Skip to main content
0-Doubt
NewsInvestorsQuestionnairesDeveloperHelp
AnonymousSign in
0-Doubt — neutral IT/Security research
BrowseResellersCertified analystsRFI/RFP questionnairesHow trust worksHelp & FAQAPI
  1. Home/
  2. Cobalt

Cobalt

enriched
Application Security (ASPM)Attack Surface Management (ASM)Breach & Attack Simulation / Pen Testing

cobalt.io ↗ · required email domain for this vendor's users

Do you work at Cobalt?

This profile was built from public sources and hasn't been claimed yet. Claiming it lets you correct what's wrong and add details only you can confirm — and marks that information as vendor-verified for buyers.

Free, and it does not affect ranking, placement, or comparison results. The first person verified on Cobalt's email domain becomes the profile admin.

Claim this profileAlready have an account?

Trust profileHow to read thisFive separate questions a buyer actually asks, each answered with its own evidence and a link to the source. There is deliberately no overall score: a single number invites comparison it cannot support, and would mostly reflect how much of Cobalt we have managed to scan rather than anything about the vendor.

Not checked means we have not looked yet, and is never counted against a vendor. Limited means we did look, but found only one line of evidence — enough to report, not enough to corroborate.

checked 9 of 16 signals
  • Limited

    Independently verified

    Has anyone other than the vendor confirmed this?

    checked 3 of 4

    Nothing here has been confirmed by an independent third party yet.

    • No third-party certifications found
    • Profile not claimed by the vendor
  • Limited

    Operating durability

    Is this a real, durable business?

    checked 3 of 4

    How long this vendor has been operating, and who stands behind them.

    • Domain registration date not available from the registrar
    • Headquarters location not disclosed on their site
  • Limited

    Behaviour under stress

    What do they do when something goes wrong?

    checked 2 of 3

    What their public record shows about handling vulnerabilities and outages.

    • 19 published CVE(s) — a public disclosure record exists
    • No public status page found
  • Limited

    Disclosure posture

    Do they tell you the awkward things unprompted?

    checked 1 of 3

    How much this vendor volunteers before you have to ask.

    • No bug bounty or vulnerability disclosure policy found
  • Not checked

    Momentum

    Are they still shipping, or coasting?

    checked 0 of 2

    We have not tracked this vendor's release activity yet.

    Nothing checked here yet — this is not a mark against Cobalt.

Data coverage: 15/100What this measures (and doesn't)

Not a quality rating or endorsement — a measure of how much verified, disclosed data we actually have about this vendor. A low score usually means "we don't have much verified information yet," not "this is a bad vendor." Never used to sort or rank vendor lists.

Verification depth0/100
Security signal0/100
Buyer feedbackno data yet (0 reviews so far)
Profile completeness25/100
claim · HQ · materials · screenshots · integrations · certifications · security check

The platform admin controls the formula's weights.

Data coverage profileHow to read thisThe same four components behind the data coverage score above, shaped instead of listed — a vendor strong on verification but thin on buyer feedback looks visibly different from one that's the other way around. Security and feedback plot at the neutral midpoint (50) when there's no data yet (no products tracked, no reviews), matching how the actual score itself treats missing data — not a guess either way.

VerificationSecurityFeedbackCompletenessThis vendor — Verification: 0This vendor — Security: 0This vendor — Feedback: no data yetThis vendor — Completeness: 25

IntegrationsUI-12 — integration graphDetected from this vendor's own published integration/partner pages by the enrichment loop — each entry links the exact page it was found on. Directional: "integrates with" is claimed by this vendor; "integrated by" is claimed by the other vendor's site. Coverage grows as the scan progresses.

11 detected

Integrates with: Embed Security ↗, Microsoft ↗, ServiceNow ↗

Integrated by: Faradaysec, Pentera, PlexTrac, Red Canary, Seemplicity, Trent AI, UncommonX, processgene

Buyer reviewsUI-14 — verified-buyer reviewsWritten only by domain-verified buyers at other companies, attributed to their company domain (never their identity), and moderated. Buyer-sourced opinion, clearly separate from the neutral catalog facts above — and never an input to search or comparison ordering.

verified buyers only

No buyer reviews yet.

