not a score, just coverage

No positive signals detected yet across the checks completed so far.

CVE severity over timeUI-24 — CVE severity timelineEvery known CVE with a disclosure date and severity, plotted by when it was published — lets you see whether disclosures are trending toward more or less severe, not just a raw count. Same NVD-sourced, name-matched data as the list below.

LOWMEDIUMHIGHCRITICAL2003200420052006CVE-2006-6182 · LOW 2.1 · 2006-12-01CVE-2006-5717 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2006-11-04CVE-2006-5228 · HIGH 7.5 · 2006-10-11CVE-2006-5019 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2006-09-28CVE-2006-1810 · LOW 1.9 · 2006-04-18CVE-2006-1811 · MEDIUM 6.4 · 2006-04-18CVE-2005-4089 · HIGH 7.1 · 2005-12-08CVE-2005-3899 · MEDIUM 5.4 · 2005-11-30CVE-2005-3869 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2005-11-29CVE-2005-3758 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2005-11-23CVE-2005-3754 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2005-11-23CVE-2005-3755 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2005-11-23CVE-2005-3756 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2005-11-23CVE-2005-3757 · HIGH 7.5 · 2005-11-23CVE-2005-3678 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2005-11-19CVE-2004-2475 · MEDIUM 4.3 · 2004-12-31CVE-2002-1443 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2003-04-11CVE-2002-1442 · HIGH 7.5 · 2003-04-11CVE-2002-1444 · LOW 2.6 · 2002-08-15

Known CVEs (19)About this listSourced from the public NVD database, matched by vendor name. This is a name-based match, not exact version tracking — always check the linked NVD record for affected versions before drawing conclusions. “New” means published within the last 30 days. “Actively exploited” means CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog confirms real-world exploitation, not just a theoretical severity score.

RSS ⇢
  • CVE-2006-6182 ↗LOW 2.12006

    The Gabriele Teotino GNotebook 0.7.0.1 gadget for Google Desktop stores Gmail passwords in plaintext in the %SYSTEMDRIVE%\temp\Gnotebook.txt log file, which allows local users to obtain passwords by r…

  • CVE-2006-5717 ↗MEDIUM 4.32006

    Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in Zend Google Data Client Library (ZendGData) Preview 0.2.0 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified parameter…

  • CVE-2006-5228 ↗HIGH 7.52006

    Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in the Google Gadget login.php (gadget/login.php) in Rob Hensley ackerTodo 4.2 and earlier allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the (1) u…

  • CVE-2006-5019 ↗MEDIUM 5.02006

    Google Mini 4.4.102.M.36 and earlier allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via a direct request for /search with an invalid client parameter, which reveals the path in an error messa…

  • CVE-2006-1810 ↗LOW 1.92006

    Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in FlexBB 0.5.5 BETA allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) ICQ, (2) AIM, (3) MSN, (4) Google Talk, (5) Website N…

  • CVE-2006-1811 ↗MEDIUM 6.42006

    Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in FlexBB 0.5.5 BETA allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the (1) id, (2) forumid, or (3) threadid parameter to index.php; the (4) ICQ, (…

  • CVE-2005-4089 ↗HIGH 7.12005

    Microsoft Internet Explorer allows remote attackers to bypass cross-domain security restrictions and obtain sensitive information by using the @import directive to download files from other domains th…

  • CVE-2005-3899 ↗MEDIUM 5.42005

    The automatic update feature in Google Talk allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU and memory consumption) by poisoning a target's DNS cache and causing a large update file to be se…

  • CVE-2005-3869 ↗MEDIUM 4.32005

    Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in index.php in Google API Search 1.3.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via hex-encoded values in the REQ parameter.

  • CVE-2005-3758 ↗MEDIUM 4.32005

    Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Google Mini Search Appliance, and possibly Google Search Appliance, allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary Javascript, and possibly other web script or…

  • CVE-2005-3754 ↗MEDIUM 4.32005

    Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Google Mini Search Appliance, and possibly Google Search Appliance, allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary Javascript, and possibly other web script or…

  • CVE-2005-3755 ↗MEDIUM 5.02005

    Directory traversal vulnerability in Google Mini Search Appliance, and possibly Google Search Appliance, allows remote attackers to determine the existence of arbitrary files via a relative path from …

  • CVE-2005-3756 ↗MEDIUM 5.02005

    Google Mini Search Appliance, and possibly Google Search Appliance, allows remote attackers to port scan arbitrary hosts via URLs with modified targets and ports, then comparing the resulting error me…

  • CVE-2005-3757 ↗HIGH 7.52005

    The Saxon XSLT parser in Google Mini Search Appliance, and possibly Google Search Appliance, allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information and execute arbitrary code via dangerous Java class…

  • CVE-2005-3678 ↗MEDIUM 5.02005

    Google Talk before 1.0.0.76, with email notification enabled, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (connection reset) via email with a blank sender.

  • CVE-2004-2475 ↗MEDIUM 4.32004

    Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Google Toolbar 2.0.114.1 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script via about.html in the About section. NOTE: some followup posts suggest that…

  • CVE-2002-1443 ↗MEDIUM 5.02003

    The Google toolbar 1.1.58 and earlier allows remote web sites to monitor a user's input into the toolbar via an "onkeydown" event handler.

  • CVE-2002-1442 ↗HIGH 7.52003

    The Google toolbar 1.1.58 and earlier allows remote web sites to perform unauthorized toolbar operations including script execution and file reading in other zones such as "My Computer" by opening a w…

  • CVE-2002-1444 ↗LOW 2.62002

    The Google toolbar 1.1.60, when running on Internet Explorer 5.5 and 6.0, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash with an exception in oleaut32.dll) via malicious HTML, possibly re…

Competitors (12)

full alternatives comparison →
AhnLabAI SPERA Inc.AkamaiAlibaba CloudBitdefenderCrowdStrikeGroup IBIvantiPalo Alto NetworksSeqriteTrend MicroVulneri

Products (8)

Managed Detection & Response (MDR)

2
  • Mandiant Managed DefenseAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    24/7 managed threat detection, investigation, and response service
  • Mandiant Threat DefenseAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Managed threat detection, hunting, and response service by Mandiant experts

Threat Intelligence

2
  • Google Threat IntelligenceAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Threat intelligence platform combining Google, Mandiant, and VirusTotal data
  • Mandiant PlatformThreat IntelligenceAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →
    Threat intelligence and incident response (Google).

Attack Surface Management (ASM)

1
  • Mandiant Attack Surface ManagementAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Discovers and monitors external internet assets for exposures and vulnerabilities

Cloud-Native Application Protection (CNAPP)

1
  • Google Cloud SecurityAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Cloud security platform with controls for workload protection and compliance

Secure Access Service Edge (SASE/SSE)

1
  • Google BeyondCorpAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Google's zero trust implementation for secure access without VPN

Detection Engineering

1
  • Google Security OperationsAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Cloud-native SIEM, SOAR, and threat intel platform for SecOps teams