Skip to main content
0-Doubt
NewsInvestorsQuestionnairesDeveloperHelp
AnonymousSign in
0-Doubt — neutral IT/Security research
BrowseResellersCertified analystsRFI/RFP questionnairesHow trust worksHelp & FAQAPI
  1. Home/
  2. HackerOne

HackerOne

enriched
Application Security (ASPM)Breach & Attack Simulation / Pen TestingBug Bounty

Represented by Carahsoft ↗

hackerone.com ↗ · required email domain for this vendor's users

Do you work at HackerOne?

This profile was built from public sources and hasn't been claimed yet. Claiming it lets you correct what's wrong and add details only you can confirm — and marks that information as vendor-verified for buyers.

Free, and it does not affect ranking, placement, or comparison results. The first person verified on HackerOne's email domain becomes the profile admin.

Claim this profileAlready have an account?

Trust profileHow to read thisFive separate questions a buyer actually asks, each answered with its own evidence and a link to the source. There is deliberately no overall score: a single number invites comparison it cannot support, and would mostly reflect how much of HackerOne we have managed to scan rather than anything about the vendor.

Not checked means we have not looked yet, and is never counted against a vendor. Limited means we did look, but found only one line of evidence — enough to report, not enough to corroborate.

checked 6 of 16 signals
  • Limited

    Independently verified

    Has anyone other than the vendor confirmed this?

    checked 3 of 4

    Nothing here has been confirmed by an independent third party yet.

    • No third-party certifications found
    • Profile not claimed by the vendor
  • Limited

    Operating durability

    Is this a real, durable business?

    checked 2 of 4

    How long this vendor has been operating, and who stands behind them.

    • Headquarters location not disclosed on their site
  • Mixed

    Behaviour under stress

    What do they do when something goes wrong?

    checked 1 of 3

    What their public record shows about handling vulnerabilities and outages.

    • 16 published CVE(s) — a public disclosure record exists
    • 1 rated critical
  • Not checked

    Disclosure posture

    Do they tell you the awkward things unprompted?

    checked 0 of 3

    We have not checked what this vendor discloses publicly yet.

    Nothing checked here yet — this is not a mark against HackerOne.

  • Not checked

    Momentum

    Are they still shipping, or coasting?

    checked 0 of 2

    We have not tracked this vendor's release activity yet.

    Nothing checked here yet — this is not a mark against HackerOne.

Data coverage: 13/100What this measures (and doesn't)

Not a quality rating or endorsement — a measure of how much verified, disclosed data we actually have about this vendor. A low score usually means "we don't have much verified information yet," not "this is a bad vendor." Never used to sort or rank vendor lists.

Verification depth0/100
Security signal0/100
Buyer feedbackno data yet (0 reviews so far)
Profile completeness13/100
claim · HQ · materials · screenshots · integrations · certifications · security check

The platform admin controls the formula's weights.

Data coverage profileHow to read thisThe same four components behind the data coverage score above, shaped instead of listed — a vendor strong on verification but thin on buyer feedback looks visibly different from one that's the other way around. Security and feedback plot at the neutral midpoint (50) when there's no data yet (no products tracked, no reviews), matching how the actual score itself treats missing data — not a guess either way.

VerificationSecurityFeedbackCompletenessThis vendor — Verification: 0This vendor — Security: 0This vendor — Feedback: no data yetThis vendor — Completeness: 13

IntegrationsUI-12 — integration graphDetected from this vendor's own published integration/partner pages by the enrichment loop — each entry links the exact page it was found on. Directional: "integrates with" is claimed by this vendor; "integrated by" is claimed by the other vendor's site. Coverage grows as the scan progresses.

9 detected

Integrated by: Konvu, Pentera, Phoenix Security, PlexTrac, Secure Code Warrior, Semgrep, UncommonX, Wiz, Zscaler

Buyer reviewsUI-14 — verified-buyer reviewsWritten only by domain-verified buyers at other companies, attributed to their company domain (never their identity), and moderated. Buyer-sourced opinion, clearly separate from the neutral catalog facts above — and never an input to search or comparison ordering.

verified buyers only

No buyer reviews yet.

Reputation ratingUI-20 — anonymous ratingA single anonymous 5-star signal from buyers, resellers, and analysts who've engaged with this vendor — separate from the domain-attributed reviews above. No rater identity is ever shown, not even at company level.

anonymous

No ratings in this window yet.

External ratingsUI-22 — third-party ratingsAggregate rating and review count pulled directly from the source site's own published data — never the review text itself, which belongs to that site. Links go to the real page so you can read the actual reviews there.

via third-party review sites
PeerSpot: 4.2/5 (11 reviews) ↗

Human-led AI red teaming service for testing AI models, APIs, and integrations AI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →

CVE severity over timeUI-24 — CVE severity timelineEvery known CVE with a disclosure date and severity, plotted by when it was published — lets you see whether disclosures are trending toward more or less severe, not just a raw count. Same NVD-sourced, name-matched data as the list below.

LOWMEDIUMHIGHCRITICAL202120222023202420252026CVE-2026-21664 · MEDIUM 6.1 · 2026-01-21CVE-2026-21663 · MEDIUM 6.1 · 2026-01-21CVE-2026-21642 · MEDIUM 6.1 · 2026-01-21CVE-2026-21641 · MEDIUM 6.5 · 2026-01-21CVE-2026-21640 · LOW 2.7 · 2026-01-21CVE-2025-55129 · MEDIUM 5.4 · 2025-12-02CVE-2025-55128 · MEDIUM 6.5 · 2025-11-21CVE-2025-55127 · MEDIUM 5.4 · 2025-11-21CVE-2025-55126 · MEDIUM 6.5 · 2025-11-21CVE-2025-42706 · MEDIUM 6.5 · 2025-10-08CVE-2025-42701 · MEDIUM 5.6 · 2025-10-08CVE-2025-8573 · MEDIUM 4.8 · 2025-08-06CVE-2022-21829 · CRITICAL 9.8 · 2022-06-24CVE-2021-22970 · HIGH 7.5 · 2021-11-20CVE-2020-8143 · MEDIUM 6.1 · 2020-04-04CVE-2020-8142 · MEDIUM 6.8 · 2020-04-04

Known CVEs (16)About this listSourced from the public NVD database, matched by vendor name. This is a name-based match, not exact version tracking — always check the linked NVD record for affected versions before drawing conclusions. “New” means published within the last 30 days. “Actively exploited” means CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog confirms real-world exploitation, not just a theoretical severity score.