Reputation ratingUI-20 — anonymous ratingA single anonymous 5-star signal from buyers, resellers, and analysts who've engaged with this vendor — separate from the domain-attributed reviews above. No rater identity is ever shown, not even at company level.

anonymous

No ratings in this window yet.

Continuous external asset discovery and monitoring with daily domain scans. AI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →

Security & trust signalsAbout these signalsCertifications are keyword-matched from the vendor's own public pages (each claim links to its source — verify directly before relying on it). Security headers are checked live against the vendor's homepage, re-checked every 90 days. Both are independent, automated signals, not a vendor-submitted or audited claim, and are not blended into a single score.

7 of 9 technical checks completed — not a score, just coverage

Security headers (5/5) — checked 8/14/2026

  • ✓ Strict-Transport-Security
  • ✓ Content-Security-Policy
  • ✓ X-Frame-Options
  • ✓ X-Content-Type-Options
  • ✓ Referrer-Policy
  • ✕ security.txt

Infrastructure & transparency signals

DNSSEC enabledCAA enabled

CVE severity over timeUI-24 — CVE severity timelineEvery known CVE with a disclosure date and severity, plotted by when it was published — lets you see whether disclosures are trending toward more or less severe, not just a raw count. Same NVD-sourced, name-matched data as the list below.

LOWMEDIUMHIGHCRITICAL20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022CVE-2022-39197 · MEDIUM 6.1 · 2022-09-22CVE-2021-36798 · HIGH 7.5 · 2021-08-09CVE-2016-10597 · MEDIUM 5.9 · 2018-06-01CVE-2008-6203 · HIGH 7.5 · 2009-02-20CVE-2008-6202 · HIGH 7.5 · 2009-02-20CVE-2002-1361 · HIGH 10.0 · 2002-12-23CVE-2002-1058 · HIGH 10.0 · 2002-10-04CVE-2002-0430 · LOW 3.7 · 2002-08-12CVE-2002-0347 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2002-06-25CVE-2002-0346 · HIGH 7.5 · 2002-06-25CVE-2002-0348 · HIGH 7.5 · 2002-06-25CVE-2001-1408 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2001-07-05CVE-2001-1075 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2001-07-04CVE-2000-0431 · HIGH 7.5 · 2000-05-22CVE-2000-0234 · MEDIUM 5.0 · 2000-03-31CVE-2000-0117 · HIGH 7.2 · 2000-01-30CVE-1999-1530 · LOW 3.6 · 1999-11-08CVE-1999-0722 · HIGH 10.0 · 1999-08-08CVE-1999-0408 · HIGH 10.0 · 1999-02-25

Known CVEs (19)About this listSourced from the public NVD database, matched by vendor name. This is a name-based match, not exact version tracking — always check the linked NVD record for affected versions before drawing conclusions. “New” means published within the last 30 days. “Actively exploited” means CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog confirms real-world exploitation, not just a theoretical severity score.

RSS ⇢
  • CVE-2022-39197 ↗⚠ actively exploitedMEDIUM 6.12022

    An XSS (Cross Site Scripting) vulnerability was found in HelpSystems Cobalt Strike through 4.7 that allowed a remote attacker to execute HTML on the Cobalt Strike teamserver. To exploit the vulnerabil…

  • CVE-2021-36798 ↗HIGH 7.52021

    A Denial-of-Service (DoS) vulnerability was discovered in Team Server in HelpSystems Cobalt Strike 4.2 and 4.3. It allows remote attackers to crash the C2 server thread and block beacons' communicatio…

  • CVE-2016-10597 ↗MEDIUM 5.92018

    cobalt-cli downloads resources over HTTP, which leaves it vulnerable to MITM attacks.