RSS ⇢
  • CVE-2026-21664 ↗MEDIUM 6.12026

    HackerOne community member Huynh Pham Thanh Luc (nigh7c0r3) has reported a reflected XSS vulnerability in the afr.php delivery script of Revive Adserver. An attacker can craft a specific URL that incl…

  • CVE-2026-21663 ↗MEDIUM 6.12026

    HackerOne community member Patrick Lang (7yr) has reported a reflected XSS vulnerability in the banner-acl.php script of Revive Adserver. An attacker can craft a specific URL that includes an HTML pay…

  • CVE-2026-21642 ↗MEDIUM 6.12026

    HackerOne community member Patrick Lang (7yr) has reported a reflected XSS vulnerability in the `banner-acl.php` and `channel-acl.php` scripts of Revive Adserver. An attacker can craft a specific URL …

  • CVE-2026-21641 ↗MEDIUM 6.52026

    HackerOne community member Jad Ghamloush (0xjad) has reported an authorization bypass vulnerability in the `tracker-delete.php` script of Revive Adserver. Users with permissions to delete trackers are…

  • CVE-2026-21640 ↗LOW 2.72026

    HackerOne community member Faraz Ahmed (PakCyberbot) has reported a format string injection in the Revive Adserver settings. When specific character combinations are used in a setting, the admin user …

  • CVE-2025-55129 ↗MEDIUM 5.42025

    HackerOne community member Kassem S.(kassem_s94) has reported that username handling in Revive Adserver was still vulnerable to impersonation attacks after the fix for CVE-2025-52672, via several alte…

  • CVE-2025-55128 ↗MEDIUM 6.52025

    HackerOne community member Dang Hung Vi (vidang04) has reported an uncontrolled resource consumption vulnerability in the “userlog-index.php”. An attacker with access to the admin interface could requ…

  • CVE-2025-55127 ↗MEDIUM 5.42025

    HackerOne community member Dao Hoang Anh (yoyomiski) has reported an improper neutralization of whitespace in the username when adding new users. A username with leading or trailing whitespace could b…

  • CVE-2025-55126 ↗MEDIUM 6.52025

    HackerOne community member Dang Hung Vi (vidang04) has reported a stored XSS vulnerability involving the navigation box at the top of advertiser-related pages, with campaign names being the vector for…

  • CVE-2025-42706 ↗MEDIUM 6.52025

    A logic error exists in the Falcon sensor for Windows that could allow an attacker, with the prior ability to execute code on a host, to delete arbitrary files. CrowdStrike released a security fix for…

  • CVE-2025-42701 ↗MEDIUM 5.62025

    A race condition exists in the Falcon sensor for Windows that could allow an attacker, with the prior ability to execute code on a host, to delete arbitrary files. CrowdStrike released a security fix …

  • CVE-2025-8573 ↗MEDIUM 4.82025

    Concrete CMS versions 9 through 9.4.2 are vulnerable to Stored XSS from Home Folder on Members Dashboard page.  Version 8 was not affected. A rogue admin could set up a malicious folder containing XSS…

  • CVE-2022-21829 ↗CRITICAL 9.82022

    Concrete CMS Versions 9.0.0 through 9.0.2 and 8.5.7 and below can download zip files over HTTP and execute code from those zip files which could lead to an RCE. Fixed by enforcing ‘concrete_secure’ in…

  • CVE-2021-22970 ↗HIGH 7.52021

    Concrete CMS (formerly concrete5) versions 8.5.6 and below and version 9.0.0 allow local IP importing causing the system to be vulnerable toa. SSRF attacks on the private LAN servers by reading files …

  • CVE-2020-8143 ↗MEDIUM 6.12020

    An Open Redirect vulnerability was discovered in Revive Adserver version < 5.0.5 and reported by HackerOne user hoangn144. A remote attacker could trick logged-in users to open a specifically crafted …

  • CVE-2020-8142 ↗MEDIUM 6.82020

    A security restriction bypass vulnerability has been discovered in Revive Adserver version < 5.0.5 by HackerOne user hoangn144. Revive Adserver, like many other applications, requires the logged in us…

Competitors (12)

full alternatives comparison →
Aikido SecurityAstra SecurityCobaltCredShieldsEntersoft SecurityFortraFYEOOnward SecurityPortSwigger Ltd.Prancer EnterpriseRapid7Synack

Products (3)

Breach & Attack Simulation / Pen Testing

1
  • HackerOne AI Red TeamingAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Human-led AI red teaming service for testing AI models, APIs, and integrations

Application Security (ASPM)

1
  • HackerOne CodeAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    AI-powered code security platform for detecting and fixing vulnerabilities

Bug Bounty

1
  • HackerOne ResponseAI-generated from public sourcesAuto-generated by 0-Doubt from public vendor materials. Not verified by the vendor or an analyst. Check the freshness indicator.Lowest independence — unverified. A higher label means a more independent source — not a better product.How trust works →source ↗
    Vulnerability disclosure program platform for external security reporting