  • CVE-2008-6203 ↗HIGH 7.52009

    SQL injection vulnerability in adminler.asp in CoBaLT 2.0 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the id parameter. NOTE: the provenance of this information is unknown; the deta…

  • CVE-2008-6202 ↗HIGH 7.52009

    SQL injection vulnerability in CoBaLT 1.0 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the id parameter to (1) urun.asp, (2) admin/bayi_listele.asp, (3) admin/urun_grup_listele.asp, a…

  • CVE-2002-1361 ↗HIGH 10.02002

    overflow.cgi CGI script in Sun Cobalt RaQ 4 with the SHP (Security Hardening Patch) installed allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a POST request with shell metacharacters in the emai…

  • CVE-2002-1058 ↗HIGH 10.02002

    Directory traversal vulnerability in splashAdmin.php for Cobalt Qube 3.0 allows local users and remote attackers, to gain privileges as the Qube Admin via .. (dot dot) sequences in the sessionId cooki…

  • CVE-2002-0430 ↗LOW 3.72002

    MultiFileUploadHandler.php in the Sun Cobalt RaQ XTR administration interface allows local users to bypass authentication and overwrite arbitrary files via a symlink attack on a temporary file, follow…

  • CVE-2002-0347 ↗MEDIUM 5.02002

    Directory traversal vulnerability in Cobalt RAQ 4 allows remote attackers to read password-protected files, and possibly files outside the web root, via a .. (dot dot) in an HTTP request.

  • CVE-2002-0346 ↗HIGH 7.52002

    Cross-site scripting vulnerability in Cobalt RAQ 4 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary script as other Cobalt users via Javascript in a URL to (1) service.cgi or (2) alert.cgi.

  • CVE-2002-0348 ↗HIGH 7.52002

    service.cgi in Cobalt RAQ 4 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service, and possibly execute arbitrary code, via a long service argument.

  • CVE-2001-1408 ↗MEDIUM 5.02001

    Directory traversal vulnerability in readmsg.php in WebMail 2.0.1 in Cobalt Qube 3 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via a .. (dot dot) in the mailbox parameter.

  • CVE-2001-1075 ↗MEDIUM 5.02001

    poprelayd script before 2.0 in Cobalt RaQ3 servers allows remote attackers to bypass authentication for relaying by causing a "POP login by user" string that includes the attacker's IP address to be i…

  • CVE-2000-0431 ↗HIGH 7.52000

    Cobalt RaQ2 and RaQ3 does not properly set the access permissions and ownership for files that are uploaded via FrontPage, which allows attackers to bypass cgiwrap and modify files.

  • CVE-2000-0234 ↗MEDIUM 5.02000

    The default configuration of Cobalt RaQ2 and RaQ3 as specified in access.conf allows remote attackers to view sensitive contents of a .htaccess file.

  • CVE-2000-0117 ↗HIGH 7.22000

    The siteUserMod.cgi program in Cobalt RaQ2 servers allows any Site Administrator to modify passwords for other users, site administrators, and possibly admin (root).

  • CVE-1999-1530 ↗LOW 3.61999

    cgiwrap as used on Cobalt RaQ 2.0 and RaQ 3i does not properly identify the user for running certain scripts, which allows a malicious site administrator to view or modify data located at another virt…

  • CVE-1999-0722 ↗HIGH 10.01999

    The default configuration of Cobalt RaQ2 servers allows remote users to install arbitrary software packages.

  • CVE-1999-0408 ↗HIGH 10.01999

    Files created from interactive shell sessions in Cobalt RaQ microservers (e.g. .bash_history) are world readable, and thus are accessible from the web server.

Competitors (12)

full alternatives comparison →
Aikido SecurityAstra SecurityBishop FoxCloudMatosCredShieldsCyCraft TechnologyEdgescanEntersoft SecurityFortraFYEOGoSecureHackerOne

Products (3)

Attack Surface Management (ASM)

1
  • Cobalt Attack Surface MonitoringAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Continuous external asset discovery and monitoring with daily domain scans.

Breach & Attack Simulation / Pen Testing

1
  • Cobalt Offensive Security PlatformAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    PTaaS platform for managing pentests, DAST, and attack surface monitoring.

Application Security (ASPM)

1
  • Cobalt DASTAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Automated DAST tool for continuous web app and API vulnerability scanning